|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-2699
THE MACULA DENSA CELLS
COMPRISE the sensing component of the tubuloglomerular feedback
(TGF) mechanism and respond to changes in tubular fluid composition by
transmitting signals to the afferent arterioles thus regulating the
preglomerular vascular resistance and filtered load to the tubules
(14, 15). This intriguing mechanism has remained under
intensive investigation, and the accrued evidence indicates that there
are multiple interacting paracrine agents involved in the communication
pathway between the macula densa cells and the vascular smooth muscle
cells. The macula densa cells are thought to produce and release ATP,
adenosine, arachidonic acid metabolites, and nitric oxide. Some of
these serve to modulate the sensitivity of the TGF mechanism, and it has remained a formidable challenge to discriminate between the powerful modulators and the specific mediator that respond to the acute
changes in distal tubular fluid composition. Perhaps the single most
important criterion distinguishing between the mediator and modulators
is that there should be a direct relationship between the change in the
macula densa stimulus and the change in the release or concentration of
the TGF mediator associated with the change in renal vascular
resistance (RVR).
Because the TGF mechanism participates in the autoregulatory responses
of the arteriolar vasculature to changes in perfusion pressure, it is
also recognized that the mediator of the TGF mechanism contributes to
the changes in RVR associated with autoregulatory responses (15,
20, 22). Thus one would expect a certain internal consistency in
the evidence regarding the mechanism that mediates the TGF mechanism
and the mechanism that mediates autoregulatory responses. Considering
that the TGF mechanism is a major mediator of renal autoregulatory
responses and primarily serves to regulate afferent arteriolar
resistance (9, 15, 20), it is surprising that no consensus
has emerged regarding the nature of the signaling mechanism that links
macula densa function with the changes in afferent arteriolar
resistance. Nevertheless, analysis of the available data provides
strong support for the hypothesis that ATP, rather than adenosine,
serves as the actual mediator of TGF mechanism. Our analysis is based
on the following criteria.
Criterion 1.
The TGF mediator must exert selective actions on preglomerular
arterioles (15) to stimulate Ca2+ influx in
afferent arteriolar renal vascular smooth muscle cells via activation
of L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in the afferent
arterioles (5, 15).
Criterion 2.
Saturation of the renal interstitial fluid (RIF) with the TGF mediator
would interfere with the ability of the afferent arteriolar smooth
muscle cells to respond to either TGF or autoregulatory responses.
Criterion 3.
Blockade of the vascular smooth muscle receptors that respond to the
TGF mediator would also interfere with TGF and autoregulatory responses.
Criterion 4.
The mediator must be released from macula densa cells into the renal
interstitium to exert its actions on the afferent arteriolar vascular
smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, there should be a relationship between changes in TGF or autoregulation dependent alterations in RVR
and the interstitial fluid concentration of the mediator.
![]()
ARTICLE
TOP
ARTICLE
REFERENCES
Point 1. ATP selectively constricts the afferent arterioles. Studies using the juxtamedullary nephron preparation demonstrated that ATP exerts direct sustained vasoconstrictive actions on afferent, but not efferent, arterioles (5, 9, 11). Furthermore, autoradiographic and immunohistochemical experiments demonstrated that the preglomerular renal vasculature expresses abundant P2X receptors, whereas efferent arterioles appear to be devoid of such receptors (3, 4).
Point 2.
ATP increases Ca2+ influx into renal microvascular smooth
muscle cells. ATP and P2X agonists, such as
,
-methylene-ATP, activate Ca2+ influx
pathways in freshly isolated vascular smooth muscle cells obtained from
preglomerular microvessels (5, 6). These actions of ATP
and of slowly metabolizable analogs of ATP are sensitive to blockade of
L-type calcium channels (5, 10).
Point 3. Autoregulatory-mediated afferent arteriolar vasoconstrictor responses are prevented by P2 receptor saturation or desensitization (8). Micropuncture and microperfusion experiments demonstrated that stop-flow pressure TGF responses to increases in late proximal perfusion rate are markedly blunted during peritubular capillary infusion with saturating doses of ATP or slowly metabolizable analogs (9, 13). P2 receptor saturation at the whole kidney level by intrarenal arterial infusion of high doses with ATP resulted in marked impairment of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate autoregulatory efficiency (12).
Point 4. P2 receptor blockade blocks afferent arteriolar autoregulatory responses. Suramin and pyridoxal phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (8) and a more selective P2X receptor antagonist, NF-279 (7), have all been shown to prevent afferent arteriolar autoregulatory responses to increases in perfusion pressure.
Point 5.
Macula densa cells secrete ATP. Although the macula densa cells have
abundant mitochondria, they have reduced levels of
Na+-K+-ATPase, making the macula densa cells
good candidates for a source of extracellular ATP (18).
Recent studies by Bell et al. (1) demonstrated that the
macula densa cells have a maxi-Cl
channel that is
permeable to ATP and that increases in luminal NaCl concentrations
result in the release of ATP from macula densa cells.
Point 6. RIF concentrations of ATP are closely associated with autoregulatory TGF-mediated changes in RVR. With the use of microdialysis probes, the RIF ATP concentrations were shown to decrease consistently in response to reductions in renal arterial pressure. Furthermore, there was a highly significant relationship between RIF ATP and autoregulatory associated alterations in RVR (16, 17). Whole kidney stimulation of the TGF mechanism elicited by administration of a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide, to inhibit proximal reabsorption rate and increase distal volume delivery (20, 21) led to increases in RIF ATP concentrations, whereas furosemide treatment reduced RIF ATP concentrations (16, 17). The association between the autoregulatory adjustments in RVR and RIF ATP concentrations is enhanced after treatment with acetazolamide, whereas furosemide abolished the relationship between RVR and RIF ATP (17).
In summary, the collective data obtained in different laboratories using various approaches strongly support the hypothesis that renal interstitial ATP, derived from macula densa cells, serves as the major paracrine agent mediating TGF signals to regulate afferent arteriolar resistance.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The work performed in the authors' laboratory was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-18426 and from the American Heart Association, Southeast Affiliate (to A. Nishiyama).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address for A. Nishiyama: Department of Pharmacology, Kagawa Medical University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-Cho, Kita-Gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan (akira{at}kms.ac.jp).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. G. Navar, Dept. of Physiology, #SL-39, Tulane Univ. Health Sciences Center, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112-2699 (E-mail: navar{at}tulane.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpregu.00071.2002
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bell, PD,
Lapointe JY,
Sabirov R,
Hayashi S,
and
Okada Y.
Maxi-chloride channel in macula densa cells: possible pathway for ATP release (Abstract).
FASEB J
14:
A134,
2001.
2.
Brown, R,
Ollerstam A,
Johansson B,
Skott O,
Gebre-Medhin S,
Fredholm B,
and
Persson AE.
Abolished tubuloglomerular feedback and increased plasma renin in adenosine A1 receptor-deficient mice.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
281:
R1362-R1367,
2001
3.
Chan, CM,
Unwin RJ,
Bardini M,
Oglesby IB,
Ford AP,
Townsend-Nicholson A,
and
Burnstock G.
Localization of P2X1 purinoceptors by autoradiography and immunohistochemistry in rat kidneys.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
274:
F799-F804,
1998
4.
Chan, CM,
Unwin RJ,
and
Burnstock G.
Potential functional roles of extracellular ATP in kidney and urinary tract.
Exp Nephrol
6:
200-207,
1998[ISI][Medline].
5.
Inscho, EW.
P2 receptors in regulation of renal microvascular function.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
280:
F927-F944,
2001
6.
Inscho, EW,
Belott TP,
Mason MJ,
Smith JB,
and
Navar LG.
Extracellular ATP increases cytosolic calcium in cultured rat renal arterial smooth muscle cells.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
23:
503-507,
1996[ISI][Medline].
7.
Inscho, EW,
and
Cook AK.
P2X1 receptor blockade inhibits pressure-induced afferent arteriolar autoregulatory behavior (Abstract).
Hypertension
36:
682,
2001.
8.
Inscho, EW,
Cook AK,
and
Navar LG.
Pressure-mediated vasoconstriction of juxtamedullary afferent arterioles involves P2-purinoceptor activation.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
271:
F1077-F1085,
1996
9.
Inscho, EW,
Mitchell KD,
and
Navar LG.
Extracellular ATP in the regulation of renal microvascular function.
FASEB J
8:
319-328,
1994[Abstract].
10.
Inscho, EW,
Ohishi K,
Cook AK,
Belott TP,
and
Navar LG.
Calcium activation mechanisms in the renal microvascular response to extracellular ATP.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
268:
F876-F884,
1995
11.
Inscho, EW,
Ohishi K,
and
Navar LG.
Effects of ATP on pre- and postglomerular juxtamedullary microvasculature.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
263:
F886-F893,
1992
12.
Majid, DSA,
Inscho EW,
and
Navar LG.
P2 purinoceptor saturation by adenosine triphosphate impairs renal autoregulation in dogs.
J Am Soc Nephrol
10:
492-498,
1999
13.
Mitchell, KD,
and
Navar LG.
Modulation of tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness by extracellular ATP.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
264:
F458-F466,
1993
14.
Navar, LG.
Integrating multiple paracrine regulators of renal microvascular dynamics.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
274:
F433-F444,
1998
15.
Navar, LG,
Inscho EW,
Majid DSA,
Imig JD,
Harrison-Bernard LM,
and
Mitchell KD.
Paracrine regulation of the renal microcirculation.
Physiol Rev
76:
425-536,
1996
16.
Nishiyama, A,
Majid DSA,
Taher KA,
Miyatake A,
and
Navar LG.
Relation between renal interstitial ATP concentrations and autoregulation-mediated changes in renal vascular resistance.
Circ Res
86:
656-662,
2000
17.
Nishiyama, A,
Majid DSA,
Walker M, III,
Miyatake A,
and
Navar LG.
Renal interstitial ATP responses to changes in arterial pressure during alterations in tubuloglomerular feedback activity.
Hypertension
37:
753-759,
2001
18.
Schnermann, J,
and
Marver D.
ATPase activity in macula densa cells of the rabbit kidney.
Pflügers Arch
407:
82-86,
1986[ISI][Medline].
19.
Sun, D,
Samuelson LC,
Yang T,
Huang Y,
Paliege A,
Saunders T,
Briggs J,
and
Schnermann J.
Mediation of tubuloglomerular feedback by adenosine: evidence from mice lacking adenosine 1 receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
98:
9983-9988,
2001
20.
Walker, M, III,
Harrison-Bernard LM,
Cook AC,
and
Navar LG.
Dynamic interaction between myogenic and TGF mechanisms in afferent arteriolar blood flow autoregulation.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
279:
F858-F865,
2000
21.
Walker, M, III,
Nishiyama A,
Majid DSA,
Taher KA,
and
Navar LG.
Dynamic autoregulatory interactions between tubuloglomerular feedback and myogenic mechanisms controlling blood flow in canine kidneys (Abstract).
FASEB J
14:
A134,
2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Vallon P2 receptors in the regulation of renal transport mechanisms Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F10 - F27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Graciano, A. Nishiyama, K. Jackson, D. M. Seth, R. M. Ortiz, M. C. Prieto-Carrasquero, H. Kobori, and L. G. Navar Purinergic receptors contribute to early mesangial cell transformation and renal vessel hypertrophy during angiotensin II-induced hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F161 - F169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-G. Feng and L. G. Navar Adenosine A2 Receptor Activation Attenuates Afferent Arteriolar Autoregulation During Adenosine Receptor Saturation in Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 744 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just Mechanisms of renal blood flow autoregulation: dynamics and contributions Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R1 - R17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Satriano, L. Wead, A. Cardus, A. Deng, G. R. Boss, S. C. Thomson, and R. C. Blantz Regulation of ecto-5'-nucleotidase by NaCl and nitric oxide: potential roles in tubuloglomerular feedback and adaptation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): F1078 - F1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. Huang, V. Vallon, H. Zimmermann, P. Koszalka, J. Schrader, and H. Osswald Ecto-5'-nucleotidase (cd73)-dependent and -independent generation of adenosine participates in the mediation of tubuloglomerular feedback in vivo Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): F282 - F288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Peti-Peterdi Calcium wave of tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): F473 - F480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald Adenosine and kidney function. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, K. E. Jackson, D. S. A. Majid, M. Rahman, and L. G. Navar Renal interstitial fluid ATP responses to arterial pressure and tubuloglomerular feedback activation during calcium channel blockade Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H772 - H777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhao, A. K. Cook, M. Field, B. Edwards, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. S. Pollock, J. D. Imig, and E. W. Inscho Impaired Ca2+ Signaling Attenuates P2X Receptor-Mediated Vasoconstriction of Afferent Arterioles in Angiotensin II Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 562 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Hansen and J. Schnermann Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects of adenosine in the kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): F590 - F599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yao, M. Suwa, B. Li, K. Kawamura, T. Morioka, and T. Oite ATP-Dependent Mechanism for Coordination of Intercellular Ca2+ Signaling and Renin Secretion in Rat Juxtaglomerular Cells Circ. Res., August 22, 2003; 93(4): 338 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon Tubuloglomerular Feedback and the Control of Glomerular Filtration Rate Physiology, August 1, 2003; 18(4): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Inscho Modulation of renal microvascular function by adenosine Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R23 - R25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ehmke Mouse gene targeting in cardiovascular physiology Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R28 - R30. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schnermann Response to A. Nishiyama and L. G. Navar: ATP mediates tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R278 - R278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama and L. G. Navar Response to J. Schnermann: Adenosine mediates tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): Ra278 - Ra280. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |