|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7617; and 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There have been no studies in any vertebrate that have localized insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I receptors in prolactin (PRL) cells or that have correlated pituitary binding to the potency of IGF-I in regulating both PRL and growth hormone (GH) secretion. We show that IGF-I binds with high affinity and specificity to the pituitary gland of hybrid striped bass (Morone saxatilis × M. chrysops). IGF-I and IGF-II were equipotent in inhibiting saturable 125I-IGF-I binding, whereas insulin was ineffective. IGF-I binds with similar affinity to the rostral pars distalis (>95% PRL cells) as the whole pituitary gland and immunohistochemistry colocalizes IGF-I receptors and PRL in this same region. Des(1-3)IGF-I, a truncated analog of IGF-I that binds with high affinity to IGF-I receptors but weakly to IGF-I binding proteins (IGFBPs), showed a similar inhibition of saturable 125I-IGF-I binding, but it was more potent than IGF-I in stimulating PRL and inhibiting GH release. These results are the first to localize IGF-I receptors to PRL cells, correlate IGF-I binding to its efficacy in regulating GH and PRL secretion, as well as demonstrate that IGFBPs may play a significant role in modulating the disparate actions of IGF-I on PRL and GH secretion.
signal transduction; teleost; insulin-like growth factor binding proteins; Morone; secretion
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I (IGF-I) is a polypeptide with similar structure and biological function to insulin. It is produced by virtually all tissues and can act in an endocrine as well as a paracrine/autocrine manner (27). The primary role of circulating IGF-I, which is derived mainly from the liver, is its inhibition of growth hormone (GH) secretion (53). This negative-feedback control of GH is well documented in humans, nonprimate mammals (4, 5, 51, 55), and more recently in fish species (6, 17, 42, 47). We discovered a novel role for IGF-I as a specific and direct stimulator of prolactin (PRL) release (17). IGF-I disparately alters the release of these two pituitary hormones through distinct cellular signaling pathways that likely involve activation of specific tyrosine kinase-linked receptors (16).
Physiological effects of IGF-I occur through high-affinity binding of
IGF-I to the type-I IGF receptor. This receptor is a heterotetramer
consisting of two
- and two
-subunits linked by disulfide bonds.
It is a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family which, when
bound, causes autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the carboxyl
end of the intracellular domain. This initial activation is followed by
additional phosphorylations of intracellular protein kinases and
eventually leads to a cellular response (32). In addition
to IGF-I, other insulin-like peptides are known to bind the IGF-I
receptor. In mammals, IGF-II binds with a 15-20-fold lower
affinity to the IGF-I receptor, whereas in the few published reports on
fish, it appears to bind with a similar affinity as IGF-I (6, 10,
11, 32, 44). In all vertebrates studied, insulin has a
100-1,000-fold lower affinity for this receptor (32,
44).
Pituitary IGF-I receptors have been identified in mammals (1, 9, 20, 34, 46), amphibians (8), and tumor cell lines (45, 54), as well as in a single species of fish, the rainbow trout (6). The sites of IGF-I action within the fish pituitary gland, however, have not been established. Although studies suggest IGF-I alters GH release by binding to receptors on somatotrophs (6, 45, 54, 55), evidence for direct mediation of IGF-I action on pituitary lactotrophs is lacking. Specifically, no studies to date have localized IGF-I receptors to pituitary PRL cells in vertebrates. The unique anatomy of the teleost pituitary, where PRL-secreting cells are segregated as a nearly homogeneous population in the rostral portion of the pars distalis, allows for easy assessment of IGF-I receptor affinity as well as localization to PRL cells within an intact tissue. In vitro autoradiography and immunohistochemistry were used to localize IGF-I receptors on tissue sections of hybrid striped bass (Morone saxatilis × M. chrysops) pituitaries. The affinity and specificity of the putative pituitary IGF-I receptor was characterized using quantitative microdensitometry.
Despite the established role of IGF-I in regulating PRL and GH synthesis and secretion in vertebrates as well as the multitude of studies demonstrating that IGF-I receptors are ubiquitously expressed (32), there have been few studies that have correlated IGF-I binding affinity to its potency in regulating both PRL and GH secretion. It is also unclear whether the disparate effects of IGF-I on PRL and GH secretion are modulated by IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs). Using des(1-3)IGF-I, an IGF-I analog that specifically binds with high affinity to IGF-I receptors but not IGFBPs, we investigated whether the actions of IGF-I on PRL and GH secretion may be modulated by IGFBPs.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Juvenile hybrid striped bass (Morone saxatilis × M. chrysops; body wt 30-60 g) were obtained from freshwater ponds at the Pamlico Aquaculture Field Laboratory of North Carolina State University or from the Vernon James Research and Extension Center (Plymouth, NC). All fish were maintained for at least 3 wk in recirculating tanks supplied with freshwater (22 ± 2°C) under simulated natural photoperiod conditions before experiments. Fish were fed ad libitum twice daily with a pelleted feed (Southern States, Richmond, VA). All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH Guiding Principles for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the North Carolina State University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Hormones and antibodies. Recombinant human (rh) IGF-I, rhIGF-II, and des(1-3)IGF-I were purchased from Gropep Pty (Adelaide, Australia) and porcine insulin was from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). 3-[125I]iodotyrosyl-rhIGF-I was purchased from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). The hybrid striped bass (hsb) PRL antibody was kindly provided by Dr. Craig Sullivan (North Carolina State University). This homologous antibody was previously characterized and shown to specifically bind hsbPRL and not other pituitary hormones by immunohistochemistry, radioimmunoassay (25), and Western blotting procedures (17, 26). The IGF-I receptor antibody (C-20) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). This antibody was raised against a portion of the human IGF-I receptor (carboxy terminus), which is highly conserved among vertebrates. A blocking peptide corresponding to the carboxy terminus of the IGF-I receptor (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to verify specificity of the antibody for pituitary bass IGF-I receptors.
Localization of IGF-I saturable binding.
Radioligand binding and in vitro autoradiography studies were performed
to localize and characterize IGF-I binding sites on hybrid striped bass
pituitary glands using a modified protocol (8, 34).
Pituitaries were collected, embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles,
Elkhart, IN) and immediately frozen on dry ice. The glands were
serially sectioned at 20 µm, thaw-mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and stored desiccated at
80°C.
The slide-mounted tissue sections were brought to room temperature and
preincubated for 15 min in 25 mM Tris · HCl buffer (pH 7.4)
that contained 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% BSA, and 1 mg/ml
bacitracin. After preincubation, the slides were dried in a stream of
air at 4°C for 30 min and placed under vacuum with desiccant for an
additional 45 min at room temperature. The slides were then incubated
in the preincubation buffer (containing 100 pM
125I-rhIGF-I) for 2 h at 22 ± 2°C, the
temperature at which the fish were maintained. Preliminary
investigations established this concentration of IGF-I as saturable,
similar to that shown in other autoradiographic binding studies
(9, 34), and within the same order of magnitude as that
used in fish membrane-binding studies (11) or semipurified receptor extracts (22, 33). Nonsaturable binding was
defined as binding in the presence of 1 µM nonradioactive rhIGF-I.
After incubation, slides were washed three times for 1 min in
Tris · HCl buffer (pH 7.4) at 4°C and rinsed twice in
distilled water at 4°C for 5 s each. The slides were dried under
a stream of air at 4°C for 1 h and stored in desiccant at room
temperature overnight. The next day, the slides were exposed to
-max
Hyperfilm (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) for 6 days. The film was
then developed with Kodak D-19 developer and fixed. Slides were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin and coverslipped.
Characterization of IGF-I specific binding. Quantitative microdensitometry of the silver grains in the autoradiograms was performed using the Bioquant Meg IV system (R and M Biometrics, Nashville, TN) with a charge-coupled device-7 solid-state video camera mounted on a Wild M5A stereomicroscope with a light-field base. Images were digitized by a Targa M8 image-capture board. Because of the nonlinear sensitivity of the film, 125I-microscale standards (Amersham) were exposed to Hyperfilm together with the tissue sections and were used to correct the sample densities. Saturable binding was obtained by subtracting the density of nonsaturable binding (binding in the presence of 1 µM nonradioactive rhIGF-I) from the density measured in the total binding samples. Competitive inhibition curves were constructed by incubating serial tissue sections with 125I-rhIGF-I (100 pM) with increasing concentrations of nonradioactive rhIGF-I, rhIGF-II, porcine insulin, and des(1-3)IGF-I (0.01-1,000 nM). To estimate the concentration of nonradioactive IGF-I, IGF-II, insulin, and des(1-3)IGF-I that inhibited 50% of saturable binding (IC50), data were analyzed by nonlinear regression using the Prism software program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Immunohistochemistry. Pituitary glands were collected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Pituitary glands were cut into 4-µm sections. Sequential sections were used for IGF-I receptor and PRL staining. Slides were deparaffinized and blocked with 3.0% hydrogen peroxide followed by 10% normal goat serum, then washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Serial sections were later incubated overnight at 4°C with optimal dilutions of primary antibody (a 1:500 dilution for hsbPRL, see Ref. 25; and a 1:50 dilution for IGF-I receptor) that contained 1.0% normal goat serum and Triton X-100. Slides were washed in PBS with Triton X-100 and treated with a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 60 min. Binding of the primary antibodies was detected by the avidin-biotinylated peroxidase method (VectaStain kit, Vector Laboratories). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol, coverslipped, and analyzed using light microscopy. Negative controls were prepared using serial sections and replacing primary antibody with normal goat serum. In addition, the IGF-I receptor antibody was preabsorbed with excess IGF-I receptor peptide to show specificity of IGF-I receptor staining.
Static tissue cultures and gel electrophoresis. Pituitary glands were collected, dissected, and incubated according to our previously described methods (17). Briefly, pituitaries were dissected into rostral pars distalis (RPD, containing ~95% PRL cells) and proximal pars distalis/pars intermedia (PPD/PI, containing GH and other pituitary cell types) and placed in defined medium consisting of a Krebs bicarbonate Ringer solution containing glucose, L-glutamine, and MEM essential amino acids (without L-glutamine, GIBCO). The control media was adjusted to 325 mosmolal, which represents the blood osmotic pressure of freshwater bass (Morone spp.). Tissues were preincubated for 2 h with control medium. After the pretreatment, media was removed and replaced with experimental media. Tissues were incubated on a gyratory platform (60 rpm) for 18-20 h at 25 ± 1°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 95% O2-5% CO2.
Prolactin and GH release were quantified according to previously established and validated procedures (17). At termination of the cultures, tissues were ultrasonically disrupted and both tissues and incubation media were subjected separately to SDS-PAGE (30). Coomassie brilliant blue (R-250)-stained PRL and GH bands were quantified by laser densitometry. Data were calculated as the percentage of total hormone released or the amount of hormone released in the media divided by the total hormone (media + tissue) in the incubation. Data from separate experiments were normalized (percent of control incubations) and statistically showed similar results and were therefore combined. Differences between treatments were determined using one-way ANOVA test followed by the Fisher protected least-significant difference test for predetermined comparisons of multiple treatments (Ref. 49; StatView 5.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All values for PRL and GH release are expressed as means ± SE.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IGF-I binding was widely distributed throughout the pituitary
gland of hybrid striped bass (Fig. 1).
All three anatomically distinct regions of the pituitary gland: RPD
(containing predominantly PRL cells), PPD (containing GH,
thyrotropin-stimulating hormone, and gonadotropin cells), and PI
(containing melanocyte stimulating hormone and somatolactin cells)
contain high-affinity binding sites for IGF-I. Nonradioactive IGF-II (1 µM) was able to displace 125I-IGF-I from its receptor,
whereas a similar dose of insulin could not (Fig.
2).
|
|
To determine the specificity and affinity of the IGF-I binding site,
competitive inhibition curves were generated using
125I-labeled rhIGF-I and increasing concentrations of
competing nonradiolabeled rhIGF-I, rhIGF-II, and porcine insulin. At
concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1,000 nM, IGF-I inhibited saturable
binding of 125I-IGF-I. The binding data were analyzed by
nonlinear regression and results indicated the presence of a
single-class, high-affinity binding site. The dose that half maximally
displaced 125I-IGF-I from its receptor (IC50)
was 2.9 nM (Fig. 3). Nonradioactive IGF-II was as equipotent as IGF-I in inhibiting saturable
125I-IGF-I binding. Insulin was altogether ineffective at
displacing IGF-I from its receptor within a concentration range as high
as 1 µM (Fig. 3). The IC50 values for IGF-II and insulin
were 3.9 and >1,000 nM, respectively. Unlabeled IGF-I also displaced
125I-IGF-I binding on the RPD (data not shown). The
IC50 for this portion of the pituitary containing
95-99% PRL cells was 4 nM, which is similar to that seen with the
entire gland. Consistent with IGF-I binding on the RPD,
immunohistochemistry colocalized IGF-I receptors and PRL in the same
cells of the bass pituitary gland (Fig. 4, c and
d). Binding of the IGF-I receptor antibody on PRL cells was
completely displaced when preabsorbed with IGF-I receptor peptide,
which shows that IGF-I receptor staining was specific (Fig.
4b). As previously
demonstrated by Jackson (25), PRL immunoreactivity was
restricted to the RPD, where PRL cells are naturally segregated.
|
|
In a separate experiment, tissue sections were incubated with
125I-labeled rhIGF-I and varying doses of nonradiolabeled
des(1-3)IGF-I, a truncated analog of IGF-I that binds
with high affinity to the IGF-I receptor but weakly to IGFBPs.
Des(1-3)IGF-I was just as effective as the
full-length IGF-I in displacing 125I-IGF-I (Fig.
5). In this experiment, the
IC50 for IGF-I binding was similar to that shown for IGF-I
in the previous experiment (see Fig. 3).
|
The effects of des(1-3)IGF-I versus IGF-I were
evaluated to determine whether IGF-I might regulate PRL and GH release
through activation of a specific IGF-I receptor, high-affinity IGFBPs, or both. Dissected RPD and PPD/PI were exposed separately to graded concentrations of both IGF-I and the analog. During 18-20-h
incubations, des(1-3)IGF-I markedly inhibited GH
release in a dose-dependent fashion at concentrations ranging from 10 to 1,000 ng/ml (P < 0.0001; Fig.
6, top). The lowest
concentration of des(1-3)IGF-I that significantly
inhibited GH release was 10 ng/ml, whereas that for IGF-I was 100 ng/ml. In contrast to GH, PRL release from the RPD increased in a
dose-dependent manner in response to des(1-3)IGF-I and became significantly different from controls at 10 ng/ml (P < 0.001). Compared with des(1-3)IGF-I, a
10-fold higher dose of IGF-I was required to augment PRL release (Fig.
6, bottom).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This investigation is the first to localize and characterize IGF-I receptors on teleost pituitary glands using in vitro receptor autoradiography and quantitative microdensitometry while simultaneously correlating the affinity of the IGF-I receptor to an established physiological action, namely, the regulation of PRL and GH secretion. This study clearly demonstrates that saturable, specific, high-affinity IGF-I binding sites are located on hybrid striped bass pituitary glands, including those areas containing GH- and PRL-secreting cells. IGF-II and the truncated IGF-I analog des(1-3)IGF-I showed equal potency as IGF-I in displacing 125I-IGF-I from its receptor, whereas insulin was unable to compete for IGF-I binding sites at concentrations as high as 1 µM. Des(1-3)IGF-I, like the full-length peptide, was effective in stimulating PRL and inhibiting GH release, which provides additional evidence that IGF-I elicits its disparate effects through activation of IGF-I receptors. The more potent responses seen with des(1-3)IGF-I compared to IGF-I point to the possibility that the regulation of PRL and GH secretion by IGF-I may be modulated by the presence of one or more IGFBPs.
Recently we showed that IGF-I disparately regulates PRL and GH synthesis and release from fish pituitary glands. These actions occur through distinct as well as overlapping cellular signaling pathways that involve regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase (16, 17). Before these investigations, it was unknown whether IGF-I actions were mediated through high-affinity receptors located within distinct regions of the fish pituitary gland containing PRL and GH cells. IGF-I receptors are widely expressed in vertebrate tissues including the pituitary gland (1, 27, 32). In fish, IGF-I binding has been demonstrated in several tissues (7, 11, 22, 23, 31, 36, 41, 44) including one study that reported IGF-I binding to pituitary glands (6). However, localization of IGF-I receptors within these tissues has been limited mainly due to the method of tissue preparation. With the exception of one study that examined IGF-I receptors in goldfish retina (7), most investigations, including that shown in trout pituitaries, characterized IGF-I receptors using membrane preparations or semipurified receptor extracts. These techniques, although well established, do not allow for localization of receptors within the tissues examined nor do they characterize binding in tissues in their normal, in situ configurations. Using thinly sectioned, frozen tissue preparations, we clearly show that IGF-I specifically binds IGF-I receptors throughout the entire pituitary gland, including the RPD and PPD or PRL- and GH-containing cell regions, respectively. IGF-I binds a single high-affinity site that presumably reflects a receptor based on regression analysis of competitive displacement curves and results from des(1-3)IGF-I, which is further discussed below.
Owing to the heterogeneous distribution of cell types within most vertebrate pituitaries, it has been difficult to localize receptors to specific cell types while correlating IGF-I binding affinities to the regulation of pituitary hormones by IGF-I. Fish anterior pituitary glands, unlike those of most other vertebrates including mammals, are segregated into distinct regions containing discrete cell types. This unique morphological characteristic of the teleost pituitary allows for the in vitro study of aggregated populations of distinct cell types (24, 37). We exploited this model system and localized high-affinity IGF-I binding sites exclusively in the RPD where there is a nearly homogeneous population (>95%) of PRL cells (21, 24). The binding was widespread throughout the RPD and of similar affinity (~3 nM) as that shown in the whole pituitary (~4 nM), which suggests specific receptors are likely important for mediating the IGF-I induction of PRL release. Colocalization of IGF-I receptors to PRL immunoreactive cells further indicates that IGF-I is likely to alter PRL release by directly acting on lactotrophs.
Competitive inhibition of saturable 125I-IGF-I binding by nonradioactive IGF-I, IGF-II, and insulin revealed a pattern of specificity for IGF-I. We found that IGF-I and IGF-II bind with high affinity to hybrid striped bass pituitary glands (IC50 = 3 and 4 nM, respectively) whereas insulin resulted in a much reduced affinity and was unable to completely displace 125I-IGF-I from its receptor even at the highest dose measured (1 µM). A previous study in rainbow trout showed high-affinity IGF-I binding in a pituitary membrane preparation (Kd = 0.23 ± 0.73; Ref. 6). The discrepancy between this study and that reported here might be associated with differences in tissue preparation, receptor binding protocols, and/or species. The binding affinity of IGF-I for its receptor seen in the present study is similar to those found in mammals and in other investigations where radioreceptor autoradiography was used rather than binding in membrane preparations or semipurified receptor extracts.
The binding affinity of IGF-I in hybrid striped bass RPD as well as whole pituitaries correlates well with the EC50 values over which IGF-I was shown to effectively augment PRL and inhibit GH release (4.6 and 3.8 nM, respectively; Ref. 17). A displacement of 50% of IGF-I from its receptor and the concentration of IGF-I that half-maximally stimulates PRL and inhibits GH are also well within the range of plasma IGF-I levels (free and bound to IGFBPs) recently measured in hybrid striped bass (50-300 ng/ml or 6.5-39 nM; unpublished data). In addition to this circulating source, IGF-I is also produced locally in hybrid striped bass pituitary glands (unpublished data; Ref. 15). This local source in addition to circulating IGF-I would result in substantially higher IGF-I concentrations that may activate pituitary receptors and cause release of these hormones. Taken together, these results further support the physiological significance of IGF-I as a disparate regulator of PRL and GH cell function.
In mammals, two types of IGF-I receptors have been characterized: IGF-I and IGF-II/mannose 6-phosphate (IGF-II/M6P) receptors. Although the precise function of the IGF-II/MP6 receptor is still uncertain, it is thought to play a role in internalization and degradation of IGF-II (27, 39, 50). Despite many attempts to identify a type II IGF receptor in oviparous species, it has only recently been shown in trout embryos that IGF-II may bind an IGF-II/MP6 receptor (35). The physiological significance of this receptor is still unclear. Similar to mammalian IGF-II/MP6 receptors, it lacks tyrosine kinase activity and therefore may have a similar function of binding and degrading IGF-II to regulate the mitogenic effects of this growth factor. Although IGF-II/MP6 receptors may exist in all vertebrates, the physiological actions of IGFs (both IGF-I and IGF-II) in fish, as in mammals, are thought to be mediated by the type I IGF receptor (11, 32, 43). Insofar as the pituitary is concerned, results from this and another study in rainbow trout (6) show that IGF-II and IGF-I bind with similar affinities whereas insulin binds with a 100-1,000-fold lower affinity to the IGF-I receptor. In mammals, IGF-II binds with a 15-20-fold lower affinity to the IGF-I receptor, and this is typically followed by a less-potent cellular response compared with IGF-I. Despite the similar affinities for the IGF-I receptor, we found that IGF-II was 10-20-fold less potent than IGF-I in regulating the release of both PRL and GH (17). There is evidence suggesting that IGF-II binds a site distinct from IGF-I (18). Thus it is possible that IGF-II binds the type I IGF receptor with high affinity but is unable to activate the appropriate intracellular messengers critical to hormone release. Future studies should assess whether IGF-II may block IGF-I-evoked PRL and GH release and/or whether it is ineffective in activating intracellular protein kinases that lead to the stimulation of PRL and inhibition of GH by IGF-I.
Binding proteins (at least six in mammals and four in fish) are carriers of circulating IGF-I that regulate availability of the growth factor and alter its bioactivity at specific target tissues. Binding proteins also are known to associate with cell membranes either by interacting with components in the extracellular matrix or binding membrane receptor sites (28, 29, 40). Des(1-3)IGF-I is a naturally occurring, truncated analog of IGF-I. Removal of the first three amino acids allows for high-affinity binding to IGF-I receptors but weak binding to IGFBPs (14, 38). In this study, des(1-3)IGF-I inhibited saturable 125I-rhIGF-I binding in a dose-dependent manner and was equally potent as IGF-I in doing so, whereas it was at least 10 times more effective than IGF-I in stimulating PRL and inhibiting GH release. These results demonstrate that IGF-I is likely binding with high affinity to IGF-I pituitary receptors to regulate PRL and GH release.
Although IGFBPs have been shown to modulate the mitogenic activity of IGF-I in various tissues, virtually nothing is known regarding the function of IGFBPs in regulating IGF-I-evoked secretory responses generally and pituitary hormone secretion specifically. Voss et al. (52) recently found that IGF-I inhibited GH mRNA expression over a narrow range of concentrations in MtT/S cells (a rat somatotroph cell line that produces GH but not PRL). This ultrasensitive effect of IGF-I on GH mRNA was reduced when an IGF-I analog that binds the receptor with high affinity but with low affinity for IGFBPs was added, which suggests that IGFBPs were responsible for modulating the actions of IGF-I on GH mRNA expression at least in this clonal cell line. Our findings in physiologically relevant "normal" cells indicate that IGFBPs may also modulate the ability of IGF-I to regulate the release of GH as well as PRL because des(1-3)IGF-I had a significantly greater potency than the full-length IGF-I in eliciting pituitary responses. Studies examining protein synthesis in L6 myoblasts show that the increased biological potency occurring with des(1-3)IGF-I is not likely due to glycosylation or other modifications to the growth factor nor to increased affinity for the type I receptor (2, 3, 13). The latter is supported by our studies demonstrating similar competitive inhibition curves for the truncated analog and full-length growth factor. We postulate that pituitary IGFBPs complex with IGF-I and prevent its access to the receptor, which would result in a less-potent response than that seen with des(1-3)IGF-I, which binds weakly to IGFBPs and therefore has more continuous access to the receptor. In mammals, all six IGFBPs have been localized to the anterior pituitary gland (1, 19). Based on Western blot analysis, pituitary production of at least one IGFBP (a 28-30 kDa, IGFBP-2-like protein) has been demonstrated in striped bass (48). In mammals as well as zebrafish, this IGFBP has been shown to inhibit IGF-I-mediated action (12, 29). Thus it is possible that an IGFBP-2-like molecule produced by bass pituitary glands reduces PRL and GH sensitivity to IGF-I by modulating the accessibility of IGF-I to its receptor.
In summary, this study demonstrates localization of a specific, high-affinity IGF-I receptor to PRL cells and throughout the entire teleost pituitary gland. Pituitary presence and a strong correlation between receptor affinity and IGF-I activity provide powerful evidence that IGF-I binds the PRL- and GH-containing regions of the pituitary to directly and differentially regulate PRL and GH secretion. It also appears that IGFBPs significantly modulate IGF-I-evoked PRL and GH cell responses in the pituitary gland. Future studies will examine whether the type I IGF receptor and IGFBPs might be regulated by conditions known to enhance or impair these two pituitary hormones.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors greatly appreciate Dr. Steve Vigna for invaluable advice and use of equipment and also thank the staff at the Pamlico Aquaculture Field Laboratory for maintaining the animals used in this study. In addition, the authors acknowledge Sandra Horton and Dr. Heather Wilkins for assistance with immunohistochemistry.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN98-10326 and the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Grant R/MG-98-01.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Borski, Dept. of Zoology, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7617, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617 (E-mail: russell_borski{at}ncsu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpregu.00511.2001
Received 23 August 2001; accepted in final form 8 April 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bach, MA,
and
Bondy CA.
Anatomy of the pituitary insulin-like growth factor system.
Endocrinology
131:
2588-2594,
1992[Abstract].
2.
Ballard, FJ,
Francis GL,
Ross M,
Bagley CJ,
May B,
and
Wallace JC.
Natural and synthetic forms of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and the potent derivative, destripeptide IGF-1: biological activities and receptor binding.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
149:
398-404,
1987[ISI][Medline].
3.
Ballard, FJ,
Wallace JC,
Francis GL,
Read LC,
and
Tomas FM.
Des(1-3)IGF-I: a truncated form of insulin-like growth factor-I.
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
28:
1085-1087,
1996[ISI][Medline].
4.
Berelowitz, M,
Szabo M,
Frohman LA,
Firestone S,
Chu L,
and
Hintz RL.
Somatomedin-C mediates growth hormone negative feedback by effects on both the hypothalamus and the pituitary.
Science
212:
1279-1281,
1981
5.
Bermann, M,
Jaffe CA,
Tsai W,
DeMott-Friberg R,
and
Barkan AL.
Negative feedback regulation of pulsatile growth hormone secretion by insulin-like growth factor I. Involvement of hypothalamic somatostatin.
J Clin Invest
94:
138-145,
1994[ISI][Medline].
6.
Blaise, O,
Weil C,
and
Le Bail PY.
Role of IGF-I in the control of GH secretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
Growth Regul
5:
142-150,
1995[ISI][Medline].
7.
Boucher, SE,
and
Hitchcock PF.
Insulin-like growth factor-I binds in the inner plexiform layer and circumferential germinal zone in the retina of the goldfish.
J Comp Neurol
394:
395-401,
1998[ISI][Medline].
8.
David, I,
Bosshard R,
Kloas W,
and
Reinecke M.
Insulin-like growth factor I in the anterior pituitary of the clawed frog Xenopus laevis: immunocytochemical and autoradiographic indication for a paracrine action and corelease with prolactin.
J Neuroendocrinol
12:
415-420,
2000[ISI][Medline].
9.
De Keyser, J,
Wilczak N,
De Backer JP,
Herroelen L,
and
Vauquelin G.
Insulin-like growth factor-I receptors in human brain and pituitary gland: an autoradiographic study.
Synapse
17:
196-202,
1994[ISI][Medline].
10.
Drakenberg, K,
Carey G,
Mather P,
Anderson A,
and
Sara VR.
Characterization of an insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor and the insulin-like effects of IGF-1 in the bony fish, Lates calcarifer.
Regul Pept
69:
41-45,
1997[ISI][Medline].
11.
Drakenberg, K,
Sara VR,
Falkmer S,
Gammeltoft S,
Maake C,
and
Reinecke M.
Identification of IGF-1 receptors in primitive vertebrates.
Regul Pept
43:
73-81,
1993[ISI][Medline].
12.
Duan, C,
Ding J,
Li Q,
Tsai W,
and
Pozios K.
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 is a growth inhibitory protein conserved in zebrafish.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
15274-15279,
1999
13.
Francis, GL,
Ross M,
Ballard FJ,
Milner SJ,
Senn C,
McNeil KA,
Wallace JC,
King R,
and
Wells JR.
Novel recombinant fusion protein analogs of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I indicate the relative importance of IGF-binding protein and receptor binding for enhanced biological potency.
J Mol Endocrinol
8:
213-223,
1992[Abstract].
14.
Francis, GL,
Upton FM,
Ballard FJ,
McNeil KA,
and
Wallace JC.
Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 in bovine colostrum. Sequences and biological activities compared with those of a potent truncated form.
Biochem J
251:
95-103,
1988[ISI][Medline].
15.
Fruchtman, S.
Regulation of Teleost Pituitary Function by Insulin-Like Growth Factor I: Gene Expression, Receptor Binding, Cell Signaling and Effects on Prolactin and Growth Hormone Synthesis and Secretion (PhD thesis). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State Univ, 2001.
16.
Fruchtman, S,
Gift B,
Howes B,
and
Borski R.
Insulin-like growth factor-I augments prolactin and inhibits growth hormone release through distinct as well as overlapping cellular signaling pathways.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol
129:
237-242,
2001[Medline].
17.
Fruchtman, S,
Jackson L,
and
Borski R.
Insulin-like growth factor I disparately regulates prolactin and growth hormone synthesis and secretion: studies using the teleost pituitary model.
Endocrinology
141:
2886-2894,
2000
18.
Germain-Lee, EL,
Janicot M,
Lammers R,
Ullrich A,
and
Casella SJ.
Expression of a type I insulin-like growth factor receptor with low affinity for insulin-like growth factor II.
Biochem J
281:
413-417,
1992.
19.
Gonzalez-Parra, S,
Argente J,
Chowen JA,
van Kleffens M,
van Neck JW,
Lindenbeigh-Kortleve DJ,
and
Drop SL.
Gene expression of the insulin-like growth factor system during postnatal development of the rat pituitary gland.
J Neuroendocrinol
13:
86-93,
2001[ISI][Medline].
20.
Goodyer, CG,
De Stephano L,
Lai WH,
Guyda HJ,
and
Posner BI.
Characterization of insulin-like growth factor receptors in rat anterior pituitary, hypothalamus, and brain.
Endocrinology
114:
1187-1195,
1984[Abstract].
21.
Grau, EG,
Richman NH,
and
Borski RJ.
Osmoreception and simple endocrine reflex of the prolactin cell of the tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus.
In: Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology, edited by Davey KG,
Peter RE,
and Tobe SS.. Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council, 1994.
22.
Gutierrez, J,
Parrizas M,
Carneiro N,
Maestro JL,
Maestro MA,
and
Planas J.
Insulin and IGF-I receptor and tyrosine kinase activity in carp ovaries: changes with reproductive cycle.
Fish Physiol Biochem
11:
247-254,
1993.
23.
Gutierrez, J,
Parrizas M,
Maestro MA,
Navarro I,
and
Plisetskaya EM.
Insulin and IGF-I binding and tyrosine kinase activity in fish heart.
J Endocrinol
146:
35-44,
1995[Abstract].
24.
Huang, L,
and
Specker JL.
Growth hormone- and prolactin-producing cells in the pituitary gland of striped bass (Morone saxatilis): immunocytochemical characterization at different life stages.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
94:
225-236,
1994[ISI][Medline].
25.
Jackson, LF.
Prolactin and Growth Hormone in Temperate Basses (Genus Morone): Purification, Characterization, Bioassay, and Reproductive Effects in Vivo and in Vitro (PhD thesis). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State Univ, 1998.
26.
Jackson, LF,
Swanson P,
Duan C,
Fruchtman S,
and
Sullivan CV.
Purification, characterization, and bioassay of prolactin and growth hormone from temperate basses, genus Morone.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
117:
138-150,
2000[ISI][Medline].
27.
Jones, JI,
and
Clemmons DR.
Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions.
Endocr Rev
16:
3-34,
1995[ISI][Medline].
28.
Kelley, KM,
Desai P,
Roth JT,
Haigwood JT,
Arope SA,
Flores RM,
Schmidt KE,
Perez M,
Nicholson S,
and
Song WW.
Evolution of endocrine growth regulation: the insulin like growth factors (IGFs), their regulatory binding proteins (IGFBPs), and IGF receptors in fishes and other ectothermic vertebrates.
In: Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology: Aquaculture, edited by Fingerman M,
and Nagabhushanam R.. Plymouth, UK: Science Publishers, 2000, p. 189-228.
29.
Kelley, KM,
Oh Y,
Gargosky SE,
Gucev Z,
Matsumoto T,
Hwa V,
Ng L,
Simpson DM,
and
Rosenfeld RG.
Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and their regulatory dynamics.
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
28:
619-637,
1996[ISI][Medline].
30.
Laemmli, UK.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:
680-685,
1970[Medline].
31.
Leibush, B,
Parrizas M,
Navarro I,
Lappova Y,
Maestro MA,
Encinas M,
Plisetskaya EM,
and
Gutierrez J.
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I receptors in fish brain.
Regul Pept
61:
155-161,
1996[ISI][Medline].
32.
LeRoith, D,
Werner H,
Beitner-Johnson D,
and
Roberts CT, Jr.
Molecular and cellular aspects of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor.
Endocr Rev
16:
143-163,
1995[ISI][Medline].
33.
Maestro, M,
Mendez E,
Planas J,
and
Gutierrez J.
Dynamics of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) ovarian receptors during maturation in the brown trout (Salmo trutta).
Fish Physiol Biochem
20:
341-349,
1999.
34.
Matsuo, K,
Niwa M,
Kurihara M,
Shigematsu K,
Yamashita S,
Ozaki M,
and
Nagataki S.
Receptor autoradiographic analysis of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) binding sites in rat forebrain and pituitary gland.
Cell Mol Neurobiol
9:
357-367,
1989[ISI][Medline].
35.
Mendez, E,
Planas JV,
Castillo J,
Navarro I,
and
Gutierrez J.
Identification of a type II insulin-like growth factor receptor in fish embryos.
Endocrinology
142:
1090-1097,
2001
36.
Moon, TW,
Castejon C,
Banos N,
Maestro MA,
Plisetskaya EM,
Gutierrez J,
and
Navarro I.
Insulin and IGF-I binding in isolated trout cardiomyocytes.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
103:
264-272,
1996[ISI][Medline].
37.
Nagahama, Y,
Olivereau M,
Farmer SW,
Nishioka RS,
and
Bern HA.
Immunocytochemical identification of the prolactin- and growth hormone-secreting cells in the teleost pituitary with antisera to tilapia prolactin and growth hormone.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
44:
389-395,
1981[ISI][Medline].
38.
Oh, Y,
Muller HL,
Lee DY,
Fielder PJ,
and
Rosenfeld RG.
Characterization of the affinities of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins 1-4 for IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-I/insulin hybrid, and IGF-I analogs.
Endocrinology
132:
1337-1344,
1993[Abstract].
39.
Oka, Y,
Rozek LM,
and
Czech MP.
Direct demonstration of rapid insulin-like growth factor II receptor internalization and recycling in rat adipocytes. Insulin stimulates 125I-insulin-like growth factor II degradation by modulating the IGF-II receptor recycling process.
J Biol Chem
260:
9435-9442,
1985
40.
Park, R,
Shepherd BS,
Nishioka RS,
Grau EG,
and
Bern HA.
Effects of homologous pituitary hormone treatment on serum insulin-like growth-factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) in hypophysectomized tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus, with special reference to a novel 20-kDa IGFBP.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
117:
404-412,
2000[ISI][Medline].
41.
Parrizas, M,
Plisetskaya EM,
Planas J,
and
Gutierrez J.
Abundant insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor binding in fish skeletal muscle.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
98:
16-25,
1995[ISI][Medline].
42.
Perez-Sanchez, J,
Weil C,
and
Le Bail PY.
Effects of human insulin-like growth factor-I on release of growth hormone by rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) pituitary cells.
J Exp Zool
262:
287-290,
1992[ISI][Medline].
43.
Planas, J,
Méndez E,
Baños N,
Capilla E,
Castillo J,
Navarro I,
and
Gutiérrez J.
Fish insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II receptors: a phylogenetic approach.
Am Zool
40:
223-233,
2000.
44.
Pozios, KC,
Ding J,
Degger B,
Upton Z,
and
Duan C.
IGFs stimulate zebrafish cell proliferation by activating MAP kinase and PI3-kinase-signaling pathways.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
280:
R1230-R1239,
2001
45.
Rosenfeld, RG,
Ceda G,
Cutler CW,
Dollar LA,
and
Hoffman AR.
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (somatomedin) receptors on cloned rat pituitary tumor cells.
Endocrinology
117:
2008-2016,
1985[Abstract].
46.
Rosenfeld, RG,
Ceda G,
Wilson DM,
Dollar LA,
and
Hoffman AR.
Characterization of high affinity receptors for insulin-like growth factors I and II on rat anterior pituitary cells.
Endocrinology
114:
1571-1575,
1984[Abstract].
47.
Rousseau, K,
Huang YS,
Le Belle N,
Vidal B,
Marchelidon J,
Epelbaum J,
and
Dufour S.
Long-term inhibitory effects of somatostatin and insulin-like growth factor 1 on growth hormone release by serum-free primary culture of pituitary cells from European eel (Anguilla anguilla).
Neuroendocrinology
67:
301-309,
1998[ISI][Medline].
48.
Siharath, K,
Nishioka R,
and
Bern H.
In vitro production of IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP) by various organs of the striped bass, Morone saxatilis.
Aquaculture
135:
195-202,
1995.
49.
Steele, R,
and
Torrie J.
Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
50.
Stewart, CE,
and
Rotwein P.
Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors.
Physiol Rev
76:
1005-1026,
1996
51.
Tannenbaum, GS,
Guyda HJ,
and
Posner BI.
Insulin-like growth factors: a role in growth hormone negative feedback and body weight regulation via brain.
Science
220:
77-79,
1983
52.
Voss, TC,
Flynn MP,
and
Hurley DL.
IGF-I causes an ultrasensitive reduction in GH mRNA levels via an extracellular mechanism involving IGF binding proteins.
Mol Endocrinol
15:
1549-1558,
2001
53.
Yakar, S,
Liu JL,
Stannard B,
Butler A,
Accili D,
Sauer B,
and
LeRoith D.
Normal growth and development in the absence of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
7324-7329,
1999
54.
Yamasaki, H,
Prager D,
Gebremedhin S,
Moise L,
and
Melmed S.
Binding and action of insulin-like growth factor I in pituitary tumor cells.
Endocrinology
128:
857-862,
1991[Abstract].
55.
Yamashita, S,
and
Melmed S.
Insulin-like growth factor I action on rat anterior pituitary cells: suppression of growth hormone secretion and messenger ribonucleic acid levels.
Endocrinology
118:
176-182,
1986[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. K. Tipsmark, J. A. Luckenbach, S. S. Madsen, and R. J. Borski IGF-I and branchial IGF receptor expression and localization during salinity acclimation in striped bass Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R535 - R543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |