AJP - Regu AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R647-R652, 2002. First published June 6, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00121.2002
0363-6119/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/3/R647    most recent
00121.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, J.
Vol. 283, Issue 3, R647-R652, September 2002

IGF-I binding in primary culture of muscle cells of rainbow trout: changes during in vitro development

Juan Castillo1, Pierre-Yves Le Bail2, Gilles Paboeuf2, Isabel Navarro1, Claudine Weil2, Benoit Fauconneau2, and Joaquim Gutiérrez1

1 Departament de Fisiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain; and 2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Station Commune de Recherches en Ichtyophysiologie, Biodiversité et Environnement, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Cedex Rennes, France


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To characterize and study the variations of IGF-I binding during the development of trout muscle cells, in vitro experiments were conducted using myocyte cultures, and IGF-I binding assays were performed in three stages of cell development: mononuclear cells (day 1), small myotubes (day 4), and large myotubes (day 10). Binding experiments were done by incubating cells with IGF-I for 12 h at 4°C. Specific IGF-I binding increased with the concentration of labeled IGF-I and reached a plateau at 32 pM. The displacement of cold human and trout IGF-I showed a very similar curve (EC50 = 1.19 ± 0.05 and 0.95 ± 0.05 nM, respectively). IGF binding proteins did not interfere significantly because displacement of labeled IGF-I by either cold trout recombinant IGF-I or Des (1-3) IGF-I resulted in similar curves. Insulin did not displace labeled IGF-I even at very high concentrations (>1 µM), which indicates the specificity of IGF-I binding. The amount of receptor (R0) increased from 253 ± 51 fmol/mg DNA on day 1 to 766 ± 107 fmol/mg DNA on day 10. However, the affinity (Kd) of IGF-I receptors did not change significantly during this development (from 1.29 ± 0.19 to 0.79 ± 0.13 nM). On the basis of our results, we conclude that rainbow trout muscle cells in culture express specific IGF-I receptors, which increase their number with development from mononuclear cells to large myotubes.

insulin-like growth factor-I; receptor


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IN VERTEBRATES, IGFs are involved in several muscle functions. They stimulate proliferation and differentiation in a number of cellular models of myogenesis (16, 18), and the overexpression of IGF-I (8) or the IGF-I receptor (42) in cultured mouse myoblasts accelerates cell differentiation. IGFs increase the expression of some crucial genes in muscle development, such as MyoD and myogenin in mammals (17) and fish (43). Moreover, IGF-I stimulates glucose uptake in avian muscle cells (12) and glycogen formation in rat skeletal muscle (19). Anabolic effects have been demonstrated in rat muscle satellite cells (1, 9), the RMO cell line (25), chicken muscle satellite cells (13, 23), turkey embryonic myoblasts and satellite cells (33, 35), and also in myotubes from porcine (24) and chick myoblasts (49).

In fish, IGF-I binding was first reported by our group in carp ovary (31). This binding was later characterized in most fish tissues (4, 6, 10, 28, 30, 36, 40, 41), in which the presence of this receptor was always remarkably abundant. In contrast to mammals (38), IGF-I binding in fish skeletal muscle is higher than insulin binding. Furthermore, this high ratio of IGF-I/insulin binding is established during development and maintained throughout adulthood (34). However, despite the literature on IGF-I binding, the role of the abundant IGF-I receptors in fish muscle still remains unclear.

The in vivo model has some limitations for the study of IGF-I in trout, because IGF-I interacts with the insulin receptor in target tissues and because IGF-I may stimulate insulin secretion (5), which could hinder the interpretation of results. Therefore, the in vitro model offers a useful alternative in studies on the regulation and function of IGF-I and its receptors in fish. Satellite cells have been isolated and cultured in many homeothermic species such as chicken or mouse (13, 45) and in two fish species: carp and zebrafish (26, 29). Culture of trout myocytes was first described by Rescan et al. (44), and a more precise protocol of isolation and optimization of conditions for the maintenance of rainbow trout satellite cells in culture was proposed by Fauconneau and Paboeuf (15). These cells in culture were functional, with simultaneous proliferation and differentiation, as shown by the expression of genes involved in developmental processes, such as MyoD and myogenin (43). On the basis of these observations, primary culture of trout satellite cells has become a useful tool with which to characterize the role of IGF-I receptors in fish skeletal muscle.

Here we aimed to examine IGF-I binding in trout muscle cells in culture and characterize this binding to study the evolution of IGF-I receptors during myocyte differentiation, as a first step to understand the role of these receptors in fish muscle physiology.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals. Trout recombinant IGF-I (rtIGF-I), human recombinant Des (1-3) IGF-I, and human recombinant IGF-I (rhIGF-I) were purchased from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia). Des (1-3) IGF-I is an analog of IGF-I that exhibits low affinity for most IGF binding proteins (IGFBP). Unlabeled porcine insulin was obtained from Lilly (Indianapolis, IN).

Recombinant human 125I-IGF-I with a specific activity of 260 µCi/µg was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Europe GmBH. Trout IGF-I was labeled following the Cloramine T method, as modified by Martal (32) (specific activity 80 to 100 µCi/µg). Other cell culture reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Quimica, S. A.

Animals. We used rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with weights ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 g. These fish were maintained in the Rennes and Barcelona facilities in closed-circuit flow systems at 12°C, fed ad libitum with a commercial diet, and fasted for 24 h before the experiments. The fish (30 to 40 for each culture) were killed by a sharp blow to the head and immersed in 70% ethanol for 30 s to sterilize external surfaces.

Isolation of myosatellite cells. The protocol used was described by Fauconneau and Paboeuf (15). White myotomal muscle was excised under sterile conditions and collected in cold (0°C) DMEM, 9 mM NaHCO3, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4, Posm 300 mosmol/kgH2O), containing 15% horse serum and antibiotics (penicillin 100 U/ml, streptomycin 100 µg/ml, fungizone 0.25 µg/ml, gentamycin 75 µg/ml) at a concentration of 5 g/ml.

The tissue was minced, and fragments were centrifuged (300 g, 5 min) and washed twice in DMEM without horse serum to eliminate the serum components.

Enzymatic digestion was performed with collagenase (Type Ia Sigma) in DMEM (final concentration 0.2%) for 1 h at 18°C with gentle agitation. The suspension was centrifuged (300 g, 5 min), and the pellet was washed with DMEM, resuspended in DMEM (5 ml/g of muscle), triturated through a pipette five times, and centrifuged again (300 g, 5 min).

Fragments were resuspended in a trypsin solution 1:250 (Sigma) (0.1% final concentration in DMEM) for 20 min at 18°C with gentle agitation and centrifuged for 5 min at 300 g.

The supernatant was diluted in 2 vol of cold complete medium to block trypsin activity. The tissue fragments (pellet) were given a second similar trypsin digestion, and the suspension was then diluted. The two supernatants of digestion were pooled, diluted (1:1 vol/vol) in cold DMEM supplemented with 15% horse serum, and centrifuged (300 g, 20 min, 4°C). The resulting pellets were resuspended in 20 ml of basal medium and submitted to mechanical dissociation by trituration five times with a 10-ml pipette and five times using a 5-ml pipette. The suspension was then filtered successively on a 100- and 40-µm nylon cell strainer and centrifuged (300 g, 2 min, 4°C). The cells were resuspended in basal medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and diluted to reach a final concentration of 106 cells/ml of normal medium.

Cell culture. Culture plates were pretreated with a solution of 100 µg/ml of poly-L-lysine (Sigma MW300000) at a concentration of 16 µg/cm2 for 2 h 30 min at 15°C. After this precoating, the poly-L-lysine solution was aspirated, substratum was washed twice with distilled water, air dried, covered with a solution of 20 µg/ml of laminin (L2020 Sigma) in DMEM at 2 µg/cm2, and incubated for 24 h at 18°C. The laminin solution was aspirated immediately before the plating of the cell suspension, which contained a crude extract of muscle cells. Culture was performed with this crude extract, without selection of satellite cells.

Cells were cultured in complete medium at 18°C in air, in 6-well plastic plates (9.6 cm2/well, NUNC), and medium was changed every 2 days. Observations of morphology were regularly made to control the state of the cells.

IGF-I binding assays. Binding studies were conducted with cells seeded at a density of 1.5 to 2 × 106 per well. In each well, monolayers were washed three times with 2.5 ml of cold DMEM without FCS and incubated for 12 h at 4°C in 1 ml DMEM containing 0.5% BSA (free of insulin, A-7888 Sigma) with 125I-labeled rtIGF-I or 125I-labeled rhIGF-I in the presence or absence of a range of concentrations of cold peptides (from 1 to 400 ng/ml for IGF-I and 1,000 times for cold insulin). Nonspecific binding (NSB) was obtained with a concentration of 400 ng/ml of cold rtIGF-I or cold rhIGF-I.

Incubation was stopped by aspiration of medium, the monolayer was washed twice with 2.5 ml of cold DMEM, and cells were triturated by incubation with 1 ml 1 N NaOH for 30 min at 40°C. Radioactive solution was counted using a gamma counter (Packard Bioscience, Meriden, CT). Each binding experiment was performed in duplicate at least three times for each developmental stage.

The DNA content of wells was determined using a RNA/DNA calculator Genequant II (Pharmacia Biotech, Barcelona, Spain). The protein content of each well was determined following the method described by Bradford (7).

Statistical analysis. The treatment was performed in duplicate in each experiment. All data are presented as means ± SE of at least three experiments (Scatchard assays). Statistical differences between conditions were tested by ANOVA (two-way ANOVA). Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The phenotype of cells in different days of culture is shown in Fig. 1: in day 1, cells are mononucleated (Fig. 1A), and throughout their development, they fuse to form small myotubes (day 4; Fig. 1B) and large myotubes later on (day 10; Fig. 1C). Time course experiments involving the incubation of cells in day 4 at 4°C with a fixed amount of labeled rtIGF-I (105 cpm/well) (Fig. 2) showed that the highest specific binding for IGF-I was obtained after 12 h and remained at this level up to 24 h. Maximum binding was ~2-2.5% of the labeled trout IGF-I incubated and ~0.4% of the labeled insulin. This temperature (4°C) and incubation time (12 h) were subsequently used to perform the binding experiments and receptor quantification.


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   Differentiation of satellite cells isolated from skeletal muscle of juvenile rainbow trout and cultured on a laminin substrate with DMEM 90%/fetal calf serum 10% medium at 18°C for 1 day (A), 4 days (B), and 10 days (C).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Time course experiment of labeled trout IGF-I binding to primary culture of trout myosatellite cells. Cells were isolated and seeded as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS, and after 4 days, they were incubated at 4°C with a fixed concentration of labeled hormone at a range of incubation times (from 4 to 24 h). Data are means ± SE of 3 experiments.

Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of labeled rtIGF-I. The NSB and total binding (TB) increased and did not reach a plateau, whereas specific binding (SB) (SB = TB - NSB) increased from ~4,000 to 20,500 cpm, then reached a plateau and remained at high amounts of labeled IGF-I (Fig. 3). The Scatchard transformation of the SB curve gave the affinity of the receptors (Kd = 0.91 ± 0.03 nM). This Kd was similar to that obtained when labeled rtIGF-I was displaced with cold rtIGF-I (Kd = 0.87 ± 0.08 nM).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   Saturation with labeled trout IGF-I. Myosatellite cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of labeled trout IGF-I (from 1.77 × 105 to 50.42 × 105 cpm) for 12 h at 4°C. SB, specific binding; TB, total binding; NSB, nonspecific binding. Data are means ± SE of 3 experiments.

We then checked whether heterologous peptides could be used in our binding system. Cells were incubated with labeled rtIGF-I and increasing concentrations of cold rtIGF-I or cold rhIGF-I for comparison. Both the homologous (trout) and the heterologous (human) nonlabeled IGF-I displaced labeled rtIGF-I in a similar way (EC50 = 0.95 ± 0.05 and 1.19 ± 0.05 nM, respectively) (Fig. 4).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   Human vs. trout IGF-I binding to muscle cells. Cells were incubated for 12 h at 4°C with a fixed amount of labeled trout IGF-I and increasing concentrations of cold human IGF-I. Data are means ± SE of 3 experiments. rtIGF-I, trout recombinant IGF-I.

To assess the possible interference of IGFBP in the binding assay, we compared the displacement of labeled trout IGF-I with either cold trout IGF-I or Des (1-3) IGF-I (Fig. 5). Labeled rtIGF-I was similarly displaced by cold rtIGF-I and cold human Des (1-3) IGF-I (EC50 = 0.75 ± 0.06 and 1.04 ± 0.02 nM, respectively), thus showing that IGFBP did not interfere significantly in the binding of IGF-I to its receptor.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   Binding to IGF-I receptor. Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of rtIGF-I and human Des (1-3) IGF-I for 12 h at 4°C. Data are means ± SE of 3 experiments.

To check the specificity of the binding, cells were incubated with labeled rtIGF-I and increasing concentrations of salmon insulin for 12 h at 4°C (Fig. 6). No displacement of labeled trout IGF-I was observed (even for concentrations 1,000 times higher than the IGF-I concentration that completely displaced labeled rtIGF-I binding). This observation indicates that IGF-I binding is specific and is caused by the binding of IGF-I to its specific receptors. Furthermore, binding of insulin was very low (from 0.1 to 0.4% of the total radioactivity added).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6.   Specificity of IGF-I binding to trout muscle cells. Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 12 h at 4°C. Binding values are expressed as percentage of maximum binding. Data are means ± SE of 3 experiments.

Binding characteristics (affinity and number of IGF-I receptors) were studied using human labeled IGF-I in three cell stages: day 1 (mononuclear cells), day 4 (small myotubes), and day 10 (large myotubes) (Table 1). The receptor affinity did not show significant differences among the three stages (Kd from 1.29 to 0.79). However, the number of IGF-I receptors per DNA content in the culture wells increased progressively with culture time and showed the highest values after 10 days (from 253 to 766 fmol/mg DNA). When results were expressed for the protein content, the number of IGF-I receptors ranged from 127 fmol/mg of protein on day 1 to 268 fmol/mg on day 10 of culture.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1.   Binding characteristics of IGF-I receptors in rainbow trout muscle cells


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study is the first report on the presence of specific IGF-I receptors in primary culture of fish muscle cells. Although several established muscle cell lines have been used in mammals, the lack of these lines in fish led us to examine the effects of IGFs in a primary muscle cell culture, which, in addition, resembles physiological conditions in vivo. In our study, cell culture contained fibroblasts (~15%) and satellite cells that presented similar characteristics to those observed by Rescan et al. (44) and Fauconneau and Paboeuf (15) in terms of growth, proliferation, and fusion of satellite cells to form myotubes. We used small fish because the number of satellite cells extracted from large ones is lower (20). The number of cells used for each binding experiment (~1.5-2 million of cells/well) was comparable to that used by other authors in other vertebrate species (13). Within the first 24 h of culture, cells attached to the culture surface and started to proliferate and differentiate; they then fused at the same time and were visible as small myotubes after 2-3 days. At 10 days, long multinucleated myotubes were clearly observed.

A temperature of 4°C and overnight incubation (12 h) were the optimal conditions selected from preliminary assays. These conditions are consistent with previous data on IGF-I binding in fish (6, 27, 30, 36, 39) and in higher vertebrates (3, 13). Our results in fish myocytes coincided with those observed in muscle cells from other species: Duclos et al. (13) obtained 3% of SB for IGF-I in chicken satellite cells, a percentage similar to that observed in our study (2-2.5%). When expressed per milligram of protein, SB in trout muscle cells (15%) present similar levels to those in mouse myoblasts (16.1%) (45). These results confirm that IGF-I binding in trout muscle cells is in the same range as that in cultured myocytes and in semipurified receptor preparations from other vertebrates.

Given that most of the previous IGF-I binding studies performed in fish used mammalian IGF, one of our objectives was to verify that this heterologous system was similar to the homologous one and, therefore, appropriate for the measurement of IGF-I binding. A comparison of the displacement curves with cold trout IGF-I and cold human IGF-I showed an equivalent EC50, a finding that is consistent with data obtained in other binding models (21, 22, 28). On the basis of these results, IGF-I receptors in trout myosatellite cells can be quantified using the heterologous peptide system. Moreover, the specific activity of commercially labeled rhIGF-I is higher (more than two times) than that obtained in our study with rtIGF-I and is therefore more suitable for this model in which binding is not very high.

In their studies on primary cultures of satellite cells of chicken, Duclos et al. (13) found that IGFBP interfered with the IGF-I binding. Other authors also reported the presence of autocrine IGFBP (especially IGFBP-4, -5, -6) in L6 rat myoblasts in culture, which inhibits the effects produced by IGF-I (2, 47). Similar binding proteins also occur in the blood of rainbow trout (50). Nevertheless, in our experiments, we did not detect interference of IGFBP in the IGF-I binding assays, because Des (1-3) IGF-I displaced bound labeled IGF-I in the same way as native IGF-I. This observation thus indicates that the IGF-I binding observed was mainly due to the binding of the peptide to its specific receptors.

Several authors working on higher vertebrate species, who found specific IGF-I binding in satellite cells in culture (3, 13, 45), observed that the IGF-I receptor bound insulin with much less affinity. A similar situation was observed in a range of fish preparations (34, 36). In this study, salmon insulin was unable to compete with rtIGF-I for binding to the IGF-I receptor, indicating the specificity of IGF-I receptors, and that this high specificity seems to be a characteristic of this culture.

We did not observe significant changes in receptor binding affinity during the differentiation of myocytes in culture. This result is in agreement with previous studies where the affinity of IGF-I receptors was maintained throughout the distinct stages of trout larvae development (34).

Specific binding of IGF-I (expressed per mg of protein content of the culture wells) increased from day 1 (myosatellite cells) to day 4 (small myotubes) and peaked on day 10 of culture (large myotubes), suggesting an increase in the presence of IGF-IR during muscle cell differentiation in fish. These results contrast with the data obtained for mouse satellite cell lines by Rosenthal et al. (45) who reported a decrease of ~60% in IGF-I binding (expressed per mg of protein) when myoblast cells develop into myotube cells. These differences cannot be explained by a variation in protein synthesis in cell culture between species or between stages because the same tendency of an increase in IGF-I receptor binding is observed when expressed per milligram of DNA of the wells. We conclude that the crucial role of IGF-I binding in trout muscle, as seen in the abundance of IGF-I receptors in trout muscle through the whole life cycle (34, 38), explains this situation. In fact, we obtained higher IGF-I binding than for insulin in satellite cells (data not shown), which shows a similar tendency to trout cardiac cells (36) or wheat germ agglutinin-purified preparations of trout muscle tissue (37). This is the inverse pattern of the binding ratio IGF-I/insulin obtained in the muscle of endothermic vertebrates.

We conclude that trout muscle cells in culture show specific IGF-I binding sites and that the binding characteristics of this growth factor are similar to those previously observed in preparations of semipurified muscle receptor. The methodology used here allowed us to obtain the first results on the changes in IGF-I receptor number during multiplication and differentiation in fish muscle cells. Our results show that in vitro experiments are useful to study the role of IGF-I and its receptor in fish muscle metabolism and growth.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Baró at the Piscifactoría Truites del Segre (Lleida) for providing the rainbow trout and facilities to conduct the sampling and for assistance. We also thank R. Rycroft for help with the English version of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported by grants from the European Union (Contract FAIR CT 95-0174, QLRT-1999-30068), DGICY Spain (AGF-98-0325, PB-97-0902, AGL-2001-2903 ACU), and CIRIT (2000 SGR-0040, 1998 FI 00634).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Gutiérrez, Departament de Fisiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain (E-mail: joaquim{at}porthos.bio.ub.es).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

June 6, 2002;10.1152/ajpregu.00121.2002

Received 22 February 2002; accepted in final form 30 May 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Allen, RE, and Boxhorn LK. Regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta , insulin like growth factor-I, and fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Physiol 138: 311-315, 1989[Web of Science][Medline].

2.   Bach, LA, Salemi R, and Leedings KS. Roles of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors and IGF-binding proteins in IGF-II-induced proliferation and differentiation of L6A1 myoblasts. Endocrinology 136: 5061-5069, 1995[Abstract].

3.   Ballard, FJ, Read LC, Francis GL, Bagley CJ, and Wallace JC. Binding properties and biological potencies of insulin-like growth factors in L6 myoblasts. Biochem J 233: 223-230, 1986[Web of Science][Medline].

4.   Baños, N, Moon TW, Castejón C, Gutiérrez J, and Navarro I. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) binding in fish red muscle: regulation by high insulin levels. Regul Pept 26: 181-187, 1997.

5.   Baños, N, Planas JV, Gutiérrez J, and Navarro I. Regulation of plasma insulin-like growth factor-I levels in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 124: 33-40, 1999[Medline].

6.   Blaise, O, Weil C, and Le Bail P.-Y. Role of the IGF-I in the control of GH secretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Growth Regul 5: 142-150, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

7.   Bradford, MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254, 1976[Web of Science][Medline].

8.   Coleman, ME, De Mayo F, Yin KC, Lee HM, Geske R, Montgomery C, and Schwartz J. Myogenic vector expression of insulin-like growth factor I stimulates muscle cell differentiation and myofiber hypertrophy in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem 270: 12109-12116, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Dodson, MV, Allen RE, and Hossner KL. Orine somatomedin, multiplication-stimulating activity, and insulin promote skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation in vitro. Endocrinology 117: 2357-2363, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Drakenberg, K, Sara VR, Falkmer S, Gammeltoft S, Maake C, and Reinecke M. Identification of IGF-I receptors in primitive vertebrates. Regul Pept 43: 73-81, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

11.   Duan, C, and Inui Y. Effects of recombinant eel growth hormone on the uptake of [35S] sulfate by ceratobranquial cartilages of the japanese eel, Anguilla Japonica. Gen Comp Endocrinol 79: 326-331, 1990[Medline].

12.   Duclos, MJ, Chevalier B, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Tanti F, Goddard C, and Simon J. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulated glucose transport in myotubes derived from chicken muscle satellite cells. J Endocrinol 137: 465-472, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Duclos, MJ, Wilkie RS, and Goddard C. Stimulation of DNA synthesis in chicken muscle satellite cells by insulin and IGFs: evidence for exclusive mediation by a type-I IGF receptor. J Endocrinol 128: 35-42, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Etherton, TD, and Evock CM. Stimulation of lipogenesis in bovine adipose tissue by insulin and insulin-like growth factor. J Anim Sci 62: 357-362, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Fauconneau, B, and Paboeuf G. Effect of fasting and refeeding on in vitro muscle cell proliferation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Cell Tissue Res 301: 459-463, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

16.   Florini, JR. Hormonal control of muscle growth. Muscle Nerve 10: 577-598, 1987[Web of Science][Medline].

17.   Florini, JR, Ewton DZ, and Roof SL. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates terminal myogenic differentiation by induction of myogenin gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 5: 718-724, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Florini, JR, and Magri KA. Effects of growth factors on myogenic differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 256: C701-C711, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Frick, F, Oscarsson J, Vikman-Adolfsson K, Ottosson M, Yoshida N, and Eden S. Different effects of IGF-I on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E729-E737, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Greenle, AR, Dodson MV, Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Kersten CA, and Cloud JG. In vitro differentiation of myoblast from skeletal muscle of rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 46: 731-747, 1995.

21.   Gutiérrez, J, Párrizas M, Maestro MA, Navarro I, and Plisetskaya EM. Insulin and IGF-I binding and tyrosine kinase activity in fish heart. J Endocrinol 146: 35-44, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Gutiérrez, J, and Plisetskaya EM. Insulin binding to liver plasma membranes of coho salmon during smoltification. Gen Comp Endocrinol 82: 466-475, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

23.   Halevy, O, Krispin A, Leshem Y, McMurtry JP, and Yahav S. Early-age heat exposure affects skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in chicks. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R302-R309, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Hembree, JR, Hathaway MR, and Dayton WR. Isolation and culture of fetal porcine myogenic cells and the effect of insulin, IGF-I, and sera on protein turnover in porcine myotube cultures. J Anim Sci 69: 3241-3250, 1991[Abstract].

25.   Johnson, SE, and Allen RE. The effects of bIGF, IGF and TGF-beta on RMO skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. Exp Cell Res 187: 250-254, 1990[Web of Science][Medline].

26.   Koumans, JTM, Akster HA, Dulos GJ, and Osse JWM Myosatellite cells of Cyprinus carpio (Teleostei) in vitro: isolation, recognition and differentiation. Cell Tissue Res 261: 173-181, 1990.

27.   Le Gac, F, Loir M, Le Bail PY, and Ollitrault M. Insulin-like growth (IGF-I) mRNA and IGF-I receptor in trout testis and in isolated spermatogenic and Sertoli cells. Mol Reprod Dev 44: 23-35, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

28.   Leibush, B, Párrizas M, Navarro I, Lappova Y, Maestro MA, Encinas M, Plisetskaya EM, and Gutiérrez J. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I receptors in fish brain. Regul Pept 22: 155-161, 1996.

29.   Liu, DW, and Westerfield M. Clustering of muscle acetylcholine receptors requires motoneurons in live embryos, but not in cell culture. J Neurosci 12: 1859-1866, 1992[Abstract].

30.   Loir, M, and Le Gac F. Insulin-like growth factor-I and -II binding and action on DNA synthesis in rainbow trout spermatogonia and spermatocytes. Biol Reprod 51: 1154-1163, 1994[Abstract].

31.   Maestro, MA, Méndez E, Párrizas M, and Gutiérrez J. Characterization of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I ovarian receptors during the reproductive cycle of carp (Cyprinus carpio). Biol Reprod 56: 1126-1132, 1991[Abstract].

32.   Martal, J. Radioimmunological determination of ovine and bovine growth hormones: study of the iodination conditions and obtention of a radioiodinated somatotropic hormone without prolactin contamination. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D 274: 2893-2896, 1972[Medline].

33.   Mc Farland, DC, Pesall JE, and Gilkerson KK. The influence of growth factors on turkey embryonic myoblasts and satellite cells in vitro. Gen Comp Endocrinol 89: 415-424, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

34.   Méndez, E, Smith A, Figueiredo-Garutti ML, Planas JV, Navarro I, and Gutiérrez J. Receptors for insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) predominate over insulin receptors in skeletal muscle throughout the life cycle of brown trout, Salmo trutta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 122: 148-157, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

35.   Minshall, RD, McFarland DC, and Donmit ME. Interaction of insulin-like growth factor I with turkey satellite cell-derived myotubes. Domest Anim Endocrinol 7: 413-424, 1990[Medline].

36.   Moon, TW, Castejón C, Baños N, Maestro MA, Plisetskaya EM, Gutiérrez J, and Navarro I. Insulin and IGF-I binding in isolated trout cardiomyocytes. Gen Comp Endocrinol 103: 264-272, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

37.   Navarro, I, Leibush B, Moon TW, Plisetskaya EM, Baños N, Méndez E, Planas JV, and Gutiérrez J. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and glucagon: the evolution of their receptors. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 122: 137-153, 1999[Medline].

38.   Párrizas, M, Maestro MA, Baños N, Navarro I, Planas J, and Gutiérrez J. Insulin/IGF-I binding ratio in skeletal and cardiac muscles of vertebrates: a phylogenetic approach. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 269: R1370-R1377, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

39.   Párrizas, M, Planas J, Plisetskaya EM, and Gutiérrez J. Insulin binding and receptor tyrosine kinase activity in skeletal muscle of carnivorous and omnivorous fish. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 266: R1944-R1950, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

40.   Párrizas, M, Plisetskaya EM, Planas J, and Gutiérrez J. Abundant insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) receptor binding in fish skeletal muscle. Gen Comp Endocrinol 98: 16-25, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

41.   Planas, JV, Méndez E, Baños N, Capilla E, Navarro I, and Gutierrez J. Insulin and IGF-I receptors in trout adipose tissue are physiologically regulated by circulating hormone levels. J Exp Biol 203: 1153-1159, 2000[Abstract].

42.   Quinn, LS, Steinmetz B, Mass A, Ong L, and Kaleko M. Type-I insulin-like growth factor receptor overexpression produces dual effects on myoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Physiol 159: 387-398, 1994[Web of Science][Medline].

43.   Rescan, PY, Gauvry L, and Paboeuf G. A gene with homology to myogenin is expressed in developing myotomal musculature of the rainbow trout and in vitro during conversion of myosatellite cells to myotubes. FEBS Lett 362: 89-92, 1995b[Web of Science][Medline].

44.   Rescan, PY, Paboeuf G, and Fauconneau B. Myosatellite cells of Onchorrhynchus mykiss: culture and myogenesis on laminin substrates. Biology of protozoa invertebrates and fishes: in vitro experimental models and applications. IFREMER editions 18: 63-68, 1995.

45.   Rosenthal, SM, Brunetti A, Brown EJ, Manula PW, and Goldfine ID. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I receptor expression during muscle cell differentiation. Potential autocrine role of IGF-II. J Clin Invest 87: 1212-1219, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

46.   Scatchard, G. The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51: 660-672, 1949[Web of Science].

47.   Silverman, LA, Cheng ZQ, Hsiao D, and Rosenthal SM. Skeletal muscle cell-derived insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) binding proteins inhibit IGF-I-induced myogenesis in rat L6E9 cells. Endocrinology 136: 720-726, 1995[Abstract].

48.   Stewart, EH, and Rothwein P. Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiol Rev 76: 1005-1026, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

49.   Vandenburg, HH, Karlisch P, Shansky J, and Feldstein R. Insulin and IGF-I induce pronounced hypertrophy of skeletal myofibers in tissue culture. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 260: C475-C484, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

50.   Yao, K, Niu PD, Le Gac F, and Le Bail PY. Presence of specific growth hormone binding sites in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) tissues: characterization of the hepatic receptor. Gen Comp Endocrinol 81: 72-82, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283(3):R647-R652
0363-6119/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. M. Cleveland, G. M. Weber, K. P. Blemings, and J. T. Silverstein
Insulin-like growth factor-I and genetic effects on indexes of protein degradation in response to feed deprivation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): R1332 - R1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Diaz, Y. Vraskou, J. Gutierrez, and J. V. Planas
Expression of rainbow trout glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT4 during in vitro muscle cell differentiation and regulation by insulin and IGF-I
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): R794 - R800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Xi, M. R. Hathaway, W. R. Dayton, and M. E. White
Growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid expression during differentiation of porcine embryonic myogenic cells
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 143 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Castillo, I. Ammendrup-Johnsen, M. Codina, I. Navarro, and J. Gutierrez
IGF-I and insulin receptor signal transduction in trout muscle cells
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): R1683 - R1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Castillo, M. Codina, M. L. Martinez, I. Navarro, and J. Gutierrez
Metabolic and mitogenic effects of IGF-I and insulin on muscle cells of rainbow trout
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R935 - R941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. A. Johnston, S. Manthri, A. Smart, P. Campbell, D. Nickell, and R. Alderson
Plasticity of muscle fibre number in seawater stages of Atlantic salmon in response to photoperiod manipulation
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2003; 206(19): 3425 - 3435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/3/R647    most recent
00121.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online