|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Adrenoceptor control of G protein function in the
neonate: determinant of desensitization or sensitization
Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neonatal
-adrenoceptors (
-ARs) are resistant to agonist-induced
desensitization. We examined the functioning of Gi and
Gs after repeated administration of
-AR agonists to
newborn rats. Isoproterenol (
1/
2 agonist)
obtunded Gi function in the heart but not the liver; in
contrast, terbutaline, a
2-selective agonist, enhanced
Gi function. Isoproterenol, but not terbutaline, increased membrane-associated Gs
, which would enhance receptor
function. In addition, isoproterenol increased and terbutaline
maintained the proportion of the short-splice (S) variant of
Gs
in the membrane fraction; Gs
S is
functionally more active than the long-splice variant. Either
isoproterenol or terbutaline treatment increased Gs
in
the cytosolic fraction, a characteristic usually associated with
desensitization in the adult. Decreased Gi activity,
coupled with increased membrane-associated Gs
concentrations and maintenance or increases in membrane
Gs
S, provide strong evidence that unique effects on G
protein function underlie the ability of the immature organism to
sustain
-AR cell signaling in the face of excessive or prolonged
stimulation; these mechanisms also contribute to tissue selectivity of
the effects of
-agonists with divergent potencies toward different
-AR subtypes.
development; heart; isoproterenol; liver; terbutaline
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RECEPTOR DESENSITIZATION
REPRESENTS the major mode for cellular homeostasis in the
presence of continued stimulation (12). In the case of
-adrenoceptors (
-ARs) and their signaling mediated through
adenylyl cyclase (AC), attenuation of receptor function is especially
important: prolonged, excessive
-AR stimulation can lead to cell
damage (5, 9, 29, 36). It is therefore critical to note
that, in all mammalian species that have been examined, the ability of
-agonists to elicit desensitization is absent in the fetus or
neonate and is acquired during postnatal development (34, 35, 42,
44). This anomaly has both physiological and therapeutic
implications. The perinatal transition requires a coordinated series of
cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic adjustments
(17). These are triggered by intense catecholaminergic stimulation (17) so that maintenance of
-AR signaling
is critical to perinatal survival and indeed to trophic effects on
general somatic growth (16, 38). Nevertheless, the
deficiency in
-AR desensitization renders developing cells
vulnerable to disruption by
-AR agonists (5, 8, 9, 31).
These effects are likely to account for a number of adverse
consequences noted after fetal exposure to drugs such as terbutaline or
ritodrine,
2-AR agonists that are used to arrest preterm
labor but that also cross the placenta to stimulate fetal
-ARs
(5, 7, 9, 14, 19, 24).
Studies exploring the resistance of immature tissues to
-AR
desensitization uncovered a number of unique features. In neonatal rats
given repeated injections of either isoproterenol or terbutaline, cardiac or hepatic
-AR/AC signaling is not desensitized, but rather
shows agonist-induced sensitization (2, 4, 37). One main
factor accounting for the anomalous response is the induction of AC,
leading to heterologous sensitization of all signals mediated through
this signaling pathway (3, 4, 43, 45); thus administration
of
-AR agonists augments the response to glucagon, which shares the
same effector, AC (3, 42, 45). In addition, alterations in
G protein expression and/or function may also participate in the
production of sensitization instead of desensitization. We recently
found that repeated
-AR agonist administration decreased neonatal
cardiac Gi expression and enhanced Gs function
(42, 44), a response pattern opposite to that typically
seen in the adult (11, 25, 26).
The current study addresses two key issues in
-AR control of G
protein function in the neonate. First, does the
-agonist-induced decrease in Gi expression (44) elicit
impairment of the ability of this protein to control AC activity? There
is a relative excess of G proteins compared with neurotransmitter or
hormone receptors or with AC (23), so that demonstrating a
loss of Gi function is essential. Accordingly, we treated
neonatal rats with
-AR agonist drugs and then evaluated the ability
of pertussis toxin (PTX) to affect AC responses mediated by the
-AR
or by forskolin, a direct AC stimulant whose activity is influenced by
the association of AC with Gs or Gi
(28). The second issue was to determine how neonatal
-agonist treatment elicits an increase in Gs function (42, 44). Overexpression of Gs
protects
-ARs from agonist-induced desensitization (39), so that
an increase in the concentration of Gs
could provide a
ready explanation for enhanced receptor-Gs coupling.
Gs
is in equilibrium between the cell membrane and
cytosol (21), and in the mature cell,
-AR activation
displaces Gs
from membrane to cytosol, contributing to
desensitization (41). Similarly, during development, there
are major shifts both in the expression of specific long- and
short-splice variants of Gs
(Gs
L and
Gs
S, respectively) and in the relative proportions of
each variant in the membrane-bound and cytosolic fractions
(21). Accordingly, we evaluated the relative proportions of Gs
L and Gs
S in membrane and cytosol
after neonatal
-agonist administration to determine the potential
role of these factors in the ability of the neonate to resist desensitization.
In designing these studies, we used models based on our earlier work
that delineated tissue- and
-AR-subtype selectivity for the balance
between agonist-induced neonatal sensitization and desensitization
(3, 4, 42-45). First, we compared the effects of
isoproterenol, a mixed
1/
2-AR agonist, to
those of terbutaline, which is more selective for
2-ARs.
Second, we contrasted effects on the heart to those in the liver; these
two tissues differ both in their relative expression of
-AR subtypes
(
1 predominant in heart,
2 in liver) and
in their ontogenetic patterns of receptor expression, because the heart
acquires
-ARs during neonatal development (18), whereas
the liver shows developmental decrements in
-AR expression
(13).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal treatments.
Studies were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki
and with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted and promulgated by the National Institutes of
Health. Timed pregnant female Sprague-Dawley rats were shipped by
climate-controlled truck (transit time 12 h) and housed with free
access to food and water. The day after birth, pups were randomized and
redistributed to the nursing dams with a litter size of 10;
randomization was repeated daily and, in addition, dams were reassigned
to different litters to distribute any maternal differences equally.
Equivalent numbers of males and females were assigned to each treatment
group. On postnatal days 2-5, pups were given daily subcutaneous injections of
L-isoproterenol hydrochloride (1.25 mg/kg), terbutaline
hemisulfate (10 mg/kg), or an equivalent volume (1 ml/kg) of isotonic
saline vehicle. These regimens elicit robust
-AR downregulation in
the adult (2) but produce sensitization of
-AR/AC
signaling in the neonate (3, 4, 37, 42-45). Twenty-four hours after the final injection, one animal was selected from each litter, and hearts and livers were frozen in liquid nitrogen
and stored at
45°C.
PTX treatment of membranes. PTX treatment of membranes was adapted from an earlier study (15). Tissues were thawed and homogenized (Polytron, Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY) in 39 vol of ice-cold buffer containing 145 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and sedimented at 40,000 g for 15 min. The pellets were washed once by resuspension (Polytron) in homogenization buffer followed by resedimentation and were then dispersed with a homogenizer (smooth glass fitted with a Teflon pestle) to achieve a protein concentration of 2-4 mg/ml in a buffer consisting of 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4). Aliquots of membrane preparations containing 0.4-0.8 mg protein were incubated for 30 min at 30°C in the presence or absence of 1 ng/µl PTX (activated by preincubation with 10 mM dithiothreitol for 30 min at 30°C), and with final concentrations of 50 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 2.5 mM ATP, 4 mM GTP, 10 mM thymidine, and 10 mM dithiothreitol. Membranes were then sedimented at 40,000 g for 15 min and then resuspended (smooth glass fitted with a Teflon pestle) to achieve a final protein concentration of 0.5-1.0 mg/ml in a buffer consisting of 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4).
AC activity.
Aliquots of membrane preparation containing 25-50 µg protein
were incubated for 30 min at 30°C with final concentrations of 100 mM
Tris · HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM theophylline, 1 mM ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and a creatine
phosphokinase-ATP-regenerating system consisting of 10 mM sodium
phosphocreatine and 8 IU/ml phosphocreatine kinase, with 10 µM GTP in
a total volume of 250 µl. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by
placing the samples in a 90-100°C water bath for 5 min, followed
by sedimentation at 3,000 g for 15 min; the supernatant
solution was assayed for cAMP using radioimmunoassay kits. Preliminary
experiments showed that the enzymatic reaction was linear well beyond
the assay period and was linear with membrane protein concentration;
concentrations of cofactors were optimal and, in particular, the
addition of higher concentrations of GTP produced no further
augmentation of activity. In addition to measuring basal AC activity,
we assessed the response to
-AR stimulation by addition of
L-isoproterenol (100 µM), as well as the response to the
direct AC stimulant forskolin (100 µM). Gi function was
then determined by comparing the activity in membranes that had been
preincubated with PTX to those that had undergone the same
preincubation without PTX.
Gs
isolation and quantitation.
To separate membrane-bound from cytosolic Gs
, tissues
were homogenized (Polytron) in 9 vol of ice-cold buffer containing 145 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), with freshly added
protease inhibitor (0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Homogenates
were sedimented at 600 g for 5 min, and the supernatant solution was then sedimented at 50,000 g for 30 min to
separate cell membranes from the cytosol. Pellets were dispersed with a Polytron in one-half the original volume of buffer and aliquots of
supernatants and resuspended pellets were stored at
80°C.
isoforms were determined by Western immunoblot
analysis essentially as described previously (44).
Aliquots containing 40 µg of protein were diluted in buffer
containing 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromphenol
blue, 100 mM dithiothreitol, and 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8) and denatured for
5 min at 65°C. Samples were then separated by electrophoresis, after
which proteins were transferred from the gels to nitrocellulose
membranes at 100 V for 1.5 h. The membranes were shaken for 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution, consisting of 200 mM
CaCl2, 800 mM NaCl, 0.0025% sodium azide, 0.2% NP-40, 5%
nonfat dry milk, and 200 mM Tris (pH 7.7). Antibody specific to
Gs
(diluted 1:10,000) was then added for a further
1 h incubation, after which there were three 10-min washes with
blocking solution. The membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit
IgG (Fc) alkaline phosphatase conjugate (1:7,500) for 1 h,
followed by three washes in blocking solution, two rinses in 200 mM
CaCl2, 800 mM NaCl, and 200 mM Tris (pH 7.7), and three
2-min washes in 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, and 50 mM Tris (pH 7.7).
The blots were developed in 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM
Tris, 0.17 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, and 0.33 mg/ml
nitroblue tetrazolium (pH 9.5), and images were digitized and quantitated.
As we evaluated subcellular fractions containing different populations
of proteins, it was not feasible to standardize the preparations
against a housekeeping protein such as
-actin, especially as the
study involved drugs that specifically alter cardiac contractile proteins. Accordingly, we ensured standardization of the Western blots
in several ways. First, protein concentrations were measured before
blotting to ensure that exactly the same amount of protein was applied
to each lane. Second, in addition to the samples, a standard
preparation from the same adult heart was run on every blot to enable
normalization of values between blots. Furthermore, a sample of
authentic Gs
L and Gs
S was included both to identify the bands and to standardize the hybridization of these
specific proteins from blot to blot. Finally, each blot contained a
protein ladder to verify molecular weights of the Gs
bands. Values were calculated in relative units by dividing the reading
for each band by the value of the standard preparation run on the same
blot. Thus, although the actual measurement units are arbitrary, the
values maintained their relative proportions and could be contrasted
among ages, treatments, and tissues.
Data analysis.
Data are presented as means and SEs, with intergroup differences
established by ANOVA (data log-transformed whenever variance was
heterogeneous), incorporating all relevant variables: treatment, specific agonist, and tissue; for AC studies, values with vs. without
PTX; for Gs
distribution studies, Gs
L vs.
Gs
S, and cytosol vs. membrane. Fisher's protected least
significant difference was used post hoc to establish differences among
individual treatments for each variable; this was carried out only
where the global test indicated an interaction between treatment and the other variables; in the absence of significant interactions, only
main treatment effects were compiled. Significance was assumed at the
level of P < 0.05 for main effects; however, for
interactions at P < 0.1, we also examined whether
lower-order main effects were detectable after subdivision of the
interactive variables (33).
Materials.
Rats were obtained from Zivic Laboratories (Pittsburgh, PA). cAMP
radioimmunoassay kits were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
(Piscataway, NJ). Gs
S, Gs
L, and
Gs
antibody were gifts from Dr. P. J. Casey (Duke
University, Durham, NC) and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Fc) alkaline
phosphatase conjugate was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). All
other reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before evaluating Gi function with PTX, we assessed
the effect of preincubation of the cardiac and hepatic membranes with the reagents required for PTX-induced ADP ribosylation, but conducted in the absence of PTX itself. The preincubation led to a loss of
~50% of basal AC activity
(pmol · min
1 · g tissue
1)
in control preparations: heart, 432 ± 17 without preincubation, 196 ± 9 with preincubation (n = 12, P < 0.0001); liver, 311 ± 13 without
preincubation, 160 ± 9 with preincubation (n = 12, P < 0.0001). However, the specific
-AR-mediated
cardiac response (isoproterenol-stimulated/basal AC) was not reduced
and was actually increased over the unincubated condition (2.43 ± 0.08 without preincubation, 3.80 ± 0.21 with preincubation,
n = 12, P < 0.0001). In the liver, the
preincubation led to the loss of about one-third of the net
-AR
response, but robust stimulation was still evident (2.57 ± 0.05 without preincubation, 1.93 ± 0.18 with preincubation, n = 12, P < 0.005). Similarly, the
forskolin response (forskolin-stimulated/basal AC) remained robust
despite the preincubation: heart, 44 ± 2 without preincubation,
49 ± 3 with preincubation (n = 12, not
significant); liver, 16.1 ± 1.0 without preincubation, 12.2 ± 0.6 with preincubation (n = 12, P < 0.005). The loss of AC activity entailed by the preincubation required
for ADP ribosylation agrees with an earlier report (1).
Next, we determined the effects of the neonatal
-agonist treatments
on AC in the membrane preparations preincubated for ADP ribosylation
but without addition of PTX (Table 1).
Neither isoproterenol nor terbutaline administration had any
significant effect on basal AC activity in heart and liver. In accord
with earlier results (3, 4, 45), the
-AR-mediated AC
response did not exhibit pronounced desensitization in animals treated
with either of the
-agonists. Animals given isoproterenol displayed
sensitization (10-15% increase), whereas those given terbutaline
showed a small (5-10%) decrement in the response. Similarly, the
response to forskolin showed significant enhancement in the animals
given isoproterenol (10% increase in the heart, 25% increase in the liver) but was unchanged by neonatal terbutaline treatment.
|
-AR agonists affect Gi signaling.
Before examining effects of PTX on individual components of AC
signaling, we performed a global ANOVA incorporating all treatments, both tissues, and the three different AC measures (basal,
-AR response, forskolin response). This initial test indicated a
significant overall increase in AC activity evoked by PTX (main effect,
P < 0.0001) and significant interactions of
treatment × tissue × PTX (P < 0.009) and
treatment × PTX × AC measure (P < 0.0004). Accordingly, we evaluated the three AC measures separately across the
two different tissues. For basal activity, PTX failed to cause an
overall stimulation of AC (Fig. 1).
Although a tissue-selective effect was seen (treatment × tissue
interaction for the response to PTX), the only individually significant
change was a small (5%) increment in the effect of PTX in the liver of
isoproterenol-treated animals; other differences of similar magnitude
were inconsistent and did not achieve statistical significance.
|
-AR-mediated response showed robust overall enhancement when the
membranes were preincubated with PTX (Fig. 1). Treatment of neonates
with
-agonists had a significant effect on the PTX response
(treatment × PTX interaction) that differed between the two
tissues (treatment × tissue × PTX interaction). In the
heart, PTX elicited an increase in
-AR-mediated AC stimulation in
controls, whereas the response to PTX was completely absent in animals
given isoproterenol treatment; in contrast, terbutaline treatment
elicited a significant increase in the PTX response. In the liver, PTX elicited a small overall enhancement of the
-AR-mediated response, with little or no alteration evoked by isoproterenol or terbutaline treatment.
Preincubation of cardiac and hepatic membranes with PTX also increased
the AC response to forskolin (forskolin/basal AC activity; main effect
of PTX, P < 0.03). However, neither isoproterenol nor
terbutaline treatment evoked any significant alterations in the PTX
effect. Values for the ratio of forskolin response with/without PTX
were heart: control 1.02 ± 0.02, isoproterenol 1.02 ± 0.02, terbutaline 0.99 ± 0.03; liver: 1.05 ± 0.03, 1.11 ± 0.04, and 1.02 ± 0.06, respectively.
-AR agonists affect Gs
subcellular distribution
and splice variants.
Western blot analysis of Gs
detected both
Gs
L (52 kDa) and Gs
S (45 kDa) isoforms in
the membrane and cytosolic fractions of neonatal tissues (Fig.
2). Quantitation was conducted on a
relative basis because of incompatibilities in measuring the absolute
quantities present in the membrane vs. cytosolic fractions:
determinations were conducted relative to a fixed amount of protein
loaded onto the gel, but absolute concentrations of membrane and
cytosolic proteins in intact cells are not equivalent; additionally,
the membrane fraction required solubilization and attendant recovery
corrections, factors that do not operate for the cytosolic fraction. We
did, however, include standards to ensure blot-to-blot comparability
(see METHODS).
|
, evaluated as the total of
Gs
L and Gs
S, with a prominent effect in
the liver (
2.5-fold above control values) and a more modest effect
(
30% increase) in the heart (Fig.
3A). In contrast, treatment
with terbutaline did not affect membrane Gs
levels.
Changes in cytosolic Gs
were quantitatively and
qualitatively different from those in the membrane fraction (Fig.
3B). Isoproterenol evoked a marked increase (
2.5-fold) that was equivalent for both the heart and liver; terbutaline also
caused significant elevations of cytosolic Gs
.
Selectivity of the shift toward cytosolic Gs
was readily
evident from the ratio of cytosol/membrane values (Fig. 3C):
terbutaline preferentially and significantly increased cytosolic
Gs
, whereas isoproterenol was much less effective (not
statistically significant). In addition, the liver showed a much higher
relative pool of cytosolic Gs
than the heart (note
different scales for Fig. 3C).
|
splice variants also influence the
effectiveness of
-AR signal transduction (6). In the
neonatal heart, Gs
S was a minor species of the membrane
fraction, accounting for only ~5% of membrane Gs
(Fig. 4A). In the neonatal
liver, however, Gs
S represented nearly 40% of
membrane-associated Gs
. Isoproterenol treatment, but not
terbutaline treatment, substantially increased the proportion of
Gs
S in both tissues. In contrast to the membrane
fractions, nearly all of the cytosolic fraction was Gs
S
(Fig. 4B). Isoproterenol treatment had little or no effect
on the proportion of cytosolic Gs
S in the heart but
evoked a significant decrement in the liver. Terbutaline treatment decreased the proportion of Gs
S in the cardiac cytosol;
although the hepatic effect was not significant compared with control
values, it also could not be distinguished from the effect in the heart (treatment × tissue interaction was not significant for
terbutaline), and the main effect of terbutaline was significant
(P < 0.02) when compiled across both tissues.
|
-agonist
treatment on Gs
distribution and isoforms were unique to
development. Adult male rats (275 g body wt, 6 animals per treatment
group) were given the same isoproterenol regimen as that used in
neonates. Twenty-four hours after the last dose, we evaluated the
characteristics of hepatic Gs
. Membrane Gs
increased ~35% after isoproterenol exposure
(control, 2.5 ± 0.3 units; isoproterenol, 3.4 ± 0.5), a
much smaller effect than had been seen in the neonate (treatment × age, P < 0.04). In the adult,
isoproterenol treatment did not produce a significant increase in
cytosolic Gs
(control, 2.0 ± 0.2 units;
isoproterenol, 2.3 ± 0.2), and again this was statistically
distinguishable from the increase seen in the neonate (treatment × age, P < 0.05). The proportion of membrane
Gs
S was unaffected by isoproterenol treatment in the
adult liver (control, 55 ± 2%; isoproterenol, 52 ± 2%),
whereas the same treatment evoked a robust increase in the neonate
(treatment × age, P < 0.03). Finally, in the
adult, isoproterenol treatment did not alter the proportion of
cytosolic Gs
representing the short-splice variant
(control, 84 ± 2%; isoproterenol, 79 ± 3%), whereas it
had elicited a significant reduction in the neonate.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Repeated isoproterenol administration to neonatal rats increased
the AC response to
-AR stimulation in both the heart and liver,
instead of uncoupling receptors from the signaling pathway. In previous
work, we showed that induction of AC is responsible, in part, for
agonist-induced sensitization in the neonate (43). In
addition, unique adaptations at the level of G proteins have been
hypothesized to contribute to the response pattern: isoproterenol administration reduces the concentration of Gi and enhances
-AR coupling to Gs (42, 44). Results
obtained here indicate that the isoproterenol-induced reduction in
Gi produces a decrement in the function of this inhibitory
G protein: PTX increased the cardiac AC response to
-AR stimulation
in membrane preparations from control animals but failed to do so in
membranes from isoproterenol-treated animals. In contrast, in mature
cardiac cells, isoproterenol increases Gi expression and
activity, contributing to desensitization (26). A decrease
in Gi function thus helps produce the opposite response, heterologous sensitization of
-AR signaling, seen in the neonate.
Isoproterenol treatment elicited an ~30% reduction in the
concentration of Gi, yet the inhibitory contribution of
Gi to the net
-AR signal was completely lost. Thus,
although the G proteins are in stoichiometric excess compared with
-ARs or AC (23), loss of a relatively minor proportion
nevertheless is sufficient to compromise the response. Recent evidence
indicates that
-AR function is determined by restriction of
signaling elements to caveolae containing the receptor juxtaposed to
its target proteins (22) and our results suggest that the
loss of Gi is likely to involve decrements in protein
colocalized with
-ARs. Furthermore, the isoproterenol-induced
decrement in Gi signaling may contribute ultimately to
adverse effects on neonatal cardiac function. Vagal parasympathetic
control of heart rate and contractility involve cholinergic receptors
operating through Gi, and these are only weakly established
in the neonatal period (20). The same isoproterenol treatment found here to interfere with Gi function, elicits
a decrement in cardiac m2-cholinergic receptor expression
(10), so that the combination of downregulation of the
Gi-linked m2-receptor, downregulation of
Gi and loss of Gi function can cumulate to
produce impairment of vagal cardiac signaling.
Our results for effects of isoproterenol in the liver and for
terbutaline in both heart and liver provide a third corollary: loss of
the PTX-related component of AC signaling was not seen in the liver
after neonatal isoproterenol treatment, nor in either tissue when the
2-selective agonist terbutaline was substituted for
isoproterenol. Given the predominance of
1-ARs in the
heart and
2-ARs in the liver (2, 32), these
results suggest that the suppression of Gi expression and
function are specifically related to stimulation of the
1-AR subtype. In fact, terbutaline tended to increase
the inhibitory actions mediated by Gi, as evidenced by an
augmented cardiac AC response to treatment of the membranes with PTX;
this resembles the homeostatic response that is seen ordinarily in
mature cells (26). The importance of Gi in
determining the net response, heterologous sensitization vs.
desensitization, is illustrated by the fact that terbutaline, unlike
isoproterenol, did not sensitize the AC response to
-AR stimulation.
Although our results indicate that Gi-mediated signaling
responds differently to
-AR stimulation in neonates compared with adults, this factor cannot totally explain why agonist administration elicits sensitization instead of desensitization, as the PTX-sensitive component of AC activity represented no more than 15% of the total AC
signal. Accordingly, we also examined effects on Gs.
Earlier work indicated that cardiac
-AR coupling to Gs
was enhanced after neonatal isoproterenol administration, instead of
exhibiting the uncoupling typical of the mature cell (42).
In the current study, we found a modest (30%) increase in the
Gs
concentration in cardiac membranes but a massive
(2.5-fold) increase in hepatic membranes; because Gs
overexpression is known to protect cells from
-AR desensitization
(39), our findings provide a ready explanation for the
ability of hepatic cells to maintain their signaling capabilities
despite the fact that they did not display a loss of Gi
function. Again, this was seen with isoproterenol treatment but not
with terbutaline. Nevertheless, we found increased Gs
expression in the cytosolic fractions of both cardiac and hepatic cells
after neonatal treatment with either of the
-agonist drugs. In the
mature cell,
-AR-mediated heterologous desensitization involves a
shift of Gs
from the membrane to the cytosol, where it
is incapable of coupling to the membrane-associated
-ARs
(41). Our findings indicate that this component of
desensitization is intact in immature cells. However, as isoproterenol
induced Gs
by the same proportion in both the membrane
and cytosolic fractions, the removal of Gs
from the
membrane was offset, so that membrane signaling was sustained. With
terbutaline administration, the membrane component was maintained (but
not enhanced), whereas the cytosolic fraction showed the increase
characteristic of desensitization; accordingly,
-AR/AC signaling was
preserved with the terbutaline model, but did not show the enhancement
that was characteristic of the isoproterenol treatment paradigm. For
these effects, relative contributions of
1-ARs and
2-ARs cannot explain the differences in effects
between isoproterenol and terbutaline. Isoproterenol had a much greater
proportional effect on membrane-associated Gs
in the
liver, which expresses the
2-subtype, than in the heart,
which has a
1-AR majority (2, 32). If
receptor subtype dictated the tissue difference, then terbutaline
should have been even more efficacious, whereas it actually had a
smaller effect. It is thus likely that the differences in
responsiveness with the two treatments reflect another factor; as
terbutaline is longer lasting than isoproterenol, it is possible that
episodic stimulation of
-ARs elicits greater Gs
induction or, alternatively, that continuous stimulation by terbutaline
provides for neonatal upregulation of Gs
but combined
with the internalization that is characteristic of adult-type
desensitization. The greater contribution of desensitization components
to the terbutaline response is likely to explain why heterologous
sensitization of the
-AR/AC pathway is less notable after
terbutaline than after isoproterenol (4, 37). Regardless
of the differences in details of the effects of isoproterenol and
terbutaline, our findings for the effects on the expression and
subcellular distribution of Gs indicate an additional
unique mechanism not present in the adult that contributes to the
resistance of immature cells to agonist-induced desensitization.
We also evaluated the effects of neonatal
-agonist administration on
splice variants of Gs
. The lower molecular weight subtype, Gs
S, has greater functional activity than the
longer splice variant, Gs
L (6, 40).
Neonatal isoproterenol treatment increased membrane Gs
S
in both the heart and liver but by differing mechanisms. In the heart,
the increase in membrane-associated Gs
S occurred without
a corresponding decrease in the cytosolic fraction, thus representing
net induction of the protein. In fact, neonatal isoproterenol treatment
shifted the proportion of the Gs
S splice variant in
neonates to approximate the higher value in the normal adult heart
(41) or liver (this study), suggesting that neonatal
isoproterenol treatment accelerates the maturational profile of
Gs
splice variants. This actually matches the functional
effect, which is to shift
-AR association with G proteins from the
lower efficacy of the neonate to the higher coupling characteristic of
the adult (42). In the liver, the increase in
membrane-associated Gs
S was juxtaposed to a decrease in
the cytosolic fraction, thus implying redistribution rather than (or in
addition to) induction. Regardless of the mechanism, induction or
redistribution, either effect would contribute to preservation or
enhancement of
-AR/AC signaling. Furthermore, both effects represent
actions that are unique to development: no such changes were seen in
adult hepatic cells in the present study, nor in earlier work with
mature cardiac cells (41). As before, the response to
terbutaline differed from isoproterenol and resembled those associated
with desensitization (i.e., no change in membrane-associated
Gs
S but a decrease in the cytosolic fraction), effects
that are likely to offset agonist-induced sensitization of AC as seen
with terbutaline (2-4).
Superimposed on the disparities in effects between isoproterenol and
terbutaline, some of the differences in G protein expression or
function may reflect selectivities dictated by the types of cells or
tissues over and above any contribution from different
-AR subtypes.
Although they both express
-ARs and G proteins, cardiac and hepatic
cells obviously bear little resemblance to each other, either in their
repertoires of other proteins or in their differentiation
characteristics. As just one example, cardiac cells undergo terminal
differentiation and lose the ability to replicate, whereas hepatic
cells maintain mitotic capabilities into adulthood (27).
Thus terbutaline treatment evoked an increase in Gi
function in the heart (augmented
-AR stimulation in PTX-treated membranes) but not in the liver, despite the fact that hepatic cells
express a higher proportion of
2-ARs. Similar tissue
disparities are likely to contribute to differential effects of
-agonists on G protein splice variants and their subcellular
distributions. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated disparate patterns
of terbutaline-induced sensitization vs. desensitization in different
brain regions, with the outcome dictated by the maturational timetable
for each region (30). Factors dictated by the cellular
milieu may thus contribute to some of the differences in the effects of
isoproterenol and terbutaline on
-AR-mediated responses in cardiac
and hepatic cells, but obviously, future work with other tissues will
be needed to clarify this issue.
In conclusion, we found changes in G protein concentrations,
subcellular distribution, and functional activity that provide mechanistic explanations for the resistance of neonatal
-ARs to
desensitization: loss of inhibitory actions mediated through Gi, enhancement of membrane-associated Gs
,
and a shift to expression of the more active, short-splice
Gs
variant. Differences in the relative contributions of
each of these factors explain the disparities of effects seen for
neonatal isoproterenol vs. terbutaline treatments on
-AR/AC
signaling in the heart and liver. However, for either treatment, the
net effect of these mechanisms, superimposed on induction of AC
(43) and resistance to agonist-induced
-AR
downregulation (2, 4, 37), combines to preserve and enhance cell signaling mediated by
-ARs during the critical period of the perinatal transition (17).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD-09713.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. A. Slotkin, Box 3813 DUMC, Dept. of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke Univ. Med. Ctr., Durham, NC 27710 (E mail: t.slotkin{at}duke.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
August 29, 2002;10.1152/ajpregu.00409.2002
Received 9 July 2002; accepted in final form 9 August 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Anand-Srivastava, MB,
Srivastava AK,
and
Cantin M.
Pertussis toxin attenuates atrial natriuretic factor-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase.
J Biol Chem
262:
4931-4934,
1987
2.
Auman, JT,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Regulation of fetal cardiac and hepatic
-adrenoceptors and adenylyl cyclase signaling: terbutaline effects.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
281:
R1079-R1089,
2001
3.
Auman, JT,
Seidler FJ,
Tate CA,
and
Slotkin TA.
Are developing
-adrenoceptors able to desensitize? Acute and chronic effects of
-agonists in neonatal heart and liver.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
283:
R205-R217,
2002
4.
Auman, JT,
Seidler FJ,
Tate CA,
and
Slotkin TA.
-Adrenoceptor-mediated cell signaling in the neonatal heart and liver: responses to terbutaline.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
281:
R1895-R1901,
2001
5.
Bey, M,
Blanchard AC,
Darnell J,
and
Stephens K.
Myocardial necrosis in a newborn after long-term maternal subcutaneous terbutaline for suppression of premature labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
167:
292,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Bourova, L,
Pesanova Z,
Novotny J,
Bengtsson T,
and
Svoboda P.
Differentiation of cultured brown adipocytes is associated with a selective increase in the short variant of Gs
protein: evidence for higher functional activity of Gs
S.
Mol Cell Endocrinol
167:
23-31,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Caritis, SN,
Darby MJ,
and
Chan L.
Pharmacologic treatment of preterm labor.
Clin Obstet Gynecol
31:
635-651,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Claycomb, WC.
Biochemical aspects of cardiac muscle differentiation.
J Biol Chem
251:
6082-6089,
1976
9.
Fletcher, SE,
Fyfe DA,
Case CL,
Wiles HB,
Upshur JK,
and
Newman RB.
Myocardial necrosis in a newborn after long-term maternal subcutaneous terbutaline infusion for suppression of preterm labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
165:
1401-1404,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Garofolo, MC,
Seidler FJ,
Auman JT,
and
Slotkin TA.
-Adrenergic modulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptor expression and function in the developing heart.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
282:
R1356-R1363,
2002
11.
Hadcock, JR,
Ros M,
Watkins DC,
and
Malbon CC.
Cross-regulation between G-protein-mediated pathways: stimulation of adenylyl cyclase increases expression of the inhibitory G-protein, Gi
2.
J Biol Chem
265:
14784-14790,
1990
12.
Hausdorff, WP,
Caron MG,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Turning off the signal: desensitization of
-adrenergic receptor function.
FASEB J
4:
2881-2889,
1990[Abstract].
13.
Huff, RA,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Glucocorticoids regulate the ontogenetic transition of adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat liver.
Life Sci
48:
1059-1066,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Ingemarsson, I,
Westgren M,
Lindberg C,
Ahrén B,
Lundquist I,
and
Carlsson C.
Single injection of terbutaline in term labor: placental transfer and effects on maternal and fetal carbohydrate metabolism.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
139:
697-701,
1981[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Kilts, JD,
Gerhardt MA,
Richardson MD,
Sreeram G,
Mackensen GB,
Grocott HP,
White WD,
Davis RD,
Newman MF,
Reves JG,
Schwinn DA,
and
Kwatra MM.
2-adrenergic and several other G protein-coupled receptors in human atrial membranes activate both Gs and Gi.
Circ Res
87:
705-709,
2000
16.
Kudlacz, EM,
Navarro HA,
Eylers JP,
and
Slotkin TA.
Adrenergic modulation of cardiac development in the rat: effects of prenatal exposure to propranolol via continuous maternal infusion.
J Dev Physiol
13:
243-249,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Lagercrantz, H,
and
Slotkin TA.
The "stress" of being born.
Sci Am
254:
100-107,
1986.
18.
Lau, C,
and
Slotkin TA.
Maturation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat heart. II Enhanced development of presynaptic and postsynaptic components of noradrenergic synapses as a result of neonatal hyperthyroidism.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
212:
126-130,
1980
19.
Lenselink, DR,
Kuhlmann RS,
Lawrence JM,
and
Kolesari GL.
Cardiovascular teratogenicity of terbutaline and ritodrine in the chick embryo.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
171:
501-506,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Mills, E.
Time course for development of vagal inhibition of the heart in neonatal rats.
Life Sci
23:
2717-2720,
1978[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Novotny, J,
Bourova L,
Malkova O,
Svoboda P,
and
Kolar F.
G-proteins,
-adrenoceptors and
-adrenergic responsiveness in immature and adult rat ventricular myocardium: influence of neonatal hypo- and hyperthyroidism.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
31:
761-772,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Ostrom, RS,
Gregorian C,
Drenan RM,
Xiang Y,
Regan JW,
and
Insel PA.
Receptor number and caveolar co-localization determine receptor coupling efficiency to adenylyl cyclase.
J Biol Chem
276:
42063-42069,
2001
23.
Post, SR,
Hilal-Dandan R,
Urasawa K,
Brunton LL,
and
Insel PA.
Quantification of signalling components and amplification in the
-adrenergic-receptor-adenylate cyclase pathway in isolated adult rat ventricular myocytes.
Biochem J
311:
75-80,
1995.
24.
Queisserluft, A,
Eggers I,
Stolz G,
Kieningerbaum D,
and
Schlaefer K.
Serial examination of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants: correlations between drug exposure and major malformations.
Am J Med Genet
63:
268-276,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Reithmann, C,
Gierschik P,
Müller U,
Werdan K,
and
Jakobs KH.
Pseudomonas exotoxin A prevents
-adrenoceptor-induced upregulation of Gi protein
-subunits and adenylyl cyclase desensitization in rat heart muscle cells.
Mol Pharmacol
37:
631-638,
1990[Abstract].
26.
Reithmann, C,
Gierschik P,
Sidiropoulos D,
Werdan K,
and
Jakobs KH.
Mechanism of noradrenaline-induced heterologous desensitization of adenylate cyclase stimulation in rat heart muscle cells: increase in the level of inhibitory G-protein
-subunits.
Eur J Pharmacol
172:
211-221,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Renick, S,
Seidler FJ,
McCook EC,
and
Slotkin TA.
Neuronal control of cardiac and hepatic macromolecule synthesis in the neonatal rat: effects of sympathectomy.
Pediatr Res
41:
359-363,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
28.
Seamon, KB,
and
Daly JW.
Forskolin: its biological and chemical properties.
Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Protein Phosphorylation Res
20:
1-150,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
Shizukuda, Y,
Buttrick PM,
Geenen DL,
Borczuk AC,
Kitsis RN,
and
Sonnenblick EH.
-Adrenergic stimulation causes cardiocyte apoptosis: influence of tachycardia and hypertrophy.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
274:
H961-H968,
1998.
30.
Slotkin, TA,
Tate CA,
Cousins MM,
and
Seidler FJ.
-Adrenoceptor signaling in the developing brain: sensitization or desensitization in response to terbutaline.
Dev Brain Res
131:
113-125,
2001.
31.
Slotkin, TA,
Whitmore WL,
Orband-Miller L,
Queen KL,
and
Haim K.
Beta adrenergic control of macromolecule synthesis in neonatal rat heart, kidney and lung: relationship to sympathetic neuronal development.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
243:
101-109,
1987
32.
Slotkin, TA,
Zhang J,
Dancel R,
Garcia SJ,
Willis C,
and
Seidler FJ.
-Adrenoceptor signaling and its control of cell replication in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
60:
153-166,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
33.
Snedecor, GW,
and
Cochran WG.
Statistical Methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1967.
34.
Stein, HM,
Oyama K,
Sapien R,
Chappell BA,
and
Padbury JF.
Prolonged
-agonist infusion does not induce desensitization or down-regulation of
-adrenergic receptors in newborn sheep.
Pediatr Res
31:
462-467,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Sun, LS.
Regulation of myocardial
-adrenergic receptor function in adult and neonatal rabbits.
Biol Neonate
76:
181-192,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Teerlink, JR,
Pfeffer JM,
and
Pfeffer MA.
Progressive ventricular remodeling in response to diffuse isoproterenol-induced myocardial necrosis in rats.
Circ Res
75:
105-113,
1994
37.
Thai, L,
Galluzzo JM,
McCook EC,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Atypical regulation of hepatic adenylyl cyclase and adrenergic receptors during a critical developmental period: agonists evoke supersensitivity accompanied by failure of receptor downregulation.
Pediatr Res
39:
697-707,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Tseng, YT,
Kopel R,
Stabila JP,
McGonnigal BG,
Nguyen TT,
Gruppuso PA,
and
Padbury JF.
-Adrenergic receptors (
AR) regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation during early postnatal life.
FASEB J
15:
1921-1926,
2001
39.
Vatner, DE,
Asai K,
Iwase M,
Ishikawa Y,
Wagner TE,
Shannon RP,
Homcy CJ,
and
Vatner SF.
Overexpression of myocardial Gs
prevents full expression of catecholamine desensitization despite increased
-adrenergic receptor kinase.
J Clin Invest
101:
1916-1922,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Walseth, TF,
Zhang HJ,
Olson LK,
Schroeder WA,
and
Robertson RP.
Increase in Gs and cyclic AMP generation in HIT cells: evidence that the 45-kDa
-subunit of Gs has greater functional activity than the 52-kDA
-subunit.
J Biol Chem
264:
21106-21111,
1989
41.
Witte, K,
Schnecko A,
and
Lemmer B.
Agonist-induced release of splice variants of the
subunit of the stimulatory G-protein from rat cardiac membranes.
Biochem Pharmacol
57:
539-543,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
Iaccarino G,
Koch WJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of cardiac
-adrenoceptor desensitization mechanisms: agonist treatment enhances receptor/G-protein transduction rather than eliciting uncoupling.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
31:
413-423,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Agonist-induced sensitization of
-adrenoceptor signaling in neonatal rat heart: expression and catalytic activity of adenylyl cyclase.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
291:
503-510,
1999
44.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of G-protein expression: control by
-adrenoceptors.
Dev Brain Res
120:
125-134,
2000.
45.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of regulatory mechanisms for
-adrenoceptor control of rat cardiac adenylyl cyclase: targeting of G-proteins and the cyclase catalytic subunit.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
603-615,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Lynch and J. G. Ryall Role of {beta}-Adrenoceptor Signaling in Skeletal Muscle: Implications for Muscle Wasting and Disease Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 729 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schwimmer, L. Eli-Berchoer, and M. Horowitz Acclimatory-phase specificity of gene expression during the course of heat acclimation and superimposed hypohydration in the rat hypothalamus J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 1992 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |