|
|
||||||||
Cardiorespiratory and Vascular Dynamics Laboratory, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cerebrovascular autoregulation is
evaluated from spontaneous fluctuations in mean flow velocity (MFV) by
transcranial Doppler ultrasound of the middle cerebral artery (MCA)
with respect to changes in arterial blood pressure (BPMCA),
but the effects of spontaneous fluctuations in arterial
PCO2 on MFV have been largely ignored.
Autoregressive moving average analysis (ARMA), a closed-loop system
identification technique, was applied to data from nine healthy
subjects during spontaneous breathing, during inspiration of 10%
CO2 for two breaths once per minute for 4 min, and during sustained breathing of 7% CO2. Cerebrovascular resistance
index (CVRi) was calculated (CVRi = BPMCA/MFV).
Reliable estimates of gain for BPMCA
MFV were obtained
for spontaneous breathing and the two-breath method. In contrast,
reliable gain estimates for PCO2
MFV or
PCO2
CVRi were achieved only under the
two-breath method. PCO2
MFV gain was
smaller with the two-breath method than during sustained 7%
CO2 (P < 0.05). BPMCA was
elevated by 7% CO2 but not by the two-breath method. The
closed-loop model provides insight into interactions between
BPMCA and PCO2 on cerebrovascular control, but reliable solutions for PCO2
effects with ARMA analysis require perturbation by the two-breath method.
autoregressive moving average analysis modeling; arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; Doppler ultrasound; cerebral blood flow; autoregulation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CEREBROVASCULAR AUTOREGULATION maintains a relatively constant cerebral blood flow across a wide range of arterial blood pressure [BPMCA, corrected at the level of the middle cerebral artery (MCA)], and its impairment can be associated with cerebrovascular disease (1). Frequency domain analysis has become popular to characterize dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation from spontaneous fluctuations in BPMCA and mean flow velocity (MFV) (2, 3, 8, 15, 22, 34). However, these analyses fail to consider a possible confounding influence of PCO2 on the cerebrovasculature. Indeed, under resting conditions, PCO2 shows spontaneous variability (17), and recent observations suggest that the dynamic relationship between BPMCA and MFV is altered under different background levels of PCO2 (11, 21).
Autoregressive moving average analysis with exogenous inputs (ARMA), a closed-loop system identification technique (24), allows for a simultaneous solution of a model with two inputs (BPMCA and PCO2) and one output [either MFV or an index of cerebrovascular resistance (CVRi), where CVRi = BPMCA/MFV]. The model parameters can be used to generate theoretical ideal impulse and step responses. The impulse represents the change in MFV or CVRi that would result if a 1-mmHg increase in BPMCA or PCO2 occurred as a brief pulse at time 0, while the step response represents the change after a sustained 1-mmHg increase in BPMCA or PCO2. ARMA offers a number of advantages over transfer function analysis; the most important is that it can discriminate between multiple inputs, thus allowing for causal relationships. The role of PCO2 in the cerebral circulation, independent of and in combination with BPMCA, can thereby be determined.
Evidence from ARMA (10) and similar models (23,
30) indicated that the BPMCA
MFV step response
obtained under spontaneous resting conditions was similar to results
obtained by altering MFV and BPMCA with the release of
cuffs placed around the upper thigh (1). Furthermore, the
PCO2
MFV response from the multiple input
model (10, 23) was similar to results acquired with step
changes in end-tidal CO2 (26) although this
latter approach often causes a significant increase in
BPMCA (12). A major limitation of ARMA
analysis when applied to resting conditions was that the PCO2 signal often lacked sufficient bandwidth
and amplitude (23) to yield a valid and consistent
solution (10). We hypothesized that this limitation could
be overcome, while at the same time avoiding elevations in
BPMCA, by introducing a short series of two inspired
breaths of 10% CO2 during spontaneous breathing. ARMA
solutions were compared with measured values determined during sustained breathing of 7% CO2. We also determined the
reproducibility of the method by examining the responses with a total
of four series of the two-breath method collected on 2 separate days.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. Nine healthy subjects (4 men and 5 women, mean age 22.1 yr, range 18-24 yr) voluntarily participated in this study approved by the Office of Research Ethics of the University of Waterloo. Informed consent was obtained in all cases.
Experimental protocol. Subjects reported to the laboratory on 2 separate days in a rested state, at least 2 h after food and caffeine ingestion. Subjects were instrumented and remained in a seated position for the duration of the tests. On each day, collection included 10 min of spontaneous resting baseline data followed by two series of a two-breath method. Subjects were switched by a four-way valve from breathing room air to inspired 10% CO2 (21% O2, balance N2) for two-breaths, every minute, for 4 consecutive minutes. The two-breath series were separated by 5 min of spontaneous collection where the valve was switched from one room air source to another as a form of control experiment. Subjects were not informed of the exact design of this protocol. After a 20-min break, 5 min of resting spontaneous data were collected before the valves were switched so that the subjects inspired from a large bag containing 7% CO2 (21% O2, balance N2) for 5 min. Continuous measurements of MFV, BPMCA, heart rate and expired CO2 were collected.
Experimental measures. Heart rate was determined from a standard three-lead electrocardiogram. MFV was measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the MCA (1). Briefly, a 2-MHz Doppler probe (Multigon, Mt. Vernon, NY) was placed over the right temporal window and fixed at a constant angle by a head-gear apparatus (Marc 600, Spencer Technologies, Seattle, WA) for the duration of the collection period. Arterial blood pressure was measured by noninvasive arterial tonometry (Colin, Pilot, San Antonio, TX) in which the sensor was placed over the radial artery. Calibration of the tonometry system was automatic against an oscillometric cuff placed on the upper arm. This measured pressure was then corrected to estimate BPMCA by measurement of the distance between the tonometry sensor and the transcranial Doppler probe (27). Cuff calibration of the Colin was turned off during data collection. PCO2 was collected continuously using a face mask connected to a mass spectrometer (MGA-1100, Perkin-Elmer, Pomona, CA). The face mask allowed breathing through both the nose and mouth.
Data analysis. All data were recorded on digital audiotape using an eight-channel recorder (TEAC, Montebello, CA) and were then transferred for analysis by a computer-based system to yield a dataset sampled at 100 Hz. The Doppler signal was processed using a fast Fourier transform to yield an outer envelope of MFV. Alveolar PCO2, which was taken as a surrogate for arterial PCO2, was calculated from the expired PCO2 profile as described by Whipp et al. (33). Each cardiac cycle was marked allowing beat-by-beat averaging of MFV, BPMCA, and PCO2 calibrated waveforms. CVRi was calculated from the average values of each cardiac cycle as BPMCA/MFV.
After removal of artifact, autospectral analysis using a Welch periodogram method (Matlab, Math Works, Natick, MA) was performed on the last 5-min of the baseline time series as well as on each of the two-breath series for the variables BPMCA, MFV, CVRi, and PCO2. A two-input (BPMCA and PCO2) and one output (MFV or CVRi) ARMA modeling procedure was also applied to baseline and each of the four, two-breath series as previously described in detail by Perrott and Cohen (24). Briefly, ARMA represents a linear, time-invariant system where the parameters of the model were estimated using a modified autoregressive parameter reduction algorithm (20). An appropriate model was selected based on two criteria: 1) minimal residuals, where the residuals represent the difference between the measured response and the modeled response, and 2) residuals with a Gaussian distribution that did not correlate with the inputs. The model parameters were used to generate the output responses to ideal impulse and step transitions of the input variables to estimate system gain.Statistical analysis.
Total autospectral power, ARMA impulse gain, and step responses were
compared across the six trials (day 1 baseline, day
1 first 2-breath series, day 1 second 2-breath series,
day 2 baseline, day 2 first 2-breath series, and
day 2 second 2-breath series) with a one-way ANOVA with
repeated measures. If significance was obtained
(P < 0.05), a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test was used to isolate the differences. The same statistical model was used to
compare the change per millimeter Hg PCO2
induced in MFV and CVRi from sustained breathing of 7% CO2
with the theoretical step gain obtained from the ARMA parameters for
the PCO2
MFV and
PCO2
CVRi relationships. The differences
between baseline MFV, CVRi, and BPMCA and steady-state
changes in these variables from breathing 7% CO2 were
compared with one-tailed, paired t-tests. An intraclass
correlation coefficient was calculated and used to assess the
reliability among the four, two-breath series (29). By
convention, <0.4 indicates poor reliability (reproducibility), between
0.4 and 0.75 indicates fair to good reliability, and >0.75 indicates
excellent reliability.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A time series dataset for one representative subject is shown in
Fig. 1. Ten minutes of resting
spontaneous baseline data followed by two series of the two-breath
CO2 method are observed in the PCO2
plot. MFV and CVRi clearly responded to the
PCO2, while BPMCA remained
relatively unaffected by the changes in PCO2.
|
Autospectral analysis.
Total autospectral power for BPMCA was unchanged across all
trials (P > 0.05, Fig.
2), while there was a significant
increase in total autospectral power for MFV (Fig. 2), CVRi, and
PCO2 (P < 0.05). Post hoc
analysis indicated that baseline trials and double-breath series
differed significantly (P < 0.05). The two baseline
trials did not differ from each other nor did the four two-breath
series (P > 0.05).
|
ARMA solution for BPMCA +
PCO2
MFV.
The impulse-response function represents the change in MFV that
would occur in response to a unit area impulse (1-mmHg increase) in the
input variable at time 0, while the step response represents the change after a sustained 1-mmHg increase. As anticipated based on
measurements of MFV in response to sustained changes in blood pressure
at the level of the MCA, for example with head-up tilt (11), the calculated MFV increased rapidly in response to
the increase in BPMCA but returned close to baseline in
<10 s (Fig. 3A). Averaged
over subjects, there was no significant difference across all trials
for the gain of BPMCA
MFV determined from the peak
impulse or step (P > 0.05, Table
1).
|
|
MFV
relationship was positive but was much slower (Fig. 3B)
compared with the response to BPMCA. Averaged over all six
trials, the time at which the step response reached 95% of the plateau
value was 17.9 ± 5.4 s (mean ± SD). The step values
were not different across trials (P > 0.05). The peak
impulse for day 2 baseline was greater than all other trials
(P < 0.05, Table 1), but three subjects were not
included because no solution was found for the ARMA model under the
spontaneous breathing condition. ARMA solutions were found in all of
the two-breath series.
ARMA solution for BPMCA +
PCO2
CVRi.
The impulse response for the relationship between
BPMCA
CVRi was positive, and the step response
showed the anticipated increase in CVRi in an attempt to maintain MFV
in the face of sustained increase in BPMCA (Fig.
3C). Mean values for the peak impulse and step response were
not significantly different across trials (P > 0.05, Table 1).
CVRi impulse and step responses
were negative, indicating that an increase in
PCO2 caused a decrease in CVRi (Fig. 3D). There were no significant differences across trials for
the peak impulse and step values as there was large variability between trials, especially in the baseline trials. A solution for
PCO2 could not be determined in the baseline
trials for two subjects on day 1 and three subjects on
day 2. Solutions were determined for all two-breath series,
and there was less variation in the mean values (Table 1). Averaged
over all trials, the step reached 95% of the plateau value within
16.3 ± 6.6 s. This was consistent with the
PCO2
MFV response.
Sustained breathing of 7% CO2.
MFV and BPMCA were significantly increased whereas CVRi was
significantly decreased under sustained breathing of 7%
CO2 (P < 0.05, Table
2). The absolute change in MFV per
millimeter Hg change in PCO2 (Table 2) was
significantly greater than the change determined for the step response
from the ARMA model for all conditions except day 2 baseline
(Table 1). The relative change in MFV per millimeter Hg
PCO2 during the sustained 7% CO2
trial was 3.4 ± 0.4% (18). Contrary to the
differences between ARMA and sustained CO2 models for the
MFV response to CO2, the CVRi response to the 7%
CO2 (Table 2) was not significantly different from the ARMA PCO2
CVRi step responses across all six
trials (Table 1, P > 0.05).
|
Reliability.
Based on the convention for evaluating intraclass correlation with
<0.4 indicating poor, 0.4-0.75 as fair to good, and >0.75 as
excellent reliability (29), most solutions for the
two-breath series ARMA models provided fair to excellent reliability
(Table 3). The impulse responses for
BPMCA as the input proved to be more reliable than the step
responses, whereas the step responses for PCO2
as the input were more reliable than the impulse responses (Table 3).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results from our new two-breath method support the hypothesis that
solutions for both the BPMCA and
PCO2 effects on the cerebrovascular response
could be obtained without causing a confounding effect on mean
BPMCA. We determined that reliable estimates of
autoregulatory gain could be determined from the impulse response
functions for BPMCA
MFV and BPMCA
CVRi
under both spontaneous baseline measurements as well as during
the two-breath method. However, the two-breath method was required to
yield accurate and reliable estimates of the
PCO2 step response. The closed-loop analysis
approach had a distinct advantage over sustained breathing of a
CO2 gas mixture. We found a significantly greater gain for
PCO2
MFV but similar gain for
PCO2
CVRi during sustained breathing of 7%
CO2 than from the ARMA model. This suggests that part of
the increase in MFV during the sustained CO2 tests was
probably a consequence of the elevated BPMCA and that it
did not reflect exclusively CO2 responsiveness.
The results of the BPMCA
MFV and BPMCA
CVRi impulse and step relationships were similar during baseline and
with the two-breath method, and the results were consistent with the
concept of cerebrovascular autoregulation. The rapid BPMCA
MFV impulse supports the concept that autoregulation operates as a
high-pass filter (13). That is, faster oscillations in
BPMCA are passed through to the cerebral circulation and
are observed within the MFV signal. In contrast, the BPMCA
MFV step response shows that MFV is returned close to baseline in
the face of sustained increases in BPMCA. The time courses
of these responses are consistent with the proposal of Aaslid et al.
(1) that an initial autoregulatory response could occur
within a few seconds but may not be complete for up to 15 s. The
adaptation of CVRi to the sustained increase in BPMCA as shown by the step response (Fig. 3C) accounts for the return
of MFV toward baseline.
The absence of a solution for the PCO2 effect
when modeling BPMCA + PCO2
MFV has been attributed to the limited amplitude and bandwidth of the
PCO2 signal (23). In the present
experiment, we successfully increased PCO2
total autospectral power with the two-breath method compared with
baseline measures. Inspiration of two breaths of 10% CO2
from a bag caused a decrease in CVRi, which, in turn, modified MFV
(Fig. 1). However, BPMCA total autospectral power remained
unchanged from baseline measures during the two-breath method (Fig. 2),
suggesting that the short duration of the PCO2 stimulus was not sufficient to evoke a blood pressure response. In
contrast, the mean value of BPMCA increased by 0.51 ± 0.32 mmHg per millimeter Hg PCO2 under
sustained 7% CO2 breathing, complicating the
interpretation of the true PCO2 effect on MFV.
In further support of the argument that modeling the MFV response to BPMCA and PCO2 was limited by insufficient amplitude and bandwidth of the PCO2 signal (23), we found a solution for PCO2 in only six of the nine subjects under resting baseline conditions. When the amplitude of the PCO2 signal was increased with the two-breath method, a solution was found in all cases. Furthermore, the impulse solutions under baseline conditions were often of poor quality, leading to the high variability observed in Table 1.
The relative gain for the PCO2
MFV
relationship calculated during the sustained breathing of 7%
CO2 was similar to previous reports (5). This
value was greater than that determined with the ARMA model, suggesting
that some of the increase in MFV during the sustained 7%
CO2 test was due to elevation in BPMCA observed here and in other studies (12). The ability of the ARMA
model to assign gain to the different inputs has also been demonstrated during investigations of the heart rate control by the arterial baroreflex where heart rate is influenced by both arterial blood pressure and the direct effect of respiration (20,
24).
The gain for the PCO2
MFV relationship has
often been evaluated by breathing a constant level of inspired
CO2. In the current study, the relative gain determined
during the sustained breathing of 7% CO2 was similar to
previous reports (5), but we observed that absolute gain
was lower when we determined the ARMA solution. Consistent with
previous investigations (12, 14), we observed an increase
in BPMCA. Thus, for investigating the relationship with
ARMA, which assigns cause between the input and output variables (20, 24), some of the increase in MFV was attributed to
the increase in BPMCA as well as the increase in
PCO2. The gain for the
PCO2
CVRi was slightly but not
significantly greater during sustained 7% CO2 breathing
than with the ARMA model. Although BPMCA and MFV are the
measured variables, CVRi is the manipulated variable that responds to
change in BPMCA or PCO2 and has
been shown to provide insight into the dynamics of the
cerebrovasculature, for example under conditions of altered arterial
PCO2 (11) or with rapid release of
thigh cuffs (1).
Methodological considerations. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound, with its high temporal resolution, combined with continuous, noninvasive blood pressure recordings have become widely used and accepted as a means of evaluating dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation. However, Doppler ultrasound measures velocity and not flow. This issue has been extensively addressed in previous publications on dynamic autoregulation (32, 34), and recently Serrador et al. (28) reported that diameter of the MCA measured by magnetic resonance imaging under an orthostatic challenge and different levels of PCO2 changed at most 0.1 mm from a mean value of 2.9 ± 0.4 mm. This further suggests that this artery remains stable under a range of cerebral blood flow and under the conditions of the current experiments.
The use of CVRi as an index of cerebrovascular resistance has been discussed previously (1, 11, 15, 32). True cerebrovascular resistance depends on the pressure gradient across the vascular bed and flow through that bed. This pressure gradient was unknown as venous and intracranial pressure could not be measured in our healthy subjects. However, our subjects remained motionless in a seated position where the venous influences on resistance and flow should be fairly constant.Perspectives
Our new two-breath method combined with ARMA analysis offers a number of advantages over previous approaches for characterizing the BPMCA and PCO2 effects on the cerebrovasculature. For example, methods relying on pharmaceutical interventions or orthostatic challenge models may not be appropriate for some patient populations. Furthermore, CO2 sensitivity tests with constant inspired CO2 increase BPMCA, confounding the relationship between PCO2 and MFV (14). Bolus injections of acetazolamide have been employed clinically to investigate the cerebrovascular reserve, for example in patients with carotid occlusive disease (25). This method does increase cerebral flow in the absence of change in arterial blood pressure (7), but there is controversy over whether it reflects the same dilatory mechanism investigated by increased PCO2 (7, 19). The two-breath method, in contrast to sustained increases in PCO2, does not cause systematic elevation in BPMCA and in addition offers the ability to clearly separate system gain for the simultaneous inputs of PCO2 and BPMCA. This latter property is functionally important for evaluation of autoregulation. Further investigation is required to determine if the two-breath method is preferable to the acetazolamide test under conditions such as after head injury (16) given potential differences in cerebrovascular CO2 sensitivity and autoregulation (9, 31). The ARMA method might also prove to be valuable under conditions where there are spontaneous fluctuations in PCO2, eliminating the need for a two-breath manipulation of CO2, for example before the onset of orthostatic vasovagal syncope (4, 6).We believe that the two-breath method can be applied under a range of conditions in healthy and patient populations and that it can be used with ARMA analysis to successfully extract information on cerebrovascular control. The two-breath technique is noninvasive and reproducible, and the results compare favorably with previously established reports of cerebral autoregulation in healthy persons.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. Kerigan and E. Hill for assistance with data collection and analysis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This research was supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (T4972) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). M. R. Edwards was supported by a postgraduate scholarship from NSERC and a Canadian Space Agency graduate supplement and by a postgraduate initiative among the Canadian Stroke Network, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health, and the CIHR and Research and Development Program together with AstraZeneca Canada.
Flexible Matlab coding for the ARMA analysis is available from the authors on request.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. L. Hughson, Cardiorespiratory and Vascular Dynamics Laboratory, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (E-mail: hughson{at}uwaterloo.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpregu.00601.2002
Received 27 September 2002; accepted in final form 26 November 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aaslid, R,
Lindegaard KF,
Sorteberg W,
and
Nornes H.
Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans.
Stroke
20:
45-52,
1989
2.
Birch, AA,
Dirnhuber MJ,
Hartley-Davies R,
Iannotti F,
and
Neil-Dwyer G.
Assessment of autoregulation by means of periodic changes in blood pressure.
Stroke
26:
834-837,
1995
3.
Blaber, AP,
Bondar RL,
Stein F,
Dunphy PT,
Moradshahi P,
Kassam MS,
and
Freeman R.
Transfer function analysis of cerebral autoregulation dynamics in autonomic failure patients.
Stroke
28:
1686-1692,
1997
4.
Carey, BJ,
Eames PJ,
Panerai RB,
and
Potter JF.
Carbon dioxide, critical closing pressure and cerebral haemodynamics prior to vasovagal syncope in humans.
Clin Sci (Lond)
101:
351-358,
2001[Medline].
5.
Cencetti, S,
Bandinelli G,
and
Lagi A.
Effect of PCO2 changes induced by head-upright tilt on transcranial Doppler recordings.
Stroke
28:
1195-1197,
1997
6.
Dan, D,
Hoag JB,
Ellenbogen KA,
Wood MA,
Eckberg DL,
and
Gilligan DM.
Cerebral blood flow velocity declines before arterial pressure in patients with orthostatic vasovagal presyncope.
J Am Coll Cardiol
39:
1039-1045,
2002
7.
Demolis, P,
Florence G,
Thomas L,
Tran Dinh YR,
Giudicelli JF,
Seylaz J,
and
Alkayed NJ.
Is the acetazolamide test valid for quantitative assessment of maximal cerebral autoregulatory vasodilation? An experimental study.
Stroke
31:
508-515,
2000
8.
Diehl, RR,
Linden D,
Lücke D,
and
Berlit P.
Spontaneous blood pressure oscillations and cerebral autoregulation.
Clin Auton Res
8:
7-12,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Diehl, RR,
Linden D,
Lücke D,
and
Berlit P.
Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure
a clinical test of autoregulation.
Stroke
26:
1801-1804,
1995
10.
Edwards, MR,
Lin DC,
and
Hughson RL.
Modeling the interaction between perfusion pressure and CO2 on cerebral blood flow.
Adv Exp Biol Med
499:
285-290,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Edwards, MR,
Shoemaker JK,
and
Hughson RL.
Dynamic modulation of cerebrovascular resistance as an index of autoregulation under tilt and controlled PETCO2.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
283:
R653-R662,
2002
12.
Garnham, J,
Panerai RB,
Naylor AR,
and
Evans DH.
Cerebrovascular response to dynamic changes in PCO2.
Cerebrovasc Dis
9:
146-151,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Giller, CA.
The frequency-dependent behavior of cerebral autoregulation.
Neurosurgery
27:
362-368,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Hetzel, A,
Braune S,
Guschlbauer B,
and
Dohms K.
CO2 reactivity testing without blood pressure monitoring?
Stroke
30:
398-401,
1999
15.
Hughson, RL,
Edwards MR,
O'Leary DD,
and
Shoemaker JK.
Critical analysis of cerebrovascular autoregulation during repeated head up tilt.
Stroke
32:
2403-2408,
2001
16.
Lee, JH,
Kelly DF,
Oertel M,
McArthur DL,
Glenn TC,
Vespa P,
Boscardin WJ,
and
Martin NA.
Carbon dioxide reactivity, pressure autoregulation, and metabolic suppression reactivity after head injury: a transcranial Doppler study.
J Neurosurg
95:
222-232,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Lenfant, C.
Time-dependent variations of pulmonary gas exchange in normal man at rest.
J Appl Physiol
22:
675-684,
1967
18.
Markwalder, T,
Grolimund P,
Seiler RW,
Roth F,
and
Aaslid R.
Dependency of blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery on end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure-a transcranial ultrasound Doppler study.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
4:
368-372,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Nemoto, EM,
and
Yonas H.
Revisiting the question, "is the acetazolamide test valid for quantitative assessment of maximal cerebral autoregulatory vasodilation?".
Stroke
32:
1236-1237,
2001.
20.
O'Leary, DD,
Lin DC,
and
Hughson RL.
Determination of baroreflex gain using autoregressive moving average analysis during spontaneous breathing.
Clin Physiol
19:
369-377,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Panerai, R,
Deverson ST,
Mahoney P,
Hayes P,
and
Evans DH.
Effect of CO2 on dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurement.
Physiol Meas
20:
265-275,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Panerai, RB,
Dawson SL,
Eames PJ,
and
Potter JF.
Cerebral blood flow velocity response to induced and spontaneous sudden changes in arterial blood pressure.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
280:
H2162-H2174,
2001
23.
Panerai, RB,
Simpson DM,
Deverson ST,
Mahoney P,
Hayes P,
and
Evans DH.
Multivariate dynamic analysis of cerebral blood flow regulation in humans.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
47:
419-423,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Perrott, MH,
and
Cohen RJ.
An efficient approach to ARMA modeling of biological systems with multiple inputs and delays.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
43:
1-14,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Pindzola, RR,
Balzer JR,
Nemoto EM,
Goldstein S,
and
Yonas H.
Cerebrovascular reserve in patients with carotid occlusive disease assessed by stable xenon-enhanced ct cerebral blood flow and transcranial Doppler.
Stroke
32:
1811-1817,
2001
26.
Poulin, MJ,
Liang PJ,
and
Robbins PA.
Dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response to step changes in end-tidal PCO2 and PO2 in humans.
J Appl Physiol
81:
1084-1095,
1996
27.
Schondorf, R,
Benoit J,
and
Wein T.
Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular measurements during neurally mediated syncope by head-up tilt.
Stroke
28:
1564-1568,
1997
28.
Serrador, JM,
Picot PA,
Rutt BK,
Shoemaker JK,
and
Bondar RL.
MRI measures of middle cerebral artery diameter in conscious humans during simulated orthostasis.
Stroke
31:
1672-1678,
2000
29.
Shrout, PE,
and
Fleiss JL.
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull
86:
420-428,
1979[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Simpson, DM,
Panerai R,
Evans DH,
and
Naylor AR.
A parametric approach to measuring cerebral blood flow autoregulation from spontaneous variations in blood pressure.
Ann Biomed Eng
29:
18-25,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Tiecks, FP,
Douville C,
Byrd S,
Lam AM,
and
Newell DW.
Evaluation of impaired cerebral autoregulation by the valsalva maneuver.
Stroke
27:
1177-1182,
1996
32.
Tiecks, FP,
Lam AM,
Aaslid R,
and
Newell DW.
Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements.
Stroke
26:
1014-1019,
1995
33.
Whipp, BJ,
Lamarra N,
Ward SA,
Davis JA,
and
Wasserman K.
Estimating arterial PCO2 from flow-weighted and time-average alveolar PCO2 during exercise.
In: Respiratory Control: A Modeling Perspective, edited by Swanson GD,
Grodins FS,
and Hughson RL.. New York: Plenum, 1989, p. 91-100.
34.
Zhang, R,
Zukerman JH,
Giller CA,
and
Levine BD.
Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
274:
H233-H241,
1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Liang, J. C. Downs, B. Fortune, G. Cull, G. A. Cioffi, and L. Wang Impact of Systemic Blood Pressure on the Relationship between Intraocular Pressure and Blood Flow in the Optic Nerve Head of Nonhuman Primates Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 2154 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Ainslie and J. Duffin Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): R1473 - R1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Murrell, L. Wilson, J. D. Cotter, S. Lucas, S. Ogoh, K. George, and P. N. Ainslie Alterations in autonomic function and cerebral hemodynamics to orthostatic challenge following a mountain marathon J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 88 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. H. R. Claassen, R. Zhang, Q. Fu, S. Witkowski, and B. D. Levine Transcranial Doppler estimation of cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular conductance during modified rebreathing J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Mitsis, R. Zhang, B. D. Levine, and V. Z. Marmarelis Cerebral hemodynamics during orthostatic stress assessed by nonlinear modeling J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 354 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Panerai, M. Moody, P. J. Eames, and J. F. Potter Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during brain activation paradigms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1202 - H1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Serrador, F. A. Sorond, M. Vyas, M. Gagnon, I. D. Iloputaife, and L. A. Lipsitz Cerebral pressure-flow relations in hypertensive elderly humans: transfer gain in different frequency domains J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 151 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Edwards, D. L. Devitt, and R. L. Hughson Two-breath CO2 test detects altered dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation and CO2 responsiveness with changes in arterial PCO2 Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): R627 - R632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |