AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R26-R27, 2003; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00192.2003
0363-6119/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kintscher, U.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kintscher, U.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, T.

EDITORIAL FOCUS

Angiotensin II receptor expression: from maturation to pathogenesis

Ulrich Kintscher and Thomas Unger

Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité Hospital, Humboldt-University Berlin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany

TISSUE-SPECIFIC CHANGES in gene expression during maturation may provide important insights into tissue-specific gene expression patterns during pathogenesis. In this context, the cell- or tissue-surrounding environment or stroma has been recognized as an important regulator (11). The great diversity observed in the composition and morphology of the extracellular environment contributes significantly to a cell-/tissue-specific pattern of gene expression (3, 7). Multiple effects of the extracellular environment on cellular characteristics at different stages of maturation have been described (1). In addition, the environmental framework of cells and tissue is greatly modified during disease development, which may result in prominent variances of gene expression (9).

The article of Nishimura and colleagues (7a) in this issue of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology demonstrates significant changes of angiotensin receptor expression in the kidney, adrenal gland, and vasculature during maturation in fowl. The studied angiotensin receptor (cAT1) is a homologue to the mammalian angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1 receptor) with 75% amino acid identity. The tissue-specific maturation-dependent changes in cAT1 expression observed in this study are an excellent demonstration of the importance of studying gene expression by focusing on time and tissue specificity. These results are consistent with studies in mammalian species demonstrating a maturation-dependent expression of the AT1/AT2-receptor subtypes (4). Parallel to the time dependency of mammalian AT-receptor expression, several studies have shown that the changes in AT-receptor expression during maturation are also tissue specific (5, 10). But how does a distinct AT-receptor gene expression pattern in specific tissues during maturation impact on AT-receptor-mediated function, and, furthermore, what is the relevance of these processes for AT-receptor dysfunction and AT-receptor-associated pathological processes?

Nishimura and colleagues investigated the endothelium-dependent effects of ANG II on vasoregulation of abdominal aortae in fowl in an ex vivo assay. ANG II stimulation of abdominal aortae led to a potent vasodilation, which was eliminated after removal of the endothelium. However, the results of this AT-receptor-dependent function did not correlate with the cAT1-expression pattern in abdominal aortae. These data are in contrast to the vasoregulatory effects of ANG II in humans, where ANG II is a potent vasoconstrictor. Other groups have investigated atypical AT receptors in the central nervous systems of gerbils, a specific rodent type, and postulated their functional relevance during cerebral ischemia (6). It appears that, in addition to the present elegant study on tissue- and maturation-dependent expression patterns of AT receptors, future studies are required to translate these results into function-related gene expression profiles. Until these data are available, one has to be careful in extrapolating from changes of gene expression in non-mammalian species or specific rodents, such as the gerbil, to functional changes and to comparable processes in humans.

What might be the impact of the observed distinct expression pattern during maturation on AT-receptor dysfunction or AT-receptor-mediated pathologies? What is the relevance of these findings for human physiology or pathophysiology? It has been previously shown in many studies that the reconstitution of an embryonic gene profile might play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple diseases (11). For example, the mammalian angiotensin type 2 receptor (AT2 receptor), which is normally expressed in embryonic phases and disappears during development, is strongly reexpressed after myocardial infarction and stroke (4). Furthermore, embryonic gene expression patterns are frequently observed in pathologically altered tissues, e.g., in the failing heart. Therefore, studies on the regulation of gene expression during maturation and the knowledge of the modifying mechanisms will heavily contribute to the understanding of pathogenic processes and their future treatment.

The study by Nishimura and colleagues also reflects the complexity of specific gene expression patterns in different tissues at different time points. The microenvironment of cells and tissue, including extracellular matrices, ions, cytokines, and growth factors, is a highly flexible framework also prominently regulated during maturation. In addition, this extracellular environment is markedly modified during pathological processes, e.g., during diabetes or obesity. For example, hyperglycemia or hyperinsulinemia are important regulators of AT-receptor expression and function in mammalian species, comparable to the modifications during maturation (8). Glucose-/insulin-mediated AT-receptor expression may have pivotal effects on AT-receptor-mediated cardiovascular functions associated with insulin resistance or diabetes. Simultaneously with the alteration of AT-receptor expression during disease progression, tissue-specific differences have been observed in diabetes. For instance, Brown and colleagues (2) demonstrated that AT-receptor density is markedly upregulated in the heart and liver of diabetic rodents, whereas there is a decrease in renal density.

In conclusion, maturation-dependent and pathogenesis-associated gene expression profiles might be closely related. Therefore, with an increasing number of studies demonstrating the specificity or selectivity of gene expression during maturation or pathogenesis, the knowledge of disease-/tissue-specific gene expression will improve. This is further supported by recently developed molecular techniques targeting gene expression in a time- and tissue-specific manner. On the basis of these data, therapeutic strategies with improved selectivity and specificity may be launched.

FOOTNOTES  

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Unger, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité Hospital, Humboldt-Univ. Berlin, Dorotheenstr. 94, D-10117 Berlin, Germany (E-mail: thomas.unger{at}charite.de).

REFERENCES

  1. Bokel C and Brown NH. Integrins in development: moving on, responding to, and sticking to the extracellular matrix. Dev Cell 3: 311–321, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Brown L, Wall D, Marchant C, and Sernia C. Tissue-specific changes in angiotensin II receptors in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. J Endocrinol 154: 355–362, 1997.[Abstract]
  3. Chang HY, Chi JT, Dudoit S, Bondre C, van de Rijn M, Botstein D, and Brown PO. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12877–12882, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. De Gasparo M, Catt KJ, Inagami T, Wright JW, and Unger T. International union of pharmacology. XXIII The angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev 52: 415–472, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Grady EF, Sechi LA, Griffin CA, Schambelan M, and Kalinyak JE. Expression of AT2 receptors in the developing rat fetus. J Clin Invest 88: 921–933, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Hauser W, Johren O, de Oliveira AM, Shibata S, and Saavedra JM. Ischemia-induced neuronal cell loss is associated with loss of atypical angiotensin type-1 receptor expression in the gerbil hippocampal formation. Brain Res 817: 34–44, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Ingber DE. Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ Res 91: 877–887, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nishimura H, Y Yang, C Hubert, J-M Gasc, K Ruijtenbeek, J De Mey, HAJ Struijker-Boudier, and P Corvol. Maturation-dependent changes of angiotensin receptor expression in fowl. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R231–R242, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Park SH and Han HJ. The mechanism of angiotensin II binding downregulation by high glucose in primary renal proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 282: F228–F237, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rumble JR, Cooper ME, Soulis T, Cox A, Wu L, Youssef S, Jasik M, Jerums G, and Gilbert RE. Vascular hypertrophy in experimental diabetes. Role of advanced glycation end products. J Clin Invest 99: 1016–1027, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Tufro-McReddie A, Harrison JK, Everett AD, and Gomez RA. Ontogeny of type 1 angiotensin II receptor gene expression in the rat. J Clin Invest 91: 530–537, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Wiseman BS and Werb Z. Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer. Science 296: 1046–1049, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A.-M. Samuelsson, E. Bollano, R. Mobini, B.-M. Larsson, E. Omerovic, M. Fu, F. Waagstein, and A. Holmang
Hyperinsulinemia: effect on cardiac mass/function, angiotensin II receptor expression, and insulin signaling pathways
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H787 - H796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M. L Chappellaz and F. G Smith
Dose-dependent systemic and renal haemodynamic effects of angiotensin II in conscious lambs: role of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors
Exp Physiol, November 1, 2005; 90(6): 837 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kintscher, U.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kintscher, U.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.