AJP - Regu AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R359-R365, 2004. First published October 16, 2003; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00214.2003
0363-6119/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
286/2/R359    most recent
00214.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, E.

NEUROHUMORAL CONTROL OF CIRCULATION AND HYPERTENSION

Bovine lactoferrin has a nitric oxide-dependent hypotensive effect in rats

Ken-ichiro Hayashida,1 Takashi Takeuchi,1 Takeshi Ozaki,2 Hirohiko Shimizu,3 Kunio Ando,3 Atsushi Miyamoto,4 and Etsumori Harada1

1Department of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori 680-0945; 2National Institute for Physiological Science, Okazaki 444-8585; 3Nuclear Receptor Ligand, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 213-0012; and 4Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan

Submitted 23 April 2003 ; accepted in final form 7 October 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Lactoferrin (LF) is a multifunctional protein that is found in milk, neutrophils, and other biological fluids. Under inflammatory conditions, LF production is increased in the periphery by neutrophils. However, the cardiovascular function of LF is still unknown. In the present study, we investigated the effect of bovine LF (BLF) on the mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) in urethane-anesthetized rats and the vascular function of BLF in the rat thoracic aorta. Intravenous injection of BLF produced dose-dependent decreases in MBP but did not affect HR, while the opioid agonist morphine decreased both MBP and HR. The hypotensive effect of BLF was not altered by naloxone methiodide, which cannot pass through the blood-brain barrier, but was significantly reduced by naloxone hydrochloride, which does pass through the blood-brain barrier. BLF-induced hypotension was completely blocked by the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) but not by the inactive enantiomer of L-NAME, NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME). BLF-induced hypotension was not altered by the muscarinic ACh receptor antagonist atropine or the cyclooxygenase inhibitor diclofenac. BLF produced relaxation in endothelium-intact but not endothelium-denuded aortic rings precontracted with phenylephrine. The relaxation evoked by BLF was completely blocked by L-NAME but not by D-NAME or the ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide. These results suggest that BLF causes hypotension via an endothelium-dependent vasodilation that is strongly mediated by NO production and that BLF-induced hypotension also may be mediated by the central opioidergic system.

NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; naloxone hydrochloride; naloxone methiodide; endothelium cell


EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE implies that the consumption of milk and dairy products is inversely related to blood pressure (BP) and the risk of hypertension. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I, an epidemiological study conducted in the United States from 1971 to 1975 involving over 20,000 people, found that a diet low in dairy products was predictive of hypertension (28). Other large population studies have also reported an inverse association between the consumption of milk and BP (1, 17, 34). In addition, milk supplementation has been shown to lower BP in some clinical studies (5, 7). There is some evidence of an inverse association between the intake of total protein or animal protein and BP (31, 34).

Based on this evidence, we were interested in lactoferrin (LF), a natural iron-binding protein in milk. LF is a single-chain glycoprotein with a molecular mass of ~80 kDa that belongs to the family of transferrins (6). LF has many peripheral functions, inducing primary defense against bacterial and viral infection, antitumor activity, immunomodulation, and cell growth regulation (6). However, there are no published studies on the cardiovascular effects of LF so far. Under inflammatory conditions, LF production is increased in the periphery by neutrophils (6, 23) and in the central nervous system (CNS) by the microglia (16). LF is also transported from blood to the cerebrospinal fluid through the blood-brain barrier via receptor-mediated transcytosis (14). It is also reported that orally administered bovine milk-derived LF (BLF) inhibits formalin-evoked nociception (19), carrageenan-induced inflammation with immunomodulation (46), and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis (30) in adult rats. Thus not only endogenous but also exogenous LF are effective in adult mammals, and the investigation of the cardiovascular action of LF should have physiological importance.

It is reported that LF binds to specific high- and low-affinity sites on the capillary endothelial cells (EC) (14). After binding to EC, LF crosses from the apical to the abluminal surface without being degraded, possibly via caveolae (14). On the other hand, it is well known that EC produces different vasodilating agents, such as nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin (PGI2), and endothelium-derived hyper-polarizing factor, and plays an important role in the control of vascular tone. Although the actions of LF on/in the EC are not clear yet, it is reported that BLF increases NO production in the macrophages (36). It is also reported that EC contains the µ3-opioid receptor that is coupled to NO release and vasodilation (38). Indeed, there are several reports that intravenously administered opioid agonists cause NO-dependent vasodilation (8, 9, 10). Moreover, opioids also act in the CNS and cause systemic hypotension (11, 39). On the other hand, LF and its receptor have also been identified in the CNS (13, 15, 16, 24, 25, 32, 33, 41). Recently, we reported that BLF produces µ-opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive activity (19), and this BLF-induced analgesia is mediated by NO production (20). Although various types of opioid ligands have been found in milk or milk digests (43), BLF did not bind to the µ-opioid receptor nor did it change its binding affinity to the opioid ligands (40). Thus BLF does not act as an opioid agonist but rather as an enhancer of endogenous opioid signaling (20). In this study, we investigated the effect of the intravenous administration of BLF on BP and heart rate (HR) in urethane-anesthetized rats and the vascular function of BLF in the rat thoracic aorta. The possible mechanism of action was also studied pharmacologically.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Male Wistar-Imamichi rats (8-9 wk old; body wt 250-330 g) were used in all experiments. All animals were maintained at a controlled temperature (22 ± 2°C) under a regular light-dark cycle (light period 0700 to 1900) with free access to food and water. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Physiological Society of Japan regarding the care of experimental animals.

Drugs

For in vivo experiments, BLF (mol wt ~78,000; Tatua, Morrinsville, New Zealand), bovine serum albumin (BSA; mol wt ~66,000; Sigma, Tokyo, Japan), naloxone hydrochloride (Sigma), naloxone methiodide (Sigma), morphine hydrochloride (Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan), diclofenac (Sigma), acetylcholine hydrochloride (ACh; Daiichi, Tokyo Japan), atropine sulfate (atropine; Fuso, Osaka, Japan), NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME; Sigma), and NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (D-NAME; Sigma) were dissolved in saline solution for administration at a volume of 1 ml/kg. For in vitro experiments, BLF, ACh, L-NAME, D-NAME, L-phenylephrine hydrochloride (Sigma), and sodium nitroprusside dihydrate (SNP, Sigma) were dissolved in distilled water, and glibenclamide (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and pinacidil (Sigma) were dissolved in DMSO at the concentration of 10 mM and diluted with distilled water to the desired concentrations. The purity of BLF (95.3%) was certificated by Tatua. We also performed SDS-PAGE on BLF to ensure that no other protein was present in the preparation (data not shown).

In Vivo Experiment

Measurement of BP and HR. Rats were initially anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of urethane (1 g/kg, Sigma, Tokyo, Japan). Supplemental doses were given through a jugular intravenous catheter whenever needed. The trachea was cannulated with polyethylene tubing (PE-240) to keep the respiratory passage patent. In all rats, body temperature was maintained by means of a heating pad. The left jugular vein and right carotid artery were cannulated with heparinized PE-50 polyethylene tubing for the purposes of intravenous injection and the measurement of arterial BP (ABP), respectively. The tubing for ABP measurement was connected to a pressure transducer (Gould Statham Instrument, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico). Mean BP (MBP) and HR were derived electronically from the ABP pulses. These parameters (MBP and HR) were monitored and recorded on a polygraph system (365-11, SAN-EI, Tokyo, Japan). To normalize the mean values of the baseline of MBP and HR in each treatment group, rats were admitted to each group on the basis of those baseline values in all sets of experiments. Thus there is no significant difference between the baseline values of treated groups in this study. Data are expressed as the mean percent change of MBP or HR (±SE).

In Vitro Experiment

Measurement of mechanical activities of thoracic aorta. Rats were killed and the thoracic aorta was removed immediately, cleaned of all fat and connective tissue, and cut into rings ~5 mm in length. Each ring was mounted in an organ bath containing 5 ml physiological solution (PSS) with the following composition (in mM): 119 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose. The organ bath solution was maintained at 37°C and gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2 (35). Each ring was left to equilibrate for at least 2 h under a resting tension of 10 mN, which was kept constant throughout the experiment. The isometric muscle tension was recorded with a force-transducer (TB-611T, Nihon Kohden Kogyo, Japan) connected to a polygraph (AP-621G, Nihon Kohden Kogyo). The presence of an intact endothelium was confirmed by observing a relaxation response to 5 µM ACh in rings precontracted with 1 µM phenylephrine. For the endothelium-denuded experiment, the endothelium was removed by gentle rubbing of the intimal surface with a cotton swab wetted with PSS. The absence of the endothelium was confirmed by a lack of relaxation response to ACh. During both the endothelium-intact and -denuded experiments, aorta rings were precontracted with phenylephrine (1 µM). When this contraction reached steady state, BLF (1-10 µM) was added into the organ bath cumulatively. At the end of experiment, SNP (100 µM) was applied to produce maximum relaxation, which was taken as 100%.

Statistics

Differences between treatment groups were assessed by the unpaired t-test or, when appropriate, ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. In all cases, a probability (P) value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In Vivo Experiment

Hypotensive effect of BLF on MBP. In the first set of experiments, the effect of BSA (1,500 nmol/kg iv) and the dose response of MBP to BLF (38.4-1,280 nmol/kg iv) were measured. The actual values of MBP are represented in Fig. 1A, and the changes in MBP by BSA or BLF are summarized in Fig. 1B. As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, BSA increased MBP slightly but not significantly compared with the baseline value (from 111.0 ± 4.3 to 114.0 ± 4.8 mmHg). In contrast, the intravenous administration of BLF dose dependently lowered the MBP. We also observed that the hypotensive response to BLF is repeatable (data not shown). Based on our results, we chose a BLF dose of 384 nmol/kg for the subsequent experiments.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of bovine lactoferrin (BLF) on mean blood pressure (MBP). Actual values in MBP (A) and changes in MBP (B) in response to the intravenous injection of BSA (1,500 nmol/kg) and BLF (38.4-1,280 nmol/kg) are shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. BSA-treated group (Dunnett's test).

 

Time course of the cardiovascular effect of BLF. In the second set of experiments, the time course of the effects on HR and MBP of an µ-opioid agonist, morphine (133 nmol/kg iv), and BLF (384 nmol/kg iv) were measured. Baseline values of MBP were 138.2 ± 8.5 mmHg in the BLF-treated group and 133.1 ± 11.0 mmHg in the morphine-treated group; baseline values of HR were 317.0 ± 16.8 and 306.2 ± 23.0 beats/min, respectively (Fig. 2). Morphine caused a marked decrease of both MBP (-44.3 ± 10.1%) and HR (-67.8 ± 16.8%) at 10 s after administration, after which MBP and HR recovered rapidly. In contrast, the maximum hypotensive effect of BLF was observed at 60 s after the administration (-31.0 ± 4.0%), and the MBP showed a slower recovery. However, BLF did not affect HR.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Time course of the changes in MBP and heart rate (HR) in response to intravenous injection of BLF and morphine. Line graphs represent the time course of changes in MBP (A) and HR (B) after the administration of BLF (384 nmol/kg iv) and morphine (Mor; 133 nmol/kg iv).

 

Role of the opioidergic system. In the third set of experiments, the effects of opioid antagonists on responses to BLF (384 nmol/kg iv) and morphine (133 nmol/kg iv) were investigated. Responses were measured 5 min after intravenous administration of opioid antagonists, namely naloxone hydrochloride, which passes through the blood-brain barrier, and naloxone methiodide, which cannot pass through it. Neither opioid receptor antagonists altered the MBP when injected at a dose of 10 mg/kg iv. However, the lowering of MBP in response to morphine (-39.2 ± 3.6%) was significantly blocked by naloxone hydrochloride (-6.6 ± 1.2%) and naloxone methiodide (-7.6 ± 1.8%) (Fig. 3). The hypotensive effect of BLF was not altered by naloxone methiodide. The low dose (2 mg/kg) of naloxone hydrochloride did not affect the BLF response; however, the higher dose of 10 mg/kg of naloxone hydrochloride significantly reversed the hypotensive response to BLF from -29.3 ± 3.0 to -14.1 ± 4.5%.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Influence of opioid antagonists on the hypotensive effects of BLF and morphine. Changes in MBP in response to the intravenous injection of BLF (384 nmol/kg) and morphine (133 nmol/kg) in the presence or absence of naloxone hydrochloride (NLX-H; 2, 10 mg/kg iv) or naloxone methiodide (NLX-M; 10 mg/kg iv) are shown. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.001 vs. control (unpaired t-test).

 

Role of NO production. In the fourth set of experiments, the role of NO release in mediating hypotensive effects of BLF (384 nmol/kg iv), ACh (100 ng/kg iv), and morphine (133 nmol/kg iv) was investigated. The actual values of MBP are represented in Fig. 4A, and the changes in MBP are summarized in Fig. 4B. Responses were measured following intravenous administration of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (50 mg/kg), and the NO synthase inhibitor was found to increase MBP (Fig. 4A). In the presence of L-NAME, decreases in MBP in response to BLF, ACh, and morphine were significantly reduced (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, the inactive enantiomer of L-NAME, D-NAME (50 mg/kg iv), did not affect the hypotensive effect of BLF.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Influence of nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor on the hypotensive effects of BLF, ACh, and morphine. Actual values in MBP (A) and changes in MBP (B) in response to the intravenous injection of BLF (384 nmol/kg), ACh (100 ng/kg), and morphine (133 nmol/kg) in the presence or absence of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 50 mg/kg iv) or NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME; 50 mg/kg iv) are shown. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.001 vs. control (unpaired t-test).

 

Role of muscarinic ACh receptor and PG production. In the fifth set of experiments, the involvement of a muscarinic ACh receptor in mediating the hypotensive effects of BLF (384 nmol/kg iv) and ACh (100 ng/kg iv) was investigated. Responses were measured 5 min after intravenous administration of the muscarinic ACh receptor antagonist atropine (0.1 mg/kg), which by itself did not alter MBP. In the presence of atropine, however, ACh-induced hypotension was completely abolished by atropine. In contrast, the hypotensive effect of BLF was not affected by atropine (Fig. 5).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Influence of a muscarinic ACh receptor antagonist on the hypotensive effects of BLF and ACh. Changes in MBP in response to the intravenous injection of BLF (384 nmol/kg) and ACh (100 ng/kg) in the presence or absence of atropine (0.1 mg/kg iv) are shown. ****P < 0.001 vs. control (unpaired t-test).

 

In the last series of experiments, the role of PG release in mediating the hypotensive effect of BLF (384 nmol/kg iv) was investigated 15 min after the administration of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac (3 mg/kg iv). The administration of diclofenac (3 mg/kg iv) did not alter MBP. This dose of diclofenac was chosen based on the report that diclofenac (3 mg/kg iv) completely inhibits PG production after intravenous injection of arachidonic acid in rats (18). Diclofenac did not affect BLF-induced hypotension (data not shown).

In Vitro Experiment

BLF-induced relaxation in the rat thoracic aorta. To clarify the vascular function of BLF, we performed isolated vascular ring myography. First, we investigated whether BLF causes relaxation of the rat thoracic aorta. The responses to BLF (1-10 µM) in the endothelium-intact and -denuded aortic rings precontracted with phenylephrine (1 µM) are presented in Fig. 6A and summarized in Fig. 6B. BLF caused concentration-dependent relaxation in the endothelium-intact aorta. Endothelial denudation completely abolished the BLF-induced relaxation.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. BLF-induced relaxation in the rat thoracic aorta. Typical responses to BLF in endothelium-intact (E+) and endothelium-denuded (E-) aortic rings precontracted with phenylephrine (Phe) are represented in A, and data are summarized in B (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). ****P < 0.001 vs. endothelium-denuded group (unpaired t-test). SNP, sodium nitroprusside.

 

Role of NO and ATP-sensitive potassium channel. We then investigated the role of NO in the BLF-induced relaxation of the aortic rings. In the presence of L-NAME (100 µM), BLF-induced relaxation was completely abolished (Fig. 7A). This concentration of L-NAME also abolished ACh (5 µM)-induced relaxation. On the other hand, D-NAME (100 µM) did not affect BLF-induced relaxation. Last, we investigated whether the ATP-sensitive potassium channel is involved in BLF-induced relaxation of the aortic rings. Figure 7B shows that an ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker, glibenclamide (3 µM), did not affect BLF-induced relaxation. This concentration of glibenclamide significantly reversed the relaxation induced by an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, pinacidil (1 µM).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Influence of the NO synthase inhibitor and ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker on BLF-induced relaxation in the rat thoracic aorta. The responses to BLF or ACh in the presence or absence of L-NAME (100 µM) or D-NAME (100 µM) are shown in A. The responses to BLF or pinacidil (Pin) in the presence or absence of glibenclamide (Gli, 3 µM) are shown in B.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we demonstrated the endothelium-dependent hypotensive effect of BLF and its mediation by NO production. The results of the present study showed that intravenous injection of BLF decreased MBP but did not affect HR (Fig. 2). On the other hand, intravenous injection of the opioid agonist morphine decreased both MBP and HR. These data indicate that the effect of BLF on the cardiovascular system is different from that of morphine. We then investigated whether BLF-induced hypotension involves the activation of the peripheral or central opioidergic systems. The hypotensive effect of BLF was significantly reduced in the presence of naloxone hydrochloride only (Fig. 3), whereas the hypotensive effect of morphine was significantly inhibited by both naloxone hydrochloride and naloxone methiodide. These data may suggest that the hypotensive effect of intravenously administered morphine is mainly mediated by the peripheral opioidergic system, while the hypotensive effect of intravenously administered BLF is mediated by the central opioidergic system. The present data also suggest that the hypotensive effect of BLF is not mediated by the activation of peripheral opioid receptors, including the µ3-opioid receptor in the EC. In addition to the peripheral tissues (e.g., EC), an LF receptor has also been identified in the CNS (13, 33). It is reported that BLF enters into the cerebrospinal fluid via receptor-mediated transcytosis (14). However, the maximum hypotensive effect of BLF was observed at 60 s after the intravenous injection in this study (Fig. 2). It is unlikely that intravenously administered BLF enters the CNS and acts on its receptor within 60 s. BLF may influence the central opioidergic system from outside the blood-brain barrier, although its mechanism is difficult to explain from the present data. The precise mechanism of BLF-induced hypotension seems to be rather complicated and to require further investigation.

We next investigated the role of NO in mediating BLF-induced hypotension. NO is known as an endothelium-derived relaxing factor that causes vasodilation and controls vascular tone. It is reported that the blood pressure-buffering effect of endogenous NO is mediated by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) (37). In the present study, BLF-induced hypotension was completely abolished by L-NAME (Fig. 4). We also found that BLF induced relaxation in the rat thoracic aorta precontracted with phenylephrine (Fig. 6). Endothelium denudation completely abolished BLF-induced relaxation. L-NAME also completely abolished the BLF-induced relaxation (Fig. 7A). These results suggest that BLF induces vasodilation via activation of eNOS, which produces NO in the EC. LF binds to specific high- and low-affinity sites on the EC (14). After binding to the EC, LF crosses from the apical to the abluminal surface without being degraded, possibly via caveolae (14) that contain ~50% of the eNOS in the EC (44). The hypotensive effect of BLF is not mediated by the muscarinic ACh receptor (Fig. 5) or the peripheral opioid receptor, which are well known to cause vasodilation via NO production from eNOS (Fig. 3). BLF may activate eNOS via its receptor-mediated mechanism or via direct interaction with eNOS, as in the case of the heat shock protein 90 (44). In addition to the peripheral hypotensive effect of NO, several studies suggest that NO is involved in the central regulation of the cardiovascular functions (2, 12, 21, 22). However, since the maximum hypotensive effect of BLF was observed at 60 s after the intravenous injection in this study, it is unlikely that intravenously administered BLF produces NO in the CNS within 60 s.

It is reported that NO activates the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in the vascular smooth muscle cell (29). The activation of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel causes the hyperpolarization of the membrane potential and is well known to reduce vascular excitability. Thus we investigated the role of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in mediating BLF-induced relaxation in the aortic rings (Fig. 7B). We found that the selective ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide did not affect BLF-induced relaxation. This result suggests that the ATP-sensitive potassium channel is not involved in BLF-induced vascular relaxation.

In addition to NO, prostacyclin (PGI2), which is produced by the EC, is well known to cause vasodilation. There are no published data on whether LF affects PGI2 production from the EC. However, it is reported that BLF inhibits PGE2 production from the macrophages in vitro (3). Based on this report, we investigated the role of PG synthesis in BLF-induced hypotension. We found that BLF-induced hypotension did not change in the presence of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (data not shown), suggesting that no PG-mediated mechanism is involved in BLF-induced hypotension.

The infants of many mammalian species constantly ingest exogenous LF from their mother's milk (26). As LF is an ubiquitous protein in the bodily fluids (4, 23, 25, 27, 32, 41, 45), endogenous LF is also available to both infants and adult animals and may participate in the physiological blood pressure buffer system. Under inflammatory conditions, LF production is increased in the periphery by neutrophils (6, 23, 45). Thus, when inflammation occurs, BLF-induced vasodilation has biological importance. Especially in local inflammation, BLF-induced vasodilation may increase the blood supply to the injury sites and facilitate their healing. Several studies reported that orally administered BLF shows various functions in adult rats (19, 30, 46). Thus not only endogenous but also exogenous LF can act in adult animals.

We used LF purified from bovine milk in the present study. The LFs of humans, bovids, mice, and pigs share 70% overall amino acid sequence and 100% identity in several stretches of 10-15 amino acids at the COOH terminus (42). In addition, we reported that recombinant human LF possesses a level of antinociceptive activity similar to that of BLF in the rat formalin test (19). Although we used BLF and no LF from other species in this study, it is likely that not only BLF but also LF from different species may possess hypotensive effects.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that BLF produces hypotension via an endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which is strongly mediated by NO production, and that BLF-induced hypotension is also possibly mediated by the central opioidergic system. In addition to the effect of BLF on the vascular system presented here, LF has many physiological functions, including inducing the primary defense against bacterial and viral infection, anti-inflammation, and antinociception (6, 19, 46). This wide range of LF activity suggests that LF has physiological importance.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This investigation was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 14360179) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and the Food Science Institute Foundation in Japan to E. Harada.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: E. Harada, Dept. of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori Univ., Tottori 680-0945, Japan (E-mail: harada{at}muses.tottori-u.ac.jp).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ackley S, Barrett-Connor E, and Suarez L. Dairy products, calcium, and blood pressure. Am J Clin Nutr 38: 457-461, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Arnolda LF, McKitrick DJ, Llewellyn-Smith IJ, and Minson JB. Nitric oxide limits pressor responses to sympathetic activation in rat spinal cord. Hypertension 36: 1089-1092, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bartal L, Padeh S, and Passwell JH. Lactoferrin inhibits prostaglandin E2 secretion by breast milk macrophages. Pediatr Res 21: 54-57, 1987.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Baynes RD and Bezwoda WR. Lactoferrin and the inflammatory response. Adv Exp Med Biol 357: 133-141, 1994.[Medline]
  5. Bierenbaum ML, Wolf E, Bisgeier G, and Maginnis WP. Dietary calcium. A method of lowering blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 1: 149S-152S, 1988.[Medline]
  6. Brock JH. The physiology of lactoferrin. Biochem Cell Biol 80: 1-6, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Buonopane GJ, Kilara A, Smith JS, and McCarthy RD. Effect of skim milk supplementation on blood cholesterol concentration, blood pressure, and triglycerides in a free-living human population. J Am Coll Nutr 11: 56-67, 1992.[Abstract]
  8. Champion HC, Bivalacqua TJ, Zadina JE, Kastin AJ, Hyman AL, and Kadowitz PJ. Role of nitric oxide in mediating vasodilator responses to opioid peptides in the rat. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29: 229-232, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Champion HC, Bivalacqua TJ, Zadina JE, Kastin AJ, and Kadowitz PJ. Vasodilator responses to the endomorphin peptides, but not nociceptin/OFQ, are mediated by nitric oxide release. Ann NY Acad Sci 897: 165-172, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Champion HC and Kadowitz PJ. D-[Ala2]endomorphin 2 and endomorphin 2 have nitric oxide-dependent vasodilator activity in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1690-H1697, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chu X, Xu N, Li P, Mao L, and Wang JQ. Inhibition of cardiovascular activity following microinjection of novel opioid-like neuropeptide nociceptin (orphanin FQ) into the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla. Brain Res 829: 134-142, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Del Carmen Garcia M, Celuch SM, and Adler-Graschinsky E. Possible participation of spinal nitric oxide in the control of the blood pressure in anesthetized rats. Brain Res 764: 67-74, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Faucheux BA, Nillesse N, Damier P, Spik G, Mouatt-Prigent A, Pierce A, Leveugle B, Kubis N, Hauw JJ, and Agid Y. Expression of lactoferrin receptors is increased in the mesencephalon of patients with Parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9603-9607, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fillebeen C, Descamps L, Dehouck MP, Fenart L, Benaissa M, Spik G, Cecchelli R, and Pierce A. Receptor-mediated transcytosis of lactoferrin through the blood-brain barrier. J Biol Chem 274: 7011-7017, 1999a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fillebeen C, Mitchell V, Dexter D, Benaissa M, Beauvillain J, Spik G, and Pierce A. Lactoferrin is synthesized by mouse brain tissue and its expression is enhanced after MPTP treatment. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 72: 183-194, 1999.[Medline]
  16. Fillebeen C, Ruchoux MM, Mitchell V, Vincent S, Benaissa M, and Pierce A. Lactoferrin is synthesized by activated microglia in the human substantia nigra and its synthesis by the human microglial CHME cell line is upregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha or 1-methyl-4-phenylpyri-dinium treatment. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 96: 103-113, 2001.[Medline]
  17. Garcia-Palmieri MR, Costas R Jr, Cruz-Vidal M, Sorlie PD, Tillotson J, and Havlik RJ. Milk consumption, calcium intake, and decreased hypertension in Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Heart Health Program study. Hypertension 6: 322-328, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Giuliano F and Warner TD. Origins of prostaglandin E2: involvements of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 in human and rat systems. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303: 1001-1006, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hayashida K, Takeuchi T, Shimizu H, Ando K, and Harada E. Novel function of bovine milk-derived lactoferrin on antinociception mediated by µ-opioid receptor in the rat spinal cord. Brain Res 965: 239-245, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Hayashida K, Takeuchi T, Shimizu H, Ando K, and Harada E. Lactoferrin enhances opioid-mediated analgesia via nitric oxide in the rat spinal cord. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R306-R312, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Koga N, Takano Y, Honda K, Saito R, and Kamiya H. Roles of nitric oxide in the spinal cord in cardiovascular regulation in rats. Neurosci Lett 267: 173-176, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Lee SB, Koh HC, Kim ON, Sung KW, and Kim SY. Intrathecal administration of sodium nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor, increases blood pressure in anesthetized rats. Neurosci Lett 203: 53-56, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Levay PF and Viljoen M. Lactoferrin: a general review. Haematologica 80: 252-267, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Leveugle B, Faucheux BA, Bouras C, Nillesse N, Spik G, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, and Hof PR. Cellular distribution of the iron-binding protein lactotransferrin in the mesencephalon of Parkinson's disease cases. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 91: 566-572, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Maffei FA, Heine RP, Whalen MJ, Mortimer LF, and Carcillo JA. Levels of antimicrobial molecules defensin and lactoferrin are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis. Pediatrics 103: 987-992, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Masson PL and Heremans JF. Lactoferrin in milk from different species. Comp Biochem Physiol B 39: 119-129, 1971.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Masson PL, Heremans JF, and Dive C. An iron-binding protein common to many external secretions. Clin Chim Acta 14: 735-739, 1966.[CrossRef]
  28. McCarron DA, Morris CD, Henry HJ, and Stanton JL. Blood pressure and nutrient intake in the United States. Science 224: 1392-1398, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Murphy ME and Brayden JE. Nitric oxide hyperpolarizes rabbit mesenteric arteries via ATP-sensitive potassium channels. J Physiol 486: 47-58, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Norrby K, Mattsby-Baltzer I, Innocenti M, and Tuneberg S. Orally administered bovine lactoferrin systemically inhibits VEGF(165)-mediated angiogenesis in the rat. Int J Cancer 91: 236-240, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Obarzanek E, Velletri PA, and Cutler JA. Dietary protein and blood pressure. JAMA 275: 1598-1603, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Qadri F, Raqib R, Ahmed F, Rahman T, Wenneras C, Das SK, Alam NH, Mathan MM, and Svennerholm AM. Increased levels of inflammatory mediators in children and adults infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 221-229, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Qian ZM and Wang Q. Expression of iron transport proteins and excessive iron accumulation in the brain in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 27: 257-267, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Reed D, McGee D, Yano K, and Hankin J. Diet, blood pressure, and multicollinearity. Hypertension 7: 405-410, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sakaguchi H, Anai N, Miyamoto A, Ishiguro S, and Nishio A. Mechanisms of the enhanced contractile response to a low concentration of phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate in thoracic aorta isolated from rats with dietary magnesium deficiency. Jpn J Pharmacol 67: 9-13, 1995.[Medline]
  36. Sorimachi K, Akimoto K, Hattori Y, Ieiri T, and Niwa A. Activation of macrophages by lactoferrin: secretion of TNF-{alpha}, IL-8 and NO. Biochem Mol Biol Int 43: 79-87, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Stauss HM, Godecke A, Mrowka R, Schrader J, and Persson PB. Enhanced blood pressure variability in eNOS knockout mice. Hypertension 33: 1359-1363, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Stefano GB, Hartman A, Bilfinger TV, Magazine HI, Liu Y, Casares F, and Goligorsky MS. Presence of the µ3 opiate receptor in endothelial cells. Coupling to nitric oxide production and vasodilation. J Biol Chem 270: 30290-30293, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Sun SY, Liu Z, Li P, and Ingenito AJ. Central effects of opioid agonists and naloxone on blood pressure and heart rate in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Gen Pharmacol 27: 1187-1194, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Takeuchi T, Hayashida K, Inagaki H, Kuwahara M, Tsubone H, Yajima T, and Harada E. Opioid mediated suppressive effect of milk-derived lactoferrin on distress induced by maternal separation in the rat pups. Brain Res 979: 216-224, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Talukder MJ, Takeuchi T, and Harada E. Transport of colostral macromolecules into the cerebrospinal fluid via plasma in newborn calves. J Dairy Sci 85: 514-524, 2002.[Abstract]
  42. Teng CT. Lactoferrin gene expression and regulation: an overview. Biochem Cell Biol 80: 7-16, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Teschemacher H and Koch G. Opioids in the milk. Endocr Regul 25: 147-150, 1991.[Medline]
  44. Tsutsui M, Ueno S, Toyohira Y, and Yanagihara N. Structure and function of nitric oxide synthases [Japanese]. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso 47: 2024-2031, 2002.[Medline]
  45. Van der Poll T, Coyle SM, Levi M, Jansen PM, Dentener M, Barbosa K, Buurman WA, Hack CE, ten Cate JW, Agosti JM, and Lowry SF. Effect of a recombinant dimeric tumor necrosis factor receptor on inflammatory responses to intravenous endotoxin in normal humans. Blood 89: 3727-3734, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Zimecki M, Miedzybrodzki R, and Szymaniec S. Oral treatment of rats with bovine lactoferrin inhibits carrageenan-induced inflammation; correlation with decreased cytokine production. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 46: 361-365, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. M. Moreno-Navarrete, F. J. Ortega, J. Bassols, A. Castro, W. Ricart, and J. M. Fernandez-Real
Association of Circulating Lactoferrin Concentration and 2 Nonsynonymous LTF Gene Polymorphisms with Dyslipidemia in Men Depends on Glucose-Tolerance Status
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2008; 54(2): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
286/2/R359    most recent
00214.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Harada, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.