AJP - Regu Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287: R349-R353, 2004. First published April 1, 2004; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00728.2003
0363-6119/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/2/R349    most recent
00728.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Breukelen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Breukelen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY

Seasonal and state-dependent changes of eIF4E and 4E-BP1 during mammalian hibernation: implications for the control of translation during torpor

Frank van Breukelen,1 Nahum Sonenberg,2 and Sandra L. Martin3

1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4004; 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado 80262; and 2Department of Biochemistry and McGill Cancer Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G IY6, Canada

Submitted 24 December 2003 ; accepted in final form 24 March 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Mammalian hibernation involves cessation of energetically costly processes typical of homeostatic regulation including protein synthesis. To further elucidate the mechanisms employed in depressing translation, we surveyed key eukaryotic initiation factors [eIF2, eIF4B, eIF4E, eIF4GI and -II, and 4E-binding protein-1 (4E-BP1), -2, and -3] for their availability and phosphorylation status in the livers of golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis) across the hibernation cycle. Western blot analyses indicated only one significant locus for regulation of translational initiation in ground squirrel liver: control of eIF4E. We found seasonal variation in a potent regulator of eIF4E activity, 4E-BP1. Summer squirrels lack 4E-BP1 and apparently control eIF4E activity through direct phosphorylation. In winter, eIF4E is regulated through binding with 4E-BP1. During the euthermic periods that separate bouts of torpor (interbout arousal), 4E-BP1 is hyperphosphorylated to promote initiation. However, during torpor, 4E-BP1 is hypophosphorylated and cap-dependent initiation of translation is restricted. The regulation of cap-dependent initiation of translation may allow for the differential expression of proteins directed toward enhancing survivorship.

eukaryotic initiation factor 4E; 4E binding protein-1; protein synthesis


IN RESPONSE TO LIMITED FOOD availability and harsh environmental conditions, many mammals enter a state of depressed metabolism or torpor (see Refs. 2, 27 for review). Ground-dwelling sciurid rodents are the masters of this adaptive hypothermia because they can maintain body temperatures (Tb) below 0°C for up to 3 wk with metabolic rates as low as 1/100th of basal metabolic rate. These squirrels follow a strict circannual rhythm of reproduction, fattening, and hibernation. The winter hibernation season is comprised of a series of sequential bouts of torpor, wherein Tb approaches that of ambient temperature. These torpor bouts are interrupted by periodic rewarmings, or interbout arousals, to core temperatures near 37°C that usually last <24 h.

Concordant with limited energy availability and low Tb, hibernators depress protein synthesis during torpor but fully restore it during each interbout arousal (4, 8, 26). Translational initiation in the liver is acutely depressed during entrance into torpor at Tb ≤ 18°C, but the data are not fully explained by temperature effects alone and indicate that an active, rapidly reversible mechanism for inhibiting initiation is also required (26). The mechanisms that surround this depression and resumption of protein synthesis are incompletely understood.

Translation initiation is mediated by the eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). These proteins are responsible for loading initiator methionyl-tRNA onto the translational start site of appropriate transcripts and for recruiting the ribosomal subunits for initiation of translation. An examination of the pathway for initiation of translation reveals two major loci for regulation: the functions of eIF2 and eIF4 (reviewed in Ref. 15; Fig. 1). Several studies have implicated eIF2, eIF4B, eIF4E, and eIF4G in controlling translational initiation under a variety of conditions in nonhibernators (6, 11, 12, 15). Partial phosphorylation (from 2 to 13%) of eIF2{alpha} has been implicated in the downregulation of translational initiation in brain during torpor in ground squirrels (8), but this change may not be sufficient to fully explain the degree of translational depression (8) and may not occur in all tissues (16). eIF2{alpha} is the only translation factor examined in hibernators to date. Therefore, to gain a broader perspective on translational control during hibernation, we surveyed the key eukaryotic initiation factors eIF2, -4B, -4E, -4GI, and -4GII, as well as the 4E binding proteins 4E-BP1, -2, and -3, for their availability and phosphorylation status in the liver across the hibernation cycle.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the major steps associated with initiation of translation. On the basis of other systems, 2 potential loci for regulation have been identified: eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2 and eIF4 function. eIF2 activity binds the initiator tRNA and GTP and delivers this complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit to form the preinitiation complex. eIF4 activity mediates the recruitment of mRNA to the preinitiation complex to form the initiation complex. Those initiation factors that have been shown to regulate initiation in other systems and whose function was assessed in this study are filled in black. Some initiation factors were omitted for clarity (see Ref. 15 for a more complete description). BP, binding protein; MET, initiator methionyl-tRNA.

 

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals. Adult golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis) were captured at Sugarloaf, Boulder County, CO. Some squirrels were killed immediately for seasonal controls (summer active; SA; n = 3). Additional squirrels were implanted with temperature-sensitive radiotelemeters (Minimitter, Sun River, OR) that allowed for the precise determination of torpor state and then placed into an environmental chamber. Ambient temperature was maintained at ~5°C, and food was restricted to promote torpor. Torpid ground squirrels had Tb of approximately 5–7°C. Squirrels were killed after being torpid for 7 days or 80% of their torpor bout (late torpor, LT; n = 3) and when euthermic in between torpor bouts (interbout aroused, IBA; n = 3). Livers were removed, snap frozen in liquid N2, and stored at –80°C until use.

Sample preparation and Western blot analyses. Livers were pulverized in liquid N2 and homogenized in either sample buffer A or B. Sample buffer A consisted of 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM glycerolphosphate, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.1 mM orthovanadate, and 50 nM okadaic acid. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 g, 4°C, to remove cellular debris. Sample buffer B consisted of 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.3, 20% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 0.4 M {beta}-mercaptoethanol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4°C for 30 min to remove cellular debris. Protein concentration of all samples was determined using a modified Lowry assay. Except as otherwise noted, the general protocol for Western blotting was as follows. Samples were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE and transferred to an appropriate membrane. Nonspecific protein binding was blocked by incubation of the membrane in 3% milk in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8, and 150 mM NaCl (Tris-buffered saline; TBS) with 0.5% Tween-20 (TTBS). Incubation conditions for use of the primary antibody were specific to the antibody as described later. Washing between incubation steps consisted of one 5-min wash in TBS, followed by two 5-min washes in TTBS, and a final 5-min wash in TBS. All visualization was performed using ECL (Amersham) with either film or a Bio-Rad Gel Doc imager.

eIF2{alpha}, eIF4B, and eIF4E blotting. Forty (eIF2{alpha} and eIF4B) or 80 µg (eIF4E) total protein samples made up in sample buffer A were electrophoresed on 15% (30:0.5 acrylamide:bisacrylamide) gels before transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. For primary antibody incubations the following conditions were used. A monoclonal antibody raised against eIF2{alpha} was diluted 1:5,000 in high-salt (500 mM NaCl) TTBS with 3% milk. A rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against eIF4B was diluted 1:1,000 in standard TTBS with 3% milk. A monoclonal antibody raised against rabbit eIF4E (Transduction Laboratories cat. no. E27620) was used at 1:1,000 in standard TTBS with 1% milk and 1% BSA.

4E-BP1, -2, and -3. Samples (200 µg total protein) in sample buffer A were heat denatured at 100°C for 7 min to enrich for the binding proteins, which are heat stable (9). Samples were cooled on ice for 5 min before centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C and 14,000 g. Laemmli sample buffer was added to the supernatant, and samples were electrophoresed on 20% (30:0.8 acrylamide:bisacrylamide) gels before transfer to 0.22-µm nitrocellulose membranes. Polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits against 4E-BP1, 4E-BP2, and 4E-BP3 were used at 1:2,500, 1:1,000, and 1:500 dilutions in 3% milk in TTBS, respectively.

eIF4GI and -II blotting. Forty micrograms total protein samples made up in sample buffer B were electrophoresed on 9% (37.5:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide) gels and transferred to PVDF membrane. Primary antibody incubation was performed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to human eIF4GI diluted 1:5,000 or a rabbit polyclonal antibody to eIF4GII diluted 1:500 in TTBS with 3% milk.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Western blot analyses indicated only one significant locus for regulation of translational initiation in ground squirrel liver: control of eIF4E. eIF4E concentration did not change as a result of season or state (data not shown), but eIF4E activity was apparently regulated through reversible phosphorylation. Western blot analysis revealed three bands (Fig. 2). In winter animals (IBA and LT), the uppermost band (i.e., the hyperphosphorylated form of eIF4E) had ~40% greater intensity than the corresponding band for summer animals (P < 0.05; ANOVA). The middle band (less phosphorylated) was reduced reciprocally in winter compared with summer (P < 0.05; ANOVA), and no change in the hypophosphorylated lower band was detected.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Results of Western blot analysis of eIF4E phosphorylation in livers obtained from ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis) in late torpor (LT), interbout-aroused (IBA), and summer active (SA) stages of the hibernation cycle. Values plot means ± SE for each of 3 forms of eIF4E that differ by their degree of phosphorylation: upper, middle, and lower bands represent hyperphosphorylated, to somewhat phosphorylated, to hypophosphorylated, respectively. The intensities of upper and middle bands are significantly different between summer (SA) and winter (IBA and LT) animals (ANOVA, P < 0.05).

 
Western blot analyses of the eIF4E binding protein 4E-BP1 demonstrated that 4E-BP1 is not detectable in the summer animals but is present in winter (Fig. 3A). During the interbout arousal, 4E-BP1 was hyperphosphorylated in contrast to torpor, where it was hypophosphorylated (Fig. 3B). No significant changes were observed for 4E-BP2 and no 4E-BP3 was detected (data not shown).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Western blot analyses for seasonal and stage-specific regulation of 4E-BP1. A: lanes contain liver extract from 3 individuals each of LT, IBA, and SA squirrels. This gel did not resolve the different forms of the protein due to differential phosphorylation but demonstrates the seasonal regulation of steady-state levels of 4E-BP1 in liver. B: lanes contain liver extract from 3 LT and IBA animals and 1 SA animal resolved in conditions that distinguish at least 3 forms of the protein (ticks at left) based on differential phosphorylation. The hyperphosphorylated form is the slowest migrating of these 3 bands, and the hypophosphorylated form is the fastest.

 
Phosphorylation of eIF2{alpha} was observed to accompany downregulation of the initiation of protein synthesis under a variety of conditions, including heat shock, viral infection, amino acid or glucose starvation, and Ca2+ mobilization (5). In ground squirrel livers, no significant difference in eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation or availability was detected (ANOVA; P > 0.05; data not shown).

Dephosphorylation of eIF4B is associated with the translational depression seen during heat shock, serum depletion, and mitosis, whereas phosphorylation of eIF4B is associated with the stimulatory effects of insulin on translation initiation (21). However, no changes in phosphorylation status were observed across the hibernation season for eIF4B (data not shown).

There are two forms of eIF4G in mammals, and both undergo partial cleavage by poliovirus to downregulate translation of cellular proteins during infection (12). A similar partial cleavage of eIF4G is observed after ischemia in rats (6). Neither eIF4G I nor II showed any evidence for cleavage or other alterations by Western blot across the hibernation season in ground squirrel liver (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This screen of translation factors for differences of expression or modification in the liver as a function of hibernation revealed only two proteins, eIF4E and 4E-BP1, with significant changes. eIF4 activity mediates recruitment of mRNA to ribosomes and is usually the rate-limiting step for initiation of translation (11). The specific role of eIF4E in this complex is to recognize the 5'-cap of the mRNA. Once eIF4E is bound to the capped mRNA, it can be recruited by eIF4G to the preinitiation complex, thereby forming the initiation complex. Regulation of eIF4E, and hence initiation of translation on capped mRNAs, is known to occur by two mechanisms: 1) direct phosphorylation; and 2) interaction with binding proteins, 4E-BPs. Hyperphosphorylation of eIF4E increases its affinity for the m7GTP cap structure of the mRNA approximately three- to fourfold relative to hypophosphorylated forms, enhancing translational initiation (23). Interaction of eIF4E with a binding protein, 4E-BP, competes with eIF4E's binding of eIF4G, thereby preventing formation of the initiation complex. The affinity of 4E-BP for eIF4E is also known to be modulated by phosphorylation; when 4E-BP1 is hypophosphorylated, it is able to efficiently bind eIF4E to restrict cap-dependent initiation. In contrast, 4E-BP1 that is hyperphosphorylated on up to six known phosphorylation sites results in decreased binding of eIF4E and increased translation rates (10).

In ground squirrels, we have found that eIF4E is in a hyperphosphorylated and presumably more constitutively active form during winter than in summer (Fig. 2). This result initially appears counterintuitive: all studies to date indicate a severe depression of protein synthesis during hibernation, down to 0.13 to 0.5% of active rates (13, 28). Furthermore, because protein synthesis accounts for approximately 12–25% of a typical cellular energy budget (24), increased protein synthesis is at odds with a strategy of energy conservation like hibernation. It is worth noting that, although it is typical that enhanced phosphorylation of eIF4E increases translation, there are examples of stress responses that increase phosphorylation of eIF4E without concomitant increases in translation. For those situations, it has been proposed that negative effects occur on other components of the translational apparatus, such that eIF4E phosphorylation is a compensatory mechanism induced by stress as an attempt to stimulate translation (11).

In the case of hibernation, the rapid cycles between torpor and euthermia may benefit by a generally enhanced activity of eIF4E (hyperphosphorylated) that can be controlled by another component. Intriguingly, 4E-BP1 is not detected in squirrels sampled during the summer but is readily detected during winter (Fig. 3A). The winter steady-state levels of 4E-BP1 are altered by phosphorylation, with the hyperphosphorylated form with reduced affinity for eIF4E predominating during each interbout arousal and the hypophosphorylated forms with higher affinity for eIF4E predominating during torpor (Fig. 3B). The patterns of expression and phosphorylation of eIF4E and its binding protein 4E-BP1 suggest a novel model for regulation of translational activity across the circannual cycle of a hibernating mammal (Fig. 4). Because the steady-state level of the constitutively active, hyperphosphorylated form of eIF4E is lower in summer than in winter (Fig. 2), it appears that summer squirrels control cap-dependent initiation via direct phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of eIF4E in the absence of 4E-BP1. In contrast, winter squirrels generally elevate the activity of eIF4E and hence cap-dependent translation by hyperphosphorylation but then control it by binding and release of 4E-BP1. During torpor, when translational initiation is depressed, hypophosphorylated 4E-BP1 sequesters eIF4E to restrict cap-dependent initiation. During interbout arousal, 4E-BP1 is hyperphosphorylated, releasing it from the binding site on eIF4E that interacts with eIF4G. Under these conditions, the hyperactivated eIF4E can function maximally to recruit the preinitiation complex via binding of eIF4G, thereby promoting cap-dependent initiation of translation. Hyperactivation of translation during interbout arousal has also been suggested based on the results of in vivo metabolic labeling experiments that used radioactive amino acid precursors to measure protein synthesis (28).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Schematic representation of the model for eIF4E function during hibernation. When eIF4E binds eIF4G, cap-dependent initiation of translation (protein synthesis; PS) is promoted. eIF4E activity may be enhanced by direct phosphorylation. During the summer (SA), the lack of 4E-BP1 apparently results in the direct regulation of eIF4E through reversible phosphorylation. During winter (IBA and LT), eIF4E appears to be in a more constitutively active form. However, the availability of a binding protein (4E-BP) allows for an additional mode of regulation. During torpor (LT), hypophosphorylated 4E-BP1 is available (active form) and binds to eIF4E to prevent formation of the eIF4E/eIF4G complex, and cap-dependent initiation of translation is inhibited. Hyperphosphorylated 4E-BP1 is unable to bind eIF4E. Because 4E-BP1 is hyperphosphorylated when the animals are aroused (IBA), cap-dependent initiation of translation is promoted. The mammalian target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) is thought to be responsible for 4E-BP1 phosphorylation based on work in nonhibernators (11). Calendar months (left to right) are June through February. TB, body temperature.

 
eIF4E regulation specifically affects cap-dependent initiation of translation. In recent years, a cap-independent mechanism for initiation of protein synthesis has also been described; internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) allow bypass of the requirement for eIF4E recognition of the cap structure (for review, see Ref. 14). While the exact in vivo function and extent of IRES-dependent initiation remain to be elucidated, recent work suggests IRES function may be particularly important in times of physiological stress, including mild hypothermia and oxygen stress (3, 7, 17, 18, 20). Thus the utilization of IRES-mediated translation at a time where the eIF4E system is inactive may promote differential gene expression geared toward enhancing survivorship of torpor. Our laboratories are currently investigating the role of IRES-mediated initiation during torpor.

The lack of 4E-BP1 during summer could have broader implications for hibernation physiology than simply its probable role in translational control during the torpor-arousal cycles of hibernation; seasonal variation in 4E-BP1 expression may also contribute to the annual cycle of weight gain and fat deposition in ground squirrels. In preparation for hibernation, adult golden-mantled ground squirrels increase body fat threefold (19). The development of large depots of brown adipose tissue (BAT) is particularly critical for the successful employment of hibernation because this is the primary site of nonshivering thermogenesis during arousal from torpor (22). The absence of 4E-BP1 during summer may contribute to the accumulation of BAT per se. White adipose tissue (WAT) of knock-out mice for 4E-BP1 (Eif4ebp1–/–) contains numerous multilocular adipocytes, which are normally associated with BAT (25). Indeed, expression of the mRNA for uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) increases sixfold in the absence of 4E-BP1. UCP1, which is usually expressed in BAT, is responsible for thermogenesis via the uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation from ATP synthesis (1). Thus it appears that 4E-BP1 may be involved in the emergence of BAT from WAT. Interestingly, knockout animals also experience 15% higher metabolic rates than controls and thus 4E-BP1 may play a role in overall energy expenditure (25).

We found no evidence of increased phosphorylation of eIF2{alpha} in the liver during hibernation, in contrast to the results of an earlier study in brain where a sixfold increase in eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation, from 2 to 13% of the total eIF2{alpha} present in the extract, was observed during torpor (8). The earlier study also reported reduced translational capacity of brain (based on incorporation of a radiolabeled amino acid) in a single animal as it entered torpor, at temperatures above the extremely cold Tb of torpor. It was concluded that an active inhibition of initiation, likely the observed phosphorylation of eIF2{alpha}, was responsible for the downregulation of protein synthesis in the torpor phase of hibernation (8). However, in light of the results of this study and other more recent data, this conclusion warrants further discussion. We subsequently showed that translational initiation in liver is depressed at Tb ≤ 18°C as squirrels enter torpor. Furthermore, initiation and elongation are fully coupled again only at Tb ≥ 18°C as the animals rewarm during arousal (26). The lone entrance animal used by Frerichs et al. (8) had a core Tb of 19°C at the onset of the experiment, and then its Tb dropped to 7.5°C by the conclusion of the labeling period. Because the majority of the labeling period for their entrance animal was spent with a Tb below 18°C, where initiation slows dramatically if not ceases altogether, the protocol utilized by Frerichs et al. (8) would not distinguish passive from active mechanisms. Other investigators have also found variability in the degree of eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation during torpor. In the kidney, eIF2{alpha} becomes phosphorylated while no such changes were found in BAT (16). Such variability between tissue types and the limited degree of phosphorylation (87% of eIF2{alpha} remained in the active form during torpor in the original study) may indicate that mechanisms in addition to eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation are required to achieve the degree of suppression of protein synthesis that has been observed in torpid hibernators (8, 13, 16, 26). The control of eIF4E activity during hibernation via seasonal expression of 4EB1, whose activity is in turn controlled by reversible phosphorylation in a manner consistent with suppressing translation during torpor but permitting it during interbout arousal, could complement or supplant the control of eIF2{alpha} depending on the tissue type.

The tremendous energetic outlay required for protein synthesis conflicts with the energy-sparing strategy of hibernation. Yet, proteins are essential to maintain cellular integrity and function. It is noteworthy that eliminating the activity of eIF4E would have an effect in addition to a general reduction in protein synthesis; blocking its activity could also be used to alter the population of mRNAs that are translated because capped, but not IRES-containing, mRNAs cease translation when eIF4E is inactivated (11, 14). Although further investigation is required, the regulation of cap-dependent initiation of translation may facilitate differential gene expression by utilizing IRES-mediated translation on a global scale to produce proteins critical to the implementation and/or survival of torpor. The identification of such a strategy that conserves energy by directing limited biochemical efforts toward promoting survivorship would have significant impact on our understanding of hibernation.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by United States Army Research Office Grant DAAD19-01-1-0550 to S. L. Martin and an American Physiological Society Fellowship in Physiological Genomics to F. van Breukelen.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. G. Maniero and C. Carey for assistance with animal care and procurement. Dr. A. Gradi graciously provided the antibody to eIF4GII.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. L. Martin, Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Program, Univ. of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262 (E-mail: sandy.martin{at}UCHSC.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Boss O, Muzzin P, and Giacobino JP. The uncoupling proteins, a review. Eur J Endocrinol 139: 1–9, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Carey HV, Andrews MT, and Martin SL. Mammalian hibernation: cellular and molecular responses to depressed metabolism and low temperature. Physiol Rev 83: 1153–1181, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chappell SA, Owens GC, and Mauro VP. A 5'-leader of Rbm3, a cold-stress induced mRNA, mediates internal initiation of translation with increased efficiency under conditions of mild hypothermia. J Biol Chem 276: 36917–36922, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chen Y, Matsushita M, Nairn AC, Damuni Z, Cai D, Frerichs KU, and Hallenbeck JM. Mechanisms for increased levels of phosphorylation of elongation factor-2 during hibernation in ground squirrels. Biochemistry 40: 11565–11570, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Clemens MJ. Protein kinases that phosphorylate eIF2 and eIF2B, and their role in eukaryotic cell translational control. In: Translational Control, edited by Hershey JWB, Mathews MB, and Sonenberg N. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1996, p. 139–172.
  6. DeGracia DJ, Neumar RW, White BC, and Krause GS. Global brain ischemia and reperfusion: modifications in eukaryotic initiation factors associated with inhibition of translation initiation. J Neurochem 67: 2005–2012, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Fernandez J, Yaman I, Mishra R, Merrick WC, Snider MD, Lamers WH, and Hatzoglou M. Internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation of a mammalian mRNA is regulated by amino acid availability. J Biol Chem 276: 12285–12291, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Frerichs KU, Smith CB, Brenner M, DeGracia DJ, Krause GS, Marrone L, Dever TE, and Hallenbeck JM. Suppression of protein synthesis in brain during hibernation involves inhibition of protein initiation and elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14511–14516, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gingras AC, Gygi SP, Raught B, Polakiewicz RD, Abraham RT, Hoekstra MF, Aebersold R, and Sonenberg N. Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism. Genes Dev 13: 1422–1437, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gingras AC, Raught B, Gygi SP, Niedzwiecka A, Miron M, Burley SK, Polakiewicz RD, Wyslouch-Cieszynska A, Aebersold R, and Sonenberg N. Hierarchical phosphorylation of the translation inhibitor 4E-BP1. Genes Dev 15: 2852–2864, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gingras AC, Raught B, and Sonenberg N. eIF4 initiation factors: Effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 913–963, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Gradi A, Imataka H, Svitkin YV, Rom E, Raught B, Morino S, and Sonenberg N. A novel functional human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G. Mol Cell Biol 18: 334–342, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gulevsky AK, Zagnoiko VI, and Mishneva LG. The intensity of protein synthesis in organs of heterothermal animals on hibernation. Cryo Lett 13: 99–108, 1992.
  14. Hellen CUT and Sarnow P. Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mRNA molecules. Genes Dev 15: 1593–1612, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  15. Hershey JWB and Merrick WC. Translational Control of Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2000, p. 33–88.
  16. Hittel D and Storey KB. The translation state of differentially expressed mRNAs in the hibernating 13-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). Arch Biochem Biophys 401: 244–254, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Holcik M, Sonenberg N, and Korneluk RG. Internal ribosome initiation of translation and the control of cell death. Trends Genet 16: 469–473, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Ito D, Tanaka K, Suzuki S, Dembo T, Kosakai A, and Fukuuchi Y. Up-regulation of the IreI-mediated signaling molecule, Bip, in ischemic rat brain. Neuroreport 12: 4023–4028, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Jameson EW and Mead RA. Seasonal changes in body fat, water and basic weight in Citellus lateralis, Eutamias speciosus, and E. amoenus. J Mammal 45: 359–365, 1964.
  20. Lang KJD, Kappel A, and Goodall GJ. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} mRNA contains an internal ribosome entry site that allows efficient translation during normoxia and hypoxia. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1792–1801, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Le H, Browning KS, and Gallie DR. The phosphorylation state of the wheat translation initiation factors eIF4B, eIF4A, and eIF2 is differentially regulated during seed development and germination. J Biol Chem 273: 20084–20089, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Milner RE, Wang LCH, and Trayhurn P. Brown fat thermogenesis during hibernation and arousal in Richardson's ground squirrel. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 256: R42–R48, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Minich W, Balasta M, Goss D, and Rhoads R. Chromatographic resolution of in vivo phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF-4E: increased Cap affinity of the phosphorylated form. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7668–7672, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rolfe DFS and Brown GC. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol Rev 77: 731–758, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tsukiyama-Kohara K, Poulin F, Kohara M, DeMaria CT, Cheng A, Wu Z, Gingras AC, Katsume A, Elchebly M, Speigelman BM, Harper ME, Tremblay ML, and Sonenberg N. Adipose tissue reduction in mice lacking the translational inhibitor 4E-BP1. Nat Med 7: 1128–1132, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Van Breukelen F and Martin SL. Translational initiation is uncoupled from elongation at 18°C during mammalian hibernation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1374–R1379, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Van Breukelen F and Martin SL. Molecular adaptations in mammalian hibernators: unique adaptations or generalized responses? J Appl Physiol 92: 2640–2647, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zhegunov GF, Mikulinsky YE, and Kudokotseva EV. Hyperactivation of protein synthesis in tissues of hibernating animals on arousal. Cryo Lett 9: 236–245, 1988.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Choi, P.-J. I. Selpides, M. M. Nowell, and B. C. Rourke
Functional overload in ground squirrel plantaris muscle fails to induce myosin isoform shifts
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): R578 - R586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
S. L Martin
Mammalian hibernation: a naturally reversible model for insulin resistance in man?
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2008; 5(2): 76 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
F. I. J. Crawford, C. L. Hodgkinson, E. Ivanova, L. B. Logunova, G. J. Evans, S. Steinlechner, and A. S. I. Loudon
Influence of torpor on cardiac expression of genes involved in the circadian clock and protein turnover in the Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus)
Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 521 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
N. J. Serkova, J. C. Rose, L. E. Epperson, H. V. Carey, and S. L. Martin
Quantitative analysis of liver metabolites in three stages of the circannual hibernation cycle in 13-lined ground squirrels by NMR
Physiol Genomics, September 11, 2007; 31(1): 15 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
D. R. Williams, L. E. Epperson, W. Li, M. A. Hughes, R. Taylor, J. Rogers, S. L. Martin, A. R. Cossins, and A. Y. Gracey
Seasonally hibernating phenotype assessed through transcript screening
Physiol Genomics, December 14, 2005; 24(1): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
L. E. Epperson, T. A. Dahl, and S. L. Martin
Quantitative Analysis of Liver Protein Expression During Hibernation in the Golden-mantled Ground Squirrel
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2004; 3(9): 920 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/2/R349    most recent
00728.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Breukelen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Breukelen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.