AJP - Regu AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287: R1172-R1183, 2004. First published July 22, 2004; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00394.2004
0363-6119/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/5/R1172    most recent
00394.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stocker, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Toney, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stocker, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Toney, G. M.

WATER AND ELECTROLYTE HOMEOSTASIS

Water deprivation increases Fos immunoreactivity in PVN autonomic neurons with projections to the spinal cord and rostral ventrolateral medulla

Sean D. Stocker,1 J. Thomas Cunningham,2 and Glenn M. Toney1

Departments of 1Physiology and 2Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229

Submitted 14 June 2004 ; accepted in final form 15 July 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present study sought to determine whether water deprivation increases Fos immunoreactivity, a neuronal marker related to synaptic activation, in sympathetic-regulatory neurons of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Fluorogold (4%, 50 nl) and cholera toxin subunit B (0.25%, 20–30 nl) were microinjected into the spinal cord (T1–T3) and rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), respectively. Rats were then deprived of water but not food for 48 h. Water deprivation significantly increased the number of Fos-positive nuclei throughout the dorsal, ventrolateral, and lateral parvocellular divisions of the PVN (water deprived, 215 ± 23 cells; control, 45 ± 7 cells, P < 0.01). Moreover, a significantly greater number of Fos-positive nuclei were localized in spinally projecting (11 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1 cells, P < 0.025) and RVLM-projecting (45 ± 7 vs. 7 ± 1 cells, P < 0.025) neurons of the PVN in water-deprived vs. control rats, respectively. The majority of these double-labeled neurons was found in the ventrolateral and lateral parvocellular divisions of the ipsilateral PVN. Interestingly, a significantly greater percentage of RVLM-projecting PVN neurons were Fos positive compared with spinally projecting PVN neurons in the ventrolateral (25.8 ± 0.7 vs. 8.0 ± 1.5%, respectively, P < 0.01) and lateral (23.4 ± 2.1 vs. 5.0 ± 0.9%, respectively, P > 0.01) parvocellular divisions. In addition, we analyzed spinally projecting neurons of the RVLM and found a significantly greater percentage were Fos positive in water-deprived rats than in control rats (26 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 1%, respectively; P < 0.001). Collectively, the present findings indicate that water deprivation evokes a distinct cellular response in sympathetic-regulatory neurons of the PVN and RVLM.

hyperosmolality; hypovolemia; dehydration; sympathetic outflow; parvocellular


WATER DEPRIVATION decreases intravascular volume and increases plasma osmolality (Posmol). In turn, this increases plasma vasopressin and ANG II levels and activates the sympathoadrenal system, thereby maintaining arterial blood pressure (ABP). The sympathoadrenal activation is reflected by increases in circulating catecholamines (50), elevated heart rate (HR) (17, 40, 41, 44), and an apparent increase in lumbar sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) (40). Moreover, our laboratory recently reported that ganglionic blockade with hexamethonium produced a significantly greater fall in ABP of water-deprived rats than control rats (44). Collectively, these observations suggest that sympathetic outflow is elevated after water deprivation; however, the central neural circuitry and cellular mechanisms supporting the elevated SNA in water-deprived rats are not fully understood.

The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) plays an important role in the regulation of SNA and ABP (1, 51). Parvocellular neurons of the PVN have axonal projections to the intermediolateral cell column (IML) of the spinal cord (34, 37, 42, 47), the location of sympathetic preganglionic neurons. In addition, PVN parvocellular neurons project to the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) (33, 34, 42), which contains bulbospinal sympathetic premotor neurons that mediate several vasomotor reflexes (for reviews, see Refs. 12, 19). Electrophysiological studies in vivo have also demonstrated that PVN sympathetic-regulatory neurons are responsive to changes in plasma osmolality, circulating ANG II, and blood volume (6, 10, 15, 16, 24, 51). Moreover, changes in SNA and/or ABP during increases in Posmol, ANG II levels, or blood volume depend on neurotransmission in the PVN (9, 16, 18, 20, 25, 56). Taken together, these observations suggest that the PVN is one site in the central nervous system that may contribute to the regulation of ABP and SNA during water deprivation. This notion is supported by recent evidence from our laboratory that demonstrated acute inhibition of the PVN with bilateral microinjection of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol decreased renal SNA and ABP to a significantly greater extent in water-deprived rats than control rats (44). These findings suggest that the elevated SNA in water-deprived rats depends, in part, on the tonic activity of PVN neurons.

Over the last decade, Fos immunoreactivity has been used to identify neurons in the central nervous system involved in cardiovascular regulation and body fluid homeostasis (11, 13). Fos is the protein product of the early intermediate gene c-fos and is part of the AP-1 transcription complex (21, 29). Because Fos production is related to synaptic activation (21), this technique has been used widely as a marker of "neuronal activation." Although water deprivation has been reported previously to increase Fos immunoreactivity in the PVN (27, 28, 30, 43, 54), these studies were focused primarily on PVN magnocellular neurons. Therefore, we sought to determine whether water deprivation increases Fos immunoreactivity in parvocellular neurons of the PVN with identified projections to the spinal cord and/or RVLM. Because there are conflicting reports regarding the relative number of PVN neurons that project to the spinal cord vs. RVLM (34, 42), we initially examined the distribution of retrogradely labeled neurons in the PVN from these two sites. In addition to the PVN, a recent report indicates that the RVLM contributes to the maintenance of ABP in water-deprived rats (7). Therefore, a final series of experiments determined whether water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in spinally projecting neurons of the RVLM.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 325–375 g were housed in a temperature-controlled room (22–23°C) with a 14:10-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 7 AM). Tap water and laboratory chow (Harlan Teklad LM-485, 0.3% NaCl) were available ad libitum except where noted.

Retrograde Tracing from the Spinal Cord and RVLM

To identify the efferent targets of parvocellular neurons of the PVN, retrograde tracers were injected into the IML and RVLM. In the first series of experiments, rats (n = 12) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg ip) and received a microinjection of 4% Fluorogold (FG, 50 nl; Fluorochrome, Denver, CO) into the region containing the IML at T1–T3 using the following coordinates (0.7 mm lateral to the midline, 0.7 mm ventral to the dorsal surface). In addition, rats received an injection of a second retrograde tracer, cholera toxin subunit B (CTB, 0.25% in isotonic saline, 20–30 nl; List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA) into the RVLM. The RVLM was found by locating the caudal pole of the facial nucleus through the use of field potential recording as described elsewhere (8, 38, 52). Briefly, a left facial nerve was exposed and stimulated electrically with a bipolar stainless steel electrode (0.2-ms pulse duration, 2 mA, 1 Hz). Field potentials were recorded with glass micropipettes filled with 0.9% isotonic saline (tip resistance 1–5 M{Omega}; tip OD 30–50 µm) connected to an Axoclamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) in bridge mode. Signals were amplified and displayed on an oscilloscope. Microinjections were performed approximately 100–300 µm behind the caudal pole of the facial nucleus. This technique has been used previously to reliably locate the area of the RVLM that contains sympathetic premotor neurons that project to the spinal cord (8, 38, 52). Once the RVLM was located, the recording pipette was removed from the brain, emptied, filled with CTB, and lowered back into the RVLM. All microinjections were performed over 1 min with glass micropipettes connected to a pneumatic picopump (WPI). Once the overlying musculature and skin were sutured, each rat was treated with ampicillin (100 mg/kg im) and returned to its home cage.

To determine whether water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in spinally projecting neurons of the RVLM, a second group of rats (n = 10) was microinjected only with 4% FG into the spinal cord at T1–T3 as described above. A second group was used to eliminate any potential influences that the previous injection in group 1 may have on Fos immunoreactivity in the RVLM.

Experimental Procedures

Approximately 2 wk after microinjection of the retrograde tracers, rats were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group was deprived of water but not food for 48 h, whereas control rats had continuous access to both food and water. Then rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/kg ip), and blood (0.4 ml) was collected from the left ventricle into microcentrifuge tubes containing heparin (10 U) by using a 23-gauge needle. Samples were used for determination of hematocrit, Posmol, and plasma protein levels as described below. Immediately after the blood sample was collected, rats were perfused transcardially with heparinized isotonic saline (30 U/ml, 100 ml) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (4°C, 300 ml) dissolved in 0.1 M PBS. Brains were removed, postfixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C, and immersed in 30% sucrose dissolved in PBS for at least 2 days. The forebrain and hindbrain were sectioned at 30 µm using a sliding microtome. Sections were collected into five serially adjacent sets and stored in vials containing cryoprotectant (53) at –25°C.

Fos Immunocytochemistry

Sections were brought to room temperature over 30 min, rinsed with PBS several times, and incubated in 0.5% sodium borohydride dissolved in PBS for 30 min. Sections were then rinsed with PBS and incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Fos antibody (1:10,000; Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, CA) at 4°C for 72 h followed by an incubation with biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit IgG for 2 h at room temperature (1:250). Next, tissue was incubated in an avidin-peroxidase conjugate for 2 h at room temperature (ABC Vectastain Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and reacted for 5 min in Tris buffer containing 0.05% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma), 2.5% nickel sulfate hexahydrate (Sigma), and 0.006% hydrogen peroxide. The reaction was terminated with several rinses in PBS. All antibody incubations were performed in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 and 1% donkey serum. Donkey serum and all secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).

CTB Immunocytochemistry

After Fos immunocytochemical procedures were completed, CTB was visualized by immunofluorescence. Briefly, sections were incubated in a goat anti-choleragenoid antibody (1:3,000; List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA) for 48 h at 4°C followed by an overnight incubation in CY3 donkey anti-goat IgG (1:250) at 4°C. CTB injection sites targeted at the RVLM were visualized by similar methods. All sections were mounted on glass slides, dehydrated in graded concentrations of alcohol, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with Cytoseal 60 (Fisher Scientific).

Determination of Hematocrit, Posmol, and Plasma Protein Concentration

Hematocrit was determined from duplicate capillary tubes using standard methods and measured with a Lancer microhematocrit tube reader (St. Louis, MO). Blood samples were centrifuged (10,000 g, 30 s), and Posmol was determined from duplicate plasma samples analyzed using a vapor pressure osmometer (model 5520, Wescor, Logan, UT). Plasma protein concentration was determined by protein refractometry (National Protometer, National Instruments, Baltimore, MD).

Histological Analysis

Fos-positive neurons in the PVN were examined under light microscopy. The PVN was sampled at three rostral-caudal levels. Level 1 was the most rostral and consisted of the dorsal parvocellular, medial parvocellular, and ventrally located posterior magnocellular subnuclei. Level 2 displayed a prominent posterior magnocellular region and both dorsal and ventrolateral parvocellular divisions. Level 3 was the most caudal and consisted of the medial and lateral parvocellular divisions (Fig. 1). Based on previous anatomic studies (34, 42, 47, 48), these levels of the PVN have efferent projections to the RVLM and IML. The RVLM was located 0–500 µm behind the caudal pole of the facial nucleus with a prominent nucleus ambiguus and a small or barely visible inferior olive. The RVLM was defined as the triangular region ventral to nucleus ambiguus, medial to the spinal trigeminal nucleus, and lateral to the inferior olive or pyramidal tracts (see Fig. 4, right side). Analysis of the PVN and RVLM were performed on one set of tissue (every 5th section). Therefore, counts in the PVN at each level were based on one section, whereas counts in the RVLM were based on the average number of Fos-positive nuclei and retrogradely labeled neurons from one to two sections per animal.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic drawings of 3 rostral-caudal levels of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) that were sampled for analysis. Level 1 was the most rostral and included the dorsal parvocellular, medial parvocellular, and ventrally located posterior magnocellular subnuclei. Level 2 contained a prominent posterior magnocellular region and both dorsal and ventrolateral parvocellular divisions. Level 3 was the most caudal and consisted of the medial and lateral parvocellular divisions. Coordinates are in reference to bregma using standard sections from the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (31). dp, dorsal parvocellular; mp, medial parvocellular; pm, posterior magnocellular; vlp, ventrolateral parvocellular; lp, lateral parvocellular; 3V, 3rd ventricle.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. A: schematic drawings of RVLM sites that were targeted for microinjection of CTB. Shaded regions represent the largest possible distribution of CTB for all rats in the present study rather than the typical injection site of an individual rat. Coordinates are in reference to bregma using standard sections from the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (31). B: example of a CTB injection site in the RVLM. RVLM, rostral ventrolateral medulla; NA, nucleus ambiguus; IO, inferior olive; py, pyramidal tract.

 
Digital images from the PVN and RVLM were collected using an Olympus IX50 microscope connected to a Spot camera (Spot RT Slider, Diagnostic Instruments) using Spot imaging software (version 3.24). The number of Fos-positive and retrogradely labeled neurons was quantified by an individual blind to the experimental groups. For purposes of visualization, FG and CTB labeled neurons were pseudocolored green and red, respectively, and images were digitally overlaid. Accordingly, double-labeled neurons (FG + CTB) appear yellow in the merged images.

Statistical Analysis

The number of Fos-positive nuclei in each subdivision of the PVN was compared between water-deprived and control rats using a two-way ANOVA (group x subdivision; Systat 10.2, Systat Software) followed by a layered Bonferonni analysis. Counts in the RVLM were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. The number of retrogradely labeled, double-, or triple-labeled neurons was analyzed similarly. When data were expressed as a percentage, groups were compared by a Mann Whitney U-test. Hematocrit, Posmol, and plasma protein concentration were analyzed by independent t-tests.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Retrograde Labeling in the PVN from the Spinal Cord and RVLM

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the relative number of PVN neurons that project to the spinal cord vs. the RVLM (34, 42). Therefore, we initially examined the distribution of neurons retrogradely labeled from these two regions at three different rostral-caudal levels of the PVN described previously in Fig. 1. Because there were no significant differences in the retrograde labeling between water-deprived and control rats (Table 1; P > 0.3 from overall ANOVAs), the results have been combined.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Number of retrogradely labeled neurons in the ipsilateral hypothalamic PVN after microinjection of FG in the spinal cord (T1-T3) and CTB in the RVLM of rats

 
Microinjection of FG in the spinal cord and CTB in the RVLM produced similar patterns of labeling throughout the rostral-caudal extent of the ipsilateral PVN (Figs. 2 and 3). The majority of retrogradely labeled neurons from either site was present in the dorsal parvocellular (Fig. 2, A, B, and D), ventrolateral parvocellular (Fig. 2, B and E), and lateral parvocellular divisions (Fig. 2, C and F). However, levels 2 and 3 had a significantly greater number of neurons retrogradely labeled from the spinal cord or RVLM than level 1 (Table 1, Fig. 3). Furthermore, a significantly greater number of retrogradely labeled neurons were present in the ventrolateral than the dorsal parvocellular division at level 2. The location of double-labeled neurons, FG + CTB, followed a similar rostral-caudal distribution (Fig. 3), and the majority was located in the ventrolateral and lateral parvocellular PVN (Figs. 2 and 3). Moreover, there were no differences between the percentage of spinally projecting neurons also projecting to the RVLM vs. RVLM-projecting neurons also projecting to the spinal cord at any level or division of the PVN (Table 1). This overall pattern of dual retrograde labeling from the spinal cord and RVLM was similar in the contralateral PVN; however, the absolute number of retrogradely neurons was significantly less in the contralateral vs. ipsilateral side (Fig. 3).



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Examples of retrograde labeling in the ipsilateral PVN at 3 different rostral-caudal levels after microinjection of fluorogold (FG) in the spinal cord and cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). FG-positive neurons are green, CTB-positive neurons are red, and neurons that colocalized FG + CTB are yellow. Retrogradely labeled neurons from the spinal cord and RVLM were present at level 1 in the dorsal parvocellular region (A), level 2 in the dorsal and ventrolateral parvocellular region (B), and level 3 in the lateral parvocellular region (C). The number of retrogradely labeled cells was significantly greater at levels 2 and 3 vs. level 1 of the PVN (counts are summarized in Table 1). Areas outlined in B and C are shown in DF. Note that each level of the PVN contains neurons colocalized with FG and CTB (yellow cells).

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Number of neurons (per section) retrogradely labeled from the spinal cord with FG (A), RVLM with CTB (B), or both spinal cord and RVLM (C) in the ipsilateral and contralateral PVN (n = 12). The PVN levels and subnuclei are described in Fig. 1. Because retrograde labeling was not different between water-deprived and control rats, the results were combined. The counts for the ipsilateral PVN in water-deprived and control rats are presented in Table 1. A significantly greater number of neurons retrogradely labeled from the spinal cord or RVLM were present in the ipsilateral vs. contralateral PVN in every subnucleus and at every rostral-caudal level examined. Moreover, the ipsilateral PVN had significantly more double-labeled neurons (FG + CTB) than the contralateral PVN in every subnucleus and at every level. Levels 2 and 3 each had a significantly greater number of spinally projecting or RVLM-projecting neurons than level 1 (P < 0.05). Values are means ± SE. *Significant difference from contralateral PVN (P < 0.01).

 
Figure 4 illustrates the CTB injection site in the RVLM. The injection site did not spread laterally to the spinal trigeminal nucleus, medially to the inferior olive or pyramidal tract, or dorsal to nucleus ambiguus.

Effect of 48-h Water Deprivation on Fos Immunoreactivity in the PVN

A major goal of the present study was to determine whether 48-h water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in autonomic regions of the PVN. As expected (27, 28, 30, 43, 54), water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in both magnocellular and parvocellular divisions of the PVN (Fig. 5). To determine whether water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in autonomic regions of the PVN, we used the retrograde labeling from both the spinal cord and RVLM to provide the anatomic boundaries of the dorsal, ventrolateral, and lateral PVN at the respective level. The number of Fos-positive nuclei was significantly higher in 48-h water-deprived than control rats in each of these subdivisions and at every level of the PVN (Figs. 5 and 6A). Similar to the distribution of retrogradely labeled neurons, a significantly greater number of Fos-positive nuclei were present in levels 2 and 3 compared with level 1 (Fig. 6A). With regard to level 2, the ventrolateral parvocellular division had significantly more Fos-positive nuclei than the dorsal parvocellular division (Fig. 6A). Not surprisingly, a similar pattern of Fos immunoreactivity was present throughout the contralateral PVN (data not shown).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Fos immunoreactivity at 3 different rostral-caudal levels of the PVN in a control (A-C) and a water-deprived (D-F) rat. The 3 different rostral-caudal levels of the PVN are illustrated in Fig. 1. Water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity at all 3 rostral-caudal levels of the PVN, including both magnocellular and parvocellular divisions. Notably, a greater number of Fos-positive nuclei were observed in water-deprived rats compared with control rats in the dorsal parvocellular, ventrolateral parvocellular, and lateral parvocellular divisions of the PVN. Counts are summarized in Fig. 6A.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Average number (per section) of Fos-positive nuclei (A), Fos + FG (spinally projecting) neurons (B), and Fos + CTB (RVLM projecting) neurons (C) in the dorsal, ventrolateral, and lateral parvocellular divisions at 3 different rostral-caudal levels of the ipsilateral PVN in water-deprived and control rats (see Fig. 1 for a description of rostral-caudal levels). The respective level is indicated in parentheses. In addition, the total across all levels and subdivisions of the PVN is included. A: water deprivation significantly increased Fos immunoreactivity in every PVN subdivision examined. The number of Fos-positive nuclei was significantly greater at levels 2 and 3 vs. level 1 (P < 0.05). B and C: in addition, a significantly greater number of spinally projecting and RVLM-projecting neurons were Fos positive in water-deprived rats than control rats. The greatest number of double-labeled neurons was present at levels 2 and 3. Within level 2, a significantly greater number of Fos-positive nuclei and double-labeled (Fos + FG and Fos + CTB) neurons were present in the ventrolateral than the dorsal subnucleus. Values are means ± SE. *Significant difference from control rats (P < 0.025). {dagger}Significant difference between dorsal and ventrolateral parvocellular subnuclei at level 2 (P < 0.05).

 
Effect of Water Deprivation on Fos Immunoreactivity in PVN Neurons With Projections to the Spinal Cord and RVLM

Spinally projecting PVN neurons. Because water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in autonomic regions of the PVN, we determined whether these Fos-positive nuclei were present in spinally projecting (FG) and/or RVLM-projecting (CTB) neurons. Among spinally projecting (FG labeled) neurons of the ipsilateral PVN, 48-h water deprivation significantly increased Fos immunoreactivity (Figs. 6B and 7). In fact, a greater percentage of spinally projecting PVN neurons were Fos positive in water-deprived rats compared with control rats (5.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.8 ± 0.3%, respectively; P < 0.01). The majority of these neurons was found in the ventrolateral and lateral parvocellular divisions of the PVN (Figs. 6B and 7). However, there was no statistical difference in the number of double-labeled neurons (FG + Fos) between water-deprived and control rats in the dorsal parvocellular division at level 1 or 2 (Fig. 6B). In contrast to the ipsilateral PVN, there were no differences in the number of spinally projecting neurons that were Fos positive throughout the rostral-caudal extent of the contralateral PVN between water-deprived and control rats (0.4 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 cells, respectively).



View larger version (194K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Examples of FG-labeling from the spinal cord (T1-T3) and Fos immunoreactivity at level 2 (A) and level 3 (B) of the PVN in a water-deprived rat. Areas outlined in A and B are shown in C-E. White arrows denote double-labeled neurons. Summary counts are presented in Fig. 6B.

 
RVLM-projecting PVN neurons. Similar to the findings in spinally projecting neurons, 48-h water deprivation significantly increased Fos immunoreactivity in RVLM-projecting neurons of the ipsilateral PVN (Figs. 6C and 8). In fact, a greater percentage of RVLM-projecting PVN neurons were Fos positive in water-deprived rats compared with control rats (21.9 ± 2.2 vs. 3.9 ± 1.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). Again, the majority of these neurons was found in the ventrolateral and lateral parvocellular divisions of the PVN, whereas there was no difference in the number of these double-labeled neurons (CTB + Fos) between control and water-deprived rats in the dorsal parvocellular division at levels 1 and 2 (Fig. 6C). Moreover, there were no differences in the number of RVLM-projecting neurons that were Fos positive between control and water-deprived rats throughout the entire contralateral PVN (1.0 ± 0.4 vs. 4.2 ± 1.3 cells, respectively).



View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Examples of CTB labeling from the RVLM and Fos immunoreactivity at level 2 (A) and level 3 (B) of the PVN in a water-deprived rat. Areas outlined in A and B are shown in C and D. White arrows denote double-labeled neurons. Summary counts are presented in Fig. 6C.

 
Spinally vs. RVLM-projecting PVN neurons. The proportion of PVN neurons that project to the RVLM and were Fos positive after water deprivation was greater than the proportion of spinally projecting neurons that were Fos positive. This was the case for the ventrolateral (25.8 ± 0.7 vs. 8.0 ± 1.5%, respectively; P < 0.01) and lateral (23.4 ± 2.1 vs. 5.0 ± 0.9%, respectively; P < 0.01) parvocellular divisions on the ipsilateral side. No differences were observed in the dorsal parvocellular PVN at level 1 (4.2 ± 4.0 vs. 1.7 ± 1.0%, respectively) or level 2 (12.3 ± 6.1 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8%, respectively).

Effect of Water Deprivation on Fos Immunoreactivity in PVN Neurons with Projections to Both the Spinal Cord and the RVLM

With regard to PVN neurons that project ipsilaterally to both the spinal cord and RVLM (FG + CTB), a significantly greater number of neurons were triple labeled (Fos + FG + CTB) in water-deprived rats than control rats in the lateral parvocellular division (2.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.2 ± 0.2 cells, respectively; P < 0.01) but not the ventrolateral division (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.2 ± 0.2 cells) of the PVN. No triple-labeled neurons were observed in either water-deprived or control rats in the dorsal parvocellular division at level 1 or 2.

Effect of Water Deprivation on Fos Immunoreactivity in RVLM Neurons With Projections to the Spinal Cord

A recent report indicates that the RVLM contributes to the maintenance of ABP in water-deprived rats (7). Therefore, we determined whether water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in spinally projecting neurons of the RVLM. Results from animals receiving only FG in the spinal cord were not different from those of animals that received both FG in the spinal cord plus CTB in the RVLM. Therefore, the data were combined. Water deprivation significantly increased the number of Fos-positive nuclei in the RVLM (Table 2, Fig. 9). In addition, a greater number of retrogradely labeled neurons in the RVLM were Fos positive in water-deprived vs. control rats (Table 2, Fig. 9), even though the absolute number of RVLM neurons retrogradely labeled was not different between groups. Therefore, a significantly greater percentage of spinally projecting neurons in the RVLM were Fos positive in water-deprived than in control rats (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Number of Fos-positive nuclei and spinally projecting (FG positive) neurons in the RVLM of control and water-deprived rats

 


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Example of Fos immunoreactivity in the RVLM of a control (A, C, E) and a water-deprived (B, D, F) rat. The RVLM was defined as the region ventral to nucleus ambiguus, lateral to the pyramidal tracts and/or inferior olive, and medial to the spinal trigeminal nucleus (see Fig. 4A). These results are summarized in Table 2. A and B: 48-h water deprivation significantly increased Fos immunoreactivity in the RVLM. C and D: low magnification (10x) of the RVLM showing Fos immunoreactivity and FG labeling from the spinal cord. Areas outlined in C and D are shown in E and F. Note that Fos-positive nuclei colocalized with spinally projecting neurons of the RVLM in water-deprived but not control rats. Arrows indicated double-labeled neurons (Fos + FG).

 
Effect of Water Deprivation on Posmol, Hematocrit, and Plasma Protein Concentration

As expected (7, 44), 48-h water deprivation significantly increased Posmol (water deprived 313 ± 1 vs. control 299 ± 1 mosmol/kgH2O, P < 0.001), hematocrit (water deprived 49.9 ± 0.6 vs. control 40.5 ± 0.5%, P < 0.001), and plasma protein concentration (water deprived 6.3 ± 0.1 vs. control 5.0 ± 0.2 g/dl, P < 0.001).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Several observations indicate that sympathetic outflow is elevated during water deprivation (17, 40, 41, 44, 50); however, the central neural circuitry and cellular mechanisms supporting this elevated SNA are not fully understood. Because inhibition of the PVN with bilateral microinjection of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol has been shown to significantly decrease renal SNA and ABP in 48-h water-deprived rats (44), we hypothesized that water deprivation would increase Fos immunoreactivity in sympathetic regulatory neurons of the PVN. The present findings support this hypothesis as water deprivation increased the number of Fos-positive nuclei in parvocellular PVN neurons with identified projections to the spinal cord and/or RVLM.

Previous studies have demonstrated that parvocellular neurons of the PVN terminate in the IML of the spinal cord and RVLM, and these projections are predominantly ipsilateral (33, 34, 37, 42, 47). The present findings confirm those observations. However, there are conflicting reports regarding the relative number of PVN neurons that project to these two regions (34, 42). Shafton and colleagues (42) reported that a greater number of PVN neurons are retrogradely labeled from the RVLM than the spinal cord, whereas Pyner and Coote (34) suggest the contrary. Although these differences may be explained by the use of different retrograde tracers or the location of injection sites in the spinal cord (upper thoracic vs. lumbar), the present findings suggest that a similar number of PVN neurons project to the upper thoracic spinal cord and to the RVLM, and ~15–20% of these neurons have collateral projections to both sites. These observations are in agreement with preliminary findings from another laboratory (46).

Water deprivation has been reported previously to increase Fos immunoreactivity in magnocellular neurons of the PVN (27, 28, 30, 43, 54). The present findings confirm and extend these observations by demonstrating that 48-h water deprivation also increases Fos immunoreactivity in the dorsolateral, ventrolateral, and lateral parvocellular divisions of the PVN. More importantly, a subset of these Fos-positive neurons had identified projections to the spinal cord and/or RVLM. Taken together, these findings suggest that the increased contribution of PVN neuronal activity to ABP and the elevated SNA in water-deprived rats may be due to activation of PVN pathways descending to both the spinal cord and RVLM (44).

Because water deprivation decreases intravascular volume and increases Posmol and circulating ANG II, one or a combination of these signals could contribute to the increase in Fos immunoreactivity in PVN sympathetic-regulatory neurons during water deprivation. In this regard, changes in intravascular volume, Posmol, and circulating ANG II have been reported to independently increase Fos immunoreactivity in parvocellular neurons of the PVN (25, 22, 32, 35, 36, 39). However, only a limited number of studies have examined whether these stimuli increase Fos immunoreactivity in parvocellular PVN neurons with identified projections to the spinal cord or RVLM (4, 5, 22). Recently, Kantzides and Badoer (22) reported that intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline did not increase Fos immunoreactivity in spinally and RVLM-projecting PVN neurons. These data raise the possibility that increases in Posmol may not contribute to the increase in Fos immunoreactivity observed in PVN sympathetic-regulatory neurons during water deprivation. Although this possibility cannot be excluded, it is noteworthy that an intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline likely increases intravascular volume due to the infusion and to osmotic movement of water into the intravascular space. Thus blood volume expansion could mask an increase in Fos immunoreactivity by elevated Posmol as volume expansion has been reported to inhibit the activity of spinally projecting PVN neurons (24). This would not be expected to occur during water deprivation as intravascular volume is reduced. In addition, an intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline reduces circulating ANG II levels, whereas plasma ANG II levels increase in response to 48-h water deprivation (45). Last, the acute infusion of hypertonic saline rapidly increases Posmol, whereas water deprivation progressively increases Posmol and ANG II levels and decreases intravascular volume. Thus several factors preclude a direct comparison between the present findings and those reported previously with an infusion of hypertonic saline (22). Nevertheless, in vivo electrophysiological recordings have demonstrated that PVN neurons with axonal projections to the spinal cord and/or hindbrain are responsive to changes in circulating ANG II, intravascular volume, and Posmol (6, 10, 15, 16, 24, 51). Moreover, changes in ABP and SNA in response to intracarotid injections of hyperosmotic solutions or changes in intravascular volume are dependent on neurotransmission within the PVN (9, 20, 25, 56). Collectively, these observations suggest that one or a combination of the aforementioned signals may increase Fos immunoreactivity in parvocellular PVN neurons and may also underlie the increased contribution of PVN neuronal activity to the elevated SNA and maintenance of ABP in water-deprived rats.

In addition to the PVN, water deprivation increased Fos immunoreactivity in bulbospinal RVLM neurons and thereby suggests that the RVLM may play a role in the elevated SNA and maintenance of ABP in water-deprived rats. A myriad of studies have demonstrated that the RVLM plays a pivotal role in the regulation of SNA and ABP (for reviews, see Refs. 12, 19). This region contains spinally projecting, barosensitive neurons that mediate several vasomotor reflexes. Interestingly, bilateral blockade of excitatory amino acid receptors with kynurenic acid in the RVLM has been reported to decrease ABP in water-deprived rats (7). The decrease in ABP correlated with Posmol when data were analyzed across control, 24-h, and 48-h water-deprived rats (7). This observation indicates that the increase in Posmol could contribute to the greater dependence of ABP on excitatory amino acid transmission in the RVLM and might also underlie the increase in Fos immunoreactivity observed in bulbospinal RVLM neurons during water deprivation. Additional studies are needed to investigate these possibilities.

Collectively, these observations raise the prospect that water deprivation activates a pathway from the PVN to RVLM that increases SNA and maintains ABP. In this regard, the changes in SNA and ABP after disinhibition of the PVN with the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline are attenuated by bilateral blockade of ANG II AT1 receptors in the RVLM (49), whereas blockade of excitatory amino acid receptors in the RVLM has been reported to have no effect on the hemodynamic responses to PVN stimulation (23, 49). Moreover, excitatory amino acid stimulation of the PVN has been reported to increase the discharge of bulbospinal RVLM neurons (55, 57); however, this increase in discharge was attenuated by iontophoretic application of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonist kynurenic acid or a vasopressin (type 1) receptor antagonist (55). Taken together, it appears that the RVLM likely contributes to PVN-evoked changes in SNA and ABP, but the neurotransmitters and/or cellular mechanisms mediating PVN inputs to the RVLM remain unclear. The discrepancies regarding the role of ANG II AT1 receptors and excitatory amino acid receptors in the RVLM in mediating the response to PVN disinhibition vs. direct excitation may be explained by the possibility that these stimuli recruit different populations of PVN neurons. Surprisingly, there is no direct evidence detailing the neurochemical phenotype of PVN neurons that project to the RVLM. Future experiments are needed to fully establish whether activation of a mono- or polysynaptic pathway from the PVN to the RVLM contributes to the elevated SNA and maintenance of ABP in water-deprived rats and to determine the neurotransmitters utilized by this pathway.

In summary, the present findings demonstrate that water deprivation increases Fos immunoreactivity in parvocellular PVN neurons with identified projections to the spinal cord and RVLM and in bulbospinal neurons of the RVLM. While these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that water deprivation activates PVN sympathetic-regulatory neurons, it cannot be definitively stated that these neurons have an increased discharge frequency. That is, an increase in Fos immunoreactivity indicates an increase in transcription but may not equate to an increase in electrical activity (26). Moreover, a significant number of PVN and RVLM neurons were not immunoreactive for Fos after water deprivation. This may suggest that only a small population of PVN and RVLM neurons is activated by water deprivation. Alternatively, it should be mentioned that not all neurons express Fos (14), and Fos immunoreactivity is typically an indicator of neuronal activation over a short time frame. Therefore, it is not clear whether the Fos immunoreactivity in PVN neurons observed in the present study is due to prolonged activation of the c-fos gene as stimulus intensity increases over time or whether different PVN neurons transiently express an immunodetectable level of Fos during the 48-h period of water deprivation. Consequently, it is possible that the present findings may underestimate the number of sympathetic-regulatory neurons affected by water deprivation. Because water deprivation produces a slow and progressive change in the variables that may underlie Fos immunoreactivity in these neurons, other inducible transcription factors such as Fos B may serve as a more accurate index of neuronal activation under these conditions (11, 21). Future experiments are needed to investigate this possibility. Nevertheless, the present findings strongly indicate that water deprivation evokes a distinct cellular response in sympathetic-regulatory neurons of the PVN and RVLM.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants R01-HL-0756834 (to G. M. Toney) and R01-HL-55692 (to J. T. Cunningham) and by American Heart Association Grant EIG-014016N (to G. M. Toney). S. D. Stocker was supported in part by a National Research Science Award Postdoctoral Fellowship (HL-073661).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank K. Keith and A. Calderon for technical assistance. We also thank M. W. Blaylock in the Optical Imaging Facility at University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio for assistance in digital image processing.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. D. Stocker, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Texas HSC at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr. (MC-7756), San Antonio, TX 78229 (E-mail: stocker{at}uthscsa.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Badoer E. Hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and cardiovascular regulation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 95–99, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Badoer E and McKinlay D. Effect of intravenous angiotensin II on Fos distribution and drinking behavior in rabbits. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R1515–R1524, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Badoer E, McKinley MJ, Oldfield BJ, and McAllen RM. Distribution of hypothalamic, medullary and lamina terminalis neurons expressing Fos after hemorrhage in conscious rats. Brain Res 582: 323–328, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Badoer E, McKinley MJ, Oldfield BJ, and McAllen RM. A comparison of hypotensive and non-hypotensive hemorrhage on Fos expression in spinally projecting neurons of the paraventricular nucleus and rostral ventrolateral medulla. Brain Res 610: 216–223, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Badoer E and Merolli J. Neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus that project to the rostral ventrolateral medulla are activated by haemorrhage. Brain Res 791: 317–320, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Bains JS and Ferguson AV. Paraventricular nucleus neurons projecting to the spinal cord receive excitatory input from the subfornical organ. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 268: R625–R633, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Brooks VL, Freeman KL, and Clow KA. Excitatory amino acids in rostral ventrolateral medulla support blood pressure during water deprivation in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H1642–H1648, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Brown DL and Guyenet PG. Cardiovascular neurons of brain stem with projections to spinal cord. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 247: R1009–R1016, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chen QH and Toney GM. AT(1)-receptor blockade in the hypothalamic PVN reduces central hyperosmolality-induced renal sympathoexcitation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1844–R1853, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chen QH and Toney GM. Discharge properties and osmotic responsiveness of hypothalamic PVN neurons projecting to the ventrolateral medulla and spinal cord (Abstract). FASEB J 14: 458.6, 2000.
  11. Cunningham JT, Penny ML, and Murphy D. Cardiovascular regulation of supraoptic neurons in the rat: synaptic inputs and cellular signals. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 84: 183–196, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Dampney RA. The subretrofacial vasomotor nucleus: anatomical, chemical and pharmacological properties and role in cardiovascular regulation. Prog Neurobiol 42: 197–227, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Dampney RA and Horiuchi J. Functional organisation of central cardiovascular pathways: studies using c-fos gene expression. Prog Neurobiol 71: 359–384, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Dragunow M and Faull R. The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J Neurosci Methods 29: 261–265, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Ferguson AV. Paraventricular nucleus neurons projecting to the dorsomedial medulla are influenced by systemic angiotensin. Brain Res Bull 20: 197–201, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Ferguson AV and Washburn DL. Angiotensin II: a peptidergic neurotransmitter in central autonomic pathways. Prog Neurobiol 54: 169–192, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Gardiner SM and Bennett T. Interactions between neural mechanisms, the renin-angiotensin system and vasopressin in the maintenance of blood pressure during water deprivation: studies in Long Evans and Brattleboro rats. Clin Sci (Lond) 68: 647–657, 1985.[Medline]
  18. Gutman MB, Jones DL, and Ciriello J. Effect of paraventricular nucleus lesions on drinking and pressor responses to ANG II. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 255: R882–R887, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Guyenet PG, Koshiya N, Huangfu D, Baraban SC, Stornetta RL, and Li YW. Role of medulla oblongata in generation of sympathetic and vagal outflows. Prog Brain Res 107, 1996.
  20. Haselton JR, Goering J, and Patel KP. Parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular nucleus are involved in the reduction in renal nerve discharge during isotonic volume expansion. J Auton Nerv Syst 50: 1–11, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Herdegen T and Leah JD. Inducible and constitutive transcription factors in the mammalian nervous system: control of gene expression by Jun, Fos and Krox, and CREB/ATF proteins. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 28: 370–490, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kantzides A and Badoer E. Fos, RVLM-projecting neurons, and spinally projecting neurons in the PVN following hypertonic saline infusion. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284: R945–R953, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kiely JM and Gordon FJ. Role of rostral ventrolateral medulla in centrally mediated pressor responses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 267: H1549–H1556, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lovick TA and Coote JH. Effects of volume loading on paraventriculo-spinal neurones in the rat. J Auton Nerv Syst 25: 135–140, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Lovick TA, Malpas S, and Mahony MT. Renal vasodilatation in response to acute volume load is attenuated following lesions of parvocellular neurones in the paraventricular nucleus in rats. J Auton Nerv Syst 43: 247–255, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Luckman SM, Dyball RE, and Leng G. Induction of c-fos expression in hypothalamic magnocellular neurons requires synaptic activation and not simply increased spike activity. J Neurosci 14: 4825–4830, 1994.[Abstract]
  27. McKinley MJ, Hards DK, and Oldfield BJ. Identification of neural pathways activated in dehydrated rats by means of Fos-immunohistochemistry and neural tracing. Brain Res 653: 305–314, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Miyata S, Nakashima T, and Kiyohara T. Expression of c-fos immunoreactivity in the hypothalamic magnocellular neurons during chronic osmotic stimulations. Neurosci Lett 175: 63–66, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Morgan JI and Curran T. Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous system: involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun. Annu Rev Neurosci 14: 421–451, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Morien A, Garrard L, and Rowland NE. Expression of Fos immunoreactivity in rat brain during dehydration: effect of duration and timing of water deprivation. Brain Res 816: 1–7, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Paxinos G and Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (CD-ROM). San Diego, CA: Academic, 1998.
  32. Potts PD, Ludbrook J, Gillman-Gaspari TA, Horiuchi J, and Dampney RA. Activation of brain neurons following central hypervolaemia and hypovolaemia: contribution of baroreceptor and non-baroreceptor inputs. Neuroscience 95: 499–511, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Pyner S and Coote JH. Identification of an efferent projection from the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus terminating close to spinally projecting rostral ventrolateral medullary neurons. Neuroscience 88: 949–957, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Pyner S and Coote JH. Identification of branching paraventricular neurons of the hypothalamus that project to the rostroventrolateral medulla and spinal cord. Neuroscience 100: 549–556, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Pyner S, Deering J, and Coote JH. Right atrial stretch induces renal nerve inhibition and c-fos expression in parvocellular neurones of the paraventricular nucleus in rats. Exp Physiol 87: 25–32, 2002.[Abstract]
  36. Rinaman L, Stricker EM, Hoffman GE, and Verbalis JG. Central c-Fos expression in neonatal and adult rats after subcutaneous injection of hypertonic saline. Neuroscience 79: 1165–1175, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Saper CB, Loewy AD, Swanson LW, and Cowan WM. Direct hypothalamo-autonomic connections. Brain Res 117: 305–312, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Schreihofer AM and Guyenet PG. Identification of C1 presympathetic neurons in rat rostral ventrolateral medulla by juxtacellular labeling in vivo. J Comp Neurol 387: 524–536, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Schreihofer AM, Hoffman GE, and Sved AF. The kidneys stimulate vasopressin release during hemorrhage in rats with chronic NTS lesions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R1540–R1551, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Scrogin KE, Grygielko ET, and Brooks VL. Osmolality: a physiological long-term regulator of lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and arterial pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 276: R1579–R1586, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Scrogin KE, McKeogh DF, and Brooks VL. Is osmolality a long-term regulator of renal sympathetic nerve activity in conscious water-deprived rats? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R560–R568, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Shafton AD, Ryan A, and Badoer E. Neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus send collaterals to the spinal cord and to the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the rat. Brain Res 801: 239–243, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Somponpun SJ, Johnson AK, Beltz T, and Sladek CD. Osmotic regulation of estrogen receptor-{beta} expression in magnocellular vasopressin neurons requires lamina terminalis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R465–R473, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Stocker SD, Keith KJ, and Toney GM. Acute inhibition of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus decreases renal sympathetic nerve activity and arterial blood pressure in water-deprived rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R719–R725, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Stocker SD, Stricker EM, and Sved AF. Acute hypertension inhibits thirst stimulated by ANG II, hyperosmolality, or hypovolemia in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R214–R224, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Sved JC, Sved AF, and Card JP. Hypothalamic projections to rostral ventrolateral medulla and thoracic spinal cord: 2004 Experimental Biology meeting abstracts [http://select.biosis.org/faseb/eb2004_data/FASEB006735.html] FASEB J 18: 444.4, 2004.
  47. Swanson LW and Kuypers HG. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and organization of projections to the pituitary, dorsal vagal complex, and spinal cord as demonstrated by retrograde fluorescence double-labeling methods. J Comp Neurol 194: 555–570, 1980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Swanson LW and Sawchenko PE. Paraventricular nucleus: a site for the integration of neuroendocrine and autonomic mechanisms. Neuroendocrinology 31: 410–417, 1980.[Web of Science][Medline]
  49. Tagawa T and Dampney RA. AT(1) receptors mediate excitatory inputs to rostral ventrolateral medulla pressor neurons from hypothalamus. Hypertension 34: 1301–1307, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Thornton RM and Proppe DW. Influence of vasoconstrictor systems on leg vasodilation during heating of dehydrated baboons. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 254: H11–H19, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Toney GM, Chen QH, Cato MJ, and Stocker SD. Central osmotic regulation of sympathetic nerve activity. Acta Physiol Scand 177: 43–55, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Verberne AJ, Stornetta RL, and Guyenet PG. Properties of C1 and other ventrolateral medullary neurones with hypothalamic projections in the rat. J Physiol 517: 477–494, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Watson RE Jr, Wiegand SJ, Clough RW, and Hoffman GE. Use of cryoprotectant to maintain long-term peptide immunoreactivity and tissue morphology. Peptides 7: 155–159, 1986.[Web of Science][Medline]
  54. Xu Z and Herbert J. Effects of unilateral or bilateral lesions within the anteroventral third ventricular region on c-fos expression induced by dehydration or angiotensin II in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus. Brain Res 713: 36–43, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Yang Z, Bertram D, and Coote JH. The role of glutamate and vasopressin in the excitation of RVL neurones by paraventricular neurones. Brain Res 908: 99–103, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  56. Yang Z and Coote JH. Role of GABA and NO in the paraventricular nucleus-mediated reflex inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity following stimulation of right atrial receptors in the rat. Exp Physiol 88: 335–342, 2003.[Abstract]
  57. Yang Z and Coote JH. Influence of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus on cardiovascular neurones in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of the rat. J Physiol 513: 521–530, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Q.-H. Chen and G. M. Toney
Excitability of paraventricular nucleus neurones that project to the rostral ventrolateral medulla is regulated by small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels
J. Physiol., September 1, 2009; 587(17): 4235 - 4247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S.-G. Wei, Y. Yu, Z.-H. Zhang, and R. B. Felder
Angiotensin II upregulates hypothalamic AT1 receptor expression in rats via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1425 - H1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Benedetti, R. Rorato, M. Castro, B. H. Machado, J. Antunes-Rodrigues, and L. L. K. Elias
Water deprivation increases Fos expression in hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor neurons induced by right atrial distension in awake rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): R1706 - R1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. Shi, M. A. Martinez, A. S. Calderon, Q. Chen, J. T. Cunningham, and G. M. Toney
Intra-carotid hyperosmotic stimulation increases Fos staining in forebrain organum vasculosum laminae terminalis neurones that project to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus
J. Physiol., November 1, 2008; 586(21): 5231 - 5245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. Salter-Venzon and A. G. Watts
The role of hypothalamic ingestive behavior controllers in generating dehydration anorexia: a Fos mapping study
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): R1009 - R1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S.-G. Wei, Y. Yu, Z.-H. Zhang, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Mediate Upregulation of Hypothalamic Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptors in Heart Failure Rats
Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S.-G. Wei, Y. Yu, Z.-H. Zhang, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Angiotensin II-Triggered p44/42 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Mediates Sympathetic Excitation in Heart Failure Rats
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 342 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. C. Taylor, J. J. McCarthy, and S. D. Stocker
Mice lacking the transient receptor vanilloid potential 1 channel display normal thirst responses and central Fos activation to hypernatremia
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1285 - R1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z.-H. Zhang, Y. Yu, Y.-M. Kang, S.-G. Wei, and R. B. Felder
Aldosterone acts centrally to increase brain renin-angiotensin system activity and oxidative stress in normal rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H1067 - H1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
J. L. Cham and E. Badoer
Exposure to a hot environment can activate rostral ventrolateral medulla-projecting neurones in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in conscious rats
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 64 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. Shi, S. D. Stocker, and G. M. Toney
Organum vasculosum laminae terminalis contributes to increased sympathetic nerve activity induced by central hyperosmolality
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): R2279 - R2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. L. Freeman and V. L. Brooks
AT1 and glutamatergic receptors in paraventricular nucleus support blood pressure during water deprivation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1675 - R1682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. D. Stocker, R. Meador, and J. M. Adams
Neurons of the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to Obesity-Induced Hypertension in Rats
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 640 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. L. O'Donaughy, Y. Qi, and V. L. Brooks
Central Action of Increased Osmolality to Support Blood Pressure in Deoxycorticosterone Acetate-Salt Rats
Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 658 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Cham, R. Klein, N. C. Owens, M. Mathai, M. McKinley, and E. Badoer
Activation of spinally projecting and nitrergic neurons in the PVN following heat exposure
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R91 - R101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. D. Stocker, M. E. Wilson, C. J. Madden, U. Lone, and A. F. Sved
Intravenous 6-hydroxydopamine attenuates vasopressin and oxytocin secretion stimulated by hemorrhage and hypotension but not hyperosmolality in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R59 - R67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. B. Gottlieb, L. L. Ji, H. Jones, M. L. Penny, T. Fleming, and J. T. Cunningham
Differential effects of water and saline intake on water deprivation-induced c-Fos staining in the rat
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): R1251 - R1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
V. L. Brooks, Y. Qi, and T. L. O'Donaughy
Increased osmolality of conscious water-deprived rats supports arterial pressure and sympathetic activity via a brain action
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): R1248 - R1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/5/R1172    most recent
00394.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stocker, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Toney, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stocker, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Toney, G. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.