AJP - Regu Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R163-R172, 2005. First published September 16, 2004; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00152.2004
0363-6119/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental figure 6
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/1/R163    most recent
00152.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalziel, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalziel, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, C. D.

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY

Mitochondrial enzyme content in the muscles of high-performance fish: evolution and variation among fiber types

Anne C. Dalziel, Shannon E. Moore, and Christopher D. Moyes

Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 10 March 2004 ; accepted in final form 3 September 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Muscle mitochondrial content varies widely among fiber types and species. We investigated the origins of variation in the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme citrate synthase (CS), an index of mitochondrial abundance, among fiber types and species of high-performance fish (tunas and billfishes). CS activities varied up to 30-fold among muscles: lowest in billfish white muscle and highest in billfish heater organ. Among species, CS activities of red, white, and cardiac muscles of three tuna species were twofold greater than the homologous muscles of two billfish species. Because comparisons of CS amino acid sequences deduced from a combination of PCR methods argue against clade-specific differences in catalytic properties, CS activity reflects CS content among these five species. To assess the bases of these differences in CS activity, we looked at the relationship between CS activity (U/g muscle), nuclear content (DNA/g muscle), and CS transcript levels (CS mRNA/g RNA). Muscle CS activity differed by 10- to 30-fold when expressed per gram of muscle but only threefold when expressed per milligram of DNA. Thus it is nuclear DNA content, not fiber-type differences, in CS gene expression that may be the main determinant of CS activity in muscle. Conversely, evolutionary (tunas vs. billfishes) differences in CS arise from differences in posttranscriptional regulation, based on relationships between CS enzyme levels and CS mRNA assessed by quantitative competitive RT-PCR. These data argue that fiber-type differences can arise without major differences in fiber-type-specific regulation of the CS gene, whereas evolutionary differences may be largely due to posttranscriptional regulation.

citrate synthase; suborder Scombroidei; nuclear DNA content; posttranscriptional regulation


MITOCHONDRIAL CONTENT, an important determinant of aerobic capacity, varies widely among muscle types and species (37). Within an individual, muscle mitochondrial content increases with differentiation (40) and then diverges as fiber types are established (30). Environmental and physiological challenges, such as cold exposure (e.g., Ref. 10) and exercise (e.g., Ref. 23), also lead to phenotypic changes in mitochondrial abundance. In addition, differences exist among species, with athletic species possessing higher levels of mitochondria than sedentary species (e.g., Ref. 39). Interestingly, the mechanisms that control evolutionary variations in mitochondrial content remain unstudied. Instead, the origins of differences in mitochondrial enzyme content are best understood in the contexts of developmental and physiological changes in mammalian muscle fiber types (13, 20, 23, 32, 33, 37, 38, 46, 53, 54). Most studies of mitochondrial biogenesis have focused on how transcriptional regulators control and coordinate the expression of nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded genes (46). The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}-coactivator 1{alpha} has emerged as a master regulator (32, 54), acting through a network of transcription factors to alter mitochondrial biogenesis in mammalian muscle fibers (13, 20, 33, 53). Although transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial enzymes is clearly important within an individual, it is not yet known whether it contributes to evolutionary variations in mitochondrial abundance that arise between species.

In this study, we use scombroid fish (order Perciformes, suborder Scombroidei) to address the origins of variations in mitochondrial content among species that arise over evolutionary time and also among fiber types within individuals. Fish are good models in which to investigate fiber-type differences in mitochondrial properties because, in contrast to mammalian fiber types, their skeletal muscles are divided into distinct red1 (aerobic) and white (glycolytic) muscle fibers with large differences in mitochondrial content (29, 30). In particular, the scombroid fish have many properties that are conducive to the study of evolutionary and developmental variations in mitochondrial abundance. They show marked phenotypic variations in muscle oxidative capacity associated with aerobic activity and thermal physiology (14, 27). The tunas (family Scombridae) have impressive exercise physiology, including high metabolic rates, rapid swimming speeds, long migrations, rapid recovery from burst swimming, endothermy, numerous adaptations for oxygen uptake and delivery, and a unique mode of swimming (9). Also, tunas have a muscle mitochondrial capacity that exceeds that of most fish (39), including the closely related billfishes (family Xiphiidae and Istiophoridae) (6, 14, 27). Billfishes possess a heater organ, which is a modified muscle that warms the brain and eyes to preserve vision in cold water (4). Derived from the superior rectus eye muscle, the heater organ lacks most muscle contractile machinery and contains a very high mitochondrial content (55–70% of cell volume) (46, 8). It is not known how this increased mitochondrial content is regulated in the heater tissue, although it is possible that the mechanisms are similar to those found between red and white muscles. This exceptional tissue may be unique to the suborder Scombroidei: an analogous tissue has been found only in the butterfly mackerel (Gasterochisma melampus) of the family Scombridae (7).

In this study, we assess the molecular basis for differences in muscle mitochondrial enzyme content found among fiber types (red muscle, white muscle, cardiac muscle, and heater organ) and also arising over evolutionary time, between clades of scombroid fishes (tunas vs. billfishes). Focusing on citrate synthase (CS) as a marker enzyme for mitochondrial content, we investigate how both genetic (enzyme structure, nuclear content) and regulatory (transcriptional, posttranscriptional) mechanisms influence mitochondrial content in these two contexts. Because CS is thought to be a transcriptionally regulated enzyme in mammalian skeletal muscle (1), we hypothesized that differences among species and tissues would be attributed to differences in CS mRNA levels that are ultimately linked to transcriptional regulators.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue samples. Tissue samples from two species of billfish [swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax)] and three tuna species [bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), and skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis)] were collected on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ships Townsend Cromwell and Oscar Elton Sette. Fish were caught in the Pacific Ocean around the Hawaiian Islands at approximate latitudes of 18–35° north and longitudes of 155–170° west by longline and trolling. Tissues (heater organ, red muscle, white muscle, and cardiac muscle) were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then powdered in a porcelain mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until analyses. All enzyme assays were performed within 1 mo.

RNA isolation and CS cDNA sequence information. We purified total RNA from guanidine thiocyanate extracts using a standard acid phenol protocol (12). Poly(A) RNA was isolated from total RNA using the poly(A) Purist MAG kit (Ambion).

All scombroid CS sequence data were determined from RT-PCR analyses. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from red muscle total RNA and used as the template for subsequent PCR reactions. Degenerate forward (F251) and reverse (R252) primers, based on CS mRNA sequences from human (GenBank accession number NM 004077), mouse (NM 026444), rat (NM 130755), pig (M21197), and zebrafish (BC045362.1), were used to amplify a 590-bp portion of CS cDNA at 50°C using standard PCR conditions (Table 1). Products were sequenced, and this information was used to design specific primers for use in 3' and 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) using the Roche 5'/3' RACE kit. Poly(A) RNA was used as the template for 5' RACE, and gene-specific reverse primers 5'-R1, 5'-R2, 5'-R3, and 5'-R4 were used in cDNA synthesis and subsequent nested amplifications (Table 1). Total RNA was used as the template for 3' RACE and reverse transcribed with an oligo(dT) primer. We performed nested PCR amplifications with this cDNA as the initial template using the specific forward primers 3'-F1, 3'-F2, and 3'-F3, respectively, each with the anchor primer (Table 1). The band from the second PCR for yellowfin and marlin and the third PCR for skipjack were excised and cloned.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers designed for citrate synthase PCRs, 5' RACE, 3' RACE, preparation of CS deletion, and QC-RT-PCR amplifications

 
Swordfish and bigeye tuna samples were not amplified by 3' RACE. Instead, a degenerate reverse primer was designed in the 3'-untranslated region of CS in a region of homology among the yellowfin, marlin, and skipjack sequences (Scomb-R1, Table 1). A 910-bp product at the 3' end of the CS coding region was amplified using 3'-F1 and Scomb-R1 at an annealing temperature of 58°C from swordfish and bigeye. All PCR products were sequenced in both directions.

CS sequence analyses. Scombroid CS sequences were threaded onto the crystal structure determined for pig CS complexed with the reaction products coenzyme A and citrate, listed under the Protein Data Bank (3) identification code 2CTS [PDB] (43). Cn3D 4.1 software was used to visualize these alignments (MMDB, NCBI). Catalytic and ligand binding residues were identified from structural studies (43, 44, 51) and site-directed mutagenesis experiments (16, 28) of pig and chicken CS.

Tissue analyses. Enzyme activities for CS (EC 4.1.3.7 [EC] ) and cytochrome c-oxidase (COX; EC 1.9.3.1 [EC] ) were measured from whole cell extracts (40) at 25°C, using assays optimized to ensure that substrates were not limiting. A small volume of homogenate (50 µl) was digested in 5 vol of proteinase K digestion buffer (29), which was then assayed for nuclear DNA content by Picogreen (Molecular Probes), with a standard curve constructed from trout genomic DNA. The contribution of mitochondrial DNA to this measure of nuclear DNA content is minimal. Despite its high copy number, mitochondrial DNA represents <2% of total DNA in striated muscles due to its small size (~16,500 bp) relative to the nuclear genome (2, 36).

We measured total RNA levels per gram of tissue directly from the upper (aqueous) phase of a standard RNA extraction protocol using Ribogreen (Molecular Probes). This organic extraction with acid phenol ensures that contaminating DNA levels are low (<2.5% of total nucleic acid content as determined from a Picogreen assay; data not shown). A mock RNA extraction (no tissue added) was performed to obtain an equivalent aqueous phase to use with the standard curve. Both Picogreen and Ribogreen analyses were conducted with a SpectraMAX GEMINI XS spectrofluorometer (Molecular Devices).

Quantitative competitive RT-PCR. CS mRNA levels were quantified using quantitative competitive (QC) RT-PCR with an RNA competitor template. The competitor template was constructed by using PCR to delete an internal portion of the endogenous template (11). Swordfish CS cDNA was amplified with the forward primer QC-delete (ATGAGGGGGATGAAGGGTCTGGTGTAAGCTTCCAGAGTGTCAGGAGTTGTTGCC), containing a HindIII restriction site, and the reverse primer QC-R1, yielding a product with a 50-bp deletion just after the end of the QC-F1 primer binding site in the CS gene product. The resulting product, {Delta}CS, was cloned into pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen), analyzed for orientation by restriction enzyme digestion with HindIII, and sequenced.

The plasmid containing {Delta}CS was linearized with BamHI, purified (QIAquick PCR purification kit, Qiagen), and used to generate sense strand {Delta}CS RNA using T7 RNA polymerase. The in vitro transcript was DNase treated (1 unit of DNase per µg DNA) and then purified with an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). No contaminating DNA was detectable at the dilution to be used in QC-RT-PCR when tested in negative control PCRs (no RT). The purity and size of the {Delta}CS transcript were verified by gel electrophoresis, quantified with Ribogreen (Molecular Probes), diluted to 500 pg/µl (4.05 fmol/µl) in DEPC-treated water, and stored in single-use aliquots at –80°C.

Before the reverse transcription procedure, RNA samples from tissues were quantified by absorbance at 260 nm using a quartz plate treated with 1 M sodium hydroxide to destroy RNases. Aliquots were taken directly from the plate well to ensure accurate quantification. A constant amount of sample RNA (500 ng) and various amounts of competitor RNA transcript were added to each RT tube. Samples were reverse transcribed at 42°C for 1 h. The synthesized cDNA was then amplified by PCR as described previously (31), using strict consensus primers (QC-F1 and QC-R1, Table 1) for all five species at an annealing temperature of 65°C. An aliquot of {alpha}-dCTP32 was added to the reaction for the last five cycles. Only reactions with full-length products within 50% of competitor products (once corrected for deoxycytosine content) were used in quantification (47). Controls with no added RT, as well as a negative PCR control, were run in parallel to detect any genomic DNA contamination. None of these negative controls generated PCR products. The amplified products were size fractioned on a 12% polyacrylamide gel, and the signal strength was quantified with a storage phosphor screen (Molecular Dynamics) and analyzed with Imagequant software (Molecular Dynamics). We converted values from nanograms to femtomoles of CS mRNA using the molecular mass of the competitor transcript (8.10 fmol/ng).

Statistical analyses. For all parameters, significant differences (P < 0.05) among tissue types within a species and for a tissue type among species were detected with one-way ANOVAs and identified with the Tukey-Kramer test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Mitochondrial enzyme content. CS and COX activities displayed similar trends between the two clades of fish. When expressed per gram of tissue, mean tuna (skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye) activities were approximately two- to threefold higher than mean billfish (swordfish, striped marlin) activities for all homologous fiber types (Fig. 1, B and D). In addition, each tuna species had significantly higher CS and COX activities for a given fiber type than each billfish species, with the exception of COX in bigeye white muscle and yellowfin cardiac muscle (P < 0.05). CS and COX also displayed similar trends across fiber types within a species (Fig. 1, A and C). Red and cardiac muscles had ~6- to 10-fold higher CS activity per gram of tissue than white muscle. The heater organ had the highest activities of all fiber types, with 15- to 30-fold more CS than billfish white muscle.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mitochondrial enzyme activities in scombroid muscles. Citrate synthase (CS; A) and cytochrome c-oxidase (COX; C) activities per gram tissue were measured at 25°C. Data are means + SE. Tissues with different superscripts are significantly different from other tissues within the given species (P < 0.05). CS (B) and COX (D) activities per gram tissue expressed relative to billfish. Data are means for each clade, with circles ({bullet}) representing the mean for each species within the clade. For A and B, n = 8 for all tuna and swordfish tissues and n = 4 for all marlin tissues, except heater organ where n = 2. For C and D, n = 5 for all tuna tissues, n = 8 for all swordfish tissues, and n = 4 for all marlin tissues, except heater organ where n = 2. WM, white muscle; RM, red muscle; CAR, cardiac muscle; HO, heater organ; SJ, skipjack tuna; BE, bigeye tuna; YF, yellowfin tuna; SW, swordfish; MA, striped marlin.

 
CS sequence analyses. The full coding region of CS was sequenced for the three tuna species [yellowfin tuna (GenBank accession number AY461848), bigeye tuna (AY461849), and skipjack tuna (AY461850)] and the two billfish species [swordfish (AY461851 [GenBank] ) and striped marlin (AY461852 [GenBank] )]. The impact of any clade-specific nonsynonymous variation (defined as sites for which all tunas have the same amino acid and all billfishes have another amino acid) was examined to determine whether variations in the enzyme's catalytic capacity may be responsible for the higher CS activity in tuna striated muscles. In the 439 amino acid CS monomer, there are five sites (Ser3Thr, Thr19Ser, Ile171Val, Pro222Ala, Leu292Met) with clade-specific variations (Fig. 2). None of these differences occurs in the highly conserved catalytic residues (present in all vertebrates), ligand-binding domains, or helices that mediate the contact between subunits (16, 28, 43, 44, 51). When localized on the enzyme with pig CS crystal structure information (2CTS), they also do not appear to affect secondary structural parameters (e.g., kinking an {alpha}-helix) and are at the periphery of the protein, far from catalytic, ligand-binding, and subunit-interaction sites (Fig. 2). Amino acid hydrophobicity is also conserved in sites with clade-specific differences. Although no crystal structure is available for fish CS, the conservation of structure between mammals (Sus scrofa, Protein Data Bank no. 2CTS) and birds (Gallus gallus, Protein Data Bank no. 3CTS) suggests that the three-dimensional properties of scombroid CS should parallel those of other vertebrates (see Fig. 6).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Variation in CS primary structure between tunas and billfishes. The 5 scombroid sequences are threaded into a crystal structure-based sequence alignment of a single subunit of the pig CS homodimer bound to the products coenzyme A (CoA) and citrate [Protein Data Bank (PDB) identification no. 2CTS]. Residues that vary between the pig and scombroid fish are highlighted in blue, and clade-specific differences between the tunas and billfishes are highlighted in yellow. The second subunit of CS binds in the region surrounding the ligands, at helices F, G, M, and L at the back of this structure (see Fig. 6). C and N, C and N terminus, respectively.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Structure-based sequence alignment of pig (Sus scofa) (PDB no. 2CTS) and chicken (Gallus gallus) (PDB no. 3CTS) CS monomer with scombroid and zebrafish (Danio rerio) CS sequences (GenBank accession no. M21197, P23007, and BC045362.1, respectively). {alpha}-Helices are indicated by boxed residues. Catalytic residues are highlighted in inverse type. *Acetyl-CoA/CoA ligand binding sites. {dagger}Oxaloactetate/citrate ligand binding sites. {ddagger}Hinge region involved in conformational change on OAA binding. §Other regions near active sites or putatively involved in binding. The 2 CS monomers interact at helices F, G, L, and M. Clade-specific differences between tunas and billfish are highlighted in gray.

 
Impact of DNA content on enzyme levels. When investigating the origins of these differences in CS content, the choice of denominator is very important. Differences found when expressed per gram tissue may not reflect gene regulatory differences per se but instead differences in nuclear content. For example, if two tissues differed in nuclear DNA content (and thus CS gene copy number), they could achieve different CS synthesis per gram muscle even if each CS gene was similarly regulated. We measured total DNA content per gram muscle, a measure of nuclei per gram muscle, so that enzyme levels could be expressed relative to DNA content as well as per gram tissue. Nuclear DNA content is a valid measure of the CS gene content of a tissue if, as expected, all nuclei within an individual are similar. This would not be the case in some tissues, such as polytenic salivary glands, where specific genes are amplified in the genome. Among these species of fish, DNA content per haploid genome size is also comparable (21, 22). There were no significant differences in DNA content between homologous tissues in tunas and billfishes (P < 0.05), but there were large differences between fiber types (Fig. 3A). Red muscle, cardiac muscle, and heater organ had, respectively, 2.5- to 4-fold, 2- to 6-fold, and 7- to 9-fold more DNA per gram tissue than white muscle. These differences are likely due to major differences in myonuclear domain, although the potential impact of nonmuscle cells (e.g., fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle) cannot be ruled out. It is important to acknowledge that all whole muscle analyses, including enzyme, RNA, and nuclear run-off analyses, are subject to potential concerns about the relative activities and levels of myonuclei in the muscle.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. DNA content per gram tissue (A) and CS activity per milligram DNA (B) in scombroid muscles. In A and B, tissues with different superscripts are significantly different from other tissues (P < 0.05). In A, all tissues and species are compared. In B, comparisons are made within species. Data are means ± SE. C: CS activity per milligram DNA for each clade expressed relative to billfish. Data are means for each clade, with circles ({bullet}) representing the mean for each species within the clade. For AC, n = 8 for all tuna and swordfish tissues and n = 4 for all marlin tissues, except the heater organ where n = 2.

 
When expressed per milligram DNA, mean tuna CS activities remained ~2-fold higher than mean billfish values in red and white muscle and increased to ~3.5-fold higher in tuna cardiac muscle (Fig. 3C). Each tuna species also had a significantly higher CS activity per milligram DNA than each billfish species in all homologous tissues (P < 0.05). Conversely, the large differences in CS activity seen among fiber types are greatly reduced when enzyme levels are expressed relative to nuclear content (Fig. 3B). For example, the ~30-fold difference in enzyme activity between the swordfish heater organ and white muscle is reduced to a threefold difference when expressed per milligram DNA (Fig. 1A vs. Fig. 3B). In addition, the 6- to 10-fold difference in CS enzyme activity between the red and cardiac muscle compared with the white muscle is reduced to an approximate threefold difference (Fig. 1A vs. Fig. 3B). These results argue for the large role of constitutive expression in combination with differences in nuclear content in determining fiber-type mitochondrial phenotype, even within the exceptional heater organ.

Role of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation. To pinpoint the step at which increased enzyme content per milligram DNA is mediated, we investigated the impact of variations in transcriptional control of the CS gene. CS mRNA levels were determined by QC-RT-PCR using primers designed in areas of exact consensus for all five species. CS transcript levels per gram total RNA calculated by QC-RT-PCR (Fig. 4B) were expressed per milligram DNA by correcting for both total DNA (Fig. 3A) and RNA (Fig. 4A) content of the tissue. Within a species, white muscle contained as much or more CS transcript per milligram DNA than the red, cardiac, and heater muscle in 10 of 12 comparisons (Fig. 4C) (significant, P < 0.05). Among clades, mean CS mRNA per milligram DNA values vary <15% between tuna and billfish cardiac muscle, and the billfish white and red muscle are found to have 40% and 3% more CS mRNA than tuna muscles, opposite to CS enzyme trends (Fig. 4D). Each billfish species also contained as much or more CS transcript per milligram DNA than each tuna species in all homologous muscles, with the exception of the swordfish red and cardiac muscles compared with the skipjack (significant, P < 0.05). Therefore, neither intertissue nor interspecies variations in CS enzyme activity (Fig. 3, B and C) are reflected in CS mRNA levels (Fig. 4, C and D), arguing against major differences in transcriptional regulation and suggesting that differences in CS activity found when DNA content is accounted arise from posttranscriptional regulation. Within a species, red and cardiac muscle produce approximately two- to threefold more CS enzyme per femtomole of CS mRNA, and the heater organ produces four- to eightfold more CS enzyme than white muscle (Fig. 5A). Between clades, mean CS enzyme production per femtomole CS mRNA for tunas is about two- to threefold greater than homologous billfish tissues (Fig. 5B). Each tuna species also produces significantly more CS enzyme per femtomole CS mRNA than each billfish species in all homologous muscles, with the exception of the bigeye and skipjack red muscle compared with the swordfish (P < 0.05).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Total RNA content per gram tissue and CS mRNA levels in scombroid muscles. A: mg RNA/g tissue. Data are means + SE. Tissues with different superscripts are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). B: representative QC-RT-PCR assay for swordfish red muscle CS mRNA/mg total RNA. Corresponding amounts of competitor template (in picograms) added to the reaction are listed above the corresponding lane. –RT, control reaction with no added RT. C: fmol CS mRNA/mg DNA. Data are means + SE. Tissues with different superscripts are significantly different from other tissues within the given species (P < 0.05). D: fmol CS mRNA/mg DNA for each clade expressed relative to billfish. Data are means for each clade, with circles ({bullet}) representing the mean for each species within the clade. For AD, n = 5 for all tuna and swordfish tissues and n = 4 for all marlin tissues, except the heater organ where n = 2.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Posttranscriptional regulation of CS. A: CS enzyme activity/fmol CS mRNA. Data are means + SE. Tissues with different superscripts are significantly different from other tissues within the given species (P < 0.05). B: CS enzyme activity/fmol CS mRNA for each clade expressed relative to billfish. Data are means for each clade, with circles ({bullet}) representing the mean for each species within the clade. For A and B, n = 5 for all tuna and swordfish tissues and n = 4 for all marlin tissues, except the heater organ where n = 2.

 
DISCUSSION

In this study, we assessed the relative importance of gene dosage and transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation in determining evolutionary and fiber-type differences in mitochondrial enzyme content in muscles of scombroid fish. Studies on mammalian muscle fiber types suggest that transcriptional regulators play an important role in controlling differences in mitochondrial enzymes between muscles and with physiological challenges (23, 32, 33, 37, 38, 46, 53, 54). However, the genetic bases for differences in mitochondrial content between animals are virtually unknown, although mitochondrial abundance is a heritable trait that can be selected for on population-level time scales (24).

We have compared the mitochondrial capacity of selected tunas and billfishes using CS, a citric acid cycle enzyme located in the mitochondrial matrix, as an index of mitochondrial content. The differences we found in CS activity among fiber types and species are consistent with previous studies (6, 15, 27, 50). Within each clade (i.e., tunas and billfishes), homologous muscles displayed similar CS activities (Fig. 1A). Between clades, tunas had about twofold higher CS activity than billfishes in each homologous muscle (Fig. 1B). Within each species, red muscle and cardiac muscle had similar enzyme activities, both ~6- to 10-fold greater than white muscle (Fig. 1A). Billfish heater organ CS activities were about 3-fold greater vs. cardiac and red muscle and 15- to 30-fold higher than activities of white muscle of the same species (Fig. 1A).

CS activity is a good marker for mitochondrial content because it correlates with morphometric measures of mitochondria volume density (42) and milligrams of mitochondrial protein (39). In this study, we also found good correlation between the activities of CS and the inner mitochondrial membrane enzyme COX or complex IV of the electron transport chain (Fig. 1). Although COX is probably a more accurate predictor of maximal mitochondrial respiration, its complex structure and regulation make such functional and regulatory investigations difficult. The genetics and enzymology of CS are well suited to study the evolution of mitochondrial properties. Metazoan CS is a homodimer encoded by a single copy nuclear gene with no known isoforms (17), no allosteric regulators (44), and no known covalent regulators. Thus any difference in CS catalytic activity between tissues also reflects a difference in CS protein content. However, when comparing across species, it is important to assess the potential for genetic differences that could affect the relationship between CS catalytic activity and CS protein content. Changes in enzyme catalytic efficiency could, in principle, occur in CS or other mitochondrial enzymes as an evolutionary mechanism to increase catalytic activity. However, this is the least parsimonious mechanism by which a global increase in mitochondrial capacity could arise because of the complexity of mitochondrial metabolism. For example, many changes in primate COX subunits have structural implications that necessitate coevolution of binding partners (19). We sequenced the full-length coding region of CS from all five species and found no clade-specific mutations that affected functionally relevant sites in the protein. There are no variations in catalytic, substrate binding, or dimerization sites, arguing that the catalytic efficiency of CS is similar between the tunas and billfishes (Figs. 2 and 6). Thus we conclude that CS activity patterns reflect CS content in comparisons between these species as well as among tissues within each species. To assess the regulatory origins of differences in CS content among species and tissues, we considered the importance of CS gene dosage (nuclei per gram tissue), transcriptional regulation (CS mRNA per CS gene), and posttranscriptional regulation (CS activity per CS mRNA).

Importance of muscle DNA content. Myonuclear domain and muscle morphology are important considerations when comparing muscles in terms of gene expression and protein levels. Consider two muscles that differ in myonuclei per gram and therefore CS gene copy number per gram. The CS genes in both tissues could be regulated identically, but a tissue with more nuclei per gram (e.g., red muscle) would be expected to synthesize more CS per gram muscle. Because mitochondrial DNA contributes <2% to total DNA content, total DNA per gram tissue is a valid measure of nuclear DNA per gram tissue (2, 36). Nuclear DNA content should also be a valid measure of the CS gene content of a tissue if all nuclei within an individual are the same. This would not be the case in some tissues, such as polytenic salivary glands, where specific genes are amplified in the genome. This measure should also be valid for our evolutionary comparisons since haploid genome size is comparable among the tunas and billfishes (21, 22). Thus expressing CS per milligram DNA provides a better indication of potential differences in CS gene expression between tissues. Although this may be less important in mammals, where myonuclear domain differs only two- to threefold between skeletal fiber types (49), it might be very important in fish, which display a much greater divergence in metabolic properties (30). The scombroid fish are of particular interest because of the mitochondria-rich heater organ tissue.

In this study, fiber-type differences in CS activity parallel variations in nuclear DNA content. Red muscle and cardiac muscle have many more nuclei and mitochondria than does white muscle (Fig. 3A and Fig. 1A). The heater organ has both the highest CS activity (Fig. 1A) and highest DNA content (Fig. 3A) of all billfish tissues: expressing CS per milligram DNA reduces the 30-fold difference in CS per gram muscle between swordfish heater organ and white muscle to a 3-fold difference (Fig. 1A vs. Fig. 3B). With such a close relationship between nuclear DNA content and CS activity across fiber types, gene regulatory mechanisms (transcriptional, posttranscriptional) need to account for only a fraction of the differences arising between tissues. Instead, our study highlights the important role of constitutive expression in controlling mitochondrial enzyme content across fiber types. Leary et al. (30) found similar evidence for constitutive expression of the mitochondrial enzymes CS and COX in red, cardiac, and white muscles of another teleost fish, Oncorhynchus mykiss (30). Surprisingly, we found that even the mitochondria-rich billfish heater organ is not exceptional with respect to mitochondrial gene expression compared with other billfish muscles. Although our results support the idea that constitutive pathways are primarily responsible for variations in mitochondrial content across scombroid muscles, they do not negate the possibility of major differences in inducible/adaptive gene regulation during physiological challenges, such as exercise and cold acclimation.

Regulation of CS content. Although gene dosage accounted for most of the differences between fiber types, it did not influence the differences in CS activities between tunas and billfishes (Fig. 3C). Most studies that assess the determinants of mitochondrial gene expression in mammalian striated muscles focus on transcriptional regulators, particularly peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}-coactivator-1{alpha} (33, 37, 38, 46). However, it is important to recognize that many mitochondrial proteins are also regulated by posttranscriptional controls [e.g., {beta}-subunit of the F1-ATPase complex (26), mitoribosomal protein S12 (35), subunit VIII-L of COX (41), aconitase (18)]. We assessed the relative importance of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation in the differences that emerge after DNA content is considered: approximately twofold between clades and threefold among muscles.

After developing a QC-RT-PCR approach that took interspecies differences in CS sequence into consideration, we assessed the relationship between CS transcript levels and CS gene dosage. CS is transcriptionally regulated during the mitochondrial biogenesis that accompanies electric stimulation in mammalian striated muscle (1). Under steady-state conditions, CS mRNA correlates with CS enzyme levels (1). Thus transcriptional regulation is a potential site for evolutionary differences in CS content among species. For example, variations in enzyme levels could arise from mutations in 1) cis-regulatory regions of genes (altering transcription factor binding), 2) cis-regulatory regions of the transcriptional regulators, or 3) transcription factor coding regions, causing structural changes that influence DNA binding or catalytic properties (25, 45). Although transcriptional regulation is increasingly implicated in evolutionary variations, in other nonmitochondrial proteins (25, 45, 52), it is not yet known whether evolutionary differences in mitochondrial protein levels arise through effects on transcriptional regulators. If the differences in CS activity between species and tissues arose by transcriptional regulation, we would also predict a correlation between CS mRNA and CS enzyme levels. However, there was little correlation between CS activity and CS mRNA levels when compared between clades of fish (Fig. 3C vs. Fig. 4D, note differences in scale). Instead, it is the amount of CS enzyme produced per femtomole of CS mRNA, a measure of posttranscriptional regulation, that accounts for the majority of differences in CS enzyme content between tunas and billfishes (Fig. 5B). There is also very little correspondence between CS enzyme and CS mRNA values when compared across fiber types within an individual (Fig. 3B vs. Fig. 4C). Again, it is the amount of CS enzyme produced per femtomole of CS mRNA (Fig. 5A) that accounts for a higher CS enzyme content per milligram DNA in the red, cardiac, and heater muscles (Fig. 3B). These data argue that the differences seen in CS activity among scombroid muscles after DNA content is accounted for likely arise through variations in posttranscriptional processes, rather than transcriptional control.

Posttranscriptional regulation of CS during mitochondrial biogenesis also occurs in the livers of North Sea eelpout (Zoarces viviparous) during cold acclimation (34). The mechanism by which the posttranscriptional regulation of CS occurs in North Sea eelpout liver and in scombroid muscles, both within and among species, is unknown. It is important to note that both studies have measured steady-state levels of CS transcripts and not transcription per se. CS mRNA levels may also be influenced by mRNA stability. However, even if this is a contributing factor, it would not affect the calculations of CS enzyme produced per CS mRNA, and the importance of posttranscriptional controls remains.

As mentioned previously, several mitochondrial enzymes are known to experience characteristic differences in posttranscriptional processing. Furthermore, declines in muscle energetics during aging and disease can also arise through posttranscriptional defects [e.g., protein import (48)]. Disease models, involving loss of function, provide insight into possible sites of posttranscriptional regulation, but they may not be directly applicable to evolutionary or developmental comparisons. Tunas are exceptional athletes among fish; it is likely that they possess unusual regulatory features that enable them to maintain higher CS levels in relation to CS mRNA. The most likely points of differential regulation are enhanced translation initiation, protein stability, or mitochondrial stability.

This is the first work to examine the genetic determinants of evolutionary variations in muscle mitochondrial content. Surprisingly, we found evidence for a substantial role of posttranscriptional differences in determining CS activity patterns among species. Posttranscriptional processes also contribute to fiber-type differences in CS content within scombroid fishes. However, we identify nuclear DNA content as the main determinant of phenotypic differences in mitochondrial content among muscle fiber types. Elucidating the posttranscriptional control mechanisms by which CS is regulated in these two contexts may have broad implications for the regulation of mitochondrial content and will represent an important step in unraveling the possible molecular mechanisms by which physiologically important traits, such as mitochondrial content, may evolve.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (C. D. Moyes) and postgraduate scholarship (A. C. Dalziel) and made possible by a research program funded by the Pelagic Fisheries Research Program.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank N. Fragoso, R. Brill (National Marine Fisheries Service), and M. Musyl (Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research) for sample collection, D. Michaud and M. Komolova for expert technical assistance, and C. Lyons for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. D. Moyes, Dept. of Biology, Queen's Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (E-mail: moyesc{at}biology.queensu.ca)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 We use the descriptive terms red and white muscle in preference to tetrapod distinctions of slow-oxidative, fast-oxidative/glycolytic, and fast-glycolytic or myosin I, IIa, IIb, or IId/x. The use of the terms red and white avoids implicit links with specific myosin isoform profiles, which in many fish is complicated by early and recent genome duplications. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Annex BH, Kraus WE, Dohm GL, and Williams RS. Mitochondrial biogenesis in striated muscles: rapid induction of citrate synthase mRNA by nerve stimulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 260: C266–C270, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Battersby BJ and Moyes CD. Influence of acclimation temperature on mitochondrial DNA, RNA, and enzymes in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R905–R912, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, and Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Block BA. Structure of the brain and eye heater tissue in marlins, sailfish, and spearfishes. J Morphol 190: 169–189, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Block BA. Billfish brain and eye heater: a new look at nonshivering heat production. News Physiol Sci 2: 208–213, 2004.
  6. Block BA and Finnerty JR. Endothermy in fishes: a phylogenetic analysis of constraints, predispositions, and selection pressures. Environ Biol Fishes 40: 283–302, 1994.[CrossRef]
  7. Block BA, Finnerty JR, Stewart AF, and Kidd J. Evolution of endothermy in fish: mapping physiological traits on a molecular phylogeny. Science 260: 210–214, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Block BA and Franzini-Armstrong C. The structure of the membrane systems in a novel muscle cell modified for heat production. J Cell Biol 107: 1099–1112, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Block BA and Stevens ED. Tuna: physiology, ecology, and evolution. In: Fish Physiology, edited by Hoar WS, Randall DJ, and Farrell AP. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2001.
  10. Buser KS, Kopp B, Gehr P, Weibel ER, and Hoppeler H. Effect of cold environment on skeletal muscle mitochondria in growing rats. Cell Tissue Res 225: 427–436, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Celi FS, Zenilman ME, and Shuldiner AR. A rapid and versatile method to synthesize internal standards for competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 1047, 1993.[Free Full Text]
  12. Chomczynski P and Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159, 1987.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Czubryt MP, McAnally J, Fishman GI, and Olson EN. Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1{alpha}) and mitochondrial function by MEF2 and HDAC5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 1711–1716, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dickson KA. Unique adaptations of the metabolic biochemistry of tunas and billfishes for life in the pelagic environment. Environ Biol Fishes 42: 65–97, 1995.[CrossRef]
  15. Dickson KA. Locomotor muscle of high-performance fishes: what do comparisons of tunas with ectothermic sister taxa reveal? Comp Biochem Physiol A 113: 39–49, 1996.
  16. Evans CT, Kurz LC, Remington SJ, and Srere PA. Active site mutants of pig citrate synthase: effects of mutations on the enzyme catalytic and structural properties. Biochemistry 35: 10661–10672, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Goldenthal MJ, Marin-Garcia J, and Ananthakrishnan R. Cloning and molecular analysis of the human citrate synthase gene. Genome 41: 733–738, 1998.[Medline]
  18. Gray NK, Pantopoulos K, Dandekar T, Ackrell BA, and Hentze MW. Translational regulation of mammalian and Drosophila citric acid cycle enzymes via iron-responsive elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 4925–4930, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Grossman LI, Schmidt TR, Wildman DE, and Goodman M. Molecular evolution of aerobic energy metabolism in primates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 18: 26–36, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Handschin C, Rhee J, Lin J, Tarr PT, and Spiegelman BM. An autoregulatory loop controls peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1{alpha} expression in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7111–7116, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hardie DC and Hebert PD. The nucleotypic effects of cellular DNA content in cartilaginous and ray-finned fishes. Genome 46: 683–706, 2003.[Medline]
  22. Hinegardner R and Rosen ED. Cellular DNA content and the evolution of teleostean fishes. Am Nat 106: 621–645, 1972.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  23. Hood DA. Invited Review: contractile activity-induced mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 90: 1137–1157, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Houle-Leroy P, Garland TJ, Swallow JG, and Guderley H. Effects of voluntary activity and genetic selection on muscle metabolic capacities in house mice Mus domesticus. J Appl Physiol 89: 1608–1616, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hsia CC and McGinnis W. Evolution of transcription factor function. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13: 199–206, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Izquierdo JM and Cuezva JM. Control of the translational efficiency of {beta}-F1-ATPase mRNA depends on the regulation of a protein that binds the 3' untranslated region of the mRNA. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5255–5268, 1997.[Abstract]
  27. Korsmeyer KE and Dewar H. Tuna metabolism and energetics. In: Tuna: Physiology, Ecology, and Evolution, edited by Block BA and Stevens ED. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2001, p. 36–78.
  28. Kurz LC, Nakra T, Stein R, Plungkhen W, Riley M, Hsu F, and Drysdale GR. Effects of changes in three catalytic residues on the relative stabilities of some of the intermediates and transition states in the citrate synthase reaction. Biochemistry 37: 9724–9737, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Leary SC, Battersby BJ, and Moyes CD. Inter-tissue differences in mitochondrial enzyme activity, RNA and DNA in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Exp Biol 201: 3377–3384, 1998.[Abstract]
  30. Leary SC, Lyons CN, Rosenberger AG, Ballantyne JS, Stillman J, and Moyes CD. Fiber-type differences in muscle mitochondrial profiles. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R817–R826, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Leary SC, Michaud D, Lyons CN, Hale TM, Bushfield TL, Adams MA, and Moyes CD. Bioenergetic remodeling of heart during treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats with enalapril. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H540–H548, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lehman JJ, Barger PM, Kovacs A, Saffitz JE, Medeiros DM, and Kelly DP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 promotes cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis. J Clin Invest 106: 847–856, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Lin J, Wu H, Tarr PT, Zhang CY, Wu Z, Boss O, Michael LF, Puigserver P, Isotani E, Olson EN, Lowell BB, Bassel-Duby R, and Spiegelman BM. Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1{alpha} drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature 418: 797–801, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Lucassen M, Schmidt A, Eckerle LG, and Pörtner HO. Mitochondrial proliferation in the permanent vs. temporary cold: enzyme activities and mRNA levels in Antarctic and temperate zoarcid fish. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R1410–R1420, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mariottini P, Shah ZH, Toivonen JM, Bagni C, Spelbrink JN, Amaldi F, and Jacobs HT. Expression of the gene for mitoribosomal protein S12 is controlled in human cells at the levels of transcription, RNA splicing, and translation. J Biol Chem 274: 31853–31862, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Miller FJ, Rosenfeldt FL, Zhang C, Linnane AW, and Nagley P. Precise determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number in human skeletal and cardiac muscle by a PCR-based assay: lack of change of copy number with age. Nucleic Acids Res 31: e61, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Moyes CD. Controlling muscle mitochondrial content. J Exp Biol 206: 4385–4391, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Moyes CD and Hood DA. Origins and consequences of mitochondrial variation in vertebrate muscle. Annu Rev Physiol 65: 177–201, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Moyes CD, Mathieu-Costello OA, Brill RW, and Hochachka PW. Mitochondrial metabolism of cardiac and skeletal muscles from a fast (Katsuwonus pelamis) and a slow (Cyprinus carpio) fish. Can J Zool 70: 1246–1253, 1992.
  40. Moyes CD, Mathieu-Costello OA, Tsuchiya N, Filburn C, and Hansford RG. Mitochondrial biogenesis during cellular differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272: C1345–C1351, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Preiss T and Lightowlers RN. Posttranscriptional regulation of tissue-specific isoforms. A bovine cytosolic RNA-binding protein, COLBP, associates with messenger RNA encoding the liver-form isopeptides of cytochrome c oxidase. J Biol Chem 268: 10659–10667, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Reichmann H, Hoppeler H, Mathieu-Costello O, von Bergen F, and Pette D. Biochemical and ultrastructural changes of skeletal muscle mitochondria after chronic electrical stimulation in rabbits. Pflügers Arch 404: 1–9, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Remington S, Wiegand G, and Huber R. Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of two different forms of citrate synthase at 2.7 and 17 A resolution. J Mol Biol 158: 111–152, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Remington SJ. Structure and mechanism of citrate synthase. Curr Top Cell Regul 33: 209–229, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Resnick MA and Inga A. Functional mutants of the sequence-specific transcription factor p53 and implications for master genes of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 9934–9939, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Scarpulla RC. Nuclear activators and coactivators in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1576: 1–14, 2002.[Medline]
  47. Souaze F, Ntodou-Thome A, Tran CY, Rostene W, and Forgez P. Quantitative RT-PCR: limits and accuracy. Biotechniques 21: 280–285, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Szczesny B, Hazra TK, Papaconstantinou J, Mitra S, and Boldogh I. Age-dependent deficiency in import of mitochondrial DNA glycosylases required for repair of oxidatively damaged bases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 10670–10675, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Tseng BS, Kasper CE, and Edgerton VR. Cytoplasm-to-myonucleus ratios and succinate dehydrogenase activities in adult rat slow and fast muscle fibers. Cell Tissue Res 275: 39–49, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Tullis A, Block BA, and Sidell BD. Activities of key metabolic enzymes in the heater organs of scombroid fishes. J Exp Biol 161: 383–403, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Wiegand G and Remington SJ. Citrate synthase: structure control, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 15: 97–117, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Wray GA, Hahn MW, Abouheif E, Balhoff JP, Pizer M, Rockman MV, and Romano LA. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 20: 1377–1419, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Wu H, Kanatous SB, Thurmond FA, Gallardo T, Isotani E, Bassel-Duby R, and Williams RS. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle by CaMK. Science 296: 349–352, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Wu Z, Puigserver P, Andersson U, Zhang C, Adelmant G, Mootha V, Troy A, Cinti S, Lowell B, Scarpulla RC, and Spiegelman BM. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell 98: 115–124, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Lucassen, N. Koschnick, L. G. Eckerle, and H.-O. Portner
Mitochondrial mechanisms of cold adaptation in cod (Gadus morhua L.) populations from different climatic zones
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2462 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. St-Pierre
MASTER OF MITOCHONDRIAL NUMBER
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): vii - vii.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental figure 6
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/1/R163    most recent
00152.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalziel, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalziel, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moyes, C. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.