AJP - Regu Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R1253-R1257, 2005. First published August 4, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00371.2005
0363-6119/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/R1253    most recent
00371.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.

REPORT

CALL FOR PAPERS
Physiology and Pharmacology of Temperature Regulation

Expanding the febrigenic role of cyclooxygenase-2 to the previously overlooked responses

Alexandre A. Steiner,1 Alla Y. Rudaya,1 Jared R. Robbins,1 Alexander S. Dragic,1 Robert Langenbach,2 and Andrej A. Romanovsky1

1Systemic Inflammation Laboratory, Trauma Research, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and 2Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Submitted 26 May 2005 ; accepted in final form 28 July 2005

ABSTRACT

Previous studies on the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in fever induced by intravenous LPS have failed to investigate the role of these isoenzymes in the earliest responses: monophasic fever (response to a low, near-threshold dose of LPS) and the first phase of polyphasic fever (response to higher doses). We studied these responses in 96 mice that were COX-1 or COX-2 deficient (–/–) or sufficient (+/+). Each mouse was implanted with a temperature telemetry probe into the peritoneal cavity and a jugular catheter. The study was conducted at a tightly controlled, neutral ambient temperature (31°C). To avoid stress hyperthermia (which masks the onset of fever), all injections were performed through a catheter extension. The +/+ mice responded to intravenous saline with no change in deep body temperature. To a low dose of LPS (1 µg/kg iv), they responded with a monophasic fever. To a higher dose (56 µg/kg), they responded with a polyphasic fever. Neither monophasic fever nor the first phase of polyphasic fever was attenuated in the COX-1 –/– mice, but both responses were absent in the COX-2 –/– mice. The second and third phases of polyphasic fever were also missing in the COX-2 –/– mice. The present study identifies a new, critical role for COX-2 in the mediation of the earliest responses to intravenous LPS: monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever. It also suggests that no product of the COX-1 gene, including the splice variant COX-1b (COX-3), is essential for these responses.

prostaglandin E2; cyclooxygenase-1b; cyclooxygenase-1V1; cyclooxygenase-3; prostaglandin H2 synthase; body temperature; thermoregulation; febrile phases

FEBRILE RESPONSE TO BACTERIAL LPS depends, among other factors, on the LPS dose. At thermoneutrality, several species, including the rat (32) and mouse (36), respond to a low, near-threshold dose of intravenous LPS with a monophasic fever–a single rise in deep body temperature (Tb) characterized by a relatively long latency, small magnitude, and short duration. As the dose increases, a single bolus injection of LPS causes a polyphasic fever. This response has a shorter latency, higher magnitude, and longer duration. Even more importantly, polyphasic fever consists of several sequential Tb rises, called febrile phases, at least three of which have been identified in the rat (33) and mouse (36). Different febrile phases are associated with different symptoms of the sickness syndrome (32) and may involve different biochemical and physiological mechanisms (9, 14, 24, 34, 45).

There is no doubt that cyclooxygenase (COX) plays a critical role in the production of fever by catalyzing the conversion of arachidonic acid to PGH2, the immediate precursor of febrigenic PGE2 (for review, see Ref. 16). This enzyme has two isoforms, COX-1 (predominantly constitutive) and COX-2 (predominantly inducible) (for review, see Ref. 25). Studies involving highly selective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors (3, 4, 8, 31, 48) or genetically modified mice (22) have shown that COX-2, but not COX-1, mediates LPS fever at its later stages, which likely correspond to the second and third phases of the typical polyphasic febrile response. However, all studies referenced above involved a stressful, often painful, procedure of LPS administration; such a procedure led to the development of stress hyperthermia and thus masked the first phase of polyphasic fever. Most of those studies were also conducted at a poorly controlled ambient temperature, a condition that made differentiation of febrile phases impossible or unreliable, and none of those studies used LPS doses small enough to produce a monophasic fever. As a result, the two earliest responses to LPS, viz., monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever, were overlooked. The only study (42) aimed at investigating the involvement of COX-1 and COX-2 in these early responses to LPS was conducted in guinea pigs. However, results obtained in that study are difficult to interpret, because nimesulide, the drug used as a selective COX-2 inhibitor, is less selective than the COX-2 inhibitors of the new generation (30). Furthermore, nimesulide can affect febrile pathogenesis by acting on many targets other than COX (2). Hence, it remains to be determined which COX isoform mediates monophasic fever and the first phase of the polyphasic febrile response to LPS.

It is possible that the early responses to LPS are mediated not by COX-2, but by COX-1. An involvement of hepatic COX-1 in the initiation of the febrile response to systemic LPS has recently been proposed (28), and it has been demonstrated that COX-1 can play a role in various inflammatory responses, especially during their initial stages, when COX-2 is presumably not fully upregulated (12, 21, 43). To determine which COX isoform is involved in monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever were the aims of the present study. To meet these aims, we used mice genetically deficient in either COX-1 or COX-2 and applied the recently developed methodology of studying monophasic and polyphasic fever responses to intravenous LPS in this species (36).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals. The present study was performed on 96 male mice with (–/–) or without (+/+) a homozygous, targeted, null mutation in either the COX-1 (21) or COX-2 (23) gene. All mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). The COX-1 –/– mice (B6;129P2-Ptgs1tm1Unc) were produced on a mixed B6;129P2 background by mating COX-1 –/– males to COX-1 +/– females on a rotational breeding scheme. Wild-type mice of the COX-1 line were produced by mating COX-1 +/+ males to COX-1 +/+ females. The COX-2 –/– (B6;129P2-Ptgs2tm1Smi) and COX-2 +/+ mice were similarly produced on a mixed B6;129P2 background. Upon arrival at St. Joseph's Hospital (Phoenix, AZ), the mice were 9–10 wk old and had a body mass of 25–30 g. The mice were initially housed two per cage; after surgery, they were housed individually. Standard mice chow (Purina, Richmond, IA) and tap water were available ad libitum. The room was maintained on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 AM) and at an ambient temperature of 27°C. Each mouse was systematically adapted (7 daily training sessions, 4 h each) to spend time inside a Plexiglas enclosure (length, 15 cm; width, 15 cm; height, 25 cm). The enclosures did not limit the animals' movement and were used later in the experiments. All experiments were started between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM. Each mouse was used in only one experiment and euthanized with pentobarbital sodium (20 mg/kg iv) immediately thereafter. The protocols were approved by the St. Joseph's Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee.

Surgery. Two surgical procedures were performed: jugular vein catheterization and implantation of a temperature transmitter in the peritoneal cavity. These procedures were performed under ketamine-xylazine-acepromazine (42.0, 4.8, and 0.6 mg/kg, respectively, ip) anesthesia and antibiotic (enrofloxacin, 3.8 mg/kg sc) protection. A silicone catheter was passed into the superior vena cava through the jugular vein, and the free end of the catheter was exteriorized at the nape. A temperature transmitter (series 4000 E-Mitter; Mini Mitter, Bend, OR) was implanted via a midline laparotomy. For details on surgical procedures, see the companion paper (36). On day 1 postsurgery, the jugular catheter was flushed with heparinized (50 U/ml) pyrogen-free saline. The mice tolerated the surgical procedures well; they showed only a minor (5–10%) loss of body mass on day 1 and regained mass on day 2. The experiments were performed on day 3.

Experimental setup and protocol. The abdominal temperature, a measure of Tb, was recorded by telemetry at 2-min intervals. Telemetry receivers (model ER-4000; Mini Mitter) were positioned inside a climatic chamber (model 3940; Forma Scientific, Marietta, OH) and connected to a computer. The home cage of each mouse was placed on top of a receiver, a Plexiglas enclosure was placed inside the cage, and the mouse was left in the enclosure. The jugular catheter was extended with a length of polyethylene-50 (PE-50) tubing prefilled either with a combination of LPS suspension (25–30 µl at the mouse end of the extension) and saline (in the rest of the extension) or with saline alone. When the combination of LPS suspension and saline was used, a small (0.5 µl) air bubble separated the two. The extension was passed through a hanger on the top of the enclosure and a wall port of the climatic chamber. The extension was connected to a syringe filled with saline. The chamber was set to an ambient temperature of 31°C, which is neutral for mice in this experimental setup (36). The mice were allowed to habituate to these experimental conditions for ~2 h. Thereafter, they were injected intravenously with either Escherichia coli 0111:B4 LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or saline. Two doses of LPS were chosen based on our recent study (36): 1 µg/kg (100 µg/kg; caused a monophasic fever in C57BL/6 mice under the same experimental conditions) and 56 µg/kg (101.75 µg/kg; caused a polyphasic fever). To administer LPS, the LPS suspension in the mouse end of the catheter extension was flushed into the mouse's circulation by injecting saline (0.3 ml) from the syringe end of the extension. Hence, the procedure was executed from outside the chamber without touching the animal or causing pain or stress.

Data analysis. Tb data were compared across genotypes, treatments, and time points by a three-way ANOVA using Statistica AX'99 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). F and P values are reported for selected time intervals. Intervals corresponding to the duration of monophasic fever and durations of all phases of polyphasic fever were selected for each genotype based on preliminary experiments. A similar approach has been used in previous studies (9, 44). The compared values were considered significantly different at P < 5.0 x 10–2. The results are reported as means ± SE.

RESULTS

In all of the mice (regardless of the genotype), intravenous saline caused no significant change in Tb (Figs. 1 and 2). In the wild-type mice (COX-1 +/+ and COX-2 +/+), the low dose of LPS (1 µg/kg) caused a single, monophasic Tb rise, but the dynamics of the response differed. In the COX-1 +/+ mice, Tb started to increase at ~60 min, peaked at ~90 min, and returned to baseline at ~130 min postinjection (Fig. 1). In the COX-2 +/+ mice, the response peaked at the same time (~90 min), but started earlier (~30 min) and ended later (~210 min) (Fig. 2). Compared with saline, the low dose of LPS produced significant effects in both the COX-1 +/+ (60–130 min, F1,96 = 1.3 x 101, P = 3.8 x 10–4) and COX-2 +/+ (30–210 min, F1,168 = 7.6 x 101, P = 1.0 x 10–7) mice. To the moderate dose of LPS (56 µg/kg), the COX-1 +/+ and COX-2 +/+ mice responded with larger Tb rises, and the responses of the two wild-type lines had different dynamics. In the COX-1 +/+ mice, Tb started to increase at ~20 min and returned to baseline at ~220 min; the response consisted of the first (20–80 min) and second (80–160 min) febrile phases but did not have a clear third phase (Fig. 1). In the COX-2 +/+ mice, Tb also started to increase at ~20 min, but it had not returned to baseline until the end of experiment (270 min); this response consisted of three febrile phases (20–100, 100–150, and 150–270 min, respectively; Fig. 2). Compared with saline, the moderate dose of LPS produced significant effects in both the COX-1 +/+ (20–160 min, F1,225 = 1.8 x 102, P = 1.0 x 10–7) and COX-2 +/+ (20–270 min, F1,389 = 2.4 x 102, P = 1.0 x 10–7) mice. In general, the febrile responses of the COX-2 +/+ mice resembled those seen in C57BL/6 mice (36), whereas the febrile responses of COX-1 +/+ mice were somewhat different. Several other responses (e.g., arachidonic acid-induced ear swelling and ANG II-induced hypertension) have also been shown to differ in their timing and magnitude between the COX-1 +/+ and COX-2 +/+ lines (21, 23, 29).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Effects of an intravenous injection (arrow) of LPS (doses indicated) or saline on the deep body temperature of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 +/+ (sufficient) and COX-1 –/– (deficient) mice at a neutral ambient temperature (31°C); n, number of mice.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Effects of an intravenous injection (arrow) of LPS (doses indicated) or saline on the deep body temperature of COX-2 +/+ and COX-2 –/– mice at a neutral ambient temperature (31°C); n, number of mice.

 
Compared with the corresponding wild-type controls, neither monophasic fever nor the first phase of polyphasic fever was attenuated in the COX-1 –/– mice (Fig. 1). In fact, their fever responses were accelerated (monophasic fever) or enhanced (polyphasic fever). In contrast to the effects of COX-1 deletion, the effects of COX-2 deletion were drastic (Fig. 2). Both monophasic fever (F1,180 = 1.9 x 102, P = 1.0 x 10–7; intergenotype difference) and the first phase of polyphasic fever (F1,108 = 1.9 x 102, P = 1.0 x 10–7) were absent in COX-2 –/– mice. The second and third phases of polyphasic fever were also missing in these mice (F1,204 = 1.9 x 102, P = 1.0 x 10–7).

DISCUSSION

An involvement of COX, whether COX-1 or COX-2, in monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever is evident from the reported ability of nonselective (or relatively nonselective) COX inhibitors to attenuate both responses and the associated bursts in PGE2 synthesis (24, 35, 37, 39, 40, 42). In the present study, we examined which COX isoform mediates each of these responses. We have found that both monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever do not occur in COX-2 –/– mice, thus indisputably demonstrating a critical role for COX-2 in both responses. An involvement of COX-2 in the mediation of the first phase of LPS fever has been previously suggested based on the fact that this enzyme is transcriptionally upregulated in the liver and lung already at the onset of the first febrile phase (15). However, transcriptional upregulation is not the only mechanism for activation of COX-2. This isoform can also be activated by the rapid reaction of tyrosine phosphorylation (27). In those organs where COX-2 is constitutively expressed (e.g., the lung and brain; see Refs. 17, 26, 46), such posttranscriptional activation may represent a mechanism for fast activation of this isoform. Hence, it remains to be investigated whether it is the inducible or the constitutive COX-2 that triggers the febrile response.

The demonstrated inability of COX-2 –/– mice to develop monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever also sheds light on the potential involvement of COX-1 in these responses. COX-2 –/– mice exhibit a compensatory, transcriptional upregulation of COX-1 (1, 18, 47). The fact that they develop no fever despite such upregulation suggests that COX-1 is not a critical mediator of the febrile responses studied. This suggestion is in line with the present results obtained in COX-1 –/– mice. The latter knockout mice showed no attenuation of either monophasic fever or any phase of polyphasic fever. In fact, their monophasic fever was accelerated, and their polyphasic fever was enhanced. Although negative results in genetically modified animals are often difficult to interpret due to potential compensatory mechanisms, the obtained combination of the negative results in COX-1 –/– mice (fever not attenuated) with the positive results in COX-2 –/– mice (fever abolished) leaves little room for any explanation other than that the responses of interest are mediated by one or more products of COX-2 and do not require any product of COX-1. That COX-1 is uninvolved in the mediation of the first febrile phase has also been shown in experiments with the highly selective COX-1 inhibitor, SC-560 (42).

Although SC-560 inhibits COX-1, it is unknown whether it also inhibits the splice variant of COX retaining intron 1 (COX-1V1), also known as COX-1b or COX-3 (5, 7). COX-1b has been proposed (5) to be a target for the action of acetaminophen (paracetomol; a widely used antipyretic drug), and involvement of COX-1b in a variety of inflammatory diseases is currently under investigation (6, 10). In contrast to the unknown effect of SC-560 on COX-1b, the effects of the genetic tools used in the present study are known: knocking out the COX-1 gene eliminates the COX-1b enzyme, and knocking out the COX-2 gene leads to COX-1b overexpression (1). Hence, the combination of negative results in COX-1 –/– mice (fever not attenuated) and positive results in COX-2 –/– mice (fever abolished) also indicates that COX-1b is involved in the genesis of neither monophasic fever nor the first phase of polyphasic LPS fever. Such uninvolvement would be in line with several recent studies showing that COX-1b is not a target for acetaminophen (13, 20), and that this protein is not induced by acute inflammatory stimuli in rodents (19, 20, 38). Furthermore, it appears that the mouse (38), rat (41), and human (11) COX-1b mRNAs are shifted out of frame by intron 1 retention and are expected to yield an inactive enzyme. That the rat COX-1b protein does not have COX activity has recently been confirmed (41).

In summary, the present study identifies a new, critical role for COX-2 in the mediation of the earliest responses to intravenous LPS: monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever. It also suggests that no product of the COX-1 gene is essential for these responses.

GRANTS

The study was funded in part by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant R01-NS-41233 (to A. A. Romanovsky).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. V. F. Turek, M. C. Almeida, J. J. Burmeister, and J. L. Roberts for editing the manuscript.

Present address of A. Y. Rudaya: Institute of Physiology, National Academy of Sciences, Minsk 220072, Belarus.

FOOTNOTES


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. A. Romanovsky, Trauma Research, St. Joseph's Hospital, 350 W. Thomas Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85013 (e-mail: aromano{at}chw.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

REFERENCES

  1. Ayoub SS, Botting RM, Goorha S, Colville-Nash PR, Willoughby DA, and Ballou LR. Acetaminophen-induced hypothermia in mice is mediated by a prostaglandin endoperoxidase synthase 1 gene-derived protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 11165–11169, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bennett A and Villa G. Nimesulide: an NSAID that preferentially inhibits COX-2, and has various unique pharmacological activities. Expert Opin Pharmacother 1: 277–286, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Cao C, Matsumura K, Yamagata K, and Watanabe Y. Involvement of cyclooxygenase-2 in LPS-induced fever and regulation of its mRNA by LPS in the rat brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R1712–R1725, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chan CC, Boyce S, Brideau C, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Gordon R, Guay D, Hill RG, Li CS, Mancini J, and Penneton M. Pharmacology of a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, L-745,337: a novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent with an ulcerogenic sparing effect in rat and nonhuman primate stomach. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274: 1531–1537, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chandrasekharan NV, Dai H, Roos KL, Evanson NK, Tomsik J, Elton TS, and Simmons DL. COX-3, a cyclooxygenase-1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure, and expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13926–13931, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cui JG, Kuroda H, Chandrasekharan NV, Pelaez RP, Simmons DL, Bazan NG, and Lukiw WJ. Cyclooxygenase-3 gene expression in Alzheimer hippocampus and in stressed human neural cells. Neurochem Res 29: 1731–1737, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Davies NM, Good RL, Roupe KA, and Yanez JA. Cyclooxygenase-3: axiom, dogma, anomaly, enigma or splice error?–Not as easy as 1, 2, 3. J Pharm Sci 7: 217–226, 2004.
  8. Dogan MD, Ataoglu H, and Akarsu ES. Effects of selective cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibitors on lipopolysaccharide-induced dual thermoregulatory changes in rats. Brain Res Bull 57: 179–185, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Dogan MD, Patel S, Rudaya AY, Steiner AA, Székely M, and Romanovsky AA. Lipopolysaccharide fever is initiated via a capsaicin-sensitive mechanism independent of the subtype-1 vanilloid receptor. Br J Pharmacol 143: 1023–1032, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Dou W, Jiao Y, Goorha S, Raghow R, and Ballou LR. Nociception and the differential expression of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), the COX-1 variant retaining intron-1 (COX-1v), and COX-2 in mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 74: 29–43, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Dinchuk JE, Liu RQ, and Trzaskos JM. COX-3: in the wrong frame in mind. Immunol Lett 86: 121, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Gilroy DW, Tomlinson A, and Willoughby DA. Differential effects of inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (cyclooxygenase 1 and cyclooxygenase 2) in acute inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol 355: 211–217, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Graham GG and Scott KF. Mechanism of action of paracetamol. Am J Ther 12: 46–55, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ivanov AI, Kulchitsky VA, and Romanovsky AA. Role for the cholecystokinin-A receptor in fever: a study of a mutant rat strain and a pharmacological analysis. J Physiol 547: 941–949, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ivanov AI, Pero RS, Scheck AC, and Romanovsky AA. Prostaglandin E2-synthesizing enzymes in fever: differential transcriptional regulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R1104–R1117, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ivanov AI and Romanovsky AA. Prostaglandin E2 as a mediator of fever: synthesis and catabolism. Front Biosci 9: 1977–1993, 2004.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Kaufmann WE, Worley PF, Pegg J, Bremer M, and Isakson P. COX-2, a synaptically induced enzyme, is expressed by excitatory neurons at postsynaptic sites in rat cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2317–2321, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kirtikara K, Morham SG, Raghow R, Laulederkind SJ, Kanekura T, Goorha S, and Ballou LR. Compensatory prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis in cyclooxygenase 1 or 2 null cells. J Exp Med 187: 517–523, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kis B, Snipes JA, Isse T, Nagy K, and Busija DW. Putative cyclooxygenase-3 expression in rat brain cells. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23: 1287–1292, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Kis B, Snipes JA, Simandle SA, and Busija DW. Acetaminophen-sensitive prostaglandin production in rat cerebral endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R897–R902, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Langenbach R, Morham SG, Tiano HF, Loftin CD, Ghanayem BI, Chulada PC, Mahler JF, Lee CA, Goulding EH, Kluckman KD, Kim HS, and Smithies O. Prostaglandin synthase 1 gene disruption in mice reduces arachidonic acid-induced inflammation and indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration. Cell 83: 483–492, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Li S, Wang Y, Matsumura K, Ballou LR, Morham SG, and Blatteis CM. The febrile response to lipopolysaccharide is blocked in cyclooxygenase-2–/–, but not in cyclooxygenase-1–/– mice. Brain Res 825: 86–94, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Morham SG, Langenbach R, Loftin CD, Tiano HF, Vouloumanos N, Jennette JC, Mahler JF, Kluckman KD, Ledford A, Lee CA, and Smithies O. Prostaglandin synthase 2 gene disruption causes severe renal pathology in the mouse. Cell 83: 473–482, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Morimoto A, Murakami N, Nakamori T, and Watanabe T. Evidence for separate mechanisms of induction of biphasic fever inside and outside the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. J Physiol 383: 629–637, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Murakami M and Kudo I. Recent advances in molecular biology and physiology of prostaglandin E2-biosynthetic pathway. Prog Lipid Res 43: 3–35, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Okamoto T and Hino O. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 mRNA in rat tissues: tissue-specific difference in the expression of the basal level of mRNA. Int J Mol Med 6: 455–457, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Parfenova H, Balabanova L, and Leffler CW. Posttranslational regulation of cyclooxygenase by tyrosine phosphorylation in cerebral endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C72–C81, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Perlik V, Li Z, Goorha S, Ballou LR, and Blatteis CM. LPS-activated complement, not LPS per se, triggers the early release of PGE2 by Kupffer cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R332–R339, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Qi Z, Hao CM, Langenbach RI, Breyer RM, Redha R, Morrow JD, and Breyer MD. Opposite effects of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 activity on the pressor response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest 110: 61–69, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Riendeau D, Percival MD, Brideau C, Charleson S, Dube D, Ethier D, Falgueyret JP, Friesen RW, Gordon R, Greig G, Guay J, Mancini J, Ouellet M, Wong E, Xu L, Boyce S, Visco D, Girard Y, Prasit P, Zamboni R, Rodger IW, Gresser M, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Young RN, and Chan CC. Etoricoxib (MK-0663): preclinical profile and comparison with other agents that selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296: 558–566, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Riendeau D, Percival MD, Boyce S, Brideau C, Charleson S, Cromlish W, Ethier D, Evans J, Falgueyret JP, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Gordon R, Greig G, Gresser M, Guay J, Kargman S, Léger S, Mancini JA, O'Neill G, Ouellet M, Rodger IW, Thérien M, Wang Z, Webb JK, Wong E, Xu L, Young RN, Zamboni R, Prasit P, and Chan CC. Biochemical and pharmacological profile of a tetrasubstituted furanone as a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor. Br J Pharmacol 121: 105–117, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Romanovsky AA, Kulchitsky VA, Akulich NV, Koulchitsky SV, Simons CT, Sessler DI, and Gourine VN. First and second phases of biphasic fever: two sequential stages of the sickness syndrome? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 271: R244–R253, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Romanovsky AA, Simons CT, and Kulchitsky VA. "Biphasic" fevers often consist of more than two phases. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R323–R331, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Romanovsky AA, Simons CT, Székely M, and Kulchitsky VA. The vagus nerve in the thermoregulatory response to systemic inflammation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R407–R413, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rotondo D, Abul HT, Milton AS, and Davidson J. Pyrogenic immunomodulators increase the level of prostaglandin E2 in the blood simultaneously with the onset of fever. Eur J Pharmacol 154: 145–152, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Rudaya AY, Steiner AA, Robbins JR, Dragic AS, and Romanovsky AA. Thermoregulatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in the mouse: dependence on the dose and ambient temperature. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R1244–R1252, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sehic E, Szekely M, Ungar AL, Oladehin A, and Blatteis CM. Hypothalamic prostaglandin E2 during lipopolysaccharide-induced fever in guinea pigs. Brain Res Bull 39: 391–399, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Shaftel SS, Olschowka JA, Hurley SD, Moore AH, and O'Banion MK. COX-3: a splice variant of cyclooxygenase-1 in mouse neural tissue and cells. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 119: 213–215, 2003 (erratum in Brain Res Mol Brain Res 123: 136, 2004).[Medline]
  39. Sirko S, Bishai I, and Coceani F. Prostaglandin formation in the hypothalamus in vivo: effect of pyrogens. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 256: R616–R624, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Skarnes RC, Brown SK, Hull SS, and McCracken JA. Role of prostaglandin E in the biphasic fever response to endotoxin. J Exp Med 154: 1212–1224, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Snipes JA, Kis B, Shelness GS, Hewett JA, and Busija DW. Cloning and characterization of cyclooxygenase-1b (putative COX-3) in rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 313: 668–676, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Steiner AA, Li S, Llanos-QJ, and Blatteis CM. Differential inhibition by nimesulide of the early and late phases of intravenous- and intracerebroventricular-LPS-induced fever in guinea pigs. Neuroimmunomodulation 9: 263–275, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Swiergiel AH and Dunn AJ. Distinct roles for cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 in interleukin-1-induced behavioral changes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 1031–1036, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Székely M, Balaskó M, Kulchitsky VA, Simons CT, Ivanov AI, and Romanovsky AA. Multiple neural mechanisms of fever. Auton Neurosci 85: 78–82, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Vybíral S, Székely M, Jansky L, and Cerny L. Thermoregulation of the rabbit during the late phase of endotoxin fever. Pflügers Arch 410: 220–222, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Yamagata K, Andreasson KI, Kaufmann WE, Barnes CA, and Worley PF. Expression of a mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase in brain neurons: regulation by synaptic activity and glucocorticoids. Neuron 11: 371–386, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Zhang J, Goorha S, Raghow T, and Ballou LR. The tissue-specific, compensatory expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in transgenic mice. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 67: 121–135, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Zhang YH, Lu J, Elmquist JK, and Saper CB. Specific roles of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in lipopolysaccharide-induced fever and fos expression in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 463: 3–12, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Steiner, J. C. Hunter, S. M. Phipps, T. B. Nucci, D. L. Oliveira, J. L. Roberts, A. C. Scheck, D. L. Simmons, and A. A. Romanovsky
Cyclooxygenase-1 or -2--which one mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced hypothermia?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): R485 - R494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. C. Havird, M. M. Miyamoto, K. P. Choe, and D. H. Evans
Gene Duplications and Losses within the Cyclooxygenase Family of Teleosts and Other Chordates
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2349 - 2359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
Y. Ootsuka, W. W. Blessing, A. A. Steiner, and A. A. Romanovsky
Fever response to intravenous prostaglandin E2 is mediated by the brain but does not require afferent vagal signaling
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1294 - R1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. A. DiMicco and D. V. Zaretsky
The dorsomedial hypothalamus: a new player in thermoregulation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R47 - R63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Romanovsky
Thermoregulation: some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R37 - R46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Persson
Temperature control: from molecular insights, regulation in king penguins and diving seals, to studies in humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): R512 - R514.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/R1253    most recent
00371.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.