AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290: R975-R981, 2006. First published December 8, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00693.2005
0363-6119/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/R975    most recent
00693.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Mokhtar, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Mokhtar, G. A.

RENAL HEMODYNAMICS AND CARDIORENAL INTEGRATION

Modulation of single-nephron GFR in the db/db mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus

David Z. Levine,1 Michelle Iacovitti,1 Susan J. Robertson,2 and Ghadeer A. Mokhtar2

1Division of Nephrology, The Kidney Research Centre, and 2Ottawa Health Research Institute and the Department of Pathology of the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 26 September 2005 ; accepted in final form 6 December 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hyperfiltration has been implicated in the progression toward diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). This study focuses for the first time on the in vivo modulation of single-nephron GFR (SNGFR) in the classic B6.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J (db/db) mouse model of DM2. To obtain stable preparations, it was necessary to use a sustaining infusion of 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1, or higher. SNGFR (measured both proximally and distally) was greater in db/db vs. heterozygote (db/m) mice (P < 0.05) but not vs. the wild-type (WT) mice. The tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses, determined as free-flow proximal vs. distal SNGFR differences, were significant in db/db mice (11.6 ± 0.8 vs. 9.3 ± 1.0 nl/min, P < 0.01), in db/m mice (8.0 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.6 nl/min, P < 0.02), and WT mice (9.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.9 ± 0.7 nl/min, P < 0.05). After increasing the sustaining infusion in the db/db mice, to offset glycosuric urine losses, the SNGFR increased significantly, and the TGF response was abolished. In these volume-replete db/db mice, absolute fluid reabsorption measured both at the late proximal and distal tubular sites were significantly increased vs. db/m mice infused at 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. After infusion of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor S-methylthiocitrulline, SNGFR fell in both db/db and db/m mice. These studies show that SNGFR is elevated in this mouse model of DM2, is suppressed by nNOS inhibition, and is modulated by TGF influences that are altered by the diabetic state and responsive to changes in extracellular fluid volume.

hyperfiltration; tubuloglomerular feedback; neuronal nitric oxide synthase


IT HAS LONG BEEN RECOGNIZED that there is hyperfiltration in patients with early diabetes, and this hyperfiltration, or its associated increased glomerular capillary pressure, may play a role in progression to diabetic nephropathy (4, 5). In type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), progression to end-stage renal disease is sufficiently prevalent to account for the largest number of patients on life support dialysis, and the role of hyperfiltration in DM2 continues to be the subject of clinical trials (3, 15).

However, virtually all of our experimental knowledge of hyperfiltration and the modulation of single-nephron GFR (SNGFR) in DM derives from streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (STZ DM1) in the rat. Reviews and recent studies on this STZ DM1 model have focused on the nitric oxide (NO) system (7–10, 23), alterations in the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system (7, 9, 10, 23, 24, 26, 27, 30), and the role of enhanced proximal reabsorption in sustaining hyperfiltration (22, 24). Although reports have suggested that STZ, known to be clinically nephrotoxic, may have renal effects separate from the diabetic state (6, 12, 16), this STZ DM1 rat model has nevertheless provided most of the framework of our current understanding of single-nephron function in diabetes.

Despite the importance of DM2, little is known about SNGFR modulation in this condition, and, as stated by Komers and Anderson (8), "... considering the epidemic increases in type 2 diabetes-associated nephropathy, studies should focus on evaluating these systems in models of type 2 diabetes." Welch (29) has recently stressed the importance of using in vivo micropuncture techniques to provide the most direct analyses of renal segmental function in genetically engineered mouse models of disease, notwithstanding the fact that the mouse micropuncture technique is much more difficult than in the rat (18). This was our experience in the present study using a fragile diabetic mouse preparation–B6.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J (db/db), the classic obese mouse model of DM2. These mice do not develop renal failure (2) despite the presence of significant glomerular changes (19) found in human diabetic nephropathy. Nevertheless, we share the view of others (19) that this classic diabetes model may provide valuable insights into human diabetic nephropathy, and we set out to document hyperfiltration in single nephrons and to gain insight into its underlying mechanisms. Our studies show for the first time, in untreated hyperglycemic db/db mice, SNGFR is elevated and responsive to changes in extracellular fluid volume (ECV), TGF effects can be demonstrated and modulated by DM2 and changes in ECV, and SNGFR can be reduced by neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) inhibition.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Wild-type, db/m, and db/db mice (stock number 000697) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). As noted in the Jackson Laboratories database (http://jaxmice.jax.org/jaxmice-cgi/jaxmicedb.cgi), the nomenclature of these db/db mice has changed. They are now identified as B6.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J or Leprdb, but they formerly were designated as C57BL/6J-m+/+Leprdb. The heterozygote (Leprdb/+) will be referred to as db/m and the wild type (Lepr+/+) as WT. The three groups were allowed free access to chow and water. The db/db mice, at 8–10 wk of age, manifested hyperglycemia and glycosuria, as well as striking weight gain (db/db mice at 10 wk weigh about 45 g, with blood glucose ~14 mM) vs. the WT and db/m mice weighing about 33 and 25 g, respectively, with blood glucose ~6 mM.

All studies were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Ottawa. For statistical analyses ANOVA, paired and unpaired Student's t-testing, was used.

Micropuncture preparation. Mice were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ip thiobutabarbital sodium (Inactin; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 100 mg/kg im with ketamine hydrochloride (Bimeda-MTC, Cambridge, ON, Canada). After being anesthetized, the mouse was placed on a heated mouse operating table; a tracheostomy was performed with polyethylene (PE)-90 tubing inserted. With the use of pulled PE-10 tubing, the left carotid artery was cannulated for continuous blood pressure measurement, blood sampling for glucose, and inulin measurements. The left jugular vein was cannulated with pulled PE-10 tubing, providing two lines for infusion of fluid and thiobutabarbital sodium anesthesia. The bladder was cannulated with PE-50 tubing. The left kidney was exposed by a flank incision, separated from the surrounding fat, and carefully dissected away from the adrenal gland while the ureter remained attached to the kidney. In the db/db mice, fat accumulation in the neck, and especially in the abdomen, made the surgical procedure most difficult. Because of the excessive intra-abdominal fat, a longer flank incision was made to the linea alba to provide space for the kidney cup, and special care was taken to prevent excess heat and fluid losses from the larger wound by using Surgicel (Ethicon). The Surgicel was placed just below the kidney cup, covering the entire incision, thereby preventing the abdominal wound from widening excessively. This operative approach allowed sufficient fat to be shifted so that the kidney could be positioned appropriately after being immobilized in a Lucite cup (10–12 mm). The kidney was set in 0.9% NaCl agar, with a surface opening created to hold a shallow layer of heavy mineral oil.

All groups were infused intravenously with 2.25% albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.9% saline for 30 min and then with 0.9% saline at either 3.3 or 4.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1 for the remainder of the experiment. When the preparation was considered to be stable, a 0.3 ml bolus of [H3]inulin (Perkin Elmer) was injected (equivalent to 5–10 µCi), followed by a sustaining infusion containing the same amount of inulin per hour. During the experimental period, groups 5 and 6, described in Experimental groups, received an infusion containing S-methylthiocitrulline (SMTC; Sigma-Aldrich), at 1.2 mg·kg–1·h–1 as part of the same 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. We found SMTC solubility in saline at this dose satisfactory for intravenous infusion as used in rats (28). Micropuncture samples were collected from 30–60 min after the bolus in the control period and 30–90 min after the start of the SMTC experimental period. For proximal tubule-determined SNGFR, the late proximal site was identified by injecting tiny boluses of 1% Lissamine green in upstream segments using a pipette with a small (3–4 µm) tip diameter.

Clearance studies. For GFR and other whole animal parameters, mice were prepared as described, but without the left kidney isolated for micropuncture. The protocol was designed to replicate the time, infusion, and blood sampling of the micropuncture experiments. Blood samples were taken for hematocrit, glucose, and inulin. Urine was collected under oil for determination of inulin concentration and urine flow from both kidneys. The mice were infused with a prime of 5–10 µCi of [H3]inulin and a sustaining infusion of an equal amount per hour in 0.9% saline.

Microalbuminuria. Individual 10- to 11-wk-old mice (db/db, n = 11; db/m, n = 4; and WT, n = 4) were placed in separate metabolic cages for 24-h urine collections. Urine albumin concentrations were analyzed using an Albuwell Murine Microalbuminuria ELISA kit (Exocell, Philadelphia, PA), and absorbance was measured with a Fluostar Galaxy Luminometer.

Experimental groups. Group 1 was db/db mice paired proximal-distal SNGFR determinations (10 mice/11 tubules) with an infusion of 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1 used in groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as well. Some of the group 1 samples were also derived from the control period for group 5, below. The other groups were group 2 (11 db/m mice, 13 tubules); group 3 (8 WT mice, 18 tubules); group 4 (5 db/db mice, 8 tubules) infused at 4.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1; group 5 (7 db/db mice, 7 SNGFR's representing the mean, per period, of 15 tubules from individual mice) were infused with SMTC after a control period; group 6 (4 db/m mice, 4 SNGFRs representing the mean, per period, of 18 tubules from individual mice) were infused with SMTC after a control period; group 7 (2 db/db mice, 11 tubules) were treated with vehicle and punctured as time controls for group 5. An additional group of 9 db/m mice (9 tubules), were infused with saline at 2.0 ml/h (~8.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1) to assess the effects of obvious ECV expansion on SNGFR in these nondiabetic heterozygotes.

Histological evaluation of kidneys. Sections were examined from db/db, db/m, and WT mice at ages from 30 to 40 wk. Whole left kidneys were bivalved, fixed in buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 3 µm. Each section was stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Jones silver methenamine, periodic acid-Schiff, Masson trichrome, and Sirius red. One full half-section was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin stains for glomerular diameter. All glomeruli in that section were measured using an ocular grid micrometer at x400 magnification. Approximately 60–100 glomeruli were examined per section. Vessels were assessed using the Masson trichrome stain, and the mesangial matrix by the silver methenamine, PAS, and Sirius red. The interstitial areas were examined by the Masson trichrome stain only. A total of 23 mice were examined: six 30-wk-old WT, five 30-wk-old db/db mice, two 40-wk-old db/db mice, and ten 40-wk-old db/m mice. The glomerular diameters from all mice were quantified and statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Student’s t-test. To quantitate the degree of mesangial expansion, 50 db/m and 50 db/db glomeruli were stained with Sirius red, photographed, and analyzed by Image Pro 4.0 using color segmentation of the Sirius red mesangial staining. Quantitative results are expressed as the ratio of red-stained pixels over total glomerular pixel surface area.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microalbuminuria. The mean albumin excretion rate for the db/db mice was 303 ± 32 µg/24 h and for the db/m and WT mice was 62 ± 21 and 83 ± 16 µg/24 h, respectively, with db/db mice values significantly higher than db/m and WT mice (P < 0.02).

Histopathology. It was immediately obvious on inspection that the db/db glomeruli at all time points examined were larger in diameter when compared with either the WT group or even the older db/m mice. The mean glomerular diameter for the 30-wk-old WT mice was 75.6 ± 2 µm vs. 95.4 ± 1 µm and 80.4 ± 1 µm in the db/db and db/m mice, respectively. ANOVA was significant (P < 0.001) for the three groups, with the glomerular diameter in the db/db mice significantly greater than either the WT or db/m (P < 0.001) with two-tailed Student's t-test. Furthermore, the 40-wk-old db/db mice (see METHODS), showed no significant difference from the 30-wk glomeruli, with the same strong significant differences (P < 0.001) vs. db/m and WT groups. Although measurements focused on subsurface and midcortical glomeruli, the juxtamedullary glomeruli appeared larger, and this might account for the higher percentage increase in whole kidney GFR vs. the SNGFR increase in db/db mice vs. WT (see Tables 1 and 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Whole animal data from db/db, db/m, and WT mice

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Micropuncture results of paired fluid collections at proximal and distal tubular sites from db/db, db/m, and WT mice

 
Mesangial expansion was noted only in db/db mice and characterized by segmental increases as seen with the Silver methenamine and Sirius red stains expressed as the ratio of red-stained pixels over total glomerular pixel surface area. Control db/m mean was 0.183 (0.015 SD) vs. db/db mean of 0.323 (0.010 SD), t = 6.7, P < 0.001. Fig. 1, A and B, show these obvious changes. Fig. 1C (silver stain) shows db/db mesangial expansion segmentally accentuation, and Fig. 1D shows db/db mouse arteriolar hyalinization. Accordingly, although the mesangial changes were marked, and almost nodular in configuration, true nodules associated with aneurismal capillary loop dilation as seen in human diabetic nephropathy were not present. Clear vascular changes, again only in the db/db mice as noted above, were restricted to arteriolar hyalinization and luminal narrowing. This was highlighted on the PAS and Masson trichrome stains. Interstitial fibrosis or inflammation was not apparent.


Figure 1
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A: heterozygote (db/m) mouse glomerulus with Sirius red stain (magnification, x400) shows normal appearance. B: B6.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J (db/db) mouse glomerulus with Sirius red stain (magnification, x400) shows diffuse mesangial matrix expansion. C: db/db mouse glomerulus with Jones silver methenamine stain (magnification, x400) shows segmental accentuation of mesangial matrix expansion reminiscent of, although not identical to, a nodular pattern. D: db/db mouse kidney with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain (magnification, x200) showing PAS-positive medial thickening of afferent arteriole.

 
Whole animal data. Table 1 summarizes groups 13 whole animal data from db/db, db/m, and WT mice infused at 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. As described previously (12, 18), the anesthetized mouse micropuncture preparation is fragile and, with time, whole kidney GFR may fall. In both the db/db and the db/m mice (groups 1 and 2), there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between the first period GFR, and the mean of all three periods, but not in the WT mice (group 3). Group 1 db/db mice showed a significantly (P < 0.02) higher GFR (mean of 3 periods) vs. db/m and WT mice, expressed either in absolute terms or per gram of kidney weight. Importantly, urine excretion of hyperglycemic db/db mice was 3 times the flow rate (~0.3 ml/h higher, P < 0.02) of either db/m (group 2) or WT (group 3) mice. Finally, it is of interest that the body weight and the kidney weight of the db/m mice were lower than in the WT mice, consistent with the report of Truett et al. (25). The misty allele (m) was introduced to provide a misty coat color to the heterozygote mice, hence the db/m designation. However, it is apparent that the m allele, per se, has growth-suppressive effects and may interfere with nucleotide metabolism (20, 25). In fact, it is obvious from Table 1, that mean body weight is less than that of WT (group 3) mice.

SNGFR. Groups 14 SNGFR data are given in Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3. In the volume-replete (group 4) mice, distal SNGFR was significantly greater than the three other groups of mice infused at the lower rate: db/db (P < 0.02) and db/m and WT mice (P < 0.01). With the lower infusion (3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1), SNGFR in group 1 db/db mice, determined at both proximal and distal sites, was significantly higher vs. group 2 db/m mice (P < 0.01, P < 0.04, respectively), but not different vs. SNGFR in group 3 WT mice. Finally, in the group of nine db/m mice infused at 8.0 ml/100 g body wt–1·h–1, paired proximal and distal SNGFR obtained in nine nephrons were 8.0 ± 0.6 and 6.7 ± 0.5 nl/min, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.05), indicating intact TGF responsiveness (data not shown in Table 2). Importantly, these SNGFR values are almost identical to that obtained from group 2 db/m mice infused at less than half the rate (3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1).


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Single-nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) in db/db, db/m, and wild-type (WT) mice (groups 2, 3, 4). The db/db mice were infused at 4.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1 [extracellular fluid volume (ECV) replete], the db/m and WT mice were infused at 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. SNGFR determined at the proximal and distal sites, were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the db/db volume-replete group 4 mice vs. db/m and WT mice. See also RESULTS and Table 2.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Late proximal (Prox)-tubule and distal (Dist)-tubule SNGFR determinations in db/db, db/m, and WT mice (groups 1-4). Each line connects one SNGFR value determined at the late-proximal tubule with another previously determined SNGFR from the distal tubule of the same nephron. A: (group 4 mice) db/db SNGFR collections with intravenous infusion at 4 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. BD: (group 1 mice) db/db, (group 2 mice) db/m, (group 3 mice), WT with SNGFR collections during intravenous infusion at 3.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1, respectively. Group 1 (B) SNGFR determined at both sites was significantly higher vs. group 2 (C); P < 0.01 but not different vs. group 3, (D). As shown, the TGF response was significant in db/db, db/m, and WT mice (BD, *P < 0.5), but not in the diabetic db/db volume-replete group 4 mice (A). See also RESULTS and Table 2.

 
Absolute fluid reabsorption and ECV changes. In the volume-replete db/db mice (group 4), absolute net fluid reabsorption, determined at the late proximal site was significantly higher than that of the db/m mice (P < 0.03; Table 2). Similarly, absolute net fluid reabsorption measured at the distal site, reflecting the net reabsorption of fluid from the proximal tubule, loop of Henle, and early distal tubule, was more than 50% higher than in group 2 db/m mice (P < 0.01). This enhanced reabsorption is consistent with the view that group 1 db/db mice were ECV contracted as a result of the glycosuric volume losses. (The TGF responses, described below, are also consistent with ECV changes.) Of interest, despite this increased fluid reabsorption, group 4 distal flow rate past the macular densa region was almost twice that measured in db/m and WT mice (groups 2 and 3; P < 0.01).

TGF responses. TGF responses were determined under free-flow conditions as differences between SNGFR determined at the late-proximal tubule site, with flow to the macula densa region interrupted, and that from the distal tubule. SNGFR and associated measurements are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 3 for groups 1-4. The TGF response in db/db group 1 mice shows the largest proximal-distal difference, whereas the TGF response is absent in the volume-replete db/db group 4 mice. Both db/m and WT mice had significant responses, although in the WT mice, significance was borderline (P < 0.049).

Effects of systemic SMTC infusion in groups 5, 6, and 7. Figures 4 and 5 show the results of the SMTC infusion without alteration of systemic blood pressure. In db/db group 5 mice, SNGFR determined at the proximal site fell from 11.0 ± 1.1 to 7.4 ± 1.0 nl/min (P < 0.01), with no significant fall in SNGFR measured at the distal tubule site (Fig. 4). In contrast, in the db/m mice (Fig. 5), both proximal and distal SNGFR dropped significantly after SMTC infusion (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). Because of the possibility of SNGFR declining as a consequence of elapsed time and anesthesia, a vehicle control group was also undertaken (Fig. 4, group 7), and samples were meticulously obtained at a time corresponding to those taken in the SMTC period. As seen in Fig. 4, there was no significant difference between the vehicle and the control periods.


Figure 4
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. SNGFR in db/db mice (group 5) before and after S-methylthiocitrulline (SMTC) infusion. SNGFR (Cont) measured at the late proximal site is significantly higher than after SMTC intravenous infusion (*P < 0.01). In contrast, the SNGFR determined at the distal site was not significantly reduced by SMTC. The SNGFR of vehicle (VE)-infused mice (group 7) was not different from control values but was significantly different from the SMTC proximal SNGFR values (**P < 0.001), as well as distal SNGFR values ({dagger}P < 0.05). See also RESULTS.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. SNGFR determined at proximal and distal tubules in db/m mice (group 6) before and after SMTC infusion. Both proximal and distal SNGFR dropped significantly after SMTC infusion (P < 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). See also RESULTS.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation. Schnermann and colleagues (13, 18) have detailed the inherent difficulties in studying the anesthetized mouse with micropuncture techniques. As previously observed in NHE3 knockout mice (18), we noted a fall in whole kidney GFR as the period of anesthesia extends to 3 h. Moreover, as already emphasized, the micropuncture preparation of these db/db mice, weighing twice as much as their db/m heterozygotes at the same age, is difficult because of excessive fat accumulation both in the neck and abdomen. Indeed, the abdominal incision and freeing the kidney from surrounding fat can be a formidable task. Furthermore, in this study, hyperglycemia was present and not treated in the db/db groups to simulate the clinical phenotype. These data provide the first information on single-nephron GFR in the db/db mouse model of DM2, which has been the subject of more than 1,800 publications.

Hyperfiltration and TGF feedback. SNGFR of the db/db mice was significantly greater than db/m mice even when an equivalent infusion per 100 g body weight was used, despite the increased urine losses. The db/db mice distal SNGFR increased by about 30% with the higher infusion to offset the urine losses of ~0.3 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. (See also below.)

Rather than vary loop perfusion to examine TGF activity by changes in early promimal stop-flow pressure (PSF), we measured, in a paired fashion, proximal-distal SNGFR differences as described by Schnermann (18). This method is sensitive to SNGFR changes in the normal-to-low range, and is more likely to detect TGF responses to very low flows than the use of the PSF technique and may be more sensitive to reductions in ECV (18, 28). The proximal SNGFR exceeded the distal SNGFR by about 11% in db/m and WT mice, while the difference was 24% in the db/db mice with the lower sustaining infusion, which did not account for urine losses. With a higher infusion rate in group 4 mice, designed to render these mice euvolemic (increasing 3.3 to 4.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1), SNGFR increased significantly, compared with the db/m and WT mice, with a loss of the TGF response, despite the increased flow rate past the macula densa site (see RESULTS and Table 2). However, to confirm there is a right shift in the TGF curve over a wide range, even higher delivery rates to the macula densa site would have to be undertaken by closed loop perfusion while tracking changes in early proximal flow rates or PSF. Still our data are consistent with the reported decrease in efficiency of the TGF mechanism in the rat STZ DM1 model (26), as well as with the effect of hyperglycemia, per se, to suppress TGF (1, 30).

As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2, the proximal-distal SNGFR difference in the WT mice were not only small, but barely met the P < 0.05 significance level. This is in contrast to the clear effects in the db/m mice (P < 0.02). These WT mice from the Jackson colony (see METHODS), although originally based on the C57BL/6J strain, have been inbred for at least 80 generations since last backcrossed to noncolony C57BL/6J mice (per Jackson Web site). It is possible, therefore, that TGF responses have been downregulated as a result of this inbreeding, but, we note, small free-flow proximal distal SNGFR differences have already been reported in WT mice (11, 28).

Effects of different infusion rates. It is appropriate to reiterate that in our preliminary experiments to establish a viable preparation in our db/db mice, we were unable to successfully use the more conventional infusion rate of ~1.2–1.5 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1. Accordingly, our db/m and WT mice, with lower than usually reported proximal fractional reabsorptive rates, may be considered to have an element of ECV expansion, but, as noted below, TGF responses have been maintained. When the infusion rate was increased from 3.3 to 4.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1, SNGFR (distal) increased almost 30% (P < 0.05) in the db/db mice, and the proximal-distal SNGFR difference was abolished. In contrast, and as noted in METHODS and RESULTS, even with much higher infusion rates (8.0 ml·100 g body wt–1·h–1), SNGFR in db/m mice did not increase, and the TGF response was present. The most reasonable explanation for these findings is that at the lower infusion rate, the db/db mice were somewhat volume contracted, and despite the assumption that the efficiency of the TGF response is reduced in diabetes based on STZ DM1 rat data (26), the reduction of ECV significantly increased the TGF response compared with db/m and WT mice. Importantly, the response was abolished at the higher infusion rates. The effect of changes in ECV on TGF responsiveness has been documented in the rat (14, 17, 21). In Nhe3–/– mice, where proximal-distal SNGFR differences were greater than in WT or Nhe3–/+ mice, ECV contraction was presumably present as well (11).

nNOS inhibition and SNGFR. In both db/db and db/m mice, a systemic infusion of SMTC (a specific inhibitor of nNOS), which did not alter systemic BP, was associated with suppression of SNGFR. In the db/m mice, both proximal- and distal-determined SNGFR were significantly lower, as shown in Fig. 5. However, in the db/db mice, only proximal SNGFR was significantly reduced. The failure to suppress distal-determined SNGFR is not readily explained in that uninterrupted flow reaching the MD site might be expected, to some degree, to counter non-SMTC-suppressed NO activity, thereby favoring TGF responsiveness. Finally, as noted at the outset, the diabetic mouse preparation is difficult, and whole kidney reductions in GFR are documented over the time of the experiment. Taken as a whole, our findings remain broadly consistent with data from rat STZ DM1 studies where nNOS inhibition was undertaken (7, 9, 10)

Tubular reabsorption and hyperfiltration. In an elegant series of publications derived from the STZ rat DM1 model, e.g., Thomson et al. (24) have put forth the view that increased reabsorption in the diabetic proximal tubule reduces delivery of salt and water to the macula densa site, mimicking the flow reduction associated with a decrease in SNGFR. In this paradigm, the TGF response is to alter the net vasoconstriction of the afferent arteriole leading to sustained hyperfiltration. The present db/db mouse data show increased proximal reabsorption is only significantly elevated in the volume-replete group 4 db/db mice vs. the group 2 db/m mice, consistent with the formulation of Thompson et al. (24). In addition, in the group 4 db/db mice, the absolute fluid reabsorption measured at the early distal site is significantly higher compared with the db/m group 2 mice, in the presence of higher collected flow rates vs. the db/m mice (Table 2). Thus there is enhanced proximal and loop fluid reabsorption as measured at the distal tubule site, but it is not sufficient to reduce flow traversing the macula densa region, a finding not observed by Thomson et al. (24). As noted above, there are data suggesting that the TGF system is altered in the diabetic hyperglycemic state, and in the present studies, the TGF response is altered, thereby allowing hyperfiltration to persist despite higher distal flow rates. Our histopathological data confirm the typical early diabetic nephropathy findings previously reported (19), showing glomerular hypertrophy and mesangial expansion (see RESULTS), providing, possibly, a larger effective filtration membrane. With respect to the mechanisms outlined by Blantz and coworkers (23), specific studies are needed to describe the DM2 mouse proximal tubular epithelium and transport, and whether ornithine decarboxylase plays a role, as described, in the rat.

In summary, our studies show for the first time, in the type 2 diabetic hyperglycemic db/db mouse, with glomerular lesions demonstrated, that when compared with the nondiabetic db/m heterozygote, 1) whole kidney and single-nephron GFR is elevated and responsive to changes in ECV, 2) TGF effects can be demonstrated and modulated by ECV and the diabetic state, and 3) SNGFR can be reduced by nNOS inhibition.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Z. Levine, The Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Univ. of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Rm. 1333, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8M5

(With the Technical Assistance of Christiano T. de Souza)1

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Blantz RC, Peterson OW, Gushwa L, and Tucker BJ. Effect of modest hyperglycemia on tubuloglomerular feedback activity. Kidney Int Suppl 12: S206–S212, 1982.[Medline]
  2. Breyer MD, Bottinger E, Brosius FC, Coffman TM, Fogo A, Harris RC, Heilig CW, and Sharma K. Diabetic nephropathy: of mice and men. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 12: 128–145, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Fliser D, Wagner KK, Loos A, Tsikas D, and Haller H. Chronic angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces (intra)renal vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1135–1140, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hostetter TH. Hypertrophy and hyperfunction of the diabetic kidney. J Clin Invest 107: 161–162, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Hostetter TH, Troy JL, and Brenner BM. Glomerular hemodynamics in experimental diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int 19: 410–415, 1981.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Imaeda A, Kaneko T, Aoki T, Kondo Y, and Nagase H. DNA damage and the effect of antioxidants in streptozotocin-treated mice. Food Chem Toxicol 40: 979–987, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Ito A, Uriu K, Inada Y, Qie YL, Takagi I, Ikeda M, Hashimoto O, Suzuka K, Eto S, Tanaka Y, and Kaizu K. Inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase ameliorates renal hyperfiltration in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat. J Lab Clin Med 138: 177–185, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Komers R and Anderson S. Paradoxes of nitric oxide in the diabetic kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F1121–F1137, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Komers R, Lindsley JN, Oyama TT, Allison KM, and Anderson S. Role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS1) in the pathogenesis of renal hemodynamic changes in diabetes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F573–F583, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Komers R, Oyama TT, Chapman JG, Allison KM, and Anderson S. Effects of systemic inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in diabetic rats. Hypertension 35: 655–661, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lorenz JN, Schultheis PJ, Traynor T, Shull GE, and Schnermann J. Micropuncture analysis of single-nephron function in NHE3-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F447–F453, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lubec B, Hermon M, Hoeger H, and Lubec G. Aromatic hydroxylation in animal models of diabetes mellitus. FASEB J 12: 1581–1587, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Meneton P, Ichikawa I, Inagami T, and Schnermann J. Renal physiology of the mouse. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F339–F351, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Moore LC and Mason J. Tubuloglomerular feedback control of distal fluid delivery: effect of extracellular volume. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 250: F1024–F1032, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Myers BD, Nelson RG, Williams GW, Bennett PH, Hardy SA, Berg RL, Loon N, Knowler WC, and Mitch WE. Glomerular function in Pima Indians with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of recent onset. J Clin Invest 88: 524–530, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Palm F, Ortsater H, Hansell P, Liss P, and Carlsson PO. Differentiating between effects of streptozotocin per se and subsequent hyperglycemia on renal function and metabolism in the streptozotocin-diabetic rat model. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 20: 452–459, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Persson AE, Schnermann J, and Wright FS. Modification of feedback influence on glomerular filtration rate by acute isotonic extracellular volume expansion. Pflügers Arch 381: 99–105, 1979.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Schnermann J. Micropuncture analysis of tubuloglomerular feedback regulation in transgenic mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2614–2619, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sharma K, McCue P, and Dunn SR. Diabetic kidney disease in the db/db mouse. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F1138–F1144, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sviderskaya EV, Novak EK, Swank RT, and Bennett DC. The murine misty mutation: phenotypic effects on melanocytes, platelets and brown fat. Genetics 148: 381–390, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Thomson SC and Blantz RC. Homeostatic efficiency of tubuloglomerular feedback in hydropenia, euvolemia, and acute volume expansion. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F930–F936, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Thomson SC, Deng A, Bao D, Satriano J, Blantz RC, and Vallon V. Ornithine decarboxylase, kidney size, and the tubular hypothesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest 107: 217–224, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Thomson SC, Deng A, Komine N, Hammes JS, Blantz RC, and Gabbai FB. Early diabetes as a model for testing the regulation of juxtaglomerular NOS I. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287: F732–F738, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Thomson SC, Vallon V, and Blantz RC. Kidney function in early diabetes: the tubular hypothesis of glomerular filtration. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F8–F15, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Truett GE, Tempelman RJ, Walker JA, and Wilson JK. Misty (m) affects growth traits. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R29–R32, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Vallon V, Blantz RC, and Thomson S. Homeostatic efficiency of tubuloglomerular feedback is reduced in established diabetes mellitus in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 269: F876–F883, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Vallon V, Richter K, Blantz RC, Thomson S, and Osswald H. Glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes mellitus: potential role of tubular reabsorption. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2569–2576, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Vallon V, Traynor T, Barajas L, Huang YG, Briggs JP, and Schnermann J. Feedback control of glomerular vascular tone in neuronal nitric oxide synthase knockout mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 1599–1606, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Welch WJ. Role of renal tissue angiotensin II in proximal tubule function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F443–F444, 2005.[Free Full Text]
  30. Woods LL, Mizelle HL, and Hall JE. Control of renal hemodynamics in hyperglycemia: possible role of tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 252: F65–F73, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. Park, B. J. Bivona, Y. Feng, E. Lazartigues, and L. M. Harrison-Bernard
Intact renal afferent arteriolar autoregulatory responsiveness in db/db mice
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1504 - F1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. Z. Levine, M. Iacovitti, and S. J. Robertson
Modulation of single-nephron GFR in the db/db mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. II. Effects of renal mass reduction
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): R1840 - R1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. Faulhaber-Walter, L. Chen, M. Oppermann, S. M. Kim, Y. Huang, N. Hiramatsu, D. Mizel, H. Kajiyama, P. Zerfas, J. P. Briggs, et al.
Lack of A1 Adenosine Receptors Augments Diabetic Hyperfiltration and Glomerular Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 722 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
L. Wu, X. Gao, R. C. Brown, S. Heller, and R. G. O'Neil
Dual role of the TRPV4 channel as a sensor of flow and osmolality in renal epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1699 - F1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. Shi, D. Patschan, T. Epstein, M. S. Goligorsky, and J. Winaver
Delayed recovery of renal regional blood flow in diabetic mice subjected to acute ischemic kidney injury
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1512 - F1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. E. Wesson
Moving closer to an understanding of the hyperfiltration of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): R973 - R974.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/R975    most recent
00693.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Mokhtar, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Mokhtar, G. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.