|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPETITE, OBESITY, DIGESTION, AND METABOLISM
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
Submitted 2 March 2006 ; accepted in final form 19 June 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
insulin; lactate; counterregulatory response; hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure; whole cell current recording
Local glucopenia in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), caused by the nonmetabolizable glucose analog, 2-deoxyglucose, triggers the release of the counterregulatory hormones, epinephrine, and glucagon (2). Conversely, VMH glucose infusion suppresses their release during systemic hypoglycemia (3). The ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMN) within the VMH contains glucose-sensing neurons, which are exquisitely sensitive to decreases in extracellular glucose (16, 17). Thus VMN glucose-sensing neurons are well situated to play a key role in the detection of hypoglycemia and initiation of the CRR. Thus we hypothesize that impaired central glucose sensitivity after recurrent hypoglycemia is associated with reduced glucose sensitivity of VMN glucose sensing neurons.
Other fuel sources (e.g., lactate and ketone bodies) also support energy metabolism during systemic hypoglycemia (8, 18). For example, VMH lactate infusion suppresses the CRR during systemic hypoglycemia (4). Lactate regulates the activity of VMN glucose-sensing neurons (17). Furthermore, if VMN glucose-sensing neurons play a key role in hypoglycemia detection and initiation of the CRR, then their glucose sensitivity should be impaired in other situations in which the CRR to hypoglycemia is suppressed. Thus we also hypothesize that lactate supplementation will decrease the glucose sensitivity of VMN glucose-sensing neurons.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of brain slices.
On the fourth day, a separate group of rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and transcardially perfused with ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2) perfusion solution composed of the following (mM): 2.5 KCl, 7 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 28 NaHCO2, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 glucose, 1 ascorbate, 3 pyruvate; osmolarity adjusted to
300 mOsm with sucrose; pH 7.4. Brains were rapidly removed and placed in ice-cold (slushy) oxygenated perfusion solution. Sections (350 µm) through the hypothalamus were made on a vibratome (Vibroslice, Camden Instruments, Camden, UK). The brain slices were maintained at 34°C in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; in mM: 126 NaCl, 1.9 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 1.3 MgCl2, and 2.4 CaCl2; osmolarity was adjusted to
300 mOsm with sucrose; pH 7.4) for 15 min and allowed to come to room temperature. They were then transferred to normal oxygenated aCSF (2.5 mM glucose) for the remainder of the day.
Electrophysiology.
Viable neurons were visualized and studied under infrared differential-interference contrast microscopy using a Leica DMLFS microscope equipped with a 40x long working-distance water-immersion objective. Current clamp recordings (standard whole cell recording configuration) from neurons in the VMN were made using a MultiClamp 700A and analyzed using pCLAMP 9 software. During recording, brain slices were perfused at 10 ml/min with normal oxygenated aCSF. 1- to 3-M
electrodes were filled with an intracellular solution containing (in mM): 128 K-gluconate, 10 KCl, 4 KOH, 10 HEPES, 4 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, 5 EGTA, and 2 Na2ATP; pH 7.2. Osmolarity was adjusted to 290300 mOsm with sucrose. Input resistance (IR) was calculated from the change in membrane potential measured during the last 1 min of a small 500-ms hyperpolarizing pulse (20 pA) given every 3 s. Extracellular glucose levels were altered as described in the figures. Each figure shows data from consecutive current-clamp recordings from VMN neurons in brain slices using conventional whole cell patch clamp.
Changes in glucose sensitivity were quantitated using the percent change in IR. This is because action potential frequency (APF) can vary between brain slices due to variation in presynaptic inputs, which remain intact as a result of the exact location of the slice. However, we have found that changes in IR in response to glucose are extremely consistent between slices, as well as animals (17, 21).
Statistical analysis. All data were expressed as means ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Similar percentages of GI neurons were observed in the saline- (15 out of 62 recorded neurons, 23%) vs. insulin- (6 out of 26 recorded neurons, 24%) treated animals. There were no significant differences between membrane potential (MP) and IR in 2.5 mM glucose for the saline (MP: 54 ± 2 mV; IR: 556 ± 39 M
; n = 15) and insulin-treated rats (MP: 47 ± 4 mV; IR: 557 ± 12l M
; n = 6). VMN GI neurons from saline-injected rats reversibly increased APF, IR, and MP as extracellular glucose decreased (Fig. 1A). IR and MP increased significantly more as glucose levels decreased from 2.5 to 0.1 mM (55.6 ± 6.2%, n = 15, 17.0 ± 1.7%, n = 15, respectively) than from 2.5 to 0.5 mM (24.1 ± 8.0%, n = 9, P < 0.05; 7.9 ± 2.4%, respectively, n = 9, P < 0.05). In contrast, after recurrent hypoglycemia VMN GI neurons failed to respond to a decrease in extracellular glucose from 2.5 to 0.5 mM (%change in IR: 0.7 ± 1.7%, n = 6 vs. saline: 24.1 ± 7.9%, n = 9; P < 0.001; Figs. 1B and 2A). However, IR increased to a similar degree in insulin-treated and control rats, as glucose decreased to 0.1 mM (49.4 ± 20.5%, n = 6; vs. 55.6 ± 6.3%, respectively, n = 9; P = 0.7; Fig. 2B). Lactate addition also decreased the glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons. APF increased as glucose decreased from 2.5 to 0.1 but not to 0.5 mM (Fig. 3). IR of VMN GI neurons only increased by 8.5 ± 4.7% (n = 5) in the presence vs. 36.9 ± 10% (n = 5) in the absence of added lactate (P < 0.05; Fig. 4). Thus recurrent hypoglycemia and lactate addition significantly reduced the glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because these studies were carried out in juvenile animals, caution must be exercised in extrapolating these data to the adult human. However, we feel this animal model has important implications. First, the developing brain may be more sensitive to the damaging effects of hypoglycemia. Children under 10 years of age with type 1 diabetes mellitus show a broad degree of neurocognitive dysfunction, involving perceptual, motor, memory and attention tasks (13). Recurrent hypoglycemia impairs hippocampal long-term potentiation in young rats (22). Furthermore, infant (nursing) humans exhibit an impaired CRR to hypoglycemia (11). Finally, the CRR is initiated at lower glucose levels in young children (10).
On the other hand, young suckling animals exhibit higher levels of monocarboxylic acid transporters, suggesting that their brains may be using more lactate and ketone bodies than mature animals (20). This may reduce the effectiveness of our model of recurrent hypoglycemia. Furthermore, the pups may not all suckle equally when returned to their dams. This potentially increases the variability in this study. Therefore, this may not be the most robust model in which to study impaired glucose-sensing mechanisms after recurrent hypoglycemia. However, despite these limitations, the data in Table 1 clearly demonstrate that even though the pups were returned to their dams to suckle after the insulin injection, they experienced a hypoglycemic challenge sufficient to impair glucose recovery during subsequent insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Because recurrent hypoglycemia (and VMH lactate perfusion) similarly impairs glucose recovery in adults, we believe that these results are germane to the deleterious effects of recurrent hypoglycemia observed clinically. It is possible that the injections elicited a stress response, independent of hypoglycemia. However, this does not seem likely since the saline-injected pups did not exhibit stress-induced hyperglycemia.
A final benefit of using young rats relates to the paucity of GI neurons in the VMN (12, 16). These neurons cannot be identified before electrophysiological recording. Additionally, at least 5 to 10 min are required to observe glucose effects (17). Because of variations in neuronal activity, we are never absolutely confident of a glucose response unless we observe reversal upon washout. Therefore, we must maintain a giga-ohm seal in a healthy neuron for an hour to measure the response to at least two glucose concentrations. It is much easier to obtain healthy cells that can withstand extended recordings in younger animals. Moreover, we have published detailed glucose concentration-response relations for glucose-sensing neurons in animals of this age, using the whole cell patch-clamp configuration (17, 21). Thus we did not have to reestablish a half-maximal concentration of glucose, which would most likely reveal a difference in glucose sensitivity between saline and insulin-treated animals. Overall, the use of young, suckling animals facilitates the study of the mechanisms underlying the impaired CRR after recurrent hypoglycemia in a model that is extremely relevant to pediatric medicine.
The mechanism by which lactate reduces glucose sensitivity is not clear. One possibility is that it is being used simply as a fuel to support neuronal activity in both glucose-sensing and nonglucose-sensing neurons. In support of this, inhibition of lactate transport during hypoglycemia increases neuronal damage, which suggests that lactate fuels neurons during hypoglycemia (9). Increased lactate could supply ATP and replace glucose in the regulation of GI neurons. However, this is not consistent with our previous studies showing that lactate regulated the activity of VMN glucose-sensing neurons in a manner distinct from that of glucose. For example, although GI neurons were inhibited by glucose, they were excited by lactate in both high and low glucose concentrations (17). Another possibility is that lactate replaces glucose as a fuel source only for nonglucose-sensing neurons, while also serving as a signal that regulates neuronal activity in glucose-sensing neurons.
In either case, we speculate that hypoglycemia induces local neuroprotective mechanisms that impair the glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons. In support of this, hypoglycemia increases neuronal and blood-brain barrier glucose and lactate transporter expression (7, 9, 15). This would protect the brain during an acute hypoglycemic event. However, recurrent hypoglycemia may result in sustained upregulation of nutrient availability/utilization to protect the brain. As a result, glucose-sensing neurons would not perceive the intensity of the glucose deficit and signal for an appropriate CRR. Finally, these data indicate the importance of approximating the physiological milieu surrounding glucose sensing neurons to properly study them. Clearly, lactate, which is a component of the extracellular fluid in the brain, has a significant effect on the function of glucose-sensing neurons. Thus it is very important that studies, especially of isolated neurons, include lactate in the perfusion solution. This is less of a concern for studies of brain slices that contain glial cells, as these cells presumably provide a certain level of lactate to adjacent neurons.
In conclusion, our findings indicate that decreased glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons in young suckling rats may contribute to their impaired glucose restoration following recurrent hypoglycemia. These data support a role for VMN GI neurons in hypoglycemia detection and initiation of the CRR.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Kang, N. M. Sanders, A. A. Dunn-Meynell, L. D. Gaspers, V. H. Routh, A. P. Thomas, and B. E. Levin Prior hypoglycemia enhances glucose responsiveness in some ventromedial hypothalamic glucosensing neurons Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R784 - R792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Matveyenko, M. Bohland, M. Saberi, and C. M. Donovan Portal vein hypoglycemia is essential for full induction of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure with slow-onset hypoglycemia Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2007; 293(3): E857 - E864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Polakof, J. M. Miguez, and J. L. Soengas In vitro evidences for glucosensing capacity and mechanisms in hypothalamus, hindbrain, and Brockmann bodies of rainbow trout Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1410 - R1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Canabal, J. G. Potian, R. G. Duran, J. J. McArdle, and V. H. Routh Hyperglycemia impairs glucose and insulin regulation of nitric oxide production in glucose-inhibited neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R592 - R600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Barnes and J. L. Beverly Nitric oxide's role in glucose homeostasis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R590 - R591. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Canabal, Z. Song, J. G. Potian, A. Beuve, J. J. McArdle, and V. H. Routh Glucose, insulin, and leptin signaling pathways modulate nitric oxide synthesis in glucose-inhibited neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1418 - R1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Sanders, G. J. Taborsky Jr., C. W. Wilkinson, W. Daumen, and D. P. Figlewicz Antecedent Hindbrain Glucoprivation Does Not Impair the Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia Diabetes, January 1, 2007; 56(1): 217 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |