AJP - Regu Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 291: R1303-R1309, 2006. First published July 6, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00232.2006
0363-6119/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/R1303    most recent
00232.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Swoap, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Swoap, S. J.

APPETITE, OBESITY, DIGESTION, AND METABOLISM

Peripheral ghrelin deepens torpor bouts in mice through the arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y signaling pathway

Elizabeth F. Gluck, Natalie Stephens, and Steven J. Swoap

Department of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts

Submitted 31 March 2006 ; accepted in final form 1 July 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Many small mammals have the ability to enter torpor, characterized by a controlled drop in body temperature (Tb). We hypothesized that ghrelin would modulate torpor bouts, because torpor is induced by fasting in mice coincident with elevated circulating ghrelin. Female National Institutes of Health (NIH) Swiss mice were implanted with a Tb telemeter and housed at an ambient temperature (Ta) of 18°C. On fasting, all mice entered a bout of torpor (minimum Tb: 23.8 ± 2.0°C). Peripheral ghrelin administration (100 µg) during fasting significantly deepened the bout of torpor (Tb minimum: 19.4 ± 0.5°C). When the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus, a ghrelin receptor-rich region of the brain, was chemically ablated with monosodium glutamate (MSG), fasted mice failed to enter torpor (minimum Tb = 31.6 ± 0.6°C). Furthermore, ghrelin administration had no effect on the Tb minimum of ARC-ablated mice (31.8 ± 0.8°C). Two major pathways that regulate food intake reside in the ARC, the anorexigenic {alpha}-melanocyte stimulating hormone ({alpha}-MSH) pathway and the orexigenic neuropeptide Y (NPY) signaling pathway. Both Ay mice, which have the {alpha}-MSH pathway blocked, and Npy –/– mice exhibited shallow, aborted torpor bouts in response to fasting (Tb minimum: 29.1 ± 0.6°C and 29.9 ± 1.2°C, respectively). Ghrelin deepened torpor in Ay mice (Tb minimum: 22.8 ± 1.3°C), but had no effect in Npy –/– mice (Tb minimum: 29.5 ± 0.8°C). Collectively, these data suggest that ghrelin's actions on torpor are mediated via NPY neurons within the ARC.

body temperature; leptin


SMALL MAMMALS HAVE THERMOREGULATORY challenges not seen with larger mammals like humans. The small size of mammals like mice, chipmunks, and hamsters necessitates a limited capacity for storage of fuels. In addition, the increased surface area-to-volume ratio of these animals requires a much higher metabolic rate relative to body size. In cold environments, the cost of thermoregulation may become prohibitively expensive. As such, some small mammals enter the hypometabolic state of torpor (18, 21, 54), generally defined as a regulated reduction in Tb below 31°C (26). By entering a state of torpor, whether daily or longer bouts of hibernation, energy expenditure is reduced 50 to 90% (18, 27). Regulation of metabolic rate is not abandoned during a bout of torpor, as body temperature (Tb) is well regulated, albeit at a much lower set point (18). While low ambient temperature (Ta) contributes toward the torpor response, the neurophysiological signaling mechanisms that lead to the onset of torpor are not well defined, although recently it has become clear that the adipocyte-derived hormone leptin may play a role in mice, hamsters, and a marsupial (16, 17, 19).

Within the hypothalamus, the arcuate nucleus (ARC) plays a key role in the integration of signals for nutrient availability and energetic balance, including metabolic and feeding control (6). The ARC has access to both the third ventricle and portal vasculature of the median eminence, allowing it to sample physiological factors in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid (6, 46). Previous investigations have shown that perinatal treatment of rodent pups with monosodium glutamate (MSG) ablates the ARC (2, 9, 11, 12, 25, 30, 38, 49, 51), resulting in adult-onset obesity. The two most prolific types of neurons in the ARC are proopiomelanocortin and cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript (POMC/CART) and neuropeptide Y/agouti-related protein (NPY/AgRP) neurons (44). POMC neurons produce a number of peptides that are derived from a common precursor, POMC. The POMC neurons are part of an anorexic pathway that originates in the ARC whose activity is decreased during fasting (14). The peptide most relevant to appetite regulation appears to be {alpha}-melanocyte-stimulating hormone ({alpha}-MSH). The POMC neurons release {alpha}-MSH, which activates melanocortin 4 receptors (MC4Rs) initiating a satiation response (5). The agouti protein is an endogenous antagonist of melanocortin receptors, and its ectopic expression outside of the hair follicles and in the hypothalamus, as seen in the Ay mouse, blocks the action of {alpha}-MSH at the MC4R (3). This action can lead to hyperphagia, reduced energy expenditure, hyperinsulinemia, yellow coat color in mice, and obesity. The second neuron type within the ARC that plays an important role in energy balance is the orexigenic NPY/AgRP neuron (14, 35). These neurons are activated during fasting to initiate the hunger response (48). When injected centrally, NPY is among the most potent orexigenic substances identified (28). However, Npy –/– mice and the double knockout of NPY and AgRP results in a relatively normal phenotype, including the response to fasting (13, 41), suggesting the presence of multiple redundant pathways to initiate the hunger response.

Energy balance is regulated centrally through many known peripherally secreted hormones, including insulin, leptin, and the stomach-derived hormone ghrelin (reviewed in Ref. 32). Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide, is an appetite-stimulating hormone that is released in response to food deprivation (52, 58). It was discovered as the first endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. These receptors are found throughout the brain, including the ARC, as well as on the vagus nerve (8, 20, 24). Recently, it has been discovered that in addition to its synthesis and release from the gut, ghrelin-producing neurons are also found within the ARC (7). Within the ARC, it appears that the action of ghrelin is to activate NPY/AgRP neurons (4, 7, 23, 31, 37, 50, 55, 57). Peripheral and central injection of ghrelin increases food intake and hypothalamic NPY expression (29, 45); blocking the action of NPY blocks ghrelin-induced food intake (33). Because one prerequisite for torpor in mice is caloric restriction, it is of interest that short-term fasting elevates circulating ghrelin levels, whereas feeding reduces circulating ghrelin (52, 58).

Because ghrelin is likely a short-acting hormone that is responsive to the fed state of an animal, we sought to determine whether ghrelin can impact fasting-induced torpor in mice. Furthermore, the integral role that caloric restriction plays in the onset of torpor in laboratory mice suggests that the hypothalamic ARC, an area of the brain that acts as a conduit for hormonal and neuronal signals relevant to energy homeostasis, may be a critical component of torpor. To test the role of ghrelin and the ARC in torpor, we utilized peripheral ghrelin injections into ARC-ablated mice, as well as mice with blocked melanocortin signaling or deficient in NPY signaling.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals. Female National Institutes of Health (NIH) Swiss, Ay mice, aa mice, and Npy –/– mice were housed individually in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and fed ad libitum. On receipt of the animals, the mice were housed at a Ta of 28°C. The NIH Swiss mice were ordered from Harlan Sprague-Dawley, and all other strains were ordered from Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME. All studies were approved by the Williams College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

MSG treatment. To ablate the ARC, postnatal mouse pups were treated with MSG while a second cohort of mice was injected with vehicle (saline) and served as controls. Seven pregnant NIH Swiss mice were purchased and monitored until pups were born. The day of delivery was considered postnatal day 0. These mouse pups were injected subcutaneously with either 1) vehicle on postnatal days 1–5 (3 litters), or 2) 2 mg MSG/g of body wt on postnatal days 1 and 2, followed by 5 mg MSG/g on postnatal days 3–5 (4 litters). Approximately 35% of the pups injected with MSG died within the first week. None of the vehicle-treated pups died. Of the 15 surviving female MSG-treated mice and 18 saline-treated, 8 from each group were implanted with temperature telemeters at 6 wk of age and assessed for the torpor response to fasting and ghrelin administration at 7 wk of age.

Implantation. Mice were anesthetized initially with 5% isoflurane in an oxygen stream, and maintained on 1–2% isoflurane. The animals were kept on a heating pad (38°C) throughout implantation of the temperature telemeter (model TA10TAF20; Data Sciences International) into the peritoneal cavity. These telemeters weigh ~3.7 g and were calibrated at three different Tas (21, 30, and 39°C). Mice were maintained on a heating pad for 48 h following the surgery and were then housed individually at a Ta of 30°C for 1 wk to allow time for recovery.

Experimental protocol. All mice used in these studies (NIH Swiss, MSG-treated, Ay, aa, Npy –/–) underwent the same general protocol. Mice were housed individually for the duration of the experiment. Mice were housed for 3 days at 18°C. A baseline Tb was established over the third 24-h period of ad libitum feeding. Mice were fasted for 24 h beginning at the onset of the dark phase on the fourth day. One-half of each group of mice was randomly assigned to be injected intraperitoneally with either vehicle (saline) or ghrelin (100 µg) (product no. 031–31; Phoenix Pharmaceuticals). This dosage of ghrelin falls within the range of others reporting peripheral ghrelin injections (4, 52, 55, 58). Mice were injected with 0.1 cc of solution 4.5 h into the dark cycle. This time point was chosen because we have never observed normal mice entering torpor earlier than 4.5 h after the initiation of a fast. After 24 h of the fast, mice were refed and housed at 30°C for 7 days. These same mice were then housed at 18°C for 3 days. Mice were again fasted for 24 h, beginning at the onset of the dark cycle on the fourth day. Mice were then injected 4.5 h after initiation of the fast with either saline or ghrelin, such that paired comparisons of Tb were possible.

Data collection. Data from the temperature telemeters was recorded at 250 Hz for 1 s of every minute.

Immunohistochemical stain for the ARC. After 14 wk, the ARC of MSG-treated and vehicle-treated mice was evaluated for the extent of lesions induced by MSG. Mice were anesthetized with a drug cocktail composed of xylazine (25 mg/kg), acepromazine (1 mg/kg), and ketamine (5 mg/kg). The animals were transcardially perfused with 20 ml of heparinized saline (1,000 U heparin/ml) followed by 80 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in saline (PFA). The brain was removed and placed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. After 24 h, the PFA was removed, and the brains were immersed in 3a 30% sucrose solution for 48 h at 4°C. Forty-micrometer coronal sections were taken through the region of the brain that includes the ARC and moved to a 1x PBS. Brain sections were washed three times in PBS. The sections were incubated in 0.2% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 5 min and again washed three times in PBS. The sections were blocked in 10 mg/ml BSA in PBS at room temperature for 15 min. A polyclonal antibody directed against tyrosine hydroxylase (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) was diluted to 1:5,000 in BSA and incubated at 4°C overnight on a rocking platform. Sections were washed three times with PBS and incubated with a Cy3-labeled goat {alpha}-rabbit IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory, West Grove, PA) at a dilution of 1:1,000 in BSA at 4°C overnight. The sections were then washed three times in PBS, stained for 10 min with 0.67 µg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO), washed three times in PBS, and mounted on a slide. Brain images were captured with a Zeiss Axioscope equipped with a x10 objective.

Statistical analysis. Data are reported as means ± SE. Tb minimum was analyzed with two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA with group as a between-subjects factor and treatment as a repeated measure, followed by a Bonferroni test. Body weights, average Tb, and maximum Tb were compared between control and experimental groups using Student's t-tests. The 0.05 level of confidence was accepted for statistical significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In response to fasting at 18°C, all of the NIH Swiss mice (n = 6; body wt = 23.5 ± 0.7 g) injected with saline entered a torpid state late in the dark cycle (Fig. 1, top), consistent with noninjected fasted mice (Stephens N, Swoap SJ, unpublished observations). The Tb minimum of fasted mice injected with saline was 23.8 ± 2.0°C. When injected with ghrelin during the fast, these mice exhibited significantly deeper bouts of torpor (Fig. 1, bottom) and with Tb minimum (19.4°C ± 0.5), only 1.4°C above Ta (18°C). To determine whether ghrelin could induce torpor in the fed state, ghrelin (100 µg) or saline was injected into these same mice 2 wk later under ad libitum conditions, 4.5 h into the dark cycle. The Tb minimum of fed mice injected with ghrelin was not significantly different from that of saline-injected fed mice (34.9 ± 0.3 vs. 35.2 ± 0.2°C, respectively).


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of fasting and ghrelin on body temperature (Tb) of National Institutes of Health (NIH) Swiss mice. Top: the Tb of 6 female NIH Swiss mice was telemetrically monitored during 1) ad libitum feeding, 2) fasting with a 0.1 cc saline ip injection at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast, or 3) fasting with a 0.1 cc ghrelin injection (100 µg) ip at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast. Typical tracings of a mouse in each condition are shown. Fasting was initiated at the start of the dark cycle. Fasted mice entered bouts of torpor late in the dark cycle. Bottom: the Tb minimum over the 24-h period was calculated. Peripheral ghrelin injection induced a significantly deeper bout of torpor. Data are shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. fasted + saline injection.

 
MSG-treated female pups (Fig. 2A) and male pups (data not shown) were smaller than saline-treated pups, until about the seventh week of age. MSG-treated mice continued to grow, whereas the body weight of saline-treated mice remained stable during weeks 8–14 (Fig. 2B). A subset of the female mice (n = 8 for each group) was used for implantation at 6 wk of age and for torpor analysis at 7 wk of age. This time point was chosen as a window where control and MSG-treated mice were relatively close in body weight (body weights at 6 wk of age: saline-treated = 22.3 ± 0.3 g; MSG-treated body weights = 20.2 ± 0.6 g). The body weights of the remaining littermates (n = 10 for saline-treated, n = 7 for MSG-treated) continued to be monitored until 14 wk of age (Fig. 2B). In the 14-wk-old saline-treated mice, we found tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive neurons present in the ARC (Fig. 2C). In contrast, MSG-treated mice displayed little or no staining of this same area, consistent with others that show postnatal MSG treatment ablates the ARC (2, 9, 11, 12, 25, 30, 49, 51).


Figure 2
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Perinatal monosodium glutamate (MSG) treatment ablates the arcuate nucleus and induces obesity. NIH Swiss pups were treated with either saline or MSG during postnatal days 1–5 (see MATERIALS AND METHODS for dosage). A: the body weight for females from each litter was monitored from weaning (3 wk of age) until 14 wk of age. The arrow indicates the time when mice were implanted with Tb telemeters for torpor analysis. P < 0.05 vs. control. B: a photo of 2 saline-treated female mice and 2 MSG-treated female mice at 14 wk of age. C: 40-µm coronal section shows tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of a control mouse. These neurons are completely absent in this section from an MSG-treated mouse brain. ME, median eminence; III, third ventricle; white lines, approximate boundary of the ARC.

 
The average Tb for MSG-treated mice housed at 18°C was significantly cooler by ~1°C than saline-treated mice under fed conditions (35.5 ± 0.2 °C vs. 36.6 ± 0.2 °C, respectively: P < 0.05). Whereas these two groups of mice had similar maximum Tb (MSG-treated = 37.8 ± 0.2 °C; saline-treated 38.0 ± 0.1 °C), the MSG-treated mice had a lower Tb minimum, whereas fed (34.2 ± 0.2°C vs. 35.2 ± 0.2°C, respectively: P < 0.05). Figure 3, top shows typical tracings of Tb of MSG-treated mice under three conditions: 1) fed, 2) fasted plus saline injection, and 3) fasted plus ghrelin injection. When MSG-treated mice were fasted and injected with saline or ghrelin, none exhibited the steep fall in Tb as seen in torpor bouts of control mice. Fasted MSG-treated mice injected with saline exhibited some level of hypothermia (Tb minimum = 31.6 ± 0.6°C), significantly higher than fasted control mice from the same cohort (Tb minimum = 24.7 ± 1.3 °C). As Fig. 3, bottom shows, ghrelin had no effect on the Tb response to fasting in MSG-treated mice (Tb minimum = 31.8 ± 0.8°C), whereas ghrelin injections into the saline-treated mice deepened the torpor bouts (19.7 ± 0.6 °C), as we observed in the previous experiment with ghrelin injections (Fig. 1).


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of fasting and ghrelin on Tb of MSG-treated NIH Swiss mice. Top: the Tb of 8 female MSG-treated mice was monitored during 1) ad libitum feeding, 2) fasting with a 0.1 cc saline ip injection at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast, or 3) fasting with a 0.1 cc ghrelin injection (100 µg) ip at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast. Fasting was initiated at the start of the dark cycle. Typical tracings of a MSG-treated mouse in each condition are shown. Bottom: the Tb minimum over the 24-h period was calculated. Fasted MSG-treated mice had lower Tb minimum than during fed periods, but these were short nontorpor-like bouts of hypothermia. Data are shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. fasted + saline injection

 
As the ARC is important for the torpor response, we next examined the Tb response to fasting in mice with deficient signaling in one of the two of the major neuron types within the ARC. Six-wk-old female Ay mice (n = 18) and littermate controls (n = 8; genotype = aa) had similar body weights at this age (21.2 ± 0.6 g vs. 21.6 ± 0.8 g, respectively). Ay mice exhibited a lower maximum Tb than their littermate controls (37.7 ± 0.1 vs. 38.4 ± 0.1 °C, respectively; P < 0.05). However, Ay mice had the same mean Tb as aa mice over a 24-h period (37.0 ± 0.1 vs. 36.8 ± 0.2°C, respectively). The Ay mice also had the same Tb minimum as aa mice (35.4 ± 0.1 vs. 35.3 ± 0.1 °C, respectively). When fasted and injected with saline, Ay mice exhibited two very different responses in Tb. Of the 18 Ay mice fasted and injected with saline, eight entered a typical torpor bout (as seen in Fig. 4, top). The Tb minimum of these eight mice that exhibited a torpor bout was 27.1 ± 0.6°C, which is significantly (P < 0.05) warmer than the Tb minimum of fasted aa mice (24.6 ± 0.4 °C). The other 10 Ay mice exhibited aborted torpor bouts. Here, the mouse initiated a steep drop in Tb, indicative of torpor but quickly returned to a normal Tb (Fig. 4, top). As such, the Tb minimum achieved by this group of mice was only 30.0 ± 1.2°C. When injected with ghrelin, all fasted Ay mice exhibited a torpor bout, with a Tb minimum of 22.8 ± 1.3°C.


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of fasting and ghrelin on Tb of Ay mice. Top: the Tb of 18 female Ay mice was monitored during 1) ad libitum feeding, 2) fasting with a 0.1 cc saline ip injection at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast, or 3) fasting with a 0.1 cc ghrelin injection (100 µg) ip at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast. Fasting was initiated at the start of the dark cycle. We observed two types of responses from the Ay fast + saline injection group: some Ay mice (n = 8) entered torpor bouts (gray line), whereas others (n = 10) did not (thin black line). A typical tracing is shown for both types of responses. However, when fasted and injected with ghrelin, all Ay mice entered torpor. Bottom: the Tb minimum over the 24-h period was calculated. Peripheral ghrelin injection induced a significantly deeper bout of torpor in these mice. Data shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. fasted + saline injection

 
The other major neuron type within the ARC is the orexigenic NPY/AgRP neurons. Fed Npy –/– mice (n = 6; body weight = 23.1 ± 0.7 g) exhibited normal maximum Tb (38.1 ± 0.1°C), average Tb (36.9 ± 0.1°C) and Tb minimum (36.0 ± 0.1°C). In response to fasting, none of the saline-injected Npy –/– mice entered a typical torpor bout (Fig. 5, top). Rather, each mouse exhibited aborted torpor bouts (minimum Tb: 29.5 ± 0.8°C). In contrast to the Ay mice, none of the six Npy –/– mice responded to the injection of ghrelin (minimum Tb: 29.1 ± 0.6°C).


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of fasting and ghrelin on Tb of Npy –/– mice. Top: the Tb of 6 female Npy –/– mice, missing the orexigenic neuropeptide Y neurotransmitter, was monitored during 1) ad libitum feeding, 2) fasting with a 0.1 cc saline ip injection at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast, or 3) fasting with a 0.1 cc ghrelin ip injection (100 µg) at 4.5 h after initiation of the fast. Fasting was initiated at the start of the dark cycle. Typical tracings of an Npy –/– mouse in each condition are shown. None of the fasted mice exhibited typical torpor bouts (compare to tracings in Fig. 1). Bottom: the Tb minimum over the 24-h period was calculated. Peripheral ghrelin injection had no effect on this parameter. Data shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. fasted + saline injection.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In response to cool Ta and calorie restriction, laboratory mice enter a state of torpor (17, 22, 39, 47, 56). The principle finding in these studies is that peripheral ghrelin deepens the torpor bout. Furthermore, our data suggest that ghrelin acts within the ARC of the hypothalamus, specifically within NPY/AgRP neurons that reside in the ARC, to modulate torpor.

In addition to ghrelin's known orexigenic effects (reviewed in Ref. 32), we show here that ghrelin can deepen the Tb minimum of a torpor bout. It is of interest to note that circulating ghrelin reaches a peak near the end of the dark cycle (36). This timing is coincident with the onset of torpor in fasting mice (see Fig. 1), which is typically 8 h after initiation of the fast. It is currently not clear whether the actions of peripherally administered ghrelin impact Tb during a torpor bout via the vagus nerve, direct actions on the ARC itself, or both. Some evidence exists that suggests ghrelin does not cross the blood-brain barrier very well in the blood-to-brain direction (1). Ghrelin may influence torpor bouts via the vagus nerve, as others have shown that vagal afferents contain ghrelin receptors and transmit a starvation signal to the nucleus of the solitary tract (8, 20, 24). Indeed, blockade of gastric vagal afferents eliminates ghrelin-induced feeding (8). However, as stated earlier, the ARC is situated such that its neurons likely sample physiological factors (ghrelin, insulin, leptin, glucose) directly in the circulation (6, 46). The ghrelin receptor colocalizes within NPY neurons (57), although these receptors may respond to CNS-derived ghrelin (7). Whether peripherally administered ghrelin acts directly on the hypothalamus or indirectly, via the vagus nerve, it remains clear that ghrelin deepens the bout of torpor and requires the ARC to do so. It remains to be determined which pathway (vagus nerve or directly on the ARC) mediates these effects.

With the use of perinatal MSG treatment, we show here that the neurons within the ARC likely play a central role in mediating the metabolic response, and in particular, the torpor response, to calorie restriction in mice. Numerous studies have used MSG to induce lesions in the ARC, which results in adult-onset obesity, stunted growth, and a lower Tb (2, 9, 11, 12, 25, 30, 38, 49, 51), observations that are confirmed here (Fig. 2). While we confirmed that extensive damage was induced in the ARC of these mice (Fig. 2), we cannot rule out that 1) damage to other regions within the brain occurred and played some role in modulating torpor and 2) that the ARC region was completely ablated, given that there is some variability in the response to MSG treatment (2, 9, 10, 34). However, the ARC is the most sensitive region to MSG within the brain (49), and the dose of MSG that we used does not cause extensive or detectable damage to other parts of the brain (9, 12, 25, 38). Thus the lack of torpor in MSG-treated mice in response to fasting observed herein is likely due to damage to neurons within the ARC, even if not all of the ARC neurons were damaged. It is interesting to note that mice treated with gold-thioglucose, which destroys glucose-sensing neurons, are also resistant to fasting-induced torpor bouts (56). Although MSG-treated mice weighed approximately the same in the fasting experiments, it is possible that fat mass is elevated in MSG-treated mice (at the expense of lean mass) and that signaling from excess fat stores may prevent torpor. This line of reasoning is supported by 1) MSG-treated mice at this age are hyperleptinemic (15), and 2) leptin administration blunts torpor bouts (see Refs. 16, 17, and 19 and Stephens N and Swoap SJ, unpublished observations). So, it may be that elevated leptin in MSG-treated mice prevents torpor during the fast. However, the effects of leptin are thought to be mediated primarily through the ARC (6, 14, 46), which has been ablated here. Indeed, ARC-ablated rats are not responsive to exogenous leptin (10), at least for effects on body weight and food intake suppression. Further experimentation is required to determine whether hyperleptinemia or perhaps some other adipocyte-derived hormone functions to blunt torpor in ARC-ablated mice.

Leptin may also have played a role in the highly variable torpor response among the Ay mice tested (Fig. 4). While we did not measure circulating leptin levels in the present study, it is of note that even preobese Ay mice can have elevated levels of leptin. Hence, it may be possible that leptin levels varied among the Ay mice (Fig. 4). It is clear, however, that these mice have the capability to undergo torpor, as ghrelin induced typical torpor bouts in every Ay mouse tested. These data suggest that the POMC pathway is not required for the torpor response, nor is it required for the modulation of torpor by ghrelin.

The lack of a Tb response to ghrelin in Npy –/– suggests that ghrelin does require NPY neurons to exert its physiological effects on Tb. Indeed, multiple lines of evidence from other studies support the concept that ghrelin exerts its physiological effects through NPY/AgRP neurons. First, peripherally administered ghrelin increases the c-fos immunoreactivity within NPY neurons (37, 55). Second, mice deficient in both NPY and AgRP do not exhibit the normal increase in feeding in response to ghrelin (4). Finally, ghrelin directly increases the physiological activity of NPY neurons in the ARC (7, 31). This is in agreement with our data that show that peripherally administrated ghrelin had no effect on the Tb of Npy –/– mice (Fig. 5) but deepened the torpor bouts of normal and Ay mice (Figs. 1 and 4). Given that Npy –/– mice were able to initiate torpor bouts but were unable to maintain them independent of ghrelin administration, we conclude that the NPY pathway is critical for both the full torpor phenotype and the modulation of torpor by ghrelin in mice.

Whereas ghrelin was important in modulating fasting-induced torpor bouts in mice, ghrelin may not play a role in animals that depend largely on photoperiod changes for a signal for torpor bouts. The Siberian hamster can enter torpor when maintained for extended periods of time in a shortened photoperiod (16, 40), although torpor entry occurs only after significant fat mass loss (43). Both circulating ghrelin levels and ghrelin receptor expression in the brain of Siberian hamsters are relatively unchanged between long photoperiods (nontorpor season) vs. short photoperiods (torpor season; Ref. 53). These hamsters can enter torpor in a long photoperiod if calorically restricted long enough, presumably to reduce body fat stores and circulating leptin (16, 42). This dependence on low circulating leptin in these hamsters may be mediated via NPY, as intracerebroventricular delivery of NPY induces torporlike bouts of hypothermia, with a drop in Tb of 10°C (40).

The complex interplay between circulating hormones that relay nutritional status like insulin, leptin, and ghrelin and the neurons residing in the hypothalamus that respond to these hormones likely set the stage for entrance into torpor. We show here that ghrelin can deepen torpor bouts in fasting mice, and its likely mechanism of action is through NPY/AgRP neurons that reside within the ARC.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN 9984170 (to S. J. Swoap), an American Physiological Society Undergraduate Research Fellowship (to E. F. Gluck), and in part by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant (to Williams College, Williamstown, MA).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Molly Gutilla for her critical reading of this manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. J. Swoap, Dept. of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267 (e-mail:sswoap{at}williams.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Banks WA, Tschop M, Robinson SM, and Heiman ML. Extent and direction of ghrelin transport across the blood-brain barrier is determined by its unique primary structure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 822–827, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bergen HT, Mizuno TM, Taylor J, and Mobbs CV. Hyperphagia and weight gain after gold-thioglucose: relation to hypothalamic neuropeptide Y and proopiomelanocortin. Endocrinology 139: 4483–4488, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Butler AA and Cone RD. The melanocortin receptors: lessons from knockout models. Neuropeptides 36: 77–84, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Chen HY, Trumbauer ME, Chen AS, Weingarth DT, Adams JR, Frazier EG, Shen Z, Marsh DJ, Feighner SD, Guan XM, Ye Z, Nargund RP, Smith RG, Van der Ploeg LHT, Howard AD, MacNeil DJ, and Qian S. Orexigenic action of peripheral ghrelin is mediated by neuropeptide Y and agouti-related protein. Endocrinology 145: 2607–2612, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cone RD. Anatomy and regulation of the central melanocortin system. Nat Neurosci 8: 571–578, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Cone RD, Cowley MA, Butler AA, Fan W, Marks DL, and Low MJ. The arcuate nucleus as a conduit for diverse signals relevant to energy homeostasis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: S63–S67, 2001.[CrossRef]
  7. Cowley MA, Smith RG, Diano S, Tschop M, Pronchuk N, Grove KL, Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M, Esterman M, and Heiman ML. The distribution and mechanism of action of ghrelin in the CNS demonstrates a novel hypothalamic circuit regulating energy homeostasis. Neuron 37: 649–661, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Date Y, Murakami N, Toshinai K, Matsukura S, Niijima A, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, and Nakazato M. The role of the gastric afferent vagal nerve in ghrelin-induced feeding and growth hormone secretion in rats. Gastroenterology 123: 1120–1128, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  9. Dawson R. Developmental and sex-specific effects of low-dose neonatal monosodium glutamate administration on mediobasal hypothalamic chemistry. Neuroendocrinology 42: 158–166, 1986.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Dawson R, Pelleymounter MA, Millard WJ, Liu S, and Eppler B. Attenuation of leptin-mediated effects by monosodium glutamate-induced arcuate nucleus damage. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 273: E202–E206, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Edelstein K, Pfaus JG, Rusak B, and Amir S. Neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment prevents effects of constant light on circadian temperature rhythms of adult-rats. Brain Res 675: 135–142, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Elefteriou F, Takeda S, Liu X, Armstrong D, and Karsenty G. Monosodium glutamate-sensitive hypothalamic neurons contribute to the control of bone mass. Endocrinology 144: 3842–3847, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Erickson JC, Ahima RS, Hollopeter G, Flier JS, and Palmiter RD. Endocrine function of neuropeptide Y knockout mice. Regul Pept 70: 199–202, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Flier JS. Obesity wars: molecular progress confronts an expanding epidemic. Cell 116: 337–350, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Frederich RC, Löllmann B, Hamann A, Napolitano-Rosen A, Kahn BB, Lowell BB, and Flier JS. Expression of ob mRNA and its encoded protein in rodents. Impact of nutrition and obesity. J Clin Invest 96: 1658–1663, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Freeman DA, Lewis DA, Kauffman AS, Blum RM, and Dark J. Reduced leptin concentrations are permissive for display of torpor in Siberian hamsters. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287: R97–R103, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gavrilova O, Leon LR, Marcus-Samuels B, Mason MM, Castle AL, Refetoff S, Vinson C, and Reitman ML. Torpor in mice is induced by both leptin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. PNAS 96: 14623–14628, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Geiser F. Metabolic rate and body temperature reduction during hibernation and daily torpor. Annu Rev Physiol 66: 239–274, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Geiser F, Kortner G, and Schmidt I. Leptin increases energy expenditure of a marsupial by inhibition of daily torpor. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1627–R1632, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Guan XM, Yu H, Palyha OC, McKee KK, Feighner SD, Sirinathsinghji DJS, Smith RG, Van der Ploeg LHT, and Howard AD. Distribution of mRNA encoding the growth hormone secretagogue receptor in brain and peripheral tissues. Mol Brain Res 48: 23–29, 1997.[Medline]
  21. Heldmaier G, Ortmann S, and Elvert R. Natural hypometabolism during hibernation and daily torpor in mammals. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 141: 317–329, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Himms-Hagen J. Food restriction increases torpor and improves brown adipose tissue thermogenesis in ob/ob mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 248: E531–E539, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Horvath TL, Diano S, and van den Pol AN. Synaptic interaction between hypocretin (orexin) and neuropeptide Y cells in the rodent and primate hypothalamus: a novel circuit implicated in metabolic and endocrine regulations. J Neurosci 19: 1072–1087, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Howard AD, Feighner SD, Cully DF, Arena JP, Liberator PA, Rosenblum CI, Hamelin M, Hreniuk DL, Palyha OC, Anderson J, Paress PS, Diaz C, Chou M, Liu KK, McKee KK, Pong SS, Chaung LY, Elbrecht A, Dashkevicz M, Heavens R, Rigby M, Sirinathsinghji DJS, Dean DC, Melillo DG, Patchett AA, Nargund R, Griffin PR, DeMartino JA, Gupta SK, Schaeffer JM, Smith RG, and VanderPloeg LHT. A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release. Science 273: 974–977, 1996.[Abstract]
  25. Hu L, Fernstrom JD, and Goldsmith PC. Exogenous glutamate enhances glutamate receptor subunit expression during selective neuronal injury in the ventral arcuate nucleus of postnatal mice. Neuroendocrinology 68: 77–88, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Hudson JW. Shallow daily torpor: a thermoregulatory adaptation. In: Strategies in the Cold: Natural Torpidity and Thermogenesis, edited by Hudson JW and Wang LCH. New York: Academic, 1978, p. 67–108.
  27. Humphries MM, Thomas DW, and Kramer DL. The role of energy availability in mammalian hibernation: a cost-benefit approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 76: 165–179, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Kalra S, Dube MG, Fournier A, Kalra PS. Structure-function analysis of stimulation of food intake by neuropeptide Y: effect of receptor agonists. Physiol Behav 50: 5–9, 1991.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Kamegai J, Tamura H, Shimizu T, Ishii S, Sugihara H, and Wakabayashi I. Chronic central infusion of ghrelin increases hypothalamic neuropeptide Y and agouti-related protein mRNA levels and body weight in rats. Diabetes 50: 2438–2443, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kerkerian L and Pelletier G. Effects of monosodium L-glutamate administration on neuropeptide Y-containing neurons in the rat hypothalamus. Brain Res 369: 388–390, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Kohno D, Gao HZ, Muroya S, Kikuyama S, and Yada T. Ghrelin directly interacts with neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in the rat arcuate nucleus: Ca2+ signaling via protein kinase A and N-type channel-dependent mechanisms and cross-talk with leptin and orexin. Diabetes 52: 948–956, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kojima M and Kangawa K. Ghrelin: structure and function. Physiol Rev 85: 495–522, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lawrence CB, Snape AC, Baudoin FMH, and Luckman SM. Acute central ghrelin and GH secretagogues induce feeding and activate brain appetite centers. Endocrinology 143: 155–162, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Morris MJ, Tortelli CF, Filippis A, and Proietto J. Reduced BAT function as a mechanism for obesity in the hypophagic, neuropeptide Y deficient monosodium glutamate-treated rat. Regul Pept 75–76: 441–447, 1998.
  35. Morton GJ and Schwartz MW. The NPY/AGRP neuron and energy homeostasis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: S56–S62, 2001.[CrossRef]
  36. Murakami N, Hayashida T, Kuroiwa T, Nakahara K, Ida T, Mondal M, Nakazato M, Kojima M, and Kangawa K. Role for central ghrelin in food intake and secretion profile of stomach ghrelin in rats. J Endocrinol 174: 283–288, 2002.[Abstract]
  37. Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, and Matsukura S. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature 409: 194–198, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Olney JW. Brain lesions obesity and other disturbances in mice treated with monosodium glutamate. Science 164: 719–721, 1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Overton JM and Williams TD. Behavioral and physiologic responses to caloric restriction in mice. Physiol Behav 81: 749–754, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Paul MJ, Freeman DA, Park JH, and Dark J. Neuropeptide Y induces torpor-like hypothermia in Siberian hamsters. Brain Res 1055: 83–92, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Qian S, Chen H, Weingarth D, Trumbauer ME, Novi DE, Guan X, Yu H, Shen Z, Feng Y, Frazier E, Chen A, Camacho RE, Shearman LP, Gopal-Truter S, MacNeil DJ, Van der Ploeg LHT, and Marsh DJ. Neither agouti-related protein nor neuropeptide Y is critically required for the regulation of energy homeostasis in mice. Mol Cell Biol 22: 5027–5035, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Ruby NF and Zucker I. Daily torpor in the absence of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in Siberian hamsters. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 263: R353–R362, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Ruf T, Stieglitz A, Steinlechner S, Blank JL, and Heldmaier G. Cold exposure and food restriction facilitate physiological responses to short photoperiod in Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). J Exp Zool 267: 104–112, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Schwartz MW and Porte D Jr. Diabetes, obesity, and the brain. Science 307: 375–379, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Shintani M, Ogawa Y, Ebihara K, Aizawa-Abe M, Miyanaga F, Takaya K, Hayashi T, Inoue G, Hosoda K, Kojima M, Kangawa K, and Nakao K. Ghrelin, an endogenous growth hormone secretagogue, is a novel orexigenic peptide that antagonizes leptin action through the activation of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y/Y1 receptor pathway. Diabetes 50: 227–232, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Stanley S, Wynne K, McGowan B, and Bloom S. Hormonal regulation of food intake. Physiol Rev 85: 1131–1158, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Swoap SJ. Altered leptin signaling is sufficient, but not required, for hypotension associated with caloric restriction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2473–H2479, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Takahashi KA and Cone RD. Fasting induces a large, leptin-dependent increase in the intrinsic action potential frequency of orexigenic arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y/agouti-related protein neurons. Endocrinology 146: 1043–1047, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Takasaki Y. Studies on brain lesion by administration of monosodium L-glutamate to mice. 1. Brain lesions in infant mice caused by administration of monosodium L-glutamate. Toxicology 9: 293–305, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Tamura H, Kamegai J, Shimizu T, Ishii S, Sugihara H, and Oikawa S. Ghrelin stimulates GH but not food intake in arcuate nucleus ablated rats. Endocrinology 143: 3268–3275, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Tokuyama K and Himms-Hagen J. Brown adipose tissue thermogenesis, torpor, and obesity of glutamate-treated mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 251: E407–E415, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Tschop M, Smiley DL, and Heiman ML. Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature 407: 908–913, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Tups A, Helwig M, Khorooshi RMH, Archer ZA, Klingenspor M, and Mercer JG. Circulating ghrelin levels and central ghrelin receptor expression are elevated in response to food deprivation in a seasonal mammal (Phodopus sungorus). J Neuroendocrinol 16: 922–928, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  54. Van Breukelen F and Martin SL. Molecular adaptations in mammalian hibernators: unique adaptations or generalized responses? J Appl Physiol 92: 2640–2647, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Wang L, Saint-Pierre DH, and Tache Y. Peripheral ghrelin selectively increases Fos expression in neuropeptide Y—synthesizing neurons in mouse hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. Neurosci Lett 325: 47–51, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  56. Webb GP, Jagot SA, and Jakobson ME. Fasting-induced torpor in Mus musculus and its implication in the use of murine models for human obesity studies. Comp Biochem Physiol 72A: 211–219, 1982.[Medline]
  57. Willesen MG, Kristensen P, and Rømer J. Co-localization of growth hormone secretagogue receptor and NPY mRNA in the arcuate nucleus of the rat. Neuroendocrinology 70: 306–316, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  58. Wren AM, Small CJ, Abbott CR, Dhillo WS, Seal LJ, Cohen MA, Batterham RL, Taheri S, Stanley SA, Ghatei MA, and Bloom SR. Ghrelin causes hyperphagia and obesity in rats. Diabetes 50: 2540–2547, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Swoap and M. J. Gutilla
Cardiovascular changes during daily torpor in the laboratory mouse
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): R769 - R774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. H. Jethwa, H. I'Anson, A. Warner, H. M. Prosser, M. H. Hastings, E. S. Maywood, and F. J. P. Ebling
Loss of prokineticin receptor 2 signaling predisposes mice to torpor
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): R1968 - R1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. M. Pelz, D. Routman, J. R. Driscoll, L. J. Kriegsfeld, and J. Dark
Monosodium glutamate-induced arcuate nucleus damage affects both natural torpor and 2DG-induced torpor-like hypothermia in Siberian hamsters
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R255 - R265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Dark and K. M. Pelz
NPY Y1 receptor antagonist prevents NPY-induced torporlike hypothermia in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R236 - R245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Swoap
Why one enters torpor: focus on "NPY Y1 receptor antagonist prevents NPY-induced torpor-like hypothermia in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters"
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R234 - R235.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Swoap, M. Rathvon, and M. Gutilla
AMP does not induce torpor
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R468 - R473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/R1303    most recent
00232.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Swoap, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Swoap, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.