AJP - Regu Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 291: R1527-R1532, 2006. First published June 29, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00186.2006
0363-6119/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/R1527    most recent
00186.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palma, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tufik, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palma, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tufik, S.

SLEEP AND TEMPERATURE REGULATION

Effects of sleep deprivation on the development of autoimmune disease in an experimental model of systemic lupus erythematosus

Beatriz Duarte Palma,1 Alexandre Gabriel, Jr.,2 Fernando A. B. Colugnati,1 and Sergio Tufik1

1Department of Psychobiology and 2Laboratory of Medical Investigation, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Submitted 17 March 2006 ; accepted in final form 23 June 2006


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sleep is hypothesized to play a restorative role on immune system. In addition, disturbed sleep is thought to impair host defense mechanisms. Chronic sleep deprivation is a common occurrence in modern society and has been observed in a number of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). New Zealand Black/New Zealand White (NZB/NZW) F1 mice develop an autoimmune disease that strongly resembles SLE in humans, exhibiting high titers of antinuclear antibodies associated with the development of rapidly progressive and lethal glomerulonephritis. On the basis of this evidence, the present study examined the onset and progress of lupus in as-yet healthy female mice submitted to sleep deprivation. Sleep deprivation was accomplished by two 96-h periods in the multiple-platform method when mice were 10 wk old, and they were observed until 28 wk of age. Blood samples were collected from the orbital plexus fortnightly to evaluate serum antinuclear antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA. Proteinuria and longevity as well as body weight were also assessed. The results indicated that mice submitted to sleep deprivation exhibited an earlier onset of the disease, as reflected by the increased number of antinuclear antibodies. However, no statistical difference was found in the other parameters analyzed. According to these results, sleep deprivation could be considered as a risk factor for the onset but not for the evolution of the disease.

sleep; New Zealand Black/New Zealand White F1 mice; antinuclear antibody

INCREASING EVIDENCE suggests a bidirectional communication between sleep and the immune system. On one hand, mediators of the immune response regulate physiological sleep, both at normal and exacerbated function, which can be observed during infection (for reviews, see Refs. 2 and 34). On the other hand, sleep is hypothesized to have a restorative function on immune processes. On the basis of results from a study (13) in which sleep deprivation (SD) caused the invasion of normally sterile body tissues by pathogenic bacteria, it may considered that abnormalities of host defense including immune suppression would render healthy sleep-deprived individuals susceptible to disease. However, these relationships have not been studied extensively.

The hypothesis that sleep might influence host defenses has been suggested by the association between decreased sleep time and increased morbidity and mortality in humans (21, 61) and by the findings in rats that SD results in septicemia and eventually death (13). SD affects several other facets of the immune system, including antigen uptake (6), phagocytosis (37), mitogen responses (32), antibody responses (23, 49), and a variety of lymphocyte subsets (9).

The effects of SD on the immune system have been widely studied. This is an important issue in its own right because SD is becoming a more frequent and more accepted occurrence in modern society. In addition, sleep disorders have been observed in a number of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as autoimmune diseases. Some of these clinical states associated with sleep disturbances include rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (for a review, see Ref. 24). The sleep disruption that is observed in some of the immune and autoimmune disorders is most likely the result of dysregulations of the sleep-immune system relationship than merely a discomfort induced by the disease symptoms or manifestations, such as pain.

SLE is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting young women at reproductive age. The female-to-male incidence ratio is approximately 9:1 in most series (43). The preponderance of SLE in women may result, in part, from stimulation of the immune system by female hormones (28). This chronic inflammatory disease is characterized by the formation of autoantibodies and deposition of immune complexes, resulting in glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. In SLE, one of the dominant antibodies is directed against the cell nucleus: antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Estrogen, pregnancy, stress, and intake of a variety of drugs are associated with the onset and worsening of SLE (19, 35, 39, 42). Lupus patients complain of unrefreshing sleep and daytime fatigue, which results from sleep disturbances (8, 27, 53, 54, 56). According to Valencia-Flores and colleagues (56), these patients are sleepier during the day by virtue of sleep fragmentation due to more arousals and stage transitions. In addition, the disease is exacerbated by sleep disruption, resulting in decreased sleep efficiency and delta sleep.

New Zealand Black/New Zealand White (NZB/NZW) F1 mice spontaneously develop an autoimmune disease that closely resembles immunological and clinical characteristics of human SLE. The evolution of the disease is characterized by abnormal polyclonal B cell activation with a high production of ANA that includes anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-DNA), lymphadenopathy, arthritis, hemolytic anemia, vasculitis, and a variety of histopathological manifestations, of which glomerulonephritis is the most prominent (55). Also, similar to characteristics in humans, the disease is most frequent in female mice, and the susceptibility is influenced by the major histocompatibity complex (57).

Although a large number of studies have focused on the relationship between the immune system and SD, relatively few have examined the long-term effects of SD and/or have evaluated more than one postdeprivation recovery day to determine the time course of postdeprivation changes in immunological parameters. If one considers that increased sleep fragmentation and increased disease activity and pain sensitivity are common features of SLE patients, it is clearly necessary to investigate experimental paradigms that allow a more precise understanding of the impact of SD on autoimmune disease. To determine whether SD can precipitate or exacerbate the development of autoimmunity in genetically predisposed animals, the disease course in NZB/NZW F1 mice was assessed by following the development of ANA, proteinuria, and longevity.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and experimental procedures. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines on animal care of the National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (CEP No. 1163/01).

NZB (females) and NZW (males) mice were obtained from the Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo, Brazil) and were mated in our Research Laboratory to produce NZB/NZW F1 hybrids. After being weaned, NZB/NZW F1 mice were housed in groups of six in plastic cages filled with hardwood bedding and provided water and rodent chow ad libitum. Animals were kept in a room with controlled lighting (12:12-h light-dark cycle) and temperature (24 ± 2°C). Because of the fact that murine lupus is more prevalent in females, only this gender was used in the present study. In addition, both control nondeprived and SD female mice were age matched because there is a natural age-dependent evolution of the disease.

SD procedures. Female NZB/NZW F1 mice aged 10 wk (an age in which they are clinically healthy) were subjected to SD using an adaptation of the multiple-platform method originally developed for rats (52). The technique is based on the muscle atonia that accompanies paradoxical sleep (18). Briefly, 12 narrow circular platforms (3 cm in diameter) were placed inside a tiled tank (41 x 34 x 17 cm) filled with water to within 1 cm below the upper border of the platform. Groups of six animals were placed on the platforms in each tank, an arrangement that allowed them to move inside the tank, jumping from one platform to the other. In this procedure, animals are aroused from sleep when the loss of muscle tone leads them to fall off the platform. This method produces a consistent amount of sleep reduction in mice (47).

Animals were randomly distributed into two groups: control mice, which remained in their home cages in the SD room (n = 22); and SD mice, which were deprived of sleep for two periods of 96 h each with an interval of 3 days (n = 28). This experimental protocol was carried out as an attempt to simulate a chronic condition of SD (similar to what is observed in chronic inflammatory disease). During the interval, animals were placed back in their home cages. Throughout the study, both groups had free access to food and water. After the end of SD, animals in the experimental group were placed back in their home cages, and both groups were observed for several weeks.

Blood sampling procedures and ANA determination. At 10 (before SD), 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and 28 wk of age, mice were weighed, rapidly anesthetized (ether vapors), and bled from the orbital venous plexus with the use of plain capillary tubes (41). After being centrifuged, the serum was separated and stored at –20°C until analysis.

Determination of ANA and anti-DNA. ANA was determined by a standard indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) technique using HEp-2 cells as the substrate (Kallestad, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA). IIF on HEp-2 cells remains the method of choice for ANA detection (48). In the case of negative ANA, the diagnosis of SLE is very unlikely. The manufacturer’s protocol was followed. Briefly, autoantibodies in a test sample bound to antigens in the substrate. A wash with PBS removed the excess serum from the substrate. Fluorescein-conjugated (FITC) antiserum added to the substrate attached to the bound autoantibody. FITC-conjugated rabbit antibodies against mice IgG were kindly donated by Biolab. In these procedures, a fluorescent antibody served as the marker for the antigen-antibody binding reaction, which occurred on a substrate surface. After a second wash step to remove the excess conjugate, the substrate was coverslipped and checked for fluorescent patterns with a fluorescent microscope. Observation of a specific fluorescent pattern on the substrate indicated the presence of autoantibodies in the test samples. A positive and negative control was included with each assay run. Sera were considered positive for the presence of ANA at a starting dilution of 1/50.

All positive sera were tested for anti-DNA antibodies by IIF on Crithidia lucilliae as a substrate (DTS) following the same procedures used for ANA detection.

Measurement of proteinuria. To evaluate the severity of the autoimmune disease, proteinuria, a surrogate marker of autoimmune nephritis, was performed. At 24, 31, and 37 wk of age, mice were placed in metabolic cages, and urine was collected. The protein concentration was determined by precipitation with 3% sulfosalicylic acid in 24-h urine samples, and measurements were performed by spectrophotometry (Spectronic, Genesys 5 Milton Roy) (15). Spectrophotometric measurement was carried out with a microplate reader at 650 nm. To convert optical density values, a standard curve was generated for each assay.

Longevity study. Mice were examined daily for signs of disease (edema, lethargy, anorexia, piloerection, or rough hair coats) and death.

Data analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the proportion of the number of mice that produced ANA and also to estimate the proportion surviving (life span) by given time. Mice that did not produce ANA or did not die until the end of the study were considered censored data. Data containing uncertainty as to when exactly an event happened are termed as censored data. Proportion and survival curves were compared using the log rank test. Visual inspection revealed differences between weeks 10 and 13 that might be relevant, although not sufficiently to provide statistical evidence by the log rank test for analysis of the whole period of study. Therefore, the binomial test for proportions was used to analyze ANA production in each week, independently. Statistical analysis of the anti-DNA data was performed with the binomial test for proportions. The remainder of the data was compared by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for unbalanced groups. All data are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
ANA and anti-DNA. Log rank data revealed that proportion curves were similar between control and SD groups (P = 0.4185), indicating that ANA production was similar between the groups (Fig. 1). Nonetheless, no new case was observed between the 10th and 13th week in control mice, meaning a 0% transition. In the SD group, however, five new cases were found during the same time interval, resulting in 21% transition. The binomial test showed a statistical difference between control and SD groups (0% x 21%, P < 0.03). No further differences were revealed throughout the study. The production of anti-DNA across both groups indicates that the antibody is spontaneously produced in this mouse strain and is not influenced by SD.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Proportion curves for negative anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) percentages in control (CTL; n = 22) and sleep-deprived (SD; n = 28) mice. Arrows indicate the periods of SD (10th and 11th week of life).

 
Body weight. Analysis of the data considering the body weights immediately before and immediately after SD (10th vs. 12th week of life) showed a main effect of time [F(1,19) = 9.87 and P = 0.005] but no effect of group or an interaction between these factors. The post hoc analysis indicated that both groups gained weight immediately after the period of SD (week 12) compared with week 10 (Fig. 2). Analysis of body weights throughout the study period again revealed a main effect of time [F(6,162) = 46.17 and P = 0.0001], but no interaction between group and time. The test of Tukey showed that, for both groups, weight gain was greater on the 16th week than on the previous weeks of life (P < 0.0001) without differences on weeks 19, 22, 25, and 28. In the later time points, weight gain was higher than on weeks 10, 13, and 16 (P < 0.0001; Fig. 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Changes in body weights during SD. Values are reported as means ± SE. *P ≤ 0.005 for comparisons with corresponding values.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Body weights in CTL and SD mice. Values are reported as means ± SE. *P ≤ 0.0001, different from previous weeks; **P ≤ 0.0001, different from weeks 10, 13, and 16. Arrows indicate periods of SD (10th and 11th weeks of life).

 
Proteinuria. In terms of proteinuria, again, a main effect of time was detected [F(2,32) = 51.03 and P = 0.0001]. In this case, augmented protein excretion was observed on the 37th week of life in both groups compared with the previous time points (P < 0.0001; Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Time course of urinary protein excretion in CTL and SD mice. Values are reported as means ± SE. *P ≤ 0.0001, different from previous weeks.

 
Life span. The log rank test did not detect a difference between the survival curves of the groups (P = 0.1317), and the average life span was 38 and 40 wk for the control and SD groups, respectively (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Survival curves for CTL (n = 22) and SD (n = 28) mice. +Censored data.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
According to the present findings, SD produced an immediate and short-lasting effect, manifested by an earlier triggering of the disease, which was reflected by more cases of positive ANA. Nonetheless, SD did not affect the evolution or severity of the disease, according to the proteinuria and longevity data.

Similar to other studies (7, 25), the onset and evolution of the disease was based on the presence and amount of ANA. This is an extremely sensitive and specific parameter, and, contrary to human beings, it is a measurement of disease activity.

One of the most replicable effects of SD in rats is the progressive increase of energy expenditure, manifested by augmented food intake and weight loss (3, 11, 16). Contrary to what is observed in rats, SD did not produce weight loss in NZB/NZW F1 mice. Both control and SD mice gained weight after the manipulation compared with their pre-SD body weight. Although we did not assess food intake, it could be hypothesized that this distinct effect of SD is due to differences in basal metabolism between rats and mice. The assessment of body weight throughout the disease evolution showed that both groups gained weight, mainly after the 22nd week of life. This is likely due to a generalized edema resulting from glomerulonephritis (55).

Glomerulonephritis is the most common kidney impairment in sick animals and the most important cause of death (55), and protein loss in the urine is the best evidence of such an impairment. In the present study, there was a progressive loss of protein in the urine for both groups, with a distinct increase on the 37th week, reaching average levels of 37 mg/day, i.e., a 10-fold increase. This finding is in agreement with the literature, which indicates a massive protein loss from the eighth month of life on (26, 55).

The average life span was similar for both groups, 38 and 40 wk for control and SD groups, respectively. This result is in accordance with an extensive review published by Theofilopoulos and Dixon (55), who reported the survival rate of several mouse strains of lupus. For NZB/NZW F1 mice, the survival rate of females, which exhibit accelerating factors such as high ANA titers and the presence of anti-DNA antibodies, varied from 36 to 39 wk. Anti-DNA antibodies production in the NZB/NZW F1 model occurs later in life, approximately between the fourth and fifth months of age, with the highest prevalence on the ninth month, and rarely before the second month of life. Even though this is seldom, some cases can be found in the early period (55). These antibodies are particularly important due to their nephritogenic properties. An immunofluorescence and kidney eluate study (22) has indicated that DNA and its antibody of the IgG class are deposited in the kidney. Moreover, there is a significant correlation between the onset of clinical symptoms and switch from IgM to IgG, and this alteration is more pronounced in females (38, 50).

The present results showed that SD accelerated the production of circulating ANA. The mechanisms by which SD affects the immune system are not completely understood, but systems that regulate immune activity are also affected by SD, such as the endocrine system. For instance, Everson and Crowley (12) believe that the reduction of immune activity after SD is due to decreased secretion of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL). Lange and colleagues (23) observed that SD subjects who exhibited low production of antibodies also showed low GH and PRL levels. Therefore, PRL appears to be important for the integrity of the immune system. Several studies using SLE attribute to PRL a disease-triggering or -stimulating effect. There is a positive correlation between PRL concentrations and the increase of anti-DNA antibodies (33). In NZB/NZW F1 mice, PRL is immune stimulating, and modest elevations of blood concentrations lead to hyper-{gamma}-globulinemia and an augmented production of immune complexes, resulting in glomerulonephritis and, ultimately, death (30). In addition, female mice whose PRL secretion is inhibited by treatment with bromocriptine display a postponed onset of SLE (29). Although the literature indicates that SD reduces PRL secretion, there is no report on its effect in NZB/NZW F1 mice; nonetheless, PRL seems to be deleterious to these mice.

Some studies have indicated that sleep loss alters immune response-related parameters, such as cytokine levels. Recently, a study (17) showed that SD induced the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, TNF, and IL-6. As reviewed by Kishimoto and Hirano (20), abnormal IL-6 production results in polyclonal B cell activation and the occurrence of autoimmune features. IL-6 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of murine lupus, because NZB/NZW F1 mice exhibit elevated levels of this cytokine, and their lymphocytes are also hyperresponsive to IL-6 (1). In addition, Mihara and coworkers (31) have shown that blockade of IL-6 receptors inhibited the development of the disease in these mice and that the administration of recombinant IL-6 exacerbated glomerulonephritis (44). Given that this cytokine is harmful to SLE, it is possible to speculate that SD induced an increase in IL-6 levels in NZB/NZW F1 mice, resulting in an earlier onset of the disease. Another interesting finding that might explain the increased production of ANA, which was reported by Everson (10), is that clinical immune parameters measured after SD in rats suggest the activation of mechanisms associated with innate immunity and responses by B lymphocytes that are consistent with polyclonal activation. Various reports (14, 46, 58, 60) have shown that the acceleration of autoimmune disease is associated to polyclonal activation of B cells. On the basis of these studies together with the present results, we do not believe that SD can be conceptualized as being only immunosuppressive condition. It is difficult to draw any firm conclusions about the effects of SD on the immune system. SD involves, to variable degrees, imposition of nonspecific stress, which may interact with the effects attributable to sleep loss per se. Discrepancies in literature may be related at least in part to technical approaches and the duration of SD. It is difficult to compare results of different deprivation protocols and durations, but it is known that the principal approaches used in the literature (disk over water, platform, and gentle handling) in fact induce SD. Despite these limitations, there is emerging evidence that in rodents chronic sleep loss is detrimental rather than acute sleep loss.

Some studies (5, 39, 59) have suggested that high levels of life stress precede the disease outbreak or exacerbation in patients with SLE. In an experimental model, Chida et al. (7) demonstrated that social isolation stress exacerbates autoimmune disease in MRL/lpr mice. However, the potential physiological mechanisms that could justify such an association remain to be clarified. It is difficult to determine exactly which pathway is being altered by stress. Even if it is an immune pathway, it must be altered in a direction that will lead to disease onset or exacerbation. Several lines of evidence support the notion that SD is a stressful stimulus. Both ACTH and corticosterone levels are increased after SD (36, 45, 51). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the increased ANA production observed after SD may be mediated by activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Although the exact mechanism of the stressor-induced increased susceptibility to the development of an autoimmune disease is not known, some possible explanations can be offered. As reviewed by Rabin (40), it is possible that stress hormones alter the kinetics of maturation of B lymphocytes so that there is a shorter window of opportunity for B lymphocytes to become tolerant to self-antigens. Besides, it is possible that the hormonal responses to stress alter the interactions between the cells that are responsible for the induction of tolerance of T lymphocytes, resulting in an increased number of autoreactive T cells.

Several studies using different deprivation paradigms have shown significant alterations in immune markers in response to SD. Such data do not necessarily provide an indicator of how SD impacts on immune function and how impaired is an organism. However, recent important studies evaluated the functional integrity of the immune system in a SD condition. Spiegel et al. (49) and Lange et al. (23) have reported that the response to influenza or hepatitis A vaccination may be impaired in individuals with chronic sleep restriction. Such data are so relevant, inasmuch as the antibody response to vaccination constitutes a valid tool to assess the impact of SD on adaptive immune functioning. In the same way, the present results demonstrate clearly that the SD accelerated the timing of autoantibody production; thus, sleep loss affects host outcome and may be harmful to the host. This study provides valuable information regarding how sleep loss can impact the autoimmune disease process.

In conclusion, the present data indicate that SD is capable of accelerating the onset of lupus in NZB/NZW F1 mice, considering ANA production as the end point. This result emphasizes the importance of adequate sleep in SLE, in which chronic sleep disturbances are reported. Despite the fact that SD exerted a triggering effect, it did not alter the evolution or severity of the disease, suggesting an acute impact. Drawing of such a conclusion was only possible because we performed a prolonged followup observation of SD effects on the immune system; most studies have assessed only the acute effects, which may be misleading in respect of the impact of sleep loss on autoimmune diseases.


   GRANTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
REFERENCES
 
Research support was provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Grants FAPESP/CEPID-01/07263-0 and 98/14303-3 and by the Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Psicofarmacologia.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Frida Zaladek Gil for the analysis of proteinuria and Flávia Cristaldi for IIF assays. We also acknowledge the care of the animals and technical assistance provided by Tomé Pimentel. The authors thank Dr. Deborah Suchecki for critically reading the manuscript and for useful comments.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. D. Palma, Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 862-1° andar, 04023-062 Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil (e-mail: biapalma{at}uol.com.br)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Moller G, and Fernandez C. Age-dependent responsiveness to interleukin-6 in B lymphocytes from a systemic lupus erythematosus prone (NZB x NZW)F1 hybrid. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 62: 264–269, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Benca RM and Quintans J. Sleep and host defense: a review. Sleep 20: 1027–1037, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Bergmann BM, Everson CA, Kushida CA, Fang VS, Leitch CA, Schoeller DA, Refetoff S, and Rechtschaffen A. Sleep deprivation in the rat: V. Energy use and mediation. Sleep 12: 31–34, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bland JM and Altman DG. Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). BMJ 317: 1572, 1998.[Free Full Text]
  5. Blumenfield M. Psychological aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus. Prim Care 5: 159–171, 1978.[Medline]
  6. Casey FB, Eisenberg J, Peterson D, and Pieper D. Altered antigen uptake and distribution due to exposure to extreme environmental temperatures or sleep deprivation. J Reticuloendothel Soc 15: 87–95, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Chida Y, Sudo N, and Kubo C. Social isolation stress exacerbates autoimmune disease in MRL/lpr mice. J Neuroimmunol 158: 138–144, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Da Costa D, Dobkin PL, Pinard L, Fortin PR, Danoff DS, Esdaile JM, and Clarke AE. The role of stress in functional disability among women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study. Arthritis Care Res 12: 112–119, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Dinges DF, Douglas SD, Zaugg L, Campbell DE, McMann JM, Whitehouse WG, Orne EC, Kapoor SC, Icaza E, and Orne MT. Leukocytosis and natural killer cell function parallel neurobehavioral fatigue induced by 64 hours of sleep deprivation. J Clin Invest 93: 1930–1939, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Everson CA. Clinical assessment of blood leukocytes, serum cytokines, and serum immunoglobulins as responses to sleep deprivation in laboratory rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R1054–R1063, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Everson CA, Bergmann BM, and Rechtschaffen A. Sleep deprivation in the rat. III. Total sleep deprivation. Sleep 12: 13–21, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Everson CA and Crowley WR. Reductions in circulating anabolic hormones induced by sustained sleep deprivation in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286: E1060–E1070, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Everson CA and Toth LA. Systemic bacterial invasion induced by sleep deprivation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: R905–R916, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Haraldsson MK, dela Paz NG, Kuan JG, Gilkeson GS, Theofilopoulos AN, and Kono DH. Autoimmune alterations induced by the New Zealand Black Lbw2 locus in BWF1 mice. J Immunol 174: 5065–5073, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Henry RJ, Sobel C, and Segalove M. Turbidimetric determination of proteins with sulfosalicyclic and thrichloracetic acids. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 92: 748–751, 1956.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Hipólide DC, Suchecki D, de Carvalho Pinto AP, Chiconelli Faria E, Tufik S, and Luz J. Paradoxical sleep deprivation and sleep recovery: effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, energy balance and body composition of rats. J Neuroendocrinol 18: 231–238, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Hu J, Chen Z, Gorczynski CP, Gorczynski LY, Kai Y, Lee L, Manuel J, and Gorczynski RM. Sleep-deprived mice show altered cytokine production manifest by perturbations in serum IL-1ra, TNFa, and IL-6 levels. Brain Behav Immun 17: 498–504, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Jouvet D, Vimont P, Delorme F, and Jouvet M. Study of selective deprivation of the paradoxal sleep phase in the cat. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 158: 756–759, 1964.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Jungers P, Dougados M, Pellissier C, Kuttenen F, Tron F, Lesavre P, and Bach JF. Influence of oral contraceptive therapy on the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 25: 618, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Kishimoto T and Hirano T. Molecular regulation of B lymphocyte response. Annu Rev Immunol 6: 485–512, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Kripke DF, Garfinkel L, Wingard DL, Klauber MR, and Marler MR. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59: 131–136, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lambert PH and Dixon FJ. Pathogenesis of the glomerulonephritis of NZB/W mice. J Exp Med 127: 507–522, 1968.[Abstract]
  23. Lange T, Perras B, Fehm HL, and Born J. Sleep enhances the human antibody responses to hepatitis A vaccination. Psychosom Med 65: 831–835, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lashley FR. A review of sleep in selected immune and autoimmune disorders. Holist Nurs Pract 17: 65–80, 2003.[Medline]
  25. Lechner O, Hu Y, Jafarian-Tehrani M, Dietrich H, Schwarz S, Herold M, Haour F, and Wick G. Disturbed immunoendocrine communication via the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in murine lupus. Brain Behav Immun 10: 337–350, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Matsumoto K, Watanabe N, Akikusa B, Kurasawa K, Matsumura R, Saito Y, Iwamoto I, and Saito T. Fc receptor-independent development of autoimmune glomerulonephritis in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice. Arthritis Rheum 48: 486–494, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. McKinley PS, Ouellette SC, and Winkel GH. The contributions of disease activity, sleep patterns, and depression to fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. A proposed model. Arthritis Rheum 38: 826–834, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. McMurray RW. Estrogen, prolactin, and autoimmunity: actions and interactions. Int Immunol 1: 995–1008, 2001.
  29. McMurray R, Keisler D, Izui S, and Walker SE. Hyperprolactinemia in male NZB/NZW (B/W) F1 mice: accelerated autoimmune disease with normal circulating testosterone. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 71: 338–343, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. McMurray R, Keisler D, Kanuckel K, Izui S, and Walker SE. Prolactin influences autoimmune disease activity in the female B/W mouse. J Immunol 147: 3780–3787, 1991.[Abstract]
  31. Mihara M, Takagi N, Takeda Y, and Ohsugi Y. IL-6 receptor blockage inhibits the onset of autoimmune kidney disease in NZB/NZWF1 mice. Clin Exp Immunol 112: 397–402, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Moldofsky H, Lue FA, Davidson JR, and Gorczynski R. Effects of sleep deprivation on human immune functions. FASEB J 3: 1972–1977, 1989.[Abstract]
  33. Neidhart M. Elevated serum prolactin or elevated prolactin/cortisol ratio are associated with autoimmune process in systemic lupus erythematosus and other connective tissue diseases. J Rheumatol 23: 476–481, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Opp MR and Toth LA. Neural-immune interactions in the regulation of sleep. Front Biosci 8: d768–d779, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Ostensen M. Sex hormones and pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann NY Acad Sci 876: 131–143, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Palma BD, Suchecki D, and Tufik S. Differential effects of acute cold and footshock on the sleep of rats. Brain Res 861: 97–104, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Palmblad J, Cantell K, Strander H, Froberg J, Karlsson CG, Levi L, and Granstrom M. Stressor exposure and immunological response in man: interferon-producing capacity and phagocytosis. J Psychosom Res 20: 193–199, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Papoian R, Pillarisetty R, and Talal N. Immunological regulation of spontaneous antibodies to DNA and RNA. II. Sequential switch from IgM to IgG in NZB/NZW F1 mice. Immunology 32: 75–79, 1977.[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Peralta-Ramirez MI, Jiménez-Alonso J, Godoy-García JF, and Perez-García M. The effects of daily stress and stressful life events on the clinical symptomatology of patients with lupus erythematosus. Psychosom Med 66: 788–794, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Rabin BS. Can stress participate in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease? J Adolesc Health 30: 71–75, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Riley V. Adaptation of orbital technic to rapid serial blood studies. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 104: 751–754, 1960.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Rubin RL. Drug-induced lupus. Toxicology 209: 135–147, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Russ V and Hochberg MC. The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. In: Dubois’ Lupus Erythematosus, edited by Wallace DJ and Han BH. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001, p. 65–83.
  44. Ryffel B, Car BD, Gunn H, Roman D, Hiestand P, and Mihatsch MJ. Interleukin-6 exacerbates glomerulonephritis in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice. Am J Pathol 144: 927–937, 1994.[Abstract]
  45. Sgoifo A, Buwalda B, Roos M, Costoli T, Merati G, and Meerlo P. Effects of sleep deprivation on cardiac autonomic and pituitary-adrenocortical stress reactivity in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31: 197–208, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Sherer Y, Gorstein A, Fritzler MJ, and Shoenfeld Y. Autoantibody explosion in systemic lupus erythematosus: more than 100 different antibodies found in SLE patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34: 501–537, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Silva RH, Abílio VC, Takatsu AL, Kameda SR, Grassl C, Chehin AB, Medravo WA, Calzavara MB, Registro S, Andersen ML, Machado RB, Carvalho RC, Ribeiro de A R, Tufik S, and Frussa-Filho R. Role of hippocampal oxidative stress in memory deficits induced by sleep deprivation in mice. Neuropharmacology 46: 895–903, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Sinico RA, Bollini B, Sabadini E, Di Toma L, and Radice A. The use of laboratory tests in diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Nephrol 15: S20–S27, 2002.
  49. Spiegel K, Sheridan JF, and Van Cauter E. Effect of sleep deprivation on response to immunization. JAMA 288: 1471–1472, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  50. Steward MW and Hay FC. Changes in immunoglobulin class and subclass of anti-DNA antibodies with increasing age in N/ZBW F1 hybrid mice. Clin Exp Immunol 26: 363–370, 1976.[Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Suchecki D, Lobo LL, Hipolide DC, and Tufik S. Increased ACTH and corticosterone secretion induced by different methods of paradoxical sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res 7: 276–281, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Suchecki D and Tufik S. Social stability attenuates the stress in the modified multiple platform method for paradoxical sleep deprivation in the rat. Physiol Behav 68: 309–316, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Sweet JJ, Doninger NA, Zee PC, and Wagner LI. Factors influencing cognitive function, sleep, and quality of life in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of the literature. Clin Neuropsychol 18: 132–147, 2004.[Web of Science][Medline]
  54. Tench CM, McCurdie I, White PD, and D’Cruz DP. The prevalence and associations of fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 39: 1249–1254, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Theofilopoulos AN and Dixon FJ. Murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus. Adv Immunol 37: 269–390, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  56. Valencia-Flores M, Resendiz M, Castano VA, Santiago V, Campos RM, Sandino S, Valencia X, Alcocer J, Ramos GG, and Bliwise DL. Objective and subjective sleep disturbances in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 42: 2189–2193, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Vyse TJ and Kotzin BL. Genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Annu Rev Immunol 16: 261–292, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  58. Ye YL, Suen JL, Chen YY, and Chiang BL. Phenotypic and functional analysis of activated B cells of autoimmune NZB x NZW F1 mice. Scand J Immunol 47: 122–126, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  59. Wallace DJ. The role of stress and trauma in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 16: 153–157, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  60. Wellmann U, Werner A, and Winkler TH. Altered selection processes of B lymphocytes in autoimmune NZB/W mice, despite intact central tolerance against DNA. Eur J Immunol 31: 2800–2810, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  61. Wingard DL and Berkman LF. Mortality risk associated with sleeping patterns among adults. Sleep 6: 102–107, 1983.[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Zager, M. L. Andersen, F. S. Ruiz, I. B. Antunes, and S. Tufik
Effects of acute and chronic sleep loss on immune modulation of rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R504 - R509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/R1527    most recent
00186.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palma, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tufik, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palma, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tufik, S.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.