AJP - Regu Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292: R150-R159, 2007. First published July 13, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00769.2005
0363-6119/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/R150    most recent
00769.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.

CALL FOR PAPERS
Physiology and Pharmacology of Temperature Regulation

The median preoptic nucleus is involved in the facilitation of heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during systemic salt loading in rats

Masahiro Konishi,1 Kazuyuki Kanosue,2 Masumi Kano,3 Akiko Kobayashi,2 and Kei Nagashima3,4,5

1Department of Physiology, Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan; 2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Sports Sciences and 3Department of Integrative Physiology, Health and Welfare, Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan; 4Consolidated Research Institute for Advanced Science and Medical Care, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan; and 5Advanced Research Center for Human Sciences, Waseda University; Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Submitted 1 November 2005 ; accepted in final form 3 July 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Systemic salt loading has been reported to facilitate operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior. In the present study, we hypothesized that the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) would be involved in this mechanism. Rats were divided into two groups (n = 6 each): one group had the MnPO lesion with ibotenic acid (4.0 µg) and the other was the vehicle control. After subcutaneous injection (10 ml/kg) of either isotonic- (154 mM) or hypertonic-saline (2,500 mM), each rat was placed in a behavior box, where the ambient temperature was changed to 26°C, 35°C, and 40°C every 1 h. The position of a rat in the box and the body core temperature (Tcore) were monitored. A rat could trigger 0°C air for 45 s in the 35°C and 40°C heat when moved in a specific area in the box (operant behavior). In the control group, counts of the operant behavior were greater (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than in the isotonic-saline injection (17 ± 2 and 10 ± 2 at 35°C, 24 ± 2 and 18 ± 1 at 40°C). Tcore remained unchanged throughout the exposure, although the level was lower (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than in the isotonic-saline trial (36.6 ± 0.2°C and 37.4 ± 0.1°C at 26°C and 36.9 ± 0.2°C and 37.4 ± 0.1°C at 40°C, respectively). However, in the MnPO-lesion group, counts of the behavior were similar between the hypertonic- and isotonic-saline injection trials (10 ± 2 and 8 ± 1 at 35°C, and 17 ± 1 and 16 ± 1 at 40°C, respectively). Tcore increased (P < 0.05) in the heat in both trials (36.8 ± 0.1°C and 37.4 ± 0.1°C at 26°C and 37.4 ± 0.2°C and 37.8 ± 0.2°C at 40°C in the hypertonic- and isotonic-saline injection trials, respectively). These results may suggest that, at least in part, the MnPO is involved in the facilitation of heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during osmotic stimulation.

osmolality; body temperature; operant behavior; lesion


IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT increases in osmolality and Na+ concentration in the plasma and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) modulate thermoregulation in mammals (3, 4, 14, 46, 48). For example, both evaporative and nonevaporative heat loss processes, such as panting in dogs (2) and tail skin vasodilatation in rats (30), are attenuated during systemic salt loading. In contrast, systemic salt loading facilitates heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in rats (22, 33) and pigeons (5). Despite this physiological evidence demonstrating the modulation of thermoregulatory responses during osmotic stimulation, the underlying mechanism remains little known.

The preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus (PO/AH) contains abundant warm-sensitive neurons (35), which are involved in various autonomic and behavioral thermoregulatory processes (12, 13, 19, 31, 42, 43). It is generally considered that activation of the warm-sensitive neurons facilitates both autonomic and behavioral responses against the heat. Baker and Doris (3, 4) first reported that osmotic stimulation attenuates evaporative heat loss at the level of the hypothalamus. Nakashima et al. (34) showed that, in an in vitro slice of rat brain, the warm-sensitive neurons in the medial PO (MPO) lower the firing rate in a hyperosmotic medium. These results suggest that osmotic stimulation attenuates the central thermosensitivity to heat, resulting in the suppression of autonomic heat loss responses. However, this speculation would not be the case in heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior. Hori et al. (13) reported that activation of the warm-sensitive neurons in the MPO was also related to operant cold-seeking behavior in monkeys. However, if activation of the warm-sensitive neurons directly determined the behavioral response to the heat, the osmotic stimulus should have attenuated the operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in our previous studies. Therefore, we surmised that a brain region other than the MPO would be involved in the facilitation of heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during systemic salt loading.

Systemic salt loading exerts several actions through the brain mechanisms at the lamina terminalis (LT), including the subfornical organ (SFO), the organum vasculosum lamina terminalis (OVLT), and the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) (7, 24, 26, 28). For example, the LT modulates blood pressure, water and salt intakes, vasopressin secretion, and renal Na+ excretion during increases in extracellular osmolality and/or Na+ (11, 25, 27, 51). Intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline activates Fos expression in the nuclei in the LT, reflected by neural activity (36, 37). In particular, neurons in the MnPO also respond to brain temperature (49). Heat exposure increases Fos expression in the MnPO (23), and the combination of heat and osmotic stimuli additively augments the Fos expression (38). Moreover, the MnPO receives the information regarding blood volume (1), which is another factor affecting thermoregulation (8, 14, 15). Therefore, in the present study, we hypothesized that the MnPO would be one of sites involved in the facilitation of heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during osmotic stimulation. To test this hypothesis, we assessed operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior of rats, in which the MnPO lesion was induced with ibotenic acid. We assumed that the facilitation of behavior would be blunted in the MnPO-lesion animals.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Male crj-Wistar rats (n = 32, 240–260 g; Charles River Japan, Osaka, Japan) were used in the present study. Rats were housed individually at an ambient temperature (Ta) of 23 ± 1°C in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 0700) and had free access to food and water. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, and conformed to the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

Surgical preparations. Under general an anesthesia induced by an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal, 50 mg/kg; Dainippon, Osaka, Japan), the salivary ducts of the parotid and major sublingual and submaxillary glands were bilaterally ligated, and the glands were removed to minimize active evaporative heat loss. It has been reported that the submaxillary gland is the most important for evaporative heat loss in the heat (10). As reported in our previous study (32), rats without these major salivary glands could not control their body temperature during a heat exposure at 40°C. However, when behavioral process (i.e., heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior) is available, the rats can control body temperature in the environment. A radio transmitter (15 x 30 x 8 mm; Physiotel, Data Science, St. Paul, MN) was placed in the peritoneal cavity for the measurement of body core temperature (Tcore). To produce a chemical lesion of the MnPO, the skull was incised, and a small hole was opened. A 30-gauge injection cannula (Unique Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was stereotaxically inserted into the brain through the hole. The coordinates used were 0.0 mm anteroposterior (AP), 6.5 mm dorsoventral (DV), and 0.0 mm mediolateral (ML) relative to the bregma (39). Ibotenic acid [a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-isoxazolyl acetic acid, 4.0 µg in 0.8 µl PBS (pH 7.4), n = 20; Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK] or the vehicle (0.8 µl; n = 12) was injected at the rate of 40 nl/min (CMA 100; Carnegie Medicin, Stockholm, Sweden). After the injection, the syringe was left in position for 10 min to prevent back flow. Another stainless steel cannula for intracerebroventricular injection (–0.9 mm AP, 3.5 mm DV, and 1.4 mm ML) was implanted in the right lateral ventricle and fixed to the skull with dental cement. To minimize postsurgical discomfort, lidocaine jelly (Xylocaine jelly; AstraZeneca, London, UK) was applied to the area of the closed incision. Desalivated rats showed postsurgical polydipsia (usually drank more than 150% of the paired control rats), and successful desalivation was verified by postmortem examination.

After a 2-wk recovery from the surgery, we selected rats in the MnPO-lesion group, based on water intake after intracerebroventricular injection of ANG II. It was reported that central administration of ANG II stimulates drinking behavior (24, 28), and chemical lesions of the MnPO attenuate this response (18). ANG II (10 ng·1.0 µl-1·100 g-1); [Sar1] ANG II, American Peptide, CA) was injected through the ventricular cannula, and water intake was measured for 30 min after the injection. Because it was difficult to conduct the MnPO lesion after the placement of the ventricular cannula, we just compared the water intake between the control and MnPO lesion rats. In the control rats, the volume of water intake after ANG II injection was 4.5 ± 0.2 ml/100 g. All of the MnPO-lesion rats drank less than this level; however, we used 15 out of 20 rats for the experiment, which drank water less than 60% of this average. Final judgment for successful lesion of the MnPO was made by histological analysis indicated later. Thus 12 out of 15 rats were selected as the MnPO-lesion group for analysis: their water intake was 0.1–2.7 ml/100 g (1.7 ± 0.4 ml/100 g in average). Water intake after the vehicle injection did not differ between the MnPO lesion (0.2 ± 0.1 ml/100 g) and control groups (0.3 ± 0.1 ml/100 g). For each rat in both groups, a silicone catheter (1.0 mm OD; Fuji Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was placed in the inferior vena cava through the femoral vein for blood sampling under general anesthesia, as described above. The other end was pulled out through the nape and plugged with a stainless steel rod. The catheter was flushed with heparinized saline (50 units/ml) daily to avoid clogging.

Experimental operant behavior system. The experimental system used for quantitative assessment of thermoregulatory behavior was reported previously (6). Briefly, the system comprised a Plexiglas box (50 x 10 x 30 cm) with many 1-cm holes in an environmental chamber (80 x 65 x 60 cm). The chamber was ventilated by either a warm (25–40°C) or cold (0–30°C) air-supply unit (CAU-210, Tabai Espec, Osaka, Japan), which was switched by computer-controlled valves. Five pairs of sensor-units located a freely moving rat to one of five 10 x 10 cm2 areas (area 1–5 from the left). Areas 4 and 5 were defined as the reward area: when a rat moved in the reward area during heat exposure at 35°C or 40°C, 0°C-air ventilated the chamber for 45 s (operant behavior). To receive another 0°C-air reward, the rat had to move out of the reward area and then back in again. Reentry to the reward area within 45 s of the previous reward did not trigger another reward. The Ta in the box and Tcore of a rat were continuously monitored with a thermocouple and by telemetry, respectively, and these data were stored on the same computer every 5 s. During the ventilation of 0°C air, the ambient temperature dropped to ~10°C. However, rats were not directly exposed to the 0°C air. Therefore, it is supposed that the cold air could not be a noxious stimulus (50), which modulates the cold-seeking behavior due to fear and pain. Moreover, Maruyama et al. (23) reported that this operant behavior did not increase Fos-IR cells in the supraoptic nucleus, amygdala, and lateral septum, which are observed during stress stimuli, such as immobilization and pain (44). At least 5 days after the venous catheter placement, a rat was put in the operant system set at 40°C for 2 h; this procedure was repeated 3 times with a 3-day interval (i.e., training session). All of the rats learned the operant behavior after this training session.

Experiment 1. Exposure to a 33°C environment without cold rewards. Twelve rats (the MnPO-lesion and control groups, n = 6 each) were used in this experiment. These rats did not learn the operant behavior but were placed in the operant system at 26°C with a similar time schedule to that of the training session. At 1000 on the experimental day, each rat was given subcutaneous injection (10 ml/kg) of either isotonic (154 mM NaCl) or hypertonic saline (2,500 mM NaCl) on its flank under local anesthesia with 0.5% lidocaine hydrochrolide (0.5 ml; Xylocaine). The injection was conducted with the rat loosely wrapped with a towel on the investigator's thigh. This procedure did not cause abnormal behavior, such as licking, biting, and scratching related to pain (21). Thirty minutes after the injection, the rat was put in the operant system set at 26°C for 60 min and then 33°C for another 90 min. The system was programmed, so as not to give cold air rewards. After a at least 1 wk of recovery, the rat repeated the same protocol with subcutaneous injection of the other tonicity of saline on the other side of the flank. The order of the two trials was randomized. Rats were deprived food and water during the experiment. After a 60-min exposure at 26°C, three rats in each group were also exposed to 35°C for 1 h, and then 40°C for another 1 h.

Experiment 2. Exposure to 35 and 40°C environments with cold rewards. For this experiment, the other 12 rats learning the operant behavior (the MnPO-lesion and control group, n = 6 each) were used. Either isotonic or hypertonic saline was injected into the rat in the same manner as in experiment 1. The rat was placed in the operant system set at 26°C for the first 60 min, and then the system (i.e., loading air temperature) was set at 35°C for 1 h and then 40°C for another 1 h. During the baseline period at 26°C, the valves were switched off not to give 0°C air. Although rats were exposed to 35°C and 40°C air, 0°C air was available for 45 s by the operant behavior. The same protocol with the saline injection of the other tonicity was repeated for each rat with a 1-wk interval at least.

Blood sampling and measurements. In experiments 1 and 2, body weight was measured at three different time points: 1) before subcutaneous saline injection, 2) 30 min after the injection (just before a rat was put in the experimental system), and 3) at the end of the experiment. In experiment 2, blood samples (0.3 ml) were taken through the venous catheter at the same time points. Plasma osmolality (freezing-point depression; One-Ten osmometer, Fiske, Norwood, MA) and Na+ concentration (flame photometry; Corning, Medfield, OR) in the blood were determined. Heamatocrit (Hct, microcentrifugation) and plasma protein concentration (PPC; refractometry, Atago, Tokyo, Japan) were measured to estimate the relative change in blood volume (29).

Histological analysis. At least 1 wk after experiment 1 or 2, all of the MnPO-lesion rats were given subcutaneous hypertonic-saline injection followed by a 2-h heat exposure at 35°C. Because both heat exposure and salt loading were reported to increase Fos expression in the MnPO (23, 3638), we assumed that the Fos response to the heat exposure and salt loading would be smaller in the lesion group of rats. In addition, 8 rats in the control group were divided into two subgroups (n = 4 each): one group received the isotonic saline injection followed by a 2-h heat exposure at 26°C, and the other received the hypertonic saline injection followed by a 2-h heat exposure at 35°C. Immediately after the exposure, each rat was killed by an intraperitoneal injection of a large dose of pentobarbital sodium (200 mg/kg) and was perfused transcardially with a fixative solution (300 ml, 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS). The brain was quickly removed and stored at 4°C in the fixative solution for 6 h and in 25% sucrose in PBS for another 48 h. Next, 40-µm coronal sections were prepared. The sections were reacted with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min and incubated with rabbit primary anti-Fos polyclonal IgG (1:4,000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 12 h. After rinsing with PBS, the sections were incubated again in biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:400 dilution; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 90 min, avidin-biotin complex (1:400 dilution; Vector Elite Kit, Burlingame, CA) for another 90 min, and then 0.02% diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in PBS. The sections were mounted on gelatin-coated glass slides, and counterstained with 0.02% thionin solution (Nissl stain), and then coverslipped. After digital images of the sections were captured (model E600; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan and model IK-TU; 42, Toshiba, Japan), Fos-IR cells in the MnPO, OVLT, SFO, and MPO were counted. In addition, the extension of the lesion was assessed by counting large cells (neural body) in the rostral, middle, and caudal part of the MnPO. We defined the large cell, of which diameter was larger than 10 µm. If the large cells resided in more than 50% of the control, the rat was excluded from the analysis. The mapping was conducted, based on the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (39). Fos-IR cells in the MnPO were counted in three consecutive sections around the injection level. Those in the MPO were also counted in the rostral, middle, and caudal parts. Counting was conducted by a person who was not informed of the details of the experiment.

Statistical analysis. Differences among means in water intake, Tcore, counts of the operant behavior, Ta, body weight, blood parameters, and counts of Fos-IR cells were assessed by ANOVA with repeated measurements or one-way ANOVA. A post hoc test to identify a significant difference at a specific time point was performed by the Newman-Keuls procedure. A null hypothesis was rejected at the level of P < 0.05. All values were presented as means ± SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment 1. Exposure to a 33°C environment without cold-air rewards. Figure 1 shows Tcore during the 33°C exposure (A) and the change from the baseline (the average for the latter 30 min during 26°C exposure, {Delta}Tcore; B and C) in the control and MnPO-lesion groups with the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline injections. In the isotonic-saline trial, the baseline Tcore was similar in the two groups (37.5 ± 0.1°C). Although Tcore in the control group remained at the level throughout the 33°C exposure, Tcore in the MnPO-lesion group became higher (P < 0.05) than that in the control group at 45–90 min (Fig. 1A; 38.0 ± 0.1°C and 37.5 ± 0.1°C at 90 min, respectively). The baseline Tcore in the hypertonic-saline trial was also similar in both groups (36.3 ± 0.1°C), but lower (P < 0.05) than the values in the isotonic-saline trial. In contrast to the isotonic-saline trial, Tcore in the hypertonic-saline trial was lower (P < 0.05) in the MnPO-lesion group than the control group at 50–90 min.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Body core temperature (Tcore) (A) and the change from the baseline ({Delta}Tcore; B, C) in experiment 1. Tcore is shown as an average for every 5 min during a 90-min exposure at 33°C after a 60-min exposure at 26°C. {Delta}Tcore denotes change in Tcore from the baseline (the average in the last 30 min of the 26°C exposure). Data are shown as means ± SE (n = 6). {dagger},{ddagger}Significant difference between the control and median preoptic nucleus (MnPO)-lesion groups in the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials, respectively, P < 0.05. *Significant difference between the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials in the control group, P < 0.05.

 
In the control group {Delta}Tcore was greater (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial at 30–90 min (by 1.5 ± 0.1°C at 90 min; Fig. 1B). However, {Delta}Tcore was not different between the two trials in the MnPO-lesion group throughout the 33°C exposure (Fig. 1C).

There was no difference in Tcore between the MnPO-lesion and control rats (n = 3 each) exposed to 35°C for 1 h and 40°C heat for another 1 h without operant behavior. In both groups, Tcore similarly elevated during a 1-h exposure at 35°C (38.5 ± 0.1°C and 38.4 ± 0.1°C at the end in the MnPO-lesion and control groups, respectively). Under the heat at 40°C, Tcore in both the control and MnPO-lesion groups surpassed 40.0°C; thus we stopped the experiment at 25 ± 2 min and 24 ± 2 min after the onset, respectively.

Experiment 2. Exposure to 35 and 40°C environments with cold-air rewards. Figure 2 illustrates examples of the operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior with Tcore and Ta in the isotonic- (A and C) and hypertonic-saline (B and D) trials in the control (A and B) and MnPO-lesion (C and D) groups. No rat moved much in the behavior box during the latter 30 min of 26°C exposure; however, the animals periodically went in and out of the reward area during the 35°C and 40°C exposure. In all of the examples, operant behavior increased with an increase in the loading temperature. In the control rat, the operant behavior seemed to be augmented in the hypertonic-saline trial (Fig. 2A and B), compared with that in the isotonic-saline trial. However, this response appeared to be less in the MnPO-lesion rats (Fig. 2, C and D).


Figure 2
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Examples of the operant behavior in experiment 2. Typical examples of the operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials of the control (A, B) and MnPO-lesion groups (C, D). POS denotes the position of a rat (area 1–5) in the behavior box; Tcore and the ambient temperature (Ta) in the box were continuously monitored. Each rat basically stayed still during the latter 30 min of the baseline period at 26°C. 0°C-air reward was given for 45 s when a rat entered the reward area in the box (areas 4 and 5 shown by the shaded area) during 35 and 40°C exposure. Rats periodically moved in and out of the reward area and received cold-air rewards. In the baseline period, the temperature of the reward air was set at 26°C.

 
Figure 3 shows the average Tcore and Ta and counts of the operant behavior in the last 30 min during 26°C exposure (baseline) and each 30 min during the 35°C and 40°C exposure in the control and MnPO-lesion groups. Similar to experiment 1, the baseline Tcore in the control group was lower (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic than the isotonic-saline trial (Fig. 3A). Tcore in each trial did not change from the baseline in the heat. The baseline counts during the 26°C exposure (i.e., nonspecific movement) was similar in both trials (2 ± 1 and 4 ± 1 in the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials, respectively; Fig. 3B). Operant behavior increased (P < 0.05) with an increase in the loading temperature in each trial; however, the counts were greater (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial (17 ± 2 and 10 ± 1 at 35°C, and 24 ± 2 and 18 ± 1 at 40°C, respectively). The average Ta in the hypertonic- and isotonic-saline trials was 29.5 ± 0.9°C and 32.5 ± 0.2°C at 30–60 min (in 35°C heat), and 31.2 ± 0.5°C and 33.6 ± 0.6°C at 90–120 min (in 40°C heat), respectively (Fig. 3C).


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Tcore (A), counts of the operant behavior (B) and Ta (C) in experiment 2. Tcore and Ta were averaged, and the operant behavior was counted during the latter 30 min of the baseline period at 26°C, and every 30 min of the 35°C and 40°C exposure. Data were shown as means ± SE (n = 6). The rats in both the control (A, B, C) and MnPO-lesion groups (D, E, F) had the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials with a 1-wk interval. *Significant difference between the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials, P < 0.05. {dagger}Significant difference from the baseline value in each trial, P < 0.05. {ddagger}Significant difference from the value in the latter 30 min of the 35°C heat, P < 0.05. §Significant difference between the control and MnPO-lesion groups in the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials, P < 0.05.

 
In the MnPO-lesion group, Tcore in each trial increased (P < 0.05) from the baseline during the 35°C and 40°C exposure. However, Tcore remained lower (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial throughout the experiment (37.4 ± 0.1°C and 37.7 ± 0.2°C at 120 min, respectively; Fig. 3D). The counts of operant behavior were similar in the two trials (2 ± 1 and 3 ± 1 in the baseline, 8 ± 1 and 10 ± 1 at 35°C, and 16 ± 1 and 17 ± 1 at 40°C in the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline trials, respectively; Fig. 3E). The average Ta was 32.1 ± 0.5°C and 31.4 ± 0.5°C at 35°C, and 33.8 ± 0.7°C and 33.8 ± 0.3°C at 40°C in the hypertonic- and isotonic-saline trial, respectively; Fig. 3F).

Tcore and the counts of the operant behavior in the isotonic-saline trial were not different between the control and MnPO-lesion groups. Although, in the hypertonic-saline trial, Tcore was also similar in the two groups, the counts of operant behavior were smaller in the MnPO-lesion group.

Changes in body weight and blood parameters. In experiments 1 and 2, body weight before subcutaneous saline injection was lower (P < 0.05) in the MnPO-lesion than the control group, although they were the same age in weeks (330 ± 8 g and 400 ± 8 g in experiment 1 and 343 ± 7 and 401 ± 9 in experiment 2, respectively). In experiment 2, percent reduction of body weight was greater (P < 0.05) in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial in the two groups (5 ± 1% and 1 ± 1% in the control, and 4 ± 1% and 1 ± 1% in the MnPO-lesion group, respectively). Baseline osmolality and Na+ concentration in the plasma were greater (P < 0.05) in the MnPO-lesion than the control group (Table 1). The two parameters in the isotonic-saline trial remained unchanged in the control group. In the MnPO-lesion group, plasma osmolality decreased to the level in the control group (301 ± 2 mosmol/kg·H2O) 30 min after the isotonic-saline injection and returned to the preinjection level at the end of experiment. Osmolality and Na+ concentration in the plasma in the hypertonic-saline trial increased (P < 0.05) 30 min after the injection in both groups (321 ± 2 mOsm/kg·H2O) and 331 ± 2 mOsm/kg·H2O) in osmolality, and 156 ± 1 mmol/l and 160 ± 2 mmol/l in Na+ concentration in the control and MnPO-lesion group, respectively), and remained unchanged until the end of the experiment. Estimated from changes in Hct and PPC, blood volume in each group increased (P < 0.05) 30 min after the isotonic- and hypertonic-saline injections (5 ± 2% and 6 ± 2% in the control group, and 5 ± 2% and 4 ± 1% in the MnPO-lesion group, respectively). At the end of the experiment, blood volume in the isotonic-saline trial returned to the baseline level (1 ± 2% and 2 ± 1% in the control and MnPO-lesion groups, respectively); however, that in the hypertonic-saline trial remained increased (6 ± 3% and 5 ± 1% in the control and MnPO-lesion groups, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Plasma osmolality and sodium concentration in experiment 2

 
Histological analysis. Photo images of the brain sections in the control and MnPO-lesion rats are shown in Fig. 4. Counts of Fos-IR cells in the MnPO, OVLT, SFO, and MPO were summarized in Fig. 5. In the MnPO area, there are more Fos-IR cells in the control rats (Figs. 4A, a and c and 5A) but less in the MnPO-lesion rats (Fig. 4A, b and d). The glial cells (i.e., small cells) substituted for normal neurons in and around the MnPO area in the rats with an MnPO lesion. In the control group, counts of large cells (>10 µm in diameter) representing neurons were 210 ± 10, 329 ± 22, and 282 ± 25 in the rostral, middle, and caudal parts of the MnPO, respectively. In the MnPO-lesion group, the counts were 35 ± 8, 24 ± 8, 29 ± 10, respectively. In the lesion group, enlargement of the third ventricle and partial destruction of the anterior commissure were observed. However, we could find no apparent deformity of other neural areas and structures. In the control group with the hypertonic-saline injection and heat exposure, Fos-IR cells increased (P < 0.05; Fig. 5A). However, counts of Fos-IR cells were less (P < 0.05) in the MnPO-lesion rats with the same stimuli and were similar to those in the control group with the isotonic-saline injection and 26°C exposure. These histological differences in the MnPO area between the MnPO-lesion and control groups were correlated to the difference in water intake after the intraventricular ANG II injection. In the OVLT (Figs. 4B, a and b and 5B), SFO (Figs. 4C, a and b and 5C), and MPO (Figs. 4D, a and b and 5D), counts of Fos-IR cells in both groups were greater (P < 0.05) after the hypertonic-saline injection and 35°C heat; however, there were no differences in the counts between the two groups.


Figure 4
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Photoimages of the brain sections. Coronal sections, including the MnPO (A, a, c), organum vasculosum lamina terminalis (OVLT; B, a), subfornical organ (SFO; C, a), and medial preoptic area (MPO; D-a) in the control and those in MnPO-lesion rats (A-b, d; B-b; C-b; D-b, respectively). The images of the MnPO denote the dorsal (A-a, b) and ventral areas (A-c, d), and those of the MPO denote the rostral (D-a, b) and caudal areas (D-c, d). The rats were exposed to 35°C heat for 2 h following subcutaneous hypertonic-saline injection. Black dots in the sections indicate Fos-immunoreactive (IR) cells. fx, fornix; ac, anterior commissure; 3v, third ventricle.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Counts of Fos-immunoreactive cells in the brain sections. Counts of Fos-IR cells in the MnPO in three sections around the injection site (A), the OVLT (B), and SFO (C), and the rostral, middle, and caudal parts of the MPO (D). The sections were prepared for the control rats placed at 26°C for 2 h after subcutaenous isotonic-saline injection (control, ISO + 26°C; n = 6) or at 35°C for 2 h after subcutaneous hypertonic-saline injection (control, HTS + 35°C; n = 6), and for the MnPO-lesion rats placed at 35°C for 2 h after subcutaneous hypertonic-saline injection (MnPO-lesion, HTS + 35°C; n = 12). Values are means ± SE. *Significant difference between the two protocols in the control rats, P < 0.05. §Significant difference between the control and MnPO-lesion rats, which were exposed to the 35°C heat after the hypertonic-saline injection, P < 0.05.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we estimated the role of the MnPO in the facilitation of operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior after the hypertonic-saline injection. After the hypertonic-saline injection, rats in the control group could not maintain their body temperature at Ta of 33°C. When the operant behavior was available, they could regulate Tcore during 35°C and 40°C heat by increasing the operant behavior. On the contrary, these responses were abolished in the MnPO-lesion rats.

Experiment 1. Exposure to a 33°C environment without cold-air rewards. Previous studies have indicated an involvement of the MnPO in autonomic heat loss processes. Whyte and Johnson (52) showed that after the formation of lesions of the anteroventral third ventricle regions (AV3V), including the ventral MnPO and OVLT, salivary spreading during a 37°C exposure was attenuated in rats, resulting in an augmented rise in Tcore. Moreover, it was reported that the MnPO has multisynaptic efferent connections with autonomic preganglionic neurons controlling the salivary glands (16, 17) and tail vasculature (45) in rats by way of several preautonomic regions, including paraventricular mucleus, rostral ventrolateral or ventromedial medulla, and periaqueductal gray matter. In the present study, we used desalivated rats to minimize the evaporative process. The rats could not maintain their Tcore during the 35°C and 40°C exposures, regardless of the MnPO lesion. Even during exposure at 33°C, the reported upper limit of the thermoneutral range [22–34°C; (9)], Tcore in the MnPO-lesion group increased by 0.5°C in the isotonic-saline trial (Fig. 1B). This result may also indicate an involvement of the MnPO in dry heat loss processes.

The baseline Tcore at the Ta of 26°C was lower in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial in both the control and MnPO-lesion groups (Fig. 1A). We previously reported that, after the hypertonic-saline injection, Tcore decreased with metabolic rate, and an increase in metabolic rate during a cold exposure was attenuated (21). Therefore, it seems that Tcore is maintained lower in thermoneutral and cold environments during the osmotic stimulus, by the suppression of metabolic heat production. However, the present study indicates that the MnPO is not involved in the reduction of Tcore after the hypertonic-saline injection. {Delta}Tcore (i.e., the change from the baseline) during the 33°C exposure was greater in the hypertonic- than the isotonic-saline trial in the control group (Fig. 1B), but not in the MnPO-lesion group (Fig. 1C). It is well known that an increase in osmolality or Na+ in the plasma attenuates both evaporative and dry heat loss processes (24, 30, 46, 48). Because we used desalivated rats in this study, the greater {Delta}Tcore in the hypertonic-saline trial may be reflected by the suppression of dry heat loss processes. Tcore increased in the MnPO-lesion group during the 33°C exposure in the isotonic-saline trial, although the saline injection decreased plasma osmolality 30 min after the injection. Moreover, the increase in Tcore in the hypertonic-saline trial was largely attenuated in the MnPO-lesion group, despite greater increase in plasma osmolality. Thus the MnPO itself may control dry heat loss in part. Moreover, the MnPO responds to osmotic stimulation and attenuates dry heat loss processes.

Experiment 2. Exposure to 35°C and 40°C environments with cold-air rewards. Rats in both the control and the MnPO-lesion groups maintained their Tcore during the 35 and 40°C exposures when the operant behavior was readily available (Fig. 3). Moreover, the operant behavior increased with the loading temperature. These results suggest that skin temperature is a major trigger for the operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in both groups, although Tcore is considered to be another factor (13, 40, 42, 43).

Tcore and counts of behavior during the 35°C and 40°C exposure in the isotonic-saline trial were not different between the control and the MnPO-lesion groups (Fig. 3). Although Tcore in the control group remained unchanged throughout the experiment, that in the MnPO-lesion group increased during the 40°C exposure. Because the average Ta during 40°C exposure in the MnPO-lesion group (33.8 ± 0.3°C) was similar to the loading temperature in experiment 1 (i.e., 33°C), the increase in Tcore may be due to attenuation of the heat loss process as suggested above. In the normal osmotic condition, the role of the MnPO in the operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior would be small.

As we previously reported (32), the hypertonic-saline injection facilitated the operant behavior during the 35°C and 40°C exposure in the control group (Fig. 3B). Because of the increase in the operant behavior, the average Ta in the hypertonic-saline trial became lower than that in the isotonic-saline trial. This response would be important in thermoregulation during osmotic stimulation. When the operant behavior was not available, Tcore gradually increased even during the 33°C exposure (experiment 1, Fig. 1). The rats maintained Tcore during the 35°C and 40°C exposure by increasing the operant behavior (experiment 2; Figs. 2 and 3). However, in the MnPO-lesion group, there was no effect of the hypertonic-saline injection on operant behavior (Fig. 3E). These results suggest that the MnPO is involved in the facilitation of operant heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during osmotic stimulation. Because Tcore in the control group remained unchanged during operant behavior in both trials, osmotic stimulation may strengthen the thermal responsiveness to the increase in environmental temperature.

A possible explanation for the difference in behavior in the hypertonic-saline trial between the control and MnPO-lesion groups may be just a result of the difference in autonomic heat loss response. That is, greater attenuation in dry heat loss in the hypertonic-saline trial in the control group (Fig. 1B) augmented behavioral response to maintain body temperature, and less influence of hyperosmolality in the MnPO-lesion group on dry heat loss resulted in unchanged behavior (Fig. 1C). However, in the hypertonic-saline trial in the control group, the behavior was augmented and Tcore was maintained at lower level than the control. Moreover, different from the control group, Tcore increased from the baseline level without a change in the behavior in the isotonic-saline trial in the MnPO-lesion group. These results may indicate that the efficiency of dry heat loss response did not determine the behavior, as we have suggested in previous studies (21, 22, 32). Thus we suppose that the behavior responds to thermal inputs themselves, and the osmotic inputs to the MnPO modulate this response. Although we used desalivated rats, Rodland and Hainsworth (41) reported that, in normal rats, the role of salivation for total evaporative water loss was 0% at Ta of 30°C and 60% at 40°C. In the present study, rats controlled Ta around 29–34°C on average. Learning of the operant behavior was not much influenced by the desalivation in our preliminary finding. Thus evaporative heat loss may not affect the behavior much, either, and the behavior would be activated independently of autonomic heat loss responses.

Keil et al. (20) reported that, in rabbits, plasma vasopressin level during hypertonic-saline infusion was augmented by hypothalamic warming and was attenuated by hypothalamic cooling. In contrast, isotonic control had no effect of vasopressin level during the hypothalamic warming and cooling. A similar but weak effect was also observed in the corticosterone level. These results indicate that thermal stimulation may also strengthen the hormonal responses to osmotic stimulus. Together, with the results in the present study, there may be bidirectional connections between the mechanisms involved in thermo- and osmoregulations.

Histological analysis indicates that the increase in Fos-IR cells after the hypertonic-saline injection with 35°C heat was attenuated in the MnPO-lesion rats. However, in other organs in the LT, such as the OVLT and SFO, the counts of Fos-IR cells were not different between the control and MnPO-lesion groups. Moreover, 80–90% of neurons in the MnPO were successfully destroyed in the lesion group, although we estimated it only by counting large-size cells (>10 µm) in the area. Oldfield et al. (36, 37) reported that osmotic stress increased Fos expression in these nuclei in the LT, which is involved in body fluid regulation and blood pressure control (11, 25, 27, 51). The Fos expression in the MnPO also responds to the heat (23, 49). In the present study, we did not estimate separately the influence of the osmotic and heat stresses on the Fos expression. However, the results may suggest that the neural responses to the osmotic and/or heat stresses were similar in both the control and MnPO-lesion rats. Moreover, among the organs in the LT, the MnPO may play an important role in the modulation of the behavioral and/or autonomic thermoregulation in the heat by osmotic stimulus.

There was no difference in the counts of Fos-IR cells in the MPO between the MnPO-lesion and sham groups in the heat with osmotic stimulus, although the counts in each group increased from that in the control condition (i.e., at 26°C with isotonic-saline injection). This result may show that the activation of the MnPO due to the heat and/or osmotic stresses had little influence on that of the MPO. In an in vitro slice of rat brain, osmotic stimulation suppresses the activity of warm-sensitive neurons in the MPO (34). All the Fos-IR cells in the MPO would not be the warm-sensitive neurons. In addition, we did not test whether the Fos-IR cells in the heat decrease during the osmotic stress. However, the results may indicate that the change in the behavioral and/or autonomic responses during the osmotic stress did not reflect neural activities in the MPO, estimated by Fos expression. Thus we speculate that the MnPO does not modulate behavioral and/or autonomic thermoregulation just by transferring osmotic signal to the MPO but plays a specific role in the thermoregulatory modulation independent of the MPO.

Numerous studies have shown that several autonomic heat loss responses to the heat are suppressed during dehydration or systemic salt loading by the factors of hyperosmolality and/or hypernatremia (24, 30, 46, 48) and hypovolemia (8, 14, 15). It seems that most investigators explain this phenomenon as an upward shift of the set point Tcore for thermoregulation. Indeed, the threshold Tcore for evaporative and nonevaporative heat loss processes was reported to elevate during dehydration or salt loading (14, 30). The report by Nakashima et al. (34) that the activity of warm-sensitive neurons in the MPO was suppressed by osmotic stimulation tends to support this concept. On the other hand, we have reported that salt loading decreases Tcore, suppresses metabolic heat production to a cold stimulus (21), and increases heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in the heat (32). Therefore, the concept of an upward shift of the set point Tcore could not explain all of the thermoregulatory modulation during osmotic stimulation.

The study showed the importance of the MnPO in behavioral thermoregulation; however, the neural mechanism involved in the behavior remains unclear and how the MnPO affects it, also. Maruyama et al. (23) reported, using Fos immunostaining, an involvement of the MnPO, the dorsomedial hypothalamus, and the parastrial nucleus in the same operant behavior as we assessed in the present study. The dorsomedial hypothalamus receives neurons from the MnPO and the parastrial nucleus (47). In addition, the dorsomedial hypothalamus has telencephalic inputs from the ventral subiculum and the prefrontal cortex, which is related to behavior and memory. The dorsomedial hypothalamus is also known to be associated with heating-induced grooming in rats (53). Therefore, it may be supposed that the dorsomedial hypothalamus plays a key role in behavioral thermoregulation, and the MnPO has an influence on it.

Autonomic responses to the heat are suppressed during dehydration, that is, water depletion and increase in solute concentration in the body fluid compartments. However, the present study showed that there would be a specific mechanism activating thermal sensation and/or discomfort to the heat, that is, an increase in behavioral response, which prevents an increase in body temperature. Precise knowledge about such a mechanism might be applied to the prevention of heat stroke, for which dehydration is one possible factor.

In conclusion, the MnPO may play an important role in the facilitation of heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior during systemic salt loading in rats. In addition, the present data also indicate a possible role of the MnPO in the attenuation of dry heat loss response during osmotic stimulation. The MnPO may be a key area integrating the regulatory mechanisms of body temperature and fluid balance.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present study was supported partly by a Grant-in-Aid for Science Research from the Ministry of Education, Science Culture of Japan Grants 1705223 and 17390062, and Waseda University Grant 2004B-912.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. M. L. Mathai, R. M. McAllen, M. Tanaka, and M. J. McKinley in the Howard Florey Institute University of Melbourne for helpful comments.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Nagashima, Dept. of Integrative Physiology, Health and Welfare, Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda Univ., Tokorozawa, Saitama 359–1192, Japan (e-mail; k-nagashima{at}waseda.jp)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aradachi H, Honda K, Negoro H, and Kubota T. Median preoptic neurones projecting to the supraoptic nucleus are sensitive to haemodynamic changes as well as to rise in plasma osmolality in rats. J Neuroendocrinol 8: 35–43, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Baker MA and Dawson DD. Inhibition of thermal panting by intracarotid infusion of hypertonic saline in dogs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 249: R787–R791, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Baker MA and Doris PA. Control of evaporative heat loss during changes in plasma osmolality in the cat. J Physiol 328: 535–545, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Baker MA and Doris PA. Effect of dehydration on hypothalamic control of evaporation in the cat. J Physiol 322: 457–468, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Brummermann M and Rautenberg W. Influence of hyopohydration on autonomic and behavioral thermoregulation in pigeons. In: Thermal Physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1989, p. 679–683.
  6. Chen XM, Hosono T, Mizuno A, Yoda T, Yoshida K, Aoyagi Y, and Kanosue K. New apparatus for studying behavioral thermoregulation in rats. Physiol Behav 64: 419–424, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Denton DA, McKinley MJ, and Weisinger RS. Hypothalamic integration of body fluid regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 7397–7404, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fortney SM, Nadel ER, Wenger CB, and Bove JR. Effect of blood volume on sweating rate and body fluids in exercising humans. J Appl Physiol 51: 1594–1600, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gordon CJ. Temperature Regulation in Laboratory Rodents. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  10. Hainsworth FR and Stricker EM. Evaporative cooling in the rat: differences between salivary glands as thermoregulatory effectors. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 49: 573–580, 1971.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Honda K. Mechanisms controlling neurohypophysial hormone release in the rat. J Reprod Dev 49: 1–11, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Hori T. An update on thermosensitive neurons in the brain: from cellular biology to thermal and non-thermal homeostatic functions. Jpn J Physiol 41: 1–22, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Hori T, Kiyohara T, Oomura Y, Nishino H, Aou S, and Fujita I. Activity of thermosensitive neurons of monkey preoptic hypothalamus during thermoregulatory operant behavior. Brain Res Bull 18: 649–655, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Horowitz M and Meiri U. Thermoregulatory activity in the rat: effects of hypohydration, hypovolemia and hypertonicity and their interaction with short-term heat acclimation. Comp Biochem Physiol A 82: 577–582, 1985.
  15. Horowitz M and Nadel ER. Effect of plasma volume on thermoregulation in the dog. Pflügers Arch 400: 211–213, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Hübschle T, Mathai ML, McKinley MJ, and Oldfield BJ. Multisynaptic neuronal pathways from the submandibular and sublingual glands to the lamina terminalis in the rat: a model for the role of the lamina terminalis in the control of osmo- and thermoregulatory behavior. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 558–569, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Hübschle T, McKinley MJ, and Oldfield BJ. Efferent connections of the lamina terminalis, the preoptic area and the insular cortex to submandibular and sublingual gland of the rat traced with pseudorabies virus. Brain Res 806: 219–231, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Jones DL. Kainic acid lesions of the median preoptic nucleus: effects on angiotensin II induced drinking and pressor responses in the conscious rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66: 1082–1086, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Kanosue K, Hosono T, Zhang YH, and Chen XM. Neuronal networks controlling thermoregulatory efectors. Prog Brain Res 115: 49–62, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Keil R, Gerstberger R, and Simon E. Hypothalamic thermal stimulation modulates vasopressin release in hyperosmotically stimulated rabbits. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 267: R1089–R1097, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Konishi M, Nagashima K, Asano K, and Kanosue K. Attenuation of metabolic heat production and cold-escape/warm-seeking behaviour during a cold exposure following systemic salt loading in rats. J Physiol 551: 713–720, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Konishi M, Nagashima K, and Kanosue K. Systemic salt loading decreases body temperature and increases heat-escape/cold-seeking behaviour via the central AT1 and V1 receptors in rats. J Physiol 545: 289–296, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Maruyama M, Nishi M, Konishi M, Takashige Y, Nagashima K, Kiyohara T, and Kanosue K. Brain regions expressing Fos during thermoregulatory behavior in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R1116–R1123, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. McKinley MJ, Allen AM, May CN, McAllen RM, Oldfield BJ, Sly D, and Mendelsohn FA. Neural pathways from the lamina terminalis influencing cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 990–992, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. McKinley MJ, Denton DA, Leksell LG, Mouw DR, Scoggins BA, Smith MH, Weisinger RS, and Wright RD. Osmoregulatory thirst in sheep is disrupted by ablation of the anterior wall of the optic recess. Brain Res 236: 210–215, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. McKinley MJ, Gerstberger R, Mathai ML, Oldfield BJ, and Schmid H. The lamina terminalis and its role in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. J Clin Neurosci 6: 289–301, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. McKinley MJ, Mathai ML, Pennington G, Rundgren M, and Vivas L. Effect of individual or combined ablation of the nuclear groups of the lamina terminalis on water drinking in sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 276: R673–R683, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. McKinley MJ, Pennington GL, and Oldfield BJ. Anteroventral wall of the third ventricle and dorsal lamina terminalis: headquarters for control of body fluid homeostasis? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 23: 271–281, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Miki K, Itoh T, Nose H, Tanaka Y, and Morimoto T. Estimation of plasma volume from hematocrit and plasma oncotic pressure during volume expansion in dogs. Jpn J Physiol 37: 687–698, 1987.[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Nakajima Y, Nose H, and Takamata A. Plasma hyperosmolality and arterial pressure regulation during heating in dehydrated and awake rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1703–R1711, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Nagashima K, Cline GW, Mack GW, Shulman GI, and Nadel ER. Intense exercise stimulates albumin synthesis in the upright posture. J Appl Physiol 88: 41–46, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nagashima K, Nakai S, Konishi M, Su L, and Kanosue K. Increased heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior following hypertonic saline injection in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R1031–R1036, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Nagashima K, Wu J, Kavouras SA, and Mack GW. Increased renal tubular sodium reabsorption during exercise-induced hypervolemia in humans. J Appl Physiol 91: 1229–1236, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nakashima T, Hori T, Kiyohara T, and Shibata M. Osmosensitivity of preoptic thermosensitive neurons in hypothalamic slices in vitro. Pflügers Arch 405: 112–117, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Nakayama T, Eisenman JS, and Hardy JD. Single unit activity of anterior hypothalamus during local heating. Science 134: 560–561, 1961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Oldfield BJ, Badoer E, Hards DK, and McKinley MJ. Fos production in retrogradely labelled neurons of the lamina terminalis following intravenous infusion of either hypertonic saline or angiotensin II. Neuroscience 60: 255–262, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Oldfield BJ, Bicknell RJ, McAllen RM, Weisinger RS, and McKinley MJ. Intravenous hypertonic saline induces Fos immunoreactivity in neurons throughout the lamina terminalis. Brain Res 561: 151–156, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Patronas P, Horowitz M, Simon E, and Gerstberger R. Differencial stimulation of c-fos expression in hypothalamic nuclei of the rat brain during short-term heat acclimation and mild dehydration. Brain Res 798: 127–139, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Paxinos G and Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 2nd ed., San Diego, CA: Academic, 1986.
  40. Roberts WW. Differential thermosensor control of thermoregulatory grooming, locomotion, and relaxed postural extension. Ann NY Acad Sci 525: 363–374, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Rodland KD and Hainsworth FR. Evaporative water loss and tissue dehydration of hamsters in the heat. Comp Biochem Physiol A 49: 331–345, 1974.
  42. Schmidt I. Effect of central thermal stimulation on the thermoregulatory behavior of the pigeon. Pflügers Arch 363: 271–272, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Schmidt I. Interactions of behavioral and autonomic thermoregulation in heat-stressed pigeons. Pflügers Arch 374: 47–55, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Senba E and Ueyama T. Stress-induced expression of immediate early genes in the brain and peripheral organs of the rat. Neurosci Res 29: 183–207, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Smith JE, Jansen AS, Gilbey MP, and Loewy AD. CNS cell groups projecting to sympathetic outflow of tail artery: neural circuits involved in heat loss in the rat. Brain Res 786: 153–164, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Takamata A, Nagashima K, Nose H, and Morimoto T. Osmoregulatory inhibition of thermally induced cutaneous vasodilation in passively heated humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R197–R204, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Thompson RH and Swanson LW. Organization of inputs to the dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus: a reexamination with Fluorogold and PHAL in the rat. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 27: 89–118, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Thornton RM and Proppe DW. Attenuation of hindlimb vasodilation in heat-stressed baboons during dehydration. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 250: R30–R35, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Travis KA and Johnson AK. In vitro sensitivity of median preoptic neurons to angiotensin II, osmotic pressure, and temperature. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 264: R1200–R1205, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Vierck CJ Jr, Kline RT, and Wiley RG. Comparison of operant escape and innate reflex responses to nociceptive skin temperatures produced by heat and cold stimulation of rats. Behav Neurosci 118: 627–635, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Weisinger RS, Considine P, Denton DA, Leksell L, McKinley MJ, Mouw DR, Muller AF, and Tarjan E. Role of sodium concentration of the cerebrospinal fluid in the salt appetite of sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 242: R51–R63, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Whyte DG and Johnson AK. Lesions of periventricular tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle (AV3V) attenuate salivation and thermal tolerance in response to a heat stress. Brain Res 951: 146–149, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  53. Yanase M, Kanosue K, Yasuda H, and Tanaka H. Salivary secretion and grooming behaviour during heat exposure in freely moving rats. J Physiol 432: 585–592, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. A. Romanovsky, M. C. Almeida, A. Garami, A. A. Steiner, M. H. Norman, S. F. Morrison, K. Nakamura, J. J. Burmeister, and T. B. Nucci
The Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-1 Channel in Thermoregulation: A Thermosensor It Is Not
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2009; 61(3): 228 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. Nakamura and S. F. Morrison
Preoptic mechanism for cold-defensive responses to skin cooling
J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2611 - 2620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Romanovsky
Thermoregulation: some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R37 - R46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/R150    most recent
00769.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.