AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (May 19, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00039.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/4/R1042    most recent
00039.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oesch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Beglinger, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oesch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Beglinger, C.
Submitted on January 19, 2005
Accepted on May 11, 2005

Effect of a protein preload on food intake and satiety feelings in response to duodenal fat perfusions in healthy male subjects

Sibylle Oesch1, Lukas Degen1, and Christoph Beglinger1*

1 Department of Research and Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Clinical Research Center, Basel, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: beglinger{at}tmr.ch.

The control of food intake and satiety requires a coordinated interplay. Oral protein and duodenal fat inhibit food intake and induce satiety, but their interactive potential is unclear. Our aim was therefore to investigate the interactions between an oral protein preload and intraduodenal (ID) fat on food intake and satiety feelings. Twenty healthy male volunteers, were studied in a randomized, double-blind, 4-period crossover design. On each study day, subjects underwent one of the following treatments: a) water preload plus ID saline perfusion; b) water preload plus ID fat perfusion; c) protein preload plus ID saline perfusion; d) protein preload plus ID fat perfusion. Subjects were free to eat and drink as much as they wished. An oral protein preload significantly reduced caloric intake (19%, p < 0.01). The simultaneous administration of an oral protein preload and ID fat did not result in a positive synergistic effect with respect to caloric consumption, rejecting the initial hypothesis that the two nutrients exert a positive synergistic effect on food intake. An oral protein preload but not ID fat altered the feelings of hunger and fullness. These data indicate that the satiety effect of an oral protein preload is not amplified by ID fat: indeed, the effect of a protein preload does not seem to be mediated by cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or peptide YY (PYY). Much more information is necessary to understand the basic physiological mechanisms that control food intake and satiety.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. J. Smeets, S. Soenen, N. D. Luscombe-Marsh, O. Ueland, and M. S. Westerterp-Plantenga
Energy Expenditure, Satiety, and Plasma Ghrelin, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, and Peptide Tyrosine-Tyrosine Concentrations following a Single High-Protein Lunch
J. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 138(4): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.