AJP - Regu AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (July 15, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00047.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/5/R1086    most recent
00047.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, A. L
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, T. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, A. L
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, T. L
Submitted on January 22, 2004
Accepted on July 12, 2004

The GI Tract "Tastes" Nutrients: Evidence from the Intestinal Taste Aversion Paradigm

Andrea L Tracy1*, Robert J Phillips1, Michael M Chi1, Terry L Powley1, and T. L Davidson1

1 Department of Psychological Sciences, Ingestive Behavior Research Center, and Integrative Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: atracy{at}psych.purdue.edu.

To develop and use a behavioral paradigm for assessments of what nutrient properties are detected by intestinal chemoreceptors, we combined features of the "electronic esophagus" preparation (Elizalde and Sclafani, 1990) and the conditioned taste aversion protocol (Garcia and Koelling, 1966). In four experiments, separate groups of food-deprived rats with gastric (Experiments 1-4) or duodenal (Experiment 4) catheters were infused with either carbohydrates (maltodextrin) or fats (corn oil) into their stomachs or small intestines, either while they consumed non-nutritive flavored solutions (Experiments 1 and 2) or in the absence of any intake (Experiments 3 and 4). For some animals, one of the macronutrient infusions was paired with lithium chloride injections shown to support conventional conditioned aversions. After training, in various oral preference test trials, animals were given opportunities to taste and consume the non-nutritive solutions that had served as oropharyngeal conditioned stimuli as well as the nutrients that had been infused intragastrically, with or without poisoning, but never sampled by mouth. As previously established, preferences for the non-nutritive flavors were enhanced by association with intragastric infusions of macronutrients, with carbohydrates producing the greater preference. On first exposure to the two macronutrients for oral consumption, animals reduced their intake of the nutrient that had been previously poisoned when it was infused into the GI tract. These results, along with additional controls, suggest that nutrient tastes detected in the intestines can be recognized centrally based on oropharyngeal gustatory stimulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
A. Chale-Rush, J. R. Burgess, and R. D. Mattes
Evidence for Human Orosensory (Taste?) Sensitivity to Free Fatty Acids
Chem Senses, June 1, 2007; 32(5): 423 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. J. St. John, L. Pour, and J. D. Boughter Jr
Phenylthiocarbamide Produces Conditioned Taste Aversions in Mice
Chem Senses, June 1, 2005; 30(5): 377 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
W. A. Cupples
Physiological regulation of food intake
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1438 - R1443.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.