AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (April 25, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00081.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/R867    most recent
00081.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ancel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ancel, A.
Submitted on February 5, 2007
Accepted on April 19, 2007

Role of huddling on the energetic of growth in a newborn altricial mammal

Caroline Gilbert1*, Stéphane Blanc1, Sylvain Giroud1, Marie Trabalon2, Yvon Le Maho3, Martine Perret4, and André Ancel1

1 CNRS, ULP, IPHC-DEPE, Strasbourg, France
2 CNRS, ULP, IPHC-DEPE, Laboratoire de Physiologie du Comportement, Nancy, France
3 IPHC; CNRS, ULP, IPHC-DIPCV, Strasbourg, France
4 UMR 5176, CNRS, MNHN, Département d'Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, Brunoy, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: caroline.gilbert{at}c-strasbourg.fr.

Huddling is considered as a social strategy to reduce thermal stress and promote growth in newborn altricial mammals. So far the role of huddling on the allocation of the saved energy has not been quantified nor the related impacts on body temperature rhythms. To determine the energy partitioning of rabbit pups either raised alone or in groups of 8, 4 or 2 individuals, when thermoregulatory inefficient (TI) and efficient (TE), we first investigated their total energy expenditure and body composition. We then monitored body temperature and activity rhythms to test whether huddling may impact on these rhythms. Pups in G8 utilized 40% less energy when TI than did pups alone and 32% less energy when TE. Pups in G8 and G4 had significantly lower thermoregulatory costs in the TI period, whereas pups in G2, G4 and G8 had lower costs during the TE period. Huddling pups could therefore channel the energy saved into processes of growth, and accrued more fat mass (on average 4.5±1.4g) than isolated pups, which lost 0.7g of fat. Pups in G4 and G8 had a body temperature significantly higher by 0.8°C than pups in G2 and G1 when TI, whereas no more differences were noted when TE. Moreover, pups alone showed an endogenous circadian body temperature rhythm which differed when compared with that of huddling pups, with no rise before suckling. Huddling enables pups to invest the saved energy into growth, and to regulate their body temperature in order to be more competitive during nursing.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.