AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (November 10, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00156.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/R881    most recent
00156.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld-Schor, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld-Schor, N.
Submitted on March 3, 2005
Accepted on November 3, 2005

Defending body mass during food restriction in Acomys russatus - a desert rodent that does not store food

Roee Gutman1, Itzhak Choshniak1, and Noga Kronfeld-Schor1*

1 Zoology, Tel Aviv Universiy, Tel Aviv, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nogaks{at}tauex.tau.ac.il.

Golden spiny mice, which inhabit rocky deserts and do not store food, must therefore employ physiological means to cope with periods of food shortage. Here we studied the physiological means used by golden spiny mice for conserving energy during food restriction and refeeding, and the mechanism by which food consumption may influence thermoregulatory mechanisms and metabolic rate. As comparison, we studied the response to food restriction of another rocky desert rodent, Wagner's gerbil, which accumulates large seed caches. Ten out of 12 food-restricted spiny mice (resistant) were able to defend their body mass after an initial decrease, as opposed to Wagner's gerbils (n=6). Two of the spiny mice (non-resistant) kept losing weight, and their food restriction was halted. In four resistant and two non-resistant spiny mice, we measured heart rate, body temperature and oxygen consumption during food restriction. The resistant spiny mice significantly (P < 0.05) reduced energy expenditure and entered daily torpor. The non-resistant spiny mice did not reduce their energy expenditure. The gerbils' response to food restriction was similar to that of the non-resistant spiny mice. Resistant spiny mice leptin levels dropped significantly (n=6, P < 0.05) after 24 h of food restriction, and continued to decrease throughout food restriction, as did body fat. During refeeding, though the golden spiny mice gained fat, leptin levels were not correlated with body mass (r2 = 0.014). It is possible that this low correlation allows them to continue eating and accumulate fat when food is plentiful.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Romanovsky
Thermoregulation: some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R37 - R46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.