AJP - Regu Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (May 9, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00216.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/1/R413    most recent
00216.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Zucker, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Zucker, I.
Submitted on March 29, 2007
Accepted on May 6, 2007

Timing of puberty and synchronization of seasonal rhythms by simulated natural photoperiods in female Siberian hamsters

Matthew P Butler1*, Justin J Trumbull2, Kevin W Turner2, and Irving Zucker3

1 Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
2 Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
3 Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States; Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mpbutler{at}berkeley.edu.

The timing of puberty is a critical life history trait of short-lived species; spring-born individuals mature rapidly and breed in the season of birth, whereas young born in mid to late summer delay puberty until the next spring. The cues that govern the transition from rapid to delayed maturation in natural populations remain unknown. To identify ecologically relevant photoperiod cues that control timing of puberty, we monitored 9 cohorts of female Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) born every two weeks from 4 weeks before to 12 weeks after the summer solstice in a simulated natural photoperiod (SNP). Hamsters born by the summer solstice underwent rapid somatic growth and achieved puberty that summer; among females born 2-4 weeks after the solstice, some delayed puberty by many weeks, whereas others manifested early puberty. Hamsters born 6 or more weeks after the solstice generally delayed puberty until the following spring. The transition from accelerated to delayed pubertal development in the SNP occurred at day lengths which induce early puberty when presented as static photoperiods. Despite differences in timing of birth and timing of puberty, autumn and subsequent spring seasonal events occurred at similar calendar dates in all cohorts. We found no evidence that prenatal photoperiod history influenced postnatal development of female hamsters. Considered together with a parallel study on males, the present findings point to sex differences in responsiveness to natural photoperiod variations. In both sexes, incrementally changing photoperiods exert a strong organizing effect on seasonal rhythms.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.