AJP - Regu AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (August 31, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00330.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/R283    most recent
00330.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, M. B
Right arrow Articles by Huhman, K. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, M. B
Right arrow Articles by Huhman, K. L
Submitted on May 16, 2006
Accepted on August 23, 2006

Social Defeat and Footshock Increase Body Mass and Adiposity in Male Syrian Hamsters

Matia B Solomon1, Michelle T Foster2, Timothy J. Bartness3, and Kim L Huhman1*

1 Psychology and Center for Behavioral Neurosciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
2 Biology and Center for Behavioral Neurosciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
3 Psychology, Biology and Center for Behavioral Neurosciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta,, Georgia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: khuhman{at}gsu.edu.

Obesity is a world-wide epidemic and many factors including stress have been linked to this growing trend. Following social stress (i.e., defeat), subordinate laboratory rats and most laboratory mice become hypophagic and subsequently lose body mass; the opposite is true of subordinate Syrian hamsters. This species becomes hyperphagic and gains body mass following social defeat compared with non-stressed controls. It is unknown whether this increase in body mass and food intake is limited to subordinate hamsters. In Experiment 1 we asked: Do dominant hamsters increase food intake, body mass, and adiposity following an agonistic encounter? Subordinates increased both food intake and body mass compared with non-stressed controls. Although there was no difference in food intake or absolute body mass between dominants and non-stressed controls, dominant hamsters had a significantly higher cumulative body mass gain than did non-stressed controls. Subordinate, but not dominant hamsters, had significantly increased total carcass lipid and white adipose tissue (WAT) masses (i.e., retroperitoneal [RWAT] and epididymal [EWAT]) compared with non-stressed controls. In Experiment 2 we asked: Does footshock stress increase food intake, body mass and adiposity? Hamsters exposed to defeat, but not footshock stress, increased food intake relative to non-stressed controls. Exposure to defeat or footshock stress increased body mass as well as mesenteric WAT mass compared with non-stressed controls. Collectively, these data demonstrate that both social and nonsocial stressors increase body and lipid mass in male hamsters suggesting that this species may prove useful for studying the physiology of stress-induced obesity observed in some humans.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
C. M. Markham and K. L. Huhman
Is the medial amygdala part of the neural circuit modulating conditioned defeat in Syrian hamsters?
Learn. Mem., January 3, 2008; 15(1): 6 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.