|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print August 8, 2002
Am J Physiol Regu Physiol, 10.1152/ajpregu.00365.2002
Submitted on June 19, 2002
Accepted on July 25, 2002
1 Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: heinz.valtin{at}dartmouth.edu.
Despite the seemingly ubiquitous admonition to "drink at least eight 8-ounce glasses of water a day" (with an accompanying reminder that beverages containing caffeine and alcohol do not count),rigorous proof for this counsel appears to be lacking. This review sought to find the origin of this advice (called "8 x 8" for short) and to examine the scientific evidence, if any, that might support it. The search included not only electronic modes but also a cursory examination of the older literature that is not covered in electronic databases - and most importantly and fruitfully, extensive consultation with several nutritionists who specialize in the field of thirst and drinking fluids. No scientific studies were found in support of 8 x 8. Rather, surveys of food and fluid intake on thousands of adults of both genders - analyses of which have been published in peer-reviewed journals - strongly suggest that such large amounts are not needed because the surveyed persons were presumably healthy and certainly not overtly ill. This conclusion is supported by published studies showing that caffeinated drinks (and, to a lesser extent, alcoholic beverages) may indeed be counted toward the daily total, as well as by the large body of published experiments that attest to the precision and effectiveness of the osmoregulatory system for maintaining water balance. It is to be emphasized that the conclusion is limited to healthy adults in a temperate climate leading a largely sedentary existence - precisely, however, the population and conditions that the "at least" in 8 x 8 refers to. Equally to be emphasized - lest the message of this review be misconstrued - is the fact (based on published evidence) that large intakes of fluid, equal to and greater than 8 x 8, are advisable for the treatment or prevention of some diseases, and certainly are called for under special circumstances, such as vigorous work and exercise, especially in hot climates. Since it is difficult or impossible to prove a negative - in this instance, the absence of scientific literature supporting the 8 x 8 recommendation - the author invites communications from readers who are aware of pertinent publications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Negoianu and S. Goldfarb Just Add Water J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1041 - 1043. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lee, Z. M. Chang, A. Anderson, C. G. Mojab, and M. Johnson Comments on "Epidural analgesia during labor and delivery" article by Chang and Heaman. J Hum Lact, February 1, 2006; 22(1): 11 - 11. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Heit, L. Blackwell, S. Thomas, and R. Ouseph Prevalence and Severity of Urinary Incontinence in Kidney Transplant Recipients Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 352 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Raman, D. A. Schoeller, A. F. Subar, R. P. Troiano, A. Schatzkin, T. Harris, D. Bauer, S. A. Bingham, J. E. Everhart, A. B. Newman, et al. Water turnover in 458 American adults 40-79 yr of age Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): F394 - F401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Skott Body sodium and volume homeostasis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R14 - R18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |