AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (November 2, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00383.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/3/R1306    most recent
00383.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lall, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lall, G.
Submitted on June 2, 2006
Accepted on October 17, 2006

Behavioral and neurochemical sources of variability of circadian period and phase: Studies of circadian rhythms of npy-/- mice

Mary Harrington1*, Penny Molyneux2, Stephanie Soscia2, Cheruba Prabakar1, Judy McKinley-Brewer3, and Gurprit Lall2

1 Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States
2 Psychology, Smith College, 01063, Massachusetts, United States
3 Biology, University of Massachusetts, 01063, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mharring{at}email.smith.edu.

The cycle length or period of the free-running rhythm is a key characteristic of circadian rhythms. In this study we verify prior reports that locomotor activity patterns and running wheel access can alter circadian period, and we report that these treatments also increase variability of circadian period between animals. We demonstrate that the loss of a neurochemical, neuropeptide Y (NPY), abolishes these influences and reduces the inter-individual variability in clock period. These behavioral and environmental influences, from daily distribution of peak locomotor activity and from access to a running wheel, both act to push the mean circadian period to a value less than 24 hours. Magnitude of light-induced resetting is altered as well. When photoperiod was abruptly changed from LD18:6 to LD6:18, mice deficient in NPY were slower to respond to the change in photoperiod by redistribution of their activity within the prolonged dark, and eventually adopted a delayed phase angle of entrainment as compared to controls. These results support the hypothesis that non-photic influences on circadian period serve a useful function when animals must respond to abruptly changing photoperiods, and point to the NPYergic pathway from the intergeniculate leaflet innervating the suprachiasmatic nucleus, as a circuit mediating these effects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.