AJP - Regu AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (September 22, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00395.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/6/R1609    most recent
00395.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moses, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Pang, C. Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moses, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Pang, C. Y
Submitted on June 3, 2005
Accepted on August 23, 2005

Inducing late phase of infarct protection in skeletal muscle by remote preconditioning: Efficacy and mechanism

Michael A Moses1, Patrick D Addison1, Peter C Neligan1, Homa Ashrafpour2, Ning Huang2, Sandra E McAllister1, Joan E Lipa3, Christopher R Forrest1, and Cho Y Pang4*

1 Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Surgery, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4 Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physiology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pang{at}sickkids.ca.

We have previously demonstrated that remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) by instigation of 3 cycles of 10 min occlusion/reperfusion in a hind limb of the pig elicits an early phase of infarct protection in local and distant skeletal muscles subjected to 4h of ischemia immediately after remote IPC. The aim of this project was to test our hypothesis that hind limb remote IPC also induces a late phase of infarct protection in skeletal muscle, and KATP channels play a pivotal role in the trigger and mediator mechanisms. We observed that pig bilateral latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flaps sustained 46 ±2% infarction when subjected to 4h of ischemia/48h of reperfusion. The late phase of infarct protection appeared at 24h and lasted up to 72h after hind limb remote IPC. The LD muscle infarction was reduced to 28 ± 3, 26 ± 1, 23 ± 2, 24 ±2 and 24 ± 4% at 24, 28, 36, 48 and 72h after remote IPC, respectively (p < 0.05; n=8). In subsequent studies, hind limb remote IPC or intravenous injection of the sarcolemmal KATP (sKATP) channel opener P-1075 (2 µg/kg) at 24h before 4h of sustained ischemia (i.e. late preconditioning) reduced muscle infarction from 43 ± 4% (ischemic control) to 24 ± 2 and 19 ± 3%, respectively (p < 0.05, n=8). Intravenous injection of the sKATP channel inhibitor HMR 1098 (10 mg/kg) or the non-specific KATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide (Glib, 1 mg/kg) at 10 min before remote IPC completely blocked the infarct protective effect of remote IPC in LD muscle flaps subjected to 4h of sustained ischemia at 24h after remote IPC. Intravenous bolus injection of the mitochondrial KATP (mKATP) channel inhibitor 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, 5 mg/kg) immediately before remote IPC and 30 min intravenous infusion of 5-HD (5 mg/kg) during remote IPC did not affect the infarct protective effect of remote IPC in LD muscle flaps. However, intravenous Glib or 5-HD but not HMR 1098 given 24h after remote IPC completely blocked the late infarct protective effect of remote IPC in LD muscle flaps. None of these drug treatments affected the infarct size of control LD muscle flaps. The late phase of infarct protection was associated with a higher (p<0.05) muscle content of ATP at the end of 4h of ischemia and 1.5h of reperfusion and a lower (p<0.05) neutrophilic activity at the end of 1.5h of reperfusion compared with the time-matched control. In conclusion, these findings support our hypothesis that hind limb remote IPC induces an uninterrupted long (48h) late phase of infarct protection, and sKATP and mKATP channels play a central role in the trigger and mediator mechanism, respectively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Martou, C. A. O'Blenes, N. Huang, S. E. McAllister, P. C. Neligan, H. Ashrafpour, C. Y. Pang, and J. E. Lipa
Development of an in vitro model for study of the efficacy of ischemic preconditioning in human skeletal muscle against ischemia-reperfusion injury
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1335 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. J. Gross
Remote preconditioning and delayed cardioprotection in skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1562 - R1563.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.