AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (February 2, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00409.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/1/R189    most recent
00409.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Rector, D. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Rector, D. M
Submitted on June 8, 2005
Accepted on January 30, 2006

Evoked Response Potential Markers for Anesthetic and Behavioral States

Manuel J Rojas1, Jinna A Navas1, and David M Rector1*

1 Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: drector{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.

The rodent whisker sensory system is a commonly used model of cortical processing, however, anesthetics cause profound differences in the shape and timing of evoked responses. Evoked response studies, especially those using spatial mapping techniques, such as fMRI or optical imaging will thus show significantly different results depending on the anesthesia used. To describe the effect of behavioral states and commonly used anesthetics, we characterized the early surface evoked response potentials (ERP) components (First ERP peak, GAMMA band 25-45 Hz, fast oscillation FO 200-400 Hz, and very fast oscillation VFO 400-600 Hz) using a 25 channel electrode array on the somatosensory cortex during whisker stimulation. We found significant differences in the ERP shape under ketamine/xylazine, urethane, propofol, isoflurane, pentobarbital, and during sleep/wake states. The highest ERP amplitudes were observed under propofol anesthesia and during quiet sleep. Under isoflurane, the ERP was nearly absent, except for a very late component which was concombinant with burst synchronization. The slowest responses were seen under urethane and propofol anesthesia. Spatial mapping experiments that use electrical, NMR, or optical techniques must consider the anesthetic dependency of these signals, especially when comparing stimulation protocols or electrical and metabolic responses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Potez and M. E. Larkum
Effect of Common Anesthetics on Dendritic Properties in Layer 5 Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1394 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.