AJP - Regu Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (December 21, 2001). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00472.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/4/R952    most recent
00472.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venuto, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Losonczy, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Venuto, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Losonczy, G.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print December 21, 2001
Am J Physiol Regu Physiol, 10.1152/ajpregu.00472.2001
Submitted on August 6, 2001
Accepted on November 12, 2001

Enhanced vascular effects of the Ca2+channel agonist Bay K8644 in pregnant rabbits

Rocco C Venuto1, Gail P Brown2, Marion Schoenl1*, and Gyorgy Losonczy3

1 Schools of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
2 School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
3 Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University Medical School, Budapest, Hungary; Schools of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mschoenl{at}acsu.buffalo.edu.

Hemodynamic studies were performed to determine if blunting of vascular pressor responsiveness to vasoconstrictors during pregnancy may be due to impaired L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCC). Bay K8644 (BAY), an L-VDCC agonist, was infused in pregnant and non-pregnant anesthetized, acutely instrumented rabbits (10, 20, 40 and 60 µg/kg) and pregnant and non-pregnant conscious, chronically instrumented rabbits (10, 25, and 50 µg/kg). BAY infusions resulted in greater elevation of mean arterial pressure in both anesthetized pregnant (n=6) versus non-pregnant (n=6) (p<0.05) and conscious pregnant (n=10) versus non-pregnant (n=10) rabbits (p<0.05). Fractional increase over baseline of total peripheral resistance index was greater in pregnant (36±5% to 78±14%) versus non-pregnant rabbits (14±4% to 52±6%) (p<0.02). Cardiac output index did not differ. There was a single high affinity L-VDCC antagonist aortic binding site with similar number and affinity in pregnant (n=7) and non-pregnant (n=7) rabbits. Conclusion: Stimulation of L-VDCC induces greater pressor responses in pregnant rabbits with heightened peripheral vasoconstriction. This does not appear to be due to a change in L-VDCC receptor parameters.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Physiological Society.