AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (October 6, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00489.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/2/R352    most recent
00489.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moncrief, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moncrief, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, S.
Submitted on July 6, 2005
Accepted on September 14, 2005

Splenic baroreceptors control splenic afferent nerve activity

Karli Moncrief1 and Susan Kaufman1*

1 Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: susan.jacobs{at}ualberta.ca.

Stenosis of either the portal or splenic vein increases splenic afferent nerve activity (SANA) which, through the splenorenal reflex, reduces renal blood flow. Since these maneuvers not only raise splenic venous pressure, but also reduce splenic venous outflow, the question remained as to whether it is increased intrasplenic post-capillary pressure and/or reduced intrasplenic blood flow which stimulates SANA. In anesthetized rats, we measured the changes in SANA in response to partial occlusion of either the splenic artery or vein. Splenic venous and arterial pressures and flows were simultaneously monitored. Splenic vein occlusion increased splenic venous pressure (9.5±0.5 to 22.9±0.8 mmHg, n=6), reduced splenic arterial blood flow (1.7±0.1 to 0.9±0.1 ml/min, n=6) and splenic venous blood flow (1.3±0.1 to 0.6±0.1 ml/min, n=6), and increased SANA (1.7±0.4 to 2.2±0.5 spikes/sec, n=6). During splenic artery occlusion, we matched the reduction in either splenic arterial blood flow (1.7±0.1 to 0.7±0.05, n=6) or splenic venous blood flow (1.2±0.1 to 0.5±0.04, n=5) with that seen during splenic vein occlusion. In neither case was there any change in either splenic venous pressure (-0.4±0.9mmHg, n=6 and +0.1±0.3mmHg, n=5) or SANA (-0.11±0.15 spikes/sec, n=6 and -0.05±0.08 spikes/sec, n=5) respectively. Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between SANA and splenic venous pressure (r=0.619, p=0.008, n=17). There was no such relationship with splenic venous (R=0.371, p=0.236, n=12) or arterial (R=0.275, p=0.413, n=11) blood flow. We conclude that it is splenic venous pressure, not flow, which stimulates splenic afferent nerve activity, and activates the splenorenal reflex in portal and splenic venous hypertension.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Hamza and S. Kaufman
Effect of mesenteric vascular congestion on reflex control of renal blood flow
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R1917 - R1922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. Moncrief, S. Hamza, and S. Kaufman
Splenic reflex modulation of central cardiovascular regulatory pathways
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R234 - R242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
H. M. Wadei, M. L. Mai, N. Ahsan, and T. A. Gonwa
Hepatorenal Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Management
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 1(5): 1066 - 1079.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.