AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (January 23, 2003). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00515.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/6/R1486    most recent
00515.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kanosue, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kanosue, K.
Submitted on August 26, 2002
Accepted on January 10, 2003

Effects of fasting on thermoregulation processes and the daily oscillations in rats

Kei Nagashima1*, Sadamu Nakai1, Kenta Matsue1, Masahiro Konishi1, Mutsumi Tanaka1, and Kazuyuki Kanosue

1 Department of Physiology, Osaka University Faculty of Medicine School of Allied Health Sciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kei{at}sahs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

To investigate the mechanism involved in the reduction of body core temperature (Tcore) during fasting in rats, which is selective in the light phase, we measured Tcore, surface temperature and oxygen consumption rate (VO2) in fed control and on day 3 of fasting and day 4 of recovery at an ambient temperature (Ta) of 23°C, by biotelemetry, infrared thermography and indirect calorimetry, respectively. On the fasting day, 1) Tcore in the light phase decreased (P<0.05) from the control, however that in the dark phase was unchanged; 2) the tail temperature fell from the control, greatly in the dark phase (P<0.05, 30.7 ± 0.1 to 23.9 ± 0.1 in the dark phase and 29.4 ± 0.1 to 25.2 ± 0.2°C in the light phase); 3) VO2 decreased from the control (P<0.05, 24.37 ± 1.06 to 16.24 ± 0.69 ml/ min.kg body weight 0.75 in the dark phase and 18.91 ± 0.64 to 14.00 ± 0.41 ml/ min.kg body weight 0.75 in the light phase). All these values returned to the control levels on the recovery day. The results suggest that, in the fasting condition, the dark phase Tcore was maintained by a suppression of heat loss mechanism despite the reduction of metabolic heat production. In contrast, the response was weakened in the light phase, decreasing Tcore greatly. Moreover, the change in the regulation of tail blood flow was a likely mechanism for the suppression of heat loss mechanism.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. Nagashima, K. Matsue, M. Konishi, C. Iidaka, K. Miyazaki, N. Ishida, and K. Kanosue
The involvement of Cry1 and Cry2 genes in the regulation of the circadian body temperature rhythm in mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): R329 - R335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.