|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Medicine, Division Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Endocrinology, Charite, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
2 Department of Medicine, Division Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Marburg, Germany
3 Institute of Anatomy, Section of Electron Microscopy and Neuroanatomy, Charite, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
4 Department of Medicine, Division Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charite, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
5 Department of Medicine, CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
6 Department of Medicine, Division Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Endocrinology, Charite, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Department of Medicine, Division Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charite, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hubert.moennikes{at}charite.de.
The interaction between ghrelin and bombesin or amylin administered intraperitoneally (ip) on food intake and brain neuronal activity was assessed by Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in non-fasted rats. Ghrelin (13 µg/kg, ip) increased food intake compared to the vehicle group when measured at 30 min (g/kg: 3.66±0.80 vs. 1.68±0.42, p< 0.0087). Bombesin (8 µg/kg) injected ip with ghrelin (13 µg/kg) blocked the orexigenic effect of ghrelin (1.18±0.41 g/kg, p<0.0002). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 µg/kg, ip) exerted a dose-related non-significant reduction of food intake (g/kg: 1.08±0.44, p>0.45 and 0.55±0.34, p>0.16 respectively). By contrast, ghrelin-induced stimulation of food intake (g/kg: 3.96± 0.56 g/kg vs. vehicle 0.82±0.59, p<0.004) was not altered by amylin (1 and 5 µg/kg, ip) (g/kg: 4.37± 1.12, p>0.69, and 3.01±0.78, respectively, p>0.37). Ghrelin increased the number of FLI positive neurons/section in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) compared to vehicle (median: 42 vs. 19, p<0.008). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 µg/kg ip) did not induce FLI neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and co-administered with ghrelin did not alter ghrelin-induced FLI in the ARC. However, bombesin (8 µg/kg) with ghrelin significantly increased neuronal activity in the PVN ~ 3-fold compared to vehicle and ~ 1.5-fold compared to the ghrelin group. Bombesin (8 µg/kg) with ghrelin injected ip induced Fos expression in 22.4±0.8 % of CRF-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN. These results suggest that peripheral bombesin, unlike amylin, inhibits peripheral ghrelin induced food intake and enhances activation of CRF neurons in the PVN.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Lutz Hunger and satiety: one brain for two? Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): R900 - R902. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |