AJP - Regu AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (September 19, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00821.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/R1875    most recent
00821.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.
Submitted on November 21, 2006
Accepted on September 14, 2007

Therapeutic Potential of Synchronized Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: Enhanced Gastric Motility in Dogs

Hongbing Zhu1, Hanaa Sallam2, Dennis D Chen1, and Jiande DZ Chen3*

1 GI Research, VA Research & Education Foundation, oklahoma city, Oklahoma, United States
2 Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States
3 Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States; GI Research, VA Research & Education Foundation, oklahoma city, Oklahoma, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jianchen{at}utmb.edu.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects and mechanism of synchronized gastric electrical stimulation (SGES) on gastric contractions and gastric emptying. Methods: The first experiment was designed to study the effects of SGES on antral contractions in 4 randomized sessions. Sessions 1 (control) and 2 (atropine,) were performed in the fasting state, composed of three 30-min periods (baseline, stimulation and recovery). Sessions 3 (control) and 4 (SGES performed during 2nd 20-min period) were performed in the fed state, consisting of two 20-min periods; glucagon was injected after the first 20 min recording. The 2nd experiment was designed to study the effect of SGES on gastric emptying and consisted of two sessions (control and SGES). SGES was delivered with train duration of 0.5-0.8s, and a pulse frequency of 40Hz, width of 2ms and amplitude of 4mA. Results: 1) SGES induced gastric antral contractions in the fasting state. The motility index was 1.3 ± 0.5 at baseline and 6.1 ± 0.7 (P=0.001) during SGES. This excitatory effect was completely blocked by atropine. 2). SGES enhanced postprandial antral contractions impaired by glucagon. 3) SGES significantly accelerated glucagon-induced delayed gastric emptying. Gastric emptying was 25.5 ± 11.3% without SGES and 38.3 ± 10.7% with SGES (P=0.006 vs. control). Conclusions: This novel method of SGES induces gastric antral contractions in the fasting state, enhances glucagon-induced antral hypomotility in the fed state and accelerates glucagon-induced delayed gastric emptying. The effect of synchronized GES on antral contractions is mediated via the cholinergic pathway.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. Yin and J. D. Chen
Excitatory effects of synchronized intestinal electrical stimulation on small intestinal motility in dogs
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): G1190 - G1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.