AJP - Regu AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (June 1, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00905.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/R1327    most recent
00905.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biga, P. R
Right arrow Articles by Goetz, F. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biga, P. R
Right arrow Articles by Goetz, F. W
Submitted on December 23, 2005
Accepted on May 31, 2006

Zebrafish and giant danio as models for muscle growth: Determinate versus indeterminate growth as determined by morphometric analysis

Peggy R Biga1* and Frederick W Goetz1

1 Great Lakes WATER Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pbiga{at}uwm.edu.

The zebrafish has become an important genetic model, but their small size makes them impractical for traditional physiological studies. In contrast, the closely-related giant danio is larger and can be utilized for physiological studies that can also make use of the extensive zebrafish genomic resources. In addition, the giant danio and zebrafish appear to exhibit different growth types, indicating the potential for developing a comparative muscle growth model system. Therefore, the current study was conducted to compare and characterize the muscle growth pattern of zebrafish and giant danio. Morphometric analyses demonstrated that giant danio exhibit an increased growth rate compared to zebrafish, starting as early as 2 weeks post-hatch. Total myotome area, mean fiber area, and total fiber number all exhibited positive correlations with larvae length in giant danio, but not in zebrafish. Morphometric analysis of giant danio and zebrafish larvae demonstrated faster, more efficient growth in giant danio larvae. Similar to larger teleosts, adult giant danio exhibited increased growth rates and muscle hyperplasia in response to growth hormone, suggesting that giant danio exhibit indeterminate growth. In contrast, adult zebrafish do not exhibit mosaic hyperplasia, nor do they respond to growth hormone, suggesting they exhibit determinate growth like mammals. These results demonstrate that giant danio and zebrafish can be utilized as a direct comparative model system for muscle growth studies, with zebrafish serving as a model organism for determinate growth and giant danio for indeterminate growth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. F. Medeiros, M. P. Phelps, F. D. Fuentes, and T. M. Bradley
Overexpression of follistatin in trout stimulates increased muscling
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): R235 - R242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. A. Johnston, H.-T. Lee, D. J. Macqueen, K. Paranthaman, C. Kawashima, A. Anwar, J. R. Kinghorn, and T. Dalmay
Embryonic temperature affects muscle fibre recruitment in adult zebrafish: genome-wide changes in gene and microRNA expression associated with the transition from hyperplastic to hypertrophic growth phenotypes
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1781 - 1793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.