AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R1369-R1375, 2005. First published January 27, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00862.2004
0363-6119/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/5/R1369    most recent
00862.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, D. E.

ENVIRONMENTAL, EXERCISE AND RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY

Effects of human pregnancy on the ventilatory chemoreflex response to carbon dioxide

Dennis Jensen,1 Larry A. Wolfe,1,2 Lubomira Slatkovska,1 Katherine A. Webb,5 Gregory A. L. Davies,3 and Denis E. O'Donnell2,4,5

1School of Physical and Health Education; Departments of 2Physiology, 3Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and 4Medicine; 5Division of Respirology and Critical Care, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 23 December 2004 ; accepted in final form 24 January 2005

This study examined the effects of human pregnancy on the central chemoreflex control of breathing. Subjects were two groups (n = 11) of pregnant subjects (PG, gestational age, 36.5 ± 0.4 wk) and nonpregnant control subjects (CG), equated for mean age, body height, prepregnant body mass, parity, and aerobic fitness. All subjects performed a hyperoxic CO2 rebreathing procedure, which includes prior hyperventilation and maintenance of iso-oxia. Resting blood gases and plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations were measured. During rebreathing trials, end-tidal PCO2 increased, whereas end-tidal PO2 was maintained at a constant hyperoxic level. The point at which ventilation (E) began to rise as end-tidal PCO2 increased was identified as the central chemoreflex ventilatory recruitment threshold for CO2 (VRTCO2). E levels below (basal E) and above (central chemoreflex sensitivity) the VRTCO2 were determined. The VRTCO2 was significantly lower in the PG vs. CG (40.5 ± 0.8 vs. 45.8 ± 1.6 Torr), and both basal E (14.8 ± 1.1 vs. 9.3 ± 1.6 l/min) and central chemoreflex sensitivity (5.07 ± 0.74 vs. 3.16 ± 0.29 l·min–1·Torr–1) were significantly higher in the PG vs. CG. Pooled data from the two groups showed significant correlations for resting arterial PCO2 with basal E, central chemoreflex sensitivity, and the VRTCO2. The VRTCO2 was also correlated with progesterone and estradiol concentrations. These data support the hypothesis that pregnancy decreases the threshold and increases the sensitivity of the central chemoreflex response to CO2. These changes may be due to the effects of gestational hormones on chemoreflex and/or nonchemoreflex drives to breathe.

human gestation; hyperoxia; chemoreflex sensitivity; ventilatory recruitment threshold



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. A. Wolfe, School of Physical and Health Education, Queen's Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (E-mail: wolfel{at}post.queensu.ca







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.