HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 295/2/R449    most recent 00040.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reidelberger, R. D. Articles by Buescher, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reidelberger, R. D. Articles by Buescher, J. L.

APPETITE, OBESITY, AND DIGESTION

Effects of different intermittent peptide YY (3-36) dosing strategies on food intake, body weight, and adiposity in diet-induced obese rats

¹Department of Veterans Affairs, Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha; and ²Biomedical Sciences Department, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Submitted 20 January 2008 ; accepted in final form 11 June 2008

Chronic administration of anorexigenic substances to experimental animals by injections or continuous infusion typically produces either no effect or a transient reduction in food intake and body weight. Our aim here was to identify an intermittent dosing strategy for intraperitoneal infusion of peptide YY(3-36) [PYY(3-36)] that produces a sustained reduction in daily food intake and adiposity in diet-induced obese rats. Rats (665 ± 10 g body wt, 166 ± 7 g body fat) with intraperitoneal catheters tethered to infusion swivels had free access to a high-fat diet. Vehicle-treated rats (n = 23) had relatively stable food intake, body weight, and adiposity during the 9-wk test period. None of 15 PYY(3-36) dosing regimens administered in succession to a second group of rats (n = 22) produced a sustained 15–25% reduction in daily food intake for >5 days, although body weight and adiposity were reduced across the 9-wk period by 12% (594 ± 15 vs. 672 ± 15 g) and 43% (96 ± 7 vs. 169 ± 9 g), respectively. The declining inhibitory effect of PYY(3-36) on daily food intake when the interinfusion interval was 3 h appeared to be due in part to an increase in food intake between infusions. The declining inhibitory effect of PYY(3-36) on daily food intake when the interinfusion interval was < 3 h suggested possible receptor downregulation and tolerance to frequent PYY(3-36) administration; however, food intake significantly increased when PYY(3-36) treatments were discontinued for 1 day following apparent loss in treatment efficacies. Together, these results demonstrate the development of a potent homeostatic response to increase food intake when PYY(3-36) reduces food intake and energy reserves in diet-induced obese rats.

gastrointestinal; peptide; intraperitoneal administration; anorexia; body composition