HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figures and Tables All Versions of this Article: 295/4/R1066    most recent 90309.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cottone, P. Articles by Zorrilla, E. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cottone, P. Articles by Zorrilla, E. P.

APPETITE, OBESITY, AND DIGESTION

Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats

¹Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders; ²Harold L. Dorris Neurological Research Institute, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California; and ³Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy

Submitted 24 March 2008 ; accepted in final form 23 July 2008

Intermittent, extended access to preferred diets increases their intake. However, the effects of such access on the acceptance and reinforcing efficacy of otherwise satisfying alternatives is less known. To investigate the role of nonnutritional contributions to the hypophagia that follows removal of preferred food, male Wistar rats were fed a chow diet (Chow A/I), preferred to their regular chow (Chow), which was equally consumed under 1-choice conditions to an even more preferred chocolate-flavored, sucrose-rich diet (Preferred). Rats then learned to obtain Chow A/I pellets under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement and were assigned to two matched groups. Each week, one group (n = 15) was diet-cycled, receiving Chow A/I for 5 days followed by the Preferred diet for 2 days. Controls received Chow A/I daily (n = 14). Progressive ratio sessions were performed daily during the 5 days that all subjects received Chow A/I in the home cage. Across 5 wk, diet-cycled rats progressively ate less of the otherwise palatable Chow A/I diet. Hypophagia was not due to greater prior intake or weight gain, motor impairment, or facilitated satiation and was associated with changes in progressive ratio performance that suggested a reduced reinforcing efficacy of the Chow A/I diet in diet-cycled animals. By week 4, diet-cycled animals began to overeat the preferred diet, especially during the first 6 h of renewed access, resembling a deprivation effect. The results suggest that intermittent access to highly preferred food, as practiced by many restrained eaters, may progressively decrease the acceptability of less palatable foods, and may promote relapse to more rewarding alternatives.

limited access; food intake; negative contrast; deprivation; palatability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. T. Bello, A. S. Guarda, C. E. Terrillion, G. W. Redgrave, J. W. Coughlin, and T. H. Moran Repeated binge access to a palatable food alters feeding behavior, hormone profile, and hindbrain c-Fos responses to a test meal in adult male rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): R622 - R631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]