AJP - Regu Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (August 6, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.90333.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/4/R1181    most recent
90333.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salzer, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Shoemaker, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salzer, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Shoemaker, J. K.
Submitted on April 1, 2008
Revised on July 20, 2008
Accepted on August 5, 2008

Neurogenic - nitric oxide interactions affecting brachial artery mechanics in humans: The roles of vessel distensibility versus diameter

Deborah A Salzer1, Philip J. Medeiros1, Rosemary Craen2, and J. Kevin Shoemaker1*

1 University of Western Ontario
2 London Health Sciences Centre

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kshoemak{at}uwo.ca.

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the interactive influence of sympathetic activation and supplemental NO on brachial artery distensibility versus its diameter. It was hypothesized that a) sympathetic activation and nitric oxide competitively impact muscular conduit artery (brachial artery) mechanics, and b) neurogenic constrictor input affects conduit vessel stiffness independent of outright changes in conduit vessel diastolic diameter. Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and a cold pressor stress (CPT) were used to study the changes in conduit vessel mechanics when the increased sympathetic outflow occurred with and without changes in heart rate (LBNP -40 vs. -15 mmHg) and blood pressure (CPT vs. LBNP). These manoeuvres were performed in the absence and presence of nitroglycerin (NG). Neither LBNP nor CPT altered brachial artery diastolic diameter; however, distensibility was reduced by 25% - 54% in each reflex (all p < 0.05). This impact of sympathetic activation on brachial artery distensibility was not altered by NG supplementation (21 -54%; p<0.05), although baseline diameter was increased by the exogenous nitric oxide (p<0.05). The results indicate that sympathetic excitation can reduce the distensibility of the brachial artery independently of concurrent changes in diastolic diameter, heart rate and blood pressure. However, exogenous nitric oxide did not minimize or reverse brachial stiffening during sympathetic activation. Therefore, sympathetic outflow appears to impact the stiffness of this conduit vessel rather than its diastolic diameter or, by inference, its local resistance to flow.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.