AJP - Regu Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (October 8, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.90648.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/6/R1999    most recent
90648.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGee-Lawrence, M. E
Right arrow Articles by Donahue, S. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGee-Lawrence, M. E
Right arrow Articles by Donahue, S. W
Submitted on August 1, 2008
Revised on September 16, 2008
Accepted on October 4, 2008

Mammalian hibernation as a model of disuse osteoporosis: the effects of physical inactivity on bone metabolism, structure, and strength

Meghan E McGee-Lawrence, Hannah V Carey1, and Seth W Donahue2*

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine
2 Michigan Technological University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: swdonahu{at}mtu.edu.

Reduced skeletal loading typically leads to bone loss because bone formation and bone resorption become unbalanced. Hibernation is a natural model of musculoskeletal disuse because hibernating animals greatly reduce weight bearing activity, and therefore they would be expected to lose bone. Some evidence suggests that small mammals like ground squirrels, bats, and hamsters do lose bone during hibernation, but the mechanism of bone loss is unclear. In contrast, hibernating bears maintain balanced bone remodeling and preserve bone structure and strength. Differences in the skeletal responses of bears and smaller mammals to hibernation may be due to differences in their hibernation patterns; smaller mammals may excrete calcium liberated from bone during periodic arousals throughout hibernation, leading to progressive bone loss over time, whereas bears may have evolved more sophisticated physiological processes to recycle calcium, prevent hypercalcaemia, and maintain bone integrity. Investigating the roles of neural and hormonal control of bear bone metabolism could give valuable insight into translating the mechanisms which prevent disuse induced bone loss in bears into novel therapies for treating osteoporosis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.