AJP - Regu Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (February 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.91047.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/5/R1613    most recent
91047.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prendergast, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prendergast, B. J.
Submitted on December 24, 2008
Revised on January 29, 2009
Accepted on February 12, 2009

Intermediate-duration day lengths unmask reproductive responses to non-photic environmental cues

Matthew J. Paul1*, Jerome Galang2, William J. Schwartz1, and Brian J. Prendergast3

1 University of Massachusetts Medical School
2 University of Chicago
3 The University of Chicago

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: matthew.paul{at}umassmed.edu.

Many animals time their breeding to the seasons, using the changing day length to forecast those months when environmental conditions favor reproductive success; in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus), long summer days stimulate whereas short winter days inhibit reproductive physiology and behavior. Non-photic environmental cues are also thought to influence the timing of breeding, but typically their effects on reproduction are minor and more variable under categorically long and short photoperiods. We hypothesized that the influence of non-photic cues might be more prominent during intermediate photoperiods (early-spring and late-summer), when day length is an unreliable predictor of year-to-year fluctuations in food availability. In hamsters housed in an intermediate photoperiod (13.5 h light/day), two non-photic seasonal cues, mild food restriction and same-sex social housing, induced gonadal regression, amplified photoperiod history-dependent reproductive responses to decreasing day lengths, and prevented pubertal development indefinitely. These cues were entirely without effect in hamsters maintained under a long photoperiod (16 h light/day). Thus, intermediate photoperiods reveal a heightened responsiveness of the reproductive axis to non-photic cues. This photoperiod-dependent efficacy of non-photic cues may explain how animals integrate long-term photic and short-term non-photic cues in nature: intermediate day lengths open a seasonal window of increased reproductive responsiveness to non-photic cues at a time when such cues may be of singular relevance, thereby allowing for precise synchronization of the onset and offset of the breeding season to local conditions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.